Expression and prognostic significance of differentiation markers in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13028-e13028
Author(s):  
H. Momota ◽  
Y. Narita ◽  
Y. Miyakita ◽  
A. Shinomiya ◽  
A. Maeshima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Differentiation Markers ◽  
Germinal Center B Cell

e13028 Background: BCL-6 expression has been reported to be associated with a better prognosis in PCNSL. However, significant differences of B-cell lymphoma subtypes exist in different geographic regions. The objectives of this study were to characterize the immunophenotypes of PCNSL in Japan and to determine their utility in predicting clinical outcomes. Methods: Immunostaining for CD5, CD10, BCL-6, and MUM-1 was done to determine the profile of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of PCNSL from 27 immunocompetent patients in Japan. Then, the authors evaluated whether clinical and immunophenotypic markers were associated with progression-free or overall survival. Results: Germinal center B-cell (GCB) marker CD10 was positive in 22% of PCNSL samples, while another GCB marker BCL-6 was positive in 48% of samples. Post-GCB marker MUM-1 was positive in 81% of samples. Poor prognostic marker of systemic B-cell lymphoma CD5 was expressed in 15% of samples. In univariate analyses, only BCL-6 expression had a significant effect on progression-free survival (median, 6.1 months in BCL-6-positive patients versus 15.6 months in BCL-6-negative patients; p = 0.037). Patients with BCL-6 expression had a trend towards longer overall survival but nonsignificant. GCB subgroup (CD10-positive or CD10-negative/BCL-6-positive/MUM-1-negative) was not significantly associated with favorable survival. Conclusions: BCL-6 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with PCNSL. The discrepancy between the reports from other groups and our results is potentially due to the racial, geographic or immunophenotypic differences of PCNSL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prognostic Significance of Cell of Origin Subclassification in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 5081-5081
Author(s):  
Muath Dawod ◽  
Juan Gomez-Gelvez ◽  
Ahmad Mattour ◽  
Kedar V. Inamdar ◽  
Nalini Janakiraman
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Of Origin ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Abstract 5081 Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease that has been divided into three different prognostic subgroups: Germinal Center B cell-like (GC), Activated B cell-like (ABC) and type 3 according to gene expression profile using cDNA. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been used as surrogate to identify these cell-of-origin subgroups. Data about the prognostic value of IHC has been conflicting. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the charts of 252 patients diagnosed with DLBCL at Henry Ford Hospital from 1999 to 2012. We excluded patients with HIV, transformed lymphomas and unavailable samples. Data was collected on a total of 157 patients. The following data was gathered: age, sex, race, IPI score, disease stage, hemoglobin, white blood and platelet counts, best response achieved and dates of treatment start, relapse, death or last follow up. Tissue microarray slides with the following IHC stains (CD10, MUM1, Bcl6) were prepared and reviewed when needed. Using Hans Algorithm, samples were divided into two major groups (GC-like and non-GC-like). 3-year progression free and overall survivals were compared between all subgroups using a log-rank test. Continuous variables were reported as median and range, and compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Categorical variables were reported as median and range, and compared using Chi-square tests. Statistical significance was set at p<0. 05. Results: Eighty patients (51%) were classified as GC-like, and 77 patients (49%) as non-GC-like. GC-like subgroup had a significantly longer 3-year progression free survival (90% vs 74%, P=0. 024), as compared with the non-GC-like subgroup. There was a trend toward longer overall survival but it didn't reach statistical significance (74% vs 67%, P=0. 161). For all patients, IPI stands as a strong prognostic index with 3-year overall survival of (85% and 46%, P=<. 001) in patients with low IPI (0 to 2) and high IPI (3 to 5) respectively. Interestingly, in patients with low IPI, cell of origin stands as a prognostic factor with 3-year progression free survival of (96% and 81%, P=0. 032) in GC-like and non-GC-like groups respectively. While in patients with high IPI, there was no significant difference in progression free survival in cell-of-origin subgroups. Conclusion: Cell of origin subclassification as determined by IHC surrogate markers predict for better progression free survival in GC-like subgroup but not for overall survival. While this prognostic value was maintained in patients with low IPI, there was no prognostic significance in patients with high IPI. IPI is still a valuable prognostic tool in patients with DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals P.108 Diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma secondary to iatrogenic immunosuppression with unusual MRI findings and literature review

