Correlation of immunological effects of anti-VEGF therapy with progression-free survival of advanced colorectal cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14559-e14559
Author(s):  
M. Manzoni ◽  
B. Rovati ◽  
S. Delfanti ◽  
K. Bencardino ◽  
S. Chatzileontiadou ◽  
...  

e14559 Background: The clinical efficacy of Bevacizumab (BEV) in advanced colorectal cancer (mCRC) could be related not only to its well-established effect on tumor neoangiogenesis but also to a counteraction of VEGF-mediated dendritic cell (DC) abnormalities. The addition of BEV to chemotherapy (CT) may improve the number and function of blood DCs in cancer pts. We have focused on the correlation between this effect and the clinical efficacy of a BEV-based, 1st-line treatment for mCRC. Methods: Starting from January 2007 we performed a flow cytometric analysis of PB lymphocytes and DC subsets in 53 mCRC pts who had not received prior CT for metastatic disease or for whom 6 months had elapsed since adjuvant CT (M/F: 31/22, median age: 59yrs; range 32–75; ECOG PS <2), before and every 3 courses of a BEV+CT (5-FU± CPT11± Oxaliplatin) program. Biological data of the 42 evaluable pts that received all the planned treatment were correlated to both tumor response (OR) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: During treatment, DCs and their subsets showed a progressive, significant increase in absolute number, with respect to baseline, both in responder (CR,PR,SD) (67%) and in non responder pts. This effect on the DC profile was evidenced in responder pts up to 4 weeks since the last treatment course. After therapy completion, pts with PFS > 15 months (58%) showed DC and DC1 absolute number significantly higher with respect to pts with shorter PFS (p< .02). Conclusions: The recovery of blood DCs induced by 1st- line, BEV-based therapy in mCRC pts indicates a potential additional anticancer mechanism of this drug. The improvement of DC number does not influence OR but correlates with longer PFS. This suggests that BEV can influence tumor regrowth by contributing to overcome the impairement of the host immune surveillance induced by VEGF. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Wei Yu ◽  
Qiaomeng Tao ◽  
Yufeng Zhang ◽  
Fengming Yi ◽  
Long Feng

Background. The most effective treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is restricted in microsatellite instability (MSI-H) subsets of advanced colorectal cancer, but MSI-H only accounts for 4-5% among them. ICIs are completely ineffective in advanced colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), according to literatures published. Regorafenib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) that could normalize tumor blood vessels by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and its downstream, thus improving cytotoxic T cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment, which has a synergistic effect with ICIs. Toripalimab is a type of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody produced by Junshi Biosciences in China. Herein, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Methods. We evaluated the outcomes of MSS patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2019 to January 2021. These patients had previously received at least second-line treatment; the regimens were oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and/or accompanied with bevacizumab or cetuximab. Thirty-three patients were treated orally with regorafenib 80 mg or 120 mg once daily for 21 days, 28 days as a cycle, combined with intravenous toripalimab until disease progression or intolerant to adverse reactions. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the rate of progression-free survival (PFS) and log-rank method to do a statistical test of the survival curve. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the influence of multiple factors on PFS. The primary endpoints were objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse reactions and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Results. The evaluation of treatment effects was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Four patients (12.12%) got partial response, twelve patients (36.36%) experienced stable disease, and seventeen patients (51.52%) suffered progressive disease. ORR was 12.12% and DCR was 48.48%. mPFS was 113 days (95% CI: 0–272.1). In univariate analysis, patients who had previously received second-line treatment were significantly better than those who had received third-line or more treatment ( p = 0.005 ). Lung metastasis was a negative factor in combined therapy ( p = 0.032 ). Five patients without previous treatment of bevacizumab were effective. Previous treatment without bevacizumab showed a trend of effective when combination therapy ( p = 0.034 ). It was also a positive factor that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) score was 0 ( p = 0.034 ). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed the number of previous chemotherapy lines and excision of primary lesions were independent prognostic factors. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were hand-foot syndrome (33.33%), liver dysfunction (27.27), hypothyroidism (24.24%), fever (24.24%), fatigue (21.21%), leukopenia (15.15%), hypertension (12.12%), platelet count decreased (6.06%), diarrhea (3.03%), and myocarditis (3.03%); one patient stopped treatment as myocarditis. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions was 9.09%. Conclusions. Regorafenib combined with toripalimab has a promising effect in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In the early use of combination therapy, excision of primary lesions can have a positive impact in regorafenib and toripalimab combination. This treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerant in combined therapy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 1381-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgane Caulet ◽  
Thierry Lecomte ◽  
Olivier Bouché ◽  
Jérôme Rollin ◽  
Valérie Gouilleux-Gruart ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vii78
Author(s):  
Yosuke Kito ◽  
Satoshi Hamauchi ◽  
Kentaro Yamazaki ◽  
Azusa Komori ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1307-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Gabriela V. Kornek ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
Birgit Schüll ◽  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
...  

Purpose: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin, two new agents with potential synergistic activity, have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Preclinical and clinical evidence indicating that dose intensification of the oral fluorouracil prodrug might result in improved therapeutic results led us to the present randomized multicenter phase II study. Patients and Methods: Eighty-nine patients with bidimensionally measurable ACC previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/d days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks (arm A) or to receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 14 combined with capecitabine 3,500 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 and 14 to 21 every 4 weeks (arm B). In both treatment arms, chemotherapy was continued for a total of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progression of disease. Results: Patients allocated to the high-dose capecitabine combination arm B had a higher radiologically confirmed response rate (54.5% v 42.2%) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival time than those allocated to control arm A (10.5 v 6.0 months; P = .0013). Median overall survival times cannot be calculated for either treatment arm at this point. Despite a 34% higher dose intensity of capecitabine in arm B, there was no difference in hematologic toxicity between treatment arms (neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: 60%/43% in arm B v 56%/33% in arm A). Similarly, the incidence rate and degree of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable: The most commonly encountered symptoms (all grades, arm A and arm B) included nausea/emesis (A: 58%; B: 62%), diarrhea (A: 44%; B: 31%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (A: 80%; B: 83%), and fatigue (A: 40%; B: 50%). Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. The dose-intensified bimonthly capecitabine arm, however, seems to be more effective in increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (19) ◽  
pp. 6329-6337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Azzopardi ◽  
Thierry Lecomte ◽  
David Ternant ◽  
Michelle Boisdron-Celle ◽  
Friedrich Piller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document