Nilotinib is associated with minimal cross intolerance to imatinib in patients with imatinib-intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7039-7039
Author(s):  
E. Jabbour ◽  
P. le Coutre ◽  
M. Baccarani ◽  
K. Bhalla ◽  
G. J. Ossenkoppele ◽  
...  

7039 Background: Nilotinib is a highly selective Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is 30-fold more potent than imatinib and is an important therapeutic option for patients (pts) who have either imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML disease. Results of a subset of pts with Ph+ CML-CP who received nilotinib for imatinib-intolerance are reported Methods: Pts were part of a phase II open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML-CP. Imatinib intolerance was defined as no MCyR and discontinuation of imatinib due to Grade 3/4 AEs or persistent (> 1 mo) or recurrent Grade 2 AE (recurred > 3 times) despite optimal supportive care. The proportion of pts achieving MCyR was the primary endpoint, and safety and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Planned starting dose was nilotinib 400mg BID. Results: Of the 316 pts with CML-CP enrolled, 95 (30%) pts had imatinib-intolerance for either non-hematologic and/or hematolgic AEs. Some pts had more then one AE satisfying the criteria for intolerance. The frequency of intolerant symptoms for imatinib and nilotinib is shown in the table below. Only 2/80 (3%) pts with non-hematologic imatinib-intolerance experienced a recurrence of similar symptoms during nilotinib therapy. 33 patients entered the study due to hematologic intolerance (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and only 7/33 (21%) developed similar problems. In 86 pts with intolerance and at least 6 mos of follow up, 55% of these patients achieved MCyR, similar to that previously reported for imatinib-resistant patients. Conclusions: These are the first reported results evaluating cross intolerance symptoms to TKIs. The results demonstrate that nilotinib is effective in imatinib-intolerant CML-CP and has a very low rate of cross- intolerance, further supporting the excellent tolerability of nilotinib No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1040-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
...  

Abstract Nilotinib, a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is 30-fold more potent than imatinib, represents an important treatment option for pts with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant Ph+CML. Reported are results from a phase II, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant Ph+CML. Imatinib resistance was defined as treatment with imatinib ≥600 mg/d with disease progression (≥50% increase in WBCs, blasts, basophils, or platelets) or no hematologic response after 4 wks. Imatinib intolerance was defined as no prior MCyR and discontinuation of imatinib due to Grade 3/4 AE or persistent (>1 mo) or recurrent Grade 2 AE (recurred >3x) despite optimal supportive care. Nilotinib-imatinib cross-intolerance was defined as treatment with nilotinib and occurrence (regardless of causality) of Grade 3/4 of the same AE that led to discontinuation of imatinib therapy. Planned starting dose was nilotinib 400 mg BID but could be escalated to 600 mg BID for lack of response. Of 320 pts with CML-CP, 94 (29.4%) were enrolled for imatinib-intolerance for either nonhematologic and/or hematologic AEs, of these, 71 (76%) had Grade 3/4 AEs at study entry. Of 127 pts with CML-AP, 24 (18.9%) were enrolled for nonhematologic and/or hematologic imatinib-intolerance; of these, 16 (67%) had Grade 3/4 AEs at study entry. Some pts had >1 AE satisfying criteria for intolerance. Only 2/71 (3%) pts with nonhematologic imatinib-intolerance experienced a recurrence of similar Grade 3/4 AEs during nilotinib therapy. Of 37 pts with hematologic intolerance to imatinib, 19/37 (51%) did not develop Grade 3/4 or similar events during nilotinib therapy. Median duration of nilotinib exposure was 350.5 days in CML-CP and 141.5 days in CML-AP with median dose intensities of 725.8 mg/d and 768.8 mg/d, respectively. Only 1 pt (CML-AP) required a dose escalation to 600 mg BID. Although nilotinib and imatinib have some molecular similarities, these results support previous findings of minimal occurrence of cross-intolerance. These results also suggest important differences in safety profiles between imatinib and nilotinib. Thrombocytopenia appears to be the only intolerant AE that may recur with nilotinib. These results support nilotinib’s excellent tolerability and indicate that it can be used effectively in both CML-CP and -AP pts with imatinib-intolerance. CML-CP Pts with Intolerance (N=94) CML-AP Pts with Intolerance (N=24) Intolerance AEs Imatinib Intolerance Grade 3/4 AE during Nilotinib Imatinib Intolerance Grade 3/4 AE during Nilotinib Non-hematologic 56 2 15 0 Rash/Skin 26 0 5 0 Fluid Retention 17 0 5 0 GI 16 1 1 0 Liver Toxicity 10 1 3 0     ALT 4 0 1 0     AST 4 1 0 0 Myalgia/arthralgia 9 0 2 0 Hematologic 29 16 8 3 Thrombocytopenia 24 13 5 1 Neutropenia 8 4 3 2 Anemia 2 1 1 0