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (S2) ◽  
pp. S45-S45 ◽  
Author(s):  
AH Naeem ◽  
MD Staudt ◽  
B Wang ◽  
D Lee ◽  
A Parrent
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Axial Mass ◽  
Large B Cell

Background: Immunosuppressive therapy is a risk factor for lymphoproliferative disorders. We present a case of primary CNS B-cell lymphoma in the setting of iatrogenic immunosuppression from azathioprine usage. A literature review is provided. Methods: Case report Results: 64-year-old male presents with several weeks of cognitive decline, impaired speech, and headache with a history of ulcerative colitis (on azathioprine and 5-ASA) with no radiological evidence of systemic malignancy. MR showed left frontal extra-axial mass (4.0 x 2.4 x 4.0 cm) with heterogeneous enhancement of a solid component with local dural thickening. The enhancing mass had solid and cystic components. Radiological differential included dural metastasis, atypical meningioma or unusual intra-axial mass including GBM with some dural involvement. He underwent surgical resection, which showed a primary CNS lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell, CD 20 + and EBV +. Post-operatively his cognition improved. Azathioprine was stopped and 5-ASA was increased. He proceeded with MPVC (methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine) chemotherapy. Conclusions: Our case shows isolated extra-nodal CNS manifestation of lymphoma in the context of immunosuppressive medications with strikingly atypical MR findings leading to a pre-operative diagnostic dilemma. Treatment is challenging and needs to be individually tailored due to a need for stopping immunosuppressive agents in conjunction with CNS lymphoma treatment.

scholarly journals Real-world practice patterns and outcomes in Veterans with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsu-Chih Chien ◽  
Deborah Morreall ◽  
Vikas Patil ◽  
Kelli M Rasmussen ◽  
Chunyang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Electronic Health Record Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Aim: To describe practices and outcomes in veterans with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients & methods: Using Veteran Affairs Cancer Registry System and electronic health record data, we identified relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients completing second-line treatment (2L) in 2000–2016. Treatments were classified as aggressive/nonaggressive. Analyses included descriptive statistics and the Kaplan–Meier estimation of progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Two hundred and seventy patients received 2L. During median 9.7-month follow-up starting from 2L, 470 regimens were observed, averaging 2.7 regimens/patient: 219 aggressive, 251 nonaggressive. One hundred and twenty-one patients proceeded to third-line, 50 to fourth-line and 18 to fifth-line treatment. Median progression-free survival in 2L was 5.2 months. Median overall survival was 9.5 months. Forty-four patients (16.3%) proceeded to bone marrow transplant. Conclusion: More effective, less toxic treatments are needed and should be initiated earlier in treatment trajectory.

