Phase I Study of Recombinant Interleukin-21 in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2034-2039 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Thompson ◽  
Brendan D. Curti ◽  
Bruce G. Redman ◽  
Shailender Bhatia ◽  
Jeffrey S. Weber ◽  
...  

Purpose A phase I study of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) evaluated the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of recombinant human interleukin-21 (rIL-21). Patients and Methods Patients who had one or fewer prior systemic treatments for metastatic MM or RCC were treated with rIL-21 administered for two 5-day cycles on days 1 through 5 and 15 through 19 of a treatment course; rIL-21 was administered by rapid intravenous infusion in an outpatient setting. Cohorts of patients received doses ranging from 3 to 100 μg/kg/dose, and an expanded cohort was treated at the MTD. Patients with stable disease (SD) or better could receive additional treatment cycles. Results Forty-three patients were treated (24 MM; 19 RCC), including 28 in the expanded cohort. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted primarily of transient grade 3 laboratory abnormalities. The MTD was estimated to be 30 μg/kg. The most common adverse events included flu-like symptoms, pruritus, and rash. Twelve patients received up to five additional two-cycle courses of treatment without cumulative toxicity, except for one patient with reversible grade 4 hepatotoxicity. Serum concentrations of rIL-21 increased in a dose-proportional manner. Dose-dependent increases in soluble CD25 reflected lymphocyte activation. Antitumor activity was observed in both MM (one complete response and 11 SD) and RCC (four partial responses, 13 SD). Conclusion Outpatient therapy with rIL-21 at 30 μg/kg was well tolerated, had dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and was associated with antitumor activity in patients with MM and RCC.


2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Ingrid M. E. Desar ◽  
John Haanen ◽  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
Ulrik Mouritzen ◽  
...  


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Monk ◽  
Elaine Lam ◽  
Amir Mortazavi ◽  
Kari Kendra ◽  
Gregory B. Lesinski ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Carlos Gomez-Roca ◽  
Marie-Quitterie Picat ◽  
Laurence Digue ◽  
Christine Chevreau ◽  
...  


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv361 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hammers ◽  
E.R. Plimack ◽  
J.R. Infante ◽  
M. Ernstoff ◽  
B.I. Rini ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Hahn ◽  
Charles Drake ◽  
Samuel R. Denmeade ◽  
Yousef Zakharia ◽  
Benjamin L. Maughan ◽  
...  


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (21) ◽  
pp. 5312-5319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Schmidt ◽  
Janet Brown ◽  
Ulrik Mouritzen ◽  
Peter Selby ◽  
Kirsten Fode ◽  
...  


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5109-5109 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Rosenberg ◽  
V. K. Weinberg ◽  
C. Claros ◽  
C. Ryan ◽  
A. M. Lin ◽  
...  


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2614-TPS2614
Author(s):  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Gary R. Hudes ◽  
Marc S. Ernstoff ◽  
Christian K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
...  

TPS2614 Background: Standard treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) block the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway (eg, sunitinib, pazopanib) or mammalian target of rapamycin pathway (e.g., temsirolimus, everolimus). However, most patients (pts) develop resistance and complete responses are rare. Upregulation of programmed death-1 (PD-1) in tumor infiltrating lymphoctyes, and its ligand PD-L1 in tumors, is associated with more aggressive disease and poor prognosis. Blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction is a novel immunotherapeutic approach for mRCC. In preliminary results of a phase I trial, the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody BMS-936558 had antitumor activity in pts with advanced tumors, including objective responses (ORs) in 6 of 18 pts with mRCC. Here we describe a phase I study planned to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BMS-936558, when combined with sunitinib or pazopanib in pts with mRCC. Methods: This open-label study will have two parallel treatment arms (BMS-936558 plus sunitinib and BMS-936558 plus pazopanib) conducted in two parts (dose escalation and dose expansion). Pts must have received ≥1 prior systemic therapy to be eligible for dose escalation. Only treatment-naïve pts will be eligible for dose expansion. Up to 36 pts (18 per arm) will be treated in the dose-escalation phase. After determining the MTD of BMS-936558, treatment-naïve pts will be enrolled to expansion cohorts allowing 24 pts to be treated at the MTD of each arm. Each treatment cycle will be 6 weeks, with BMS-936558 dosed on Days 1 and 22 and sunitinib or pazopanib given according to product label. Adverse events will be graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.0. Disease will be assessed every 6 weeks for the first four assessments and then every 12 weeks until disease progression. Pts will be treated until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent. The safety profile in pts treated at the MTD will be used to determine the recommended phase II study dose of BMS-936558 in each combination arm. Secondary objectives will include OR rate and duration of response based on RECIST 1.1. Exploratory analyses will investigate predictive biomarkers of BMS-936558.



2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4504-4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Marc S. Ernstoff ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document