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1834-1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Oliver G. Ottmann ◽  
Francis Giles ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
...  

Patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML-AP) have very limited therapeutic options. Nilotinib is a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This phase 2 trial was designed to characterize the efficacy and safety of nilotinib (400 mg twice daily) in this patient population with hematologic response (HR) as primary efficacy endpoint. A total of 119 patients were enrolled and had a median duration of treatment of 202 days (range, 2–611 days). An HR was observed in 56 patients (47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-56%). Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was observed in 35 patients (29%; 95% CI, 21%-39%). The median duration of HR has not been reached. Overall survival rate among the 119 patients after 12 months of follow-up was 79% (95% CI, 70%-87%). Nonhematologic adverse events were mostly mild to moderate. Severe peripheral edema and pleural effusions were not observed. The most common grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events were thrombocytopenia (35%) and neutropenia (21%). Grade 3 or higher bilirubin and lipase elevations occurred in 9% and 18% of patients, respectively, resulting in treatment discontinuation in one patient. In conclusion, nilotinib is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in imatinib-resistant and -intolerant CML-AP. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00384228.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
pp. 3540-3546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Francis Giles ◽  
Norbert Gattermann ◽  
Kapil Bhalla ◽  
Giuliana Alimena ◽  
...  

Abstract Nilotinib, an orally bioavailable, selective Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is 30-fold more potent than imatinib in pre-clinical models, and overcomes most imatinib resistant BCR-ABL mutations. In this phase 2 open-label study, 400 mg nilotinib was administered orally twice daily to 280 patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) after imatinib failure or intolerance. Patients had at least 6 months of follow-up and were evaluated for hematologic and cytogenetic responses, as well as for safety and overall survival. At 6 months, the rate of major cytogenetic response (Ph ≤ 35%) was 48%: complete (Ph = 0%) in 31%, and partial (Ph = 1%-35%) in 16%. The estimated survival at 12 months was 95%. Nilotinib was effective in patients harboring BCR-ABL mutations associated with imatinib resistance (except T315I), and also in patients with a resistance mechanism independent of BCR-ABL mutations. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, and there was minimal cross-intolerance with imatinib. Grades 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 29% of patients; pleural or pericardial effusions were observed in 1% (none were severe). In summary, nilotinib is highly active and safe in patients with CML-CP after imatinib failure or intolerance. This clinical trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as ID no. NCT00109707.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2170-2170
Author(s):  
Francis Giles ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Kapil Bhalla ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
G.J. Ossenkopplele ◽  
...  