Survival of Limited Stage Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Is Similar To Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2817-2817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Mukesh Chhanabhai ◽  
Nicholas Voss ◽  
Shenkier Tamara ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous group of diseases with an overall poor prognosis. Little information is available regarding the outcome of PTCL patients who present with limited stage disease. We sought to determine the outcome of PTCL patients presenting with limited disease in comparison with a cohort of patients with limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: In a retrospective analysis we identified all patients with limited stage (non-bulky (<10cm) stage I/II disease no symptoms) PTCL diagnosed at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 1983 and 2004. Patients were excluded if they had cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (CutALCL) (n=13), NK/T-cell lymphoma nasal type (n=9) or primary CNS/ocular involvement (n=6). Results: Thirty-seven patients with PTCL were identified according to the World Health Organization Classification: ALK-neg ALCL 8 (22%); PTCL-unspecified (PTCLUS) 28 (78%); enteropathy associated TCL (EATL) 1 (3 %). The majority received CHOP-type chemotherapy (n=31, 86%), most with brief chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation (n=19, 61%). The 5 y OS and PFS was similar between PTCLUS and ALK-neg ALCL. There was no difference in survival between extranodal and nodal cases. The outcome of PTCL patients (including ALK-neg ALCL and PTCLUS) was compared to a cohort of limited stage DLBCL patients (excluding CNS/ocular lymphoma) (n=305) diagnosed over the same time period and treated similarly. There was no difference in 5 y OS or PFS (Figure 1,2). Interestingly, there were no late relapses observed in PTCLUS, in marked contrast to DLBCL. Conclusions: Limited stage PTCL is rare, however outcomes appear to be comparable to early stage DLBCL, supporting that they should be treated in a similar manner. Unlike limited stage DLBCL where late relapses occur, a plateau in the progression-free survival curve is observed, highlighting a distinct natural history for limited stage PTCL. Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07

Significance of c-myc Rearrangements in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2030-2030
Author(s):  
Philip Bierman ◽  
Fausto Loberiza ◽  
Bhavana Dave ◽  
Warren Sanger ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Rearrangements of the c-myc oncogene can be seen in 5–10% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, studies examining the significance of this finding have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis to determine the clinical significance of c-myc rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The results of classical cytogenetic studies and FISH analyses were used to identify diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases in the database of the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group with or without c-myc rearrangements. Patients who were HIV positive and those with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were excluded. We identified 16 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and c-myc rearrangements. All patients were initially treated with doxorubicin- or mitoxantrone-containing chemotherapy regimens. The median age of these 16 patients was 61 years (range 40 to 80), and 5 (31%) were males. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was 0–2 at diagnosis in 9 patients (56%), and 3–5 in 7 patients (44%). Eleven patients (69%) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm) at diagnosis. No significant differences in outcome were identified when the 16 c-myc positive patients were compared with 97 c-myc negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the same age range. The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for the c-myc positive patients was 23% (95% CI 6% to 46%), as compared with 38% (95% CI 29% to 48%) for c-myc negative patients (p=0.17). The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 36% (95% CI 14% to 59%) and 47% (95% CI 36% to 56%), respectively (p=0.19). Classical cytogenetics and FISH analyses were also used to examine the 16 c-myc positive cases for bcl-2 rearrangements. Eight (50%) cases had rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc rearrangements. These patients were similar to the c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients except for a higher likelihood of an elevated LDH level at diagnosis (88% vs. 25%; p=0.03). The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients was 0%, as compared to 33% (95% CI 6% to 66%) for patients with rearrangements of c-myc alone, and 37% (95% CI 28% to 47%) for c-myc negative patients. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 12% (95% CI 1% to 42%), 47% (95% CI 12% to 76%), and 41% (95% CI 31% to 51%), respectively. A multivariate analysis, adjusting for IPI score, demonstrated that the relative risk (RR) of treatment failure was significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.32–6.23; p=0.008). Similarly, mortality was also significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.18–6.11; p=0.02). In contrast, no significant differences in treatment failure or overall survival were demonstrated when c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients were compared with c-myc negative patients. Our results demonstrate that the c-myc rearrangement is not associated with poorer survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, patients with rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival.

No Benefit from Rituximab Containing Regimens in Patients with Primary Extranodal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3615-3615
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Gutiérrez-García ◽  
Luis Colomo ◽  
Neus Villamor ◽  
Leonor Arenillas ◽  
Antonio Martínez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous category of lymphoid tumors that comprises different clinical forms not fully recognized in the WHO classification. In this regard, extranodal (EN) DLBCLs have particular clinicobiological features and outcome, sometimes related to the specific site where the lymphoma arises. Nowadays, rituximab plus chemotherapy (CT) is the gold-standard in the treatment of DLBCL. However, the superiority of rituximab-CT (R-CT) over CT alone has not been addressed for all the clinical subsets of the disease and, in fact, the clinical role of the new therapies might be different for primary nodal or EN DLBCLs. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of rituximab in patients suffering from nodal or EN DLBCL. Two-hundred and thirty non-immunocompromised patients (112M/118F; median age, 61 years) diagnosed with CD20+DLBCL in a single institution between 1997 and 2006 (five years before and after establishing R-CT as the standard treatment in DLBCL) and treated with adriamycin-containing regimens were the subject of the present study. The series included 148 primary nodal and 82 EN DLBCL. Patients with primary CNS lymphoma were excluded and lymphomas arising at Waldeyer ring were considered as nodal DLBCL. The main EN sites were GI (n=26), bone (n=13), soft tissue (n=13), lung/pleura (n=9), liver (n=9), and other (n=12). Main clinico-biological and evolutive variables were analyzed. One hundred nineteen patients received only CT and 111 R-CT. Eighty-seven cases with available information were assigned to germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) (41%) or non-GCB (59%) groups according to the Hans method (Blood2004;103:275–82) based on CD10, BCL6 and MUM1 expression. Main initial features, including the primary nodal or EN origin, international prognostic index (IPI), and GCB/non-GCB categories were similar for CT and R-CT groups. No correlation was observed between the GCB/non-GCB groups and the primary site of the tumor, although nodal lymphomas more frequently expressed MUM1 than EN (69% vs. 31%, respectively; p=0.01). CR rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) according to the treatment arm (CT vs. R-CT) is detailed for the whole series and for the nodal and EN groups in the table and OS curves depicted in the figure. In the whole series, variables predicting poor OS in the multivariate analysis were high-risk IPI (RR 2.5; p<0.001), primary nodal involvement (RR 1.6; p=0.04) and no R-CT treatment (RR 1.9; p=0.002). In the nodal group, IPI and no R-CT maintained the prognostic value, whereas in the primary EN only IPI predicted OS. Moreover, no difference in OS was observed according to the nodal or EN origin in those patients receiving R-CT. Biological subtypes GCB vs. non-GCB did not add predictive information neither in the whole series nor in the nodal or EN groups. In conclusion, patients with primary EN DLBCL seem to have little benefit from the use of R-CT. Nevertheless, this intriguing observation should be confirmed in further prospective studies. Complete response CR (%) 5-years OS (%) CT R-CT CT R-CT *p<0.002 R-CT vs. CT All cases (n=230) 59 79* 46 70* Primary nodal (n=148) 54 78* 34 71* Primary extranodal (n=82) 68 78 70 69 Figure Figure

The Impact of Activated Akt Expression On Clinical Outcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study of 99 Cases.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2676-2676
Author(s):  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Moon Ki Choi ◽  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
Chi Hoon Maeng ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 2676 Purpose Akt is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a central role in cell proliferation and growth. To define clinical impact of Akt expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL), we investigated the expression of phospho-Akt(p-Akt) in DLBCL and analyzed clinical impact of p-Akt expression on patient survival. Methods We evaluated the p-Akt expression in 99 DLBCL patients using tissue microarray(TMA) technology. Results Positive p-Akt expression was observed in 15.2% of the patients and significantly associated with elevated lactic dehydrogenase level (P = .044). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with positive p-Akt expression showed substantially poorer overall survival (p-Akt+ vs p-Akt- 25.3 months [95% confidence interval(CI), 14.4–36.2 months] vs 192.6 months [95% CI, 131.3–253.9 months], P < .001) and progression-free survival (p-Akt+ vs p-Akt- 13.6 months[95% CI, 14.4–36.2 months] vs 134.5 months [95% CI, 131.3–253.9 months], P < .001), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with DLBCL with p-Akt positivity showed poorer overall survival with 3.2 fold (95% CI, 1.6–6.8, P = .002) risk for death compared to patients with DLBCL with p-Akt negativity. Conclusion Positive expression of p-Akt in DLBCL patients is associated with poorer overall and progression-free survival. Expression of p-Akt may act as an independent poor prognostic factor and might be a novel therapeutic target for DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Effect of addition of rituximab to CHOP on survival of patients in both the GCB and non-GCB subgroups of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8040-8040 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Fu ◽  
K. D. Perry ◽  
L. M. Smith ◽  
C. P. Hans ◽  
T. C. Greiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cell Of Origin ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