Abstract Nilotinib is a potent, highly selective, aminopyrimidine inhibitor which in vitro is 30-fold more potent than imatinib and active against 32/33 imatinib resistant cell lines with Bcr-Abl mutations. This open-label study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety as defined by hematologic and cytogenetic response rates (HR/CyR) of nilotinib administered at a daily dose of 400 mg bid to patients who previously received and either failed or were intolerant to imatinib and dasatinib. A total of 50 patients were enrolled and included CP (n=26), AP (n=10), and BC (n=14) patients. Of the 14 BC patients 10 were myeloid and 4 were lymphoid. Overall 8 (16%) patients had extramedullary disease at baseline. The median age was 57 (range 19–78) years and the median time from first diagnosis of CP, AP, or BC to treatment was 65 (range 8–213) months. The median duration of nilotinib exposure was 226 (range 3–379) days. A total of 28 (56%) patients remain on treatment, 22 (44%) discontinued (6 for adverse events, 11 for disease progression, 3 withdrew consent, and there were 2 deaths related to cerebral hemorrhages). Complete (HR) was reported in 9 of the 20 (45%) CP patients who did not have a CHR at baseline. Of the 26 CP patients, 8 (31%) had a major CyR (2 complete and 6 partial), 2 (8%) patients had minimal responses, and 9 (35%) patients had no response. Disease progression occurred in one CP patient and 6 patients were not evaluable. Confirmed hematologic responses were observed in 2 of 10 (20%) AP patients who had a return to chronic phase (RTC), 7 patients were not evaluable and there was one patient death. Of the 10 AP patients 1 (10%) each had CyR (partial, minor, minimal and no response). Of the 14 BC patients 1 had a CHR (7%), 2 (14%) had a return to chronic phase (RTC), 6 (43%) were not assessable for response, and 5 (36%) had progressive disease. Overall the most frequent Grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported were thrombocytopenia in 12 (24%), neutropenia in 11 (22%), and anemia in 5 (10%) patient. In summary, nilotinib has significant clinical activity and an acceptable safety and tolerability in CML-CP, AP, and BC patients who were resistant or intolerant to imatinib and have also failed dasatinib therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7099-7099
Author(s):  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽  
Tim H. Brummendorf ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
...  

7099 Background: BOS is an oral dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for treatment of Ph+ CML following resistance/intolerance to prior therapy. Prior reports from this phase I/II trial indicated the BOS safety profile was primarily characterized by myelosuppression, gastrointestinal events, and rash. The current analysis compares the incidence of toxicity in Year 1 (Y1) for pts on treatment ≤1 y and within Y1 and Year 2 (Y2) for pts on treatment for >1 y. Methods: BOS 500 mg/d was evaluated in 3 cohorts: chronic phase (CP) CML after imatinib only (CP 2L cohort; n = 286); CP CML after imatinib + dasatinib and/or nilotinib (CP 3L cohort; n = 119); and accelerated/blast phase CML or ALL after prior TKI therapy (ADV cohort; n = 164). Results: The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in each cohort occurred more frequently within Y1 than Y2 (Table). The incidence for grade 3/4 events followed a similar pattern. AEs were the most common reason for BOS discontinuation in Y1 (CP 2L, 53%; CP 3L, 32%; ADV, 41%). Of the pts whose primary reason for discontinuing BOS was an AE during the first 2 y, most did so during Y1 (CP 2L, n = 51/60 [85%]; CP 3L, n = 22/24 [92%]; ADV, n = 24/25 [96%]); the most common reasons during Y1 were thrombocytopenia (12%; 9%; 4%), increased ALT (6%; 4%; 2%), neutropenia (3%; 6%; 0%), diarrhea (4%; 3%; 0%), and vomiting (3%; 4%; 1%). Serious AEs were more common among pts who discontinued BOS ≤1 y versus on treatment >1 y in the CP 3L and ADV cohorts, but similar in the CP 2L cohort (Table). Conclusions: Discontinuation due to AEs was observed primarily in Y1. For pts on BOS for >1 y, the incidence of common TEAEs decreased substantially after Y1, suggesting BOS tolerability improves after long-term exposure. Clinical trial information: NCT00261846. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6591-6591 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jabbour ◽  
F. Giles ◽  
J. Cortes ◽  
S. O’Brien ◽  
F. Ravandi ◽  
...  

6591 Background: AMN107 is a novel, highly selective oral Bcr-Abl inhibitor which is 20–50-fold more potent than imatinib. High response rates with AMN107 were observed in all CML phases post imatinib failure. Methods: Study Aims: Evaluate the efficacy of AMN107in newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML-CP. Study Group and Therapy: Patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML-CP were treated with AMN107 400 mg orally twice daily. Results: So far, 13 patients have been treated; median age 49 (range 24 to 72). Sokal risk at pretreatment: low - 10, intermediate - 2, high - 1. Five have reached the 3 month evaluation: all 5 (100%) had a complete cytogenetic response [CGCR] (Ph 0%). This is compared with a CGCR at 3 months of 36% with imatinib 400 mg/d and 55% with imatinib 800 mg/d in historical data of newly diagnosed patients treated at M. D. Anderson. The median QPCR with AMN at 3 months was 0.67% (range 0.3 to 3.0), compared with a median QPCR of 8% with imatinib 800 mg daily. Grade 3–4 myelosuppression was observed in 3/13 and other grade 3–4 side effects in 1/13 requiring temporary AMN107 interruption for < 2 weeks and resumption at same dose level in the 3 patients with myelosuppression, and for 6 weeks+ in the patient with grade 3 elevation of liver enzymes which were reduced to grade 1 on last follow-up. One patient had a transient elevation of total bilirubin > 3 mg/L which was self limited with continued therapy. Conclusions: Early results with AMN107 400 mg orally twice daily are encouraging in newly diagnosed CML. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 3195-3199 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tyler Thiesing ◽  
Sayuri Ohno-Jones ◽  
Kathryn S. Kolibaba ◽  
Brian J. Druker

Abstract Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), a malignancy of a hematopoietic stem cell, is caused by the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase. STI571(formerly CGP 57148B), an Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has specific in vitro antileukemic activity against Bcr-Abl–positive cells and is currently in Phase II clinical trials. As it is likely that resistance to a single agent would be observed, combinations of STI571 with other antileukemic agents have been evaluated for activity against Bcr-Abl–positive cell lines and in colony-forming assays in vitro. The specific antileukemic agents tested included several agents currently used for the treatment of CML: interferon-alpha (IFN), hydroxyurea (HU), daunorubicin (DNR), and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). In proliferation assays that use Bcr-Abl–expressing cells lines, the combination of STI571 with IFN, DNR, and Ara-C showed additive or synergistic effects, whereas the combination of STI571 and HU demonstrated antagonistic effects. However, in colony-forming assays that use CML patient samples, all combinations showed increased antiproliferative effects as compared with STI571 alone. These data indicate that combinations of STI571 with IFN, DNR, or Ara-C may be more useful than STI571 alone in the treatment of CML and suggest consideration of clinical trials of these combinations.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2169-2169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Norbert Gattermann ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Richard Larson ◽  
Teresa Rafferty ◽  
...  