8040 Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) includes at least two prognostically important subgroups, i.e. germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL, which were initially characterized by gene expression profiling and subsequently validated by immunostaining. Bcl-2 has also been identified as a prognostic indicator in the ABC subgroup. However, with the addition of rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy, the prognostic significance of this subclassification of DLBCL is unclear. Methods: We studied 119 cases of de novo DLBCL including 70 cases treated with R-CHOP and 49 cases treated with CHOP. The cases were assigned to either the GCB or non-GCB subgroups using the methodology described by Hans et al (Blood 2004; 103:275). Characteristics of the patients were compared using the Chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: The median age of the 119 patients was 67 years, ranging from 20 to 90 years, and there were 62 males and 57 females. The clinical characteristics of patients treated with CHOP versus R-CHOP, including the IPI, were comparable. R-CHOP was more effective than CHOP with improved 5-year EFS (63% vs 41%, p=0.013) and OS (78% vs 47%, p<0.001). In both patient groups treated with R-CHOP or CHOP, the GCB subgroup had a significantly better 5-year EFS and OS compared to the non-GCB subgroup (OS: 91% vs 64% for R-CHOP, p=0.0073; 67% vs 31% for CHOP, p=0.034, respectively). Additionally, both the GCB and non-GCB subgroups treated with R-CHOP had a significantly improved OS compared to their respective subgroups receiving CHOP alone (GCB, p=0.015; non-GCB, p=0.019). Bcl-2 expression was not a significant predictor in either the GCB or non-GCB subgroups treated with R-CHOP (OS, GCB: p=0.32; non-GCB: p=0.43). Conclusions: In this retrospective study, we demonstrate that subclassification based on the cell of origin continues to have prognostic significance in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. Addition of rituximab to CHOP improves the overall survival of patients with DLBCL in both the GCB and non-GCB subgroups. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

CD44 standard isoform expression is associated with diffuse large B cell lymphoma of non-germinal center B cell-like types

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18531-18531
Author(s):  
W. Kim ◽  
Y. Oh ◽  
C. Park
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Spread ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Germinal Center B Cell ◽  
Cd44s Expression ◽  
Large B Cell

18531 Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be subdivided into germinal center B cell-like (GCB) and non- germinal center B cell-like (Non-GC) types by immunohistochemical profiling. Previous studies showed better survival rate for the GCB groups. CD44 is necessary for tumor spread and metastasis and its expression is generally associated with unfavorable prognosis. We analyzed the expression and prognostic significance of standard isoform CD44s and its variant isoform CD44v6 in DLBCL types. Methods: Tissue microarray blocks were created from 52 nodal DLBCL with control tissue. Immunohistochemical staining for CD10, Bcl-6, MUM-1, CD44s, and CD44v6 were performed. The median follow-up period was 44 months. Results: Nodal DLBCLs were subclassified into GCB [CD10+ or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=17 (33%)] and non-GC subgroups [CD10-/Bcl6- or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=35 (67%)]. CD44s expression appeared more on non-GC cases of DLBCL (p=0.04). CD44s and CD44v6 did not result in any difference according to tumor stage, IPI scores, LDH levels. Upon survival analysis, CD44s and CD44v6 expression did not show any statistical correlation. Conclusions: CD44s expression may play a role during lymphomatogenesis of non-GC type DLBCL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document