Abstract Nilotinib is a potent, highly selective, aminopyrimidine inhibitor of Bcr-Abl which in vitro is 30-fold more potent than imatinib. It is active against 32/33 imatinib resistant Bcr-Abl mutations. This open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy as defined by hematologic/cytogenetic response (HR/CyR) rates of nilotinib at a dose of 400 mg bid in imatinib resistant or intolerant AP patients. Daily doses of nilotinib could be escalated to 600 mg BID for patients who did not adequately respond to treatment, and in the absence of safety concerns. Safety and efficacy data are reported for 64 patients of which 52 (81%) are resistant and 12 (19%) are intolerant to imatinib. More than half (63%) of the patients had CML for ≥ 5 years. The median age was 61 (range 24-79) years and the median time from CML diagnosis and AP diagnosis were 74 (range 2 to 298), and 2 (range 0-106) months, respectively. Of the 64 patients, 17 (27%) had extramedullary disease at baseline. The median duration of nilotinib exposure was 141 (range 2–380) days and the median average dose intensity (mg/days) for all patients, with and without dose escalations, was 797 (range 157 to 1136). Treatment is ongoing for 33 (52%) patients, and 31 (48%) have discontinued (14 for disease progression, 8 for adverse events, 1 each for an abnormal laboratory value, administrative problems, lost to follow up, 4 patients withdrew consent and there were 2 deaths listed as the primary reason for discontinuation). Overall, there were 7 deaths including 4 for disease progression, one related to progressive disease complicated by a cerebral hemorrhage, one cardiac failure and one due to sepsis. Confirmed HR occurred in 28 (44%) patients, of which 11 (17%) were complete, 5 (8%) were marrow responses/no evidence of leukemia, 12 (19%) were return to chronic phase. There were 7 (11%) patients with stable disease/no response, 6 (9%) with disease progression and 21 (33%) patients were not evaluable. Major CyR occurred in 20 (31%) patients, of which 11 (17%) were complete, 9 (14%) were partial, 11 (17%) were minor, and 15 (23%) were minimal. There were 6 patients (9%) that did not respond. The rate of major CyR for the resistant and intolerant patients was 16 (31%) and 3 (25%), respectively. The majority of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia in 21 (33%), neutropenia in 17 (27%), anemia in 10 (16%) patients, decreased hemoglobin in 4 (6%) patients, and increased lipase in 5 (8%). In summary, these data suggest nilotinib is clinically active and has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile when administered to patients with CML-AP. Updated information will be presented at the meeting.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3286-3286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp D. le Coutre ◽  
Anna Turkina ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Bernadeta Ceglarek ◽  
Giuliana Alimena ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3286 Poster Board III-1 Introduction: Nilotinib, a potent and highly selective BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogeneous leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase (CML-CP) and accelerated phase (CML-AP) who are resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib. The ENACT study is a Phase IIIb, open-label, multicenter study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in adult pts with imatinib-resistant or intolerant CML in a clinical practice setting outside of a registration program. It is the largest single source of efficacy and safety information of any available tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in CML, particularly among the elderly. Methods: The present is a sub-analysis of the ENACT study on the efficacy and safety of 400 mg twice daily nilotinib in elderly (aged =60 years) pts initiating treatment in CML-CP who were resistant and/or intolerant to imatinib. Results: Of the 1,422 CML-CP pts enrolled in the ENACT study between January 2006 and October 2008, 452 (32%) were elderly (=60 years) at study initiation and 165 (37%) of these pts were =70 years [10 (2%) were =80 years]. Countries that enrolled =20 elderly pts include France, Italy, USA, Germany, UK, Spain, Canada, and Brazil. At study initiation, elderly pts had longer median durations of CML (<60: 51.1 months; =60: 69.3; =70: 66.6) and higher proportions with CML duration >5 years (<60: 43%; =60: 56%; =70: 52%). Besides imatinib, prior CML treatments received by elderly pts included dasatinib (=60: 20%; =70: 19%), cytarabine (=60: 23%; =70: 19%), busulfan (=60: 10%; =70: 7%), and interferons (=60: 50%; =70: 42%). Elderly pts were previously treated with imatinib for longer median durations (<60: 27.4 months; =60: 32.7; =70: 29.9), with higher proportions treated for >5 years (<60: 12%; =60: 19%; =70: 18%). The proportion of imatinib-intolerant to resistant elderly pts was about 1:1, which was higher than the proportion among <60 pts at about 0.6:1, such that relatively few elderly pts had prior highest imatinib dose >800 mg (<60: 34%; =60: 26%; =70: 21%). While response rates to prior imatinib were similar, among pts who required therapy after failing imatinib, elderly pts had lower cytogenetic response rates (<60: 22%; =60: 17%; =70: 19%) to prior dasatinib. During ENACT, less than 50% of elderly pts experienced nilotinib dose interruptions (=60: 46%; =70: 41%) and reductions (=60: 7%; =70: 6%) lasting >5 days, which was consistent with the overall ENACT dataset. The median duration of dose interruptions and reductions was 15 (=70: also 15) and 41 (=70: 32) days, respectively. The main reason for dose interruptions and reductions was adverse events (AEs). The median duration of nilotinib exposure was 227 days (=70: 219) and the median dose intensity was 749 mg/day (=70: 775). Efficacy was similar among elderly pts, with 39% (=70: 35%) of pts achieving complete hematologic response (CHR), 41% (=70: 39%) achieving major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and 31% (=70: 33%) achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MCyR rate was also similar among elderly hematologic responders (=60: 64%; =70: 65%). Among elderly pts requiring nilotinib therapy after both imatinib and dasatinib, and therefore have more resistant CML, CHR rate was 39% (=70: 32%), MCyR rate was 28% (=70: 29%) and CCyR rate was 20% (=70: 16%). Safety was likewise similar among elderly pts, with grade 3/4 study drug-related AEs occurring in 56% of pts (=70: 53%). The most frequent of these AEs were thrombocytopenia (=60: 24%; =70: 21%) and neutropenia (=60: 14%; =70: 11%). The most common method of managing these AEs was brief dose interruptions and/or reductions [thrombocytopenia (=60:86/108 pts; =70: 30/35), neutropenia (=60: 42/62 pts; =70: 9/18)]. Among elderly pts with prior dasatinib, 53% (=70: 58%) experienced grade 3/4 study drug-related AEs, while 7 out of 8 pts with pleural effusion on dasatinib no longer had it on nilotinib. Conclusions: In ENACT, pts aged =60 years at study initiation appear to have longer durations of CML, be more heavily pre-treated and more intolerant to imatinib than the younger cohort. Nonetheless, nilotinib induced comparable clinical responses in CML-CP pts regardless of age. Importantly, the safety profile of nilotinib is maintained in elderly pts. Disclosures: le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Turkina:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Kim:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Ceglarek:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Shen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Smith:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Rizzieri:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Szczudlo:Novartis: Employment. Berton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wang:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wang:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nicolini:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chemgenex: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6534-6534 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Kantarjian ◽  
N. Gattermann ◽  
S. G. O’Brien ◽  
K. Bhalla ◽  
A. Hochhaus ◽  
...  

6534 Background: AMN107 is a potent, highly selective, aminopyrimidine inhibitor which in vitro is 30-fold more potent than imatinib and active against 32/33 imatinib resistant Bcr-Abl mutations. Methods: This open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AMN107 (400 mg bid) defined by hematologic/cytogenetic response (HR/CyR) rates in imatinib resistant or intolerant CP pts. Results: For this study which remains open to enrollment, preliminary data are reported for 67 pts including 39 (58%) with imatinib-resistant and 27 (40%) imatinib-intolerant CML (1 pt unknown). The median age was 62 (range 31–80) yrs and the median time from first diagnosis to treatment was 52 (range 5–279) mos. BCR-ABL mutations associated with imatinib resistance were detected in 11/17 (65%) pts at baseline. The median duration of AMN107 exposure was 129 (range 3–225) days. Treatment is ongoing for 50 (75%) pts with 17 (25%) pts discontinued (9 adverse events, 2 disease progression, 6 other). Major CyR was observed in 13 (19%) pts (6 complete, 7 partial), minor CyR was observed in 4 (17%) pts, and minimal CyR in 5 (7%) pts. Complete HR was reported in 35 of 42 (83%) pts without a baseline CHR. AE’s in ≥ 10% of pts were headache in 24 (36%) pts, fatigue in 21 (31%) pts (Gr 3/4 in 2 (3%)), pruritus in 19 (28.4%) pts (Gr 3/4 in 1 (2%)), rash in 18 (27%) pts (Gr 3/4 in 2 (3%)), nausea in 18 (27%) pts, diarrhea in 18 (27%) pts (Gr 3/4 in 1 (2%)), constipation in 11 (16%) pts, vomiting in 10 (15%) pts, thrombocytopenia in 10 (15%) pts (Gr 3/4 in 9 (13%)), anemia in 10 (14.9%) pts (Gr 3/4, 1 (2%)), neutropenia in 9 (13%) pts (Gr 3/4 in 8 (12%)), bone pain, muscle spasms, arthralgia, peripheral edema in 8 (12%) pts each, abdominal pain and myalgia in 7 (10%) pts each (Gr 3/4 in 1 (2%) each), and dyspnea in 7 (10%) pts. No deaths occurred. Conclusions: AMN107 has clinical activity and an acceptable safety and tolerability in pts with imatinib-resistant or intolerant CML-CP. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document