Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Two Different Schedules of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1307-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Gabriela V. Kornek ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
Birgit Schüll ◽  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
To Receive

Purpose: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin, two new agents with potential synergistic activity, have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Preclinical and clinical evidence indicating that dose intensification of the oral fluorouracil prodrug might result in improved therapeutic results led us to the present randomized multicenter phase II study. Patients and Methods: Eighty-nine patients with bidimensionally measurable ACC previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/d days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks (arm A) or to receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 14 combined with capecitabine 3,500 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 and 14 to 21 every 4 weeks (arm B). In both treatment arms, chemotherapy was continued for a total of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progression of disease. Results: Patients allocated to the high-dose capecitabine combination arm B had a higher radiologically confirmed response rate (54.5% v 42.2%) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival time than those allocated to control arm A (10.5 v 6.0 months; P = .0013). Median overall survival times cannot be calculated for either treatment arm at this point. Despite a 34% higher dose intensity of capecitabine in arm B, there was no difference in hematologic toxicity between treatment arms (neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: 60%/43% in arm B v 56%/33% in arm A). Similarly, the incidence rate and degree of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable: The most commonly encountered symptoms (all grades, arm A and arm B) included nausea/emesis (A: 58%; B: 62%), diarrhea (A: 44%; B: 31%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (A: 80%; B: 83%), and fatigue (A: 40%; B: 50%). Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. The dose-intensified bimonthly capecitabine arm, however, seems to be more effective in increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time.

Phase II study alternating mFOLFOX 6 and FOLFIRI (FIREFOX) plus bevacizumab (bev) regimen in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in Japanese patients (KSCC 0801).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 602-602
Author(s):  
Yutaka Ogata ◽  
Yoshito Akagi ◽  
Yoshihiro Kakeji ◽  
Yasunori Emi ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Ps

602 Background: The Kyushu Study group of Clinical Cancer conducted a phase II study that evaluated the FIREFOX regimen. (KSCC0701, Akagi et al, J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010). This study demonstrated the efficacy and mild neurotoxicity of this regimen. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the FIREFOX plus bevacizumab (bev). Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed advanced colorectal cancer, ECOG PS 0-2 and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function. Patients (pts) received an alternating regimen of 4 cycles of mFOLFOX-6 plus bev (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, bev 5 mg/kg d1 followed by 400 mg/m2 bolus 5-FU and a 46-hr 2,400 mg/m2 5-FU infusion every 2 weeks) followed by 4 cycles of FOLFIRI plus bev (oxaliplatin replaced with irinotecan 150 mg/m2 d1). This schedule was repeated until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. (UMIN000001312) Results: Of the 52 pts enrolled from May 2008 to July 2009. Two of the patients did not fulfill the eligibility criteria. M/F, 30/20; median age, 59.5 years (range 37 - 75); ECOG PS 0/1/2, 46/4/0. The median number of administration cycles was 14 (range, 2 - 44). Response rate (RECIST criteria) for CR, PR, SD, PD and NE were 2 (4%), 28 (56%), 14 (28%), 4 (8%) and 2 (4%), respectively. An overall response rate was 60% (95% CI: 45 - 74%). Median progression-free survival was14.2 M (95% CI: 10.6 M-16.3 M) and median overall survival was 27.5 M (95% CI; 22.4 M – not determined). The 2-year survival rate was 56.8%. Of the 52 pts evaluated for toxicity. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia (7.7%), neutropenia (32.7%), anemia (1.9%), fatigue (9.6%), anorexia (13.5%), stomatitis (3.8%), neurotoxicity (3.8%), hypertension (1.9%), diarrhea (7.7%), febrile neutropenia (3.8%), nausea (9.6%), vomiting (5.8%), hypersensitivity (3.8%), and thromboembolism (1.9%). Conclusions: The results of this phase II study show that the FIREFOX plus bev regimen is effective and well tolerated in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. The low rate of neurotoxicity is also promising.

The efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus raltitrexed as second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) patients: An interim analysis of a multicenter, phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15061-e15061
Author(s):  
Yunpeng Liu ◽  
Zan Teng ◽  
Xiujuan Qu ◽  
Yan qiao Zhang ◽  
Zhendong Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Elevated Transaminases

e15061 Background: There are limited therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer which fail first-line chemotherapy. Phase I studies have shown that the combined application of the irinotecan (CPT-11) and raltitrexed has significant synergistic effect and acceptable toxicity. The aim of this multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of second-line raltitrexed plus irinotecan in Chinese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This is an open-label,single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial (Registered in clinicaltrials.gov with NCT03053167).Brief inclusion criteria: patients were aged 18 to 75 years with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil therapy. Enrolled patients received CPT-11 (180 mg /m2 , d1) and raltitrexed (3 mg/m2, d1) each 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) and safety. In all, 100 patients were required for primary point testing. Results: Between November 2016 and December 2018, a total of 70 patients were screened for enrollment and 53 patients reached the primary endpoint. Nine patients achieved a partial response and twenty-seven stable disease. The overall response rate was 17% (9/53) and the disease control rate was 67.9% (36/53). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.3 months and median overall survival was not observed. The most common adverse events were elevated transaminases (21/53), fatigue (14/53), diarrhea (12/53), neutrocytopenia (10/53), erythrocytopenia (9/53), hypohemoglobin (8/53) and leukocytopenia (6/53). The total incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was 17% (9/53) , mainly diarrhea (2/53), neutrocytopenia (2/53) and elevated transaminases (2/53). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that CPT-11 plus raltitrexed is active and feasible in patients with second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. This trial will progress as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03053167.

Phase II clinical study of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1(IRIS) for inoperable recurrent advanced colorectal cancer: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group study HGCSG-0302)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3589-3589
Author(s):  
Y. Komatsu ◽  
S. Yuki ◽  
H. Akita ◽  
M. Kudo ◽  
M. Tateyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Study

3589 Background: We planned to conduct a phase II clinical study of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1, a new oral anticancer drug of the fluorinated pyrimidine type. We reported the interium reports of this study in colorectal cancer patients at GI cancer Symposium 2006. Methods: The antitumor effect was the primary endpoint, while the safety, progression-free survival time, and median survival time were the secondary endpoints. The subjects were untreated patients with inoperable advanced colorectal cancer aged 20–75 years. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (on days 1 and 15) as an intravenous infusion over 90 minutes, and oral S-1 (40 mg/m2) was administered after breakfast and dinner and then withdrawn for 2 weeks. Results: Forty patients were enrolled in the present study. There were 23 men and 17 women. The median age was 62 years (range: 34 to 74 years). Two patient showed grade 4 neutropenia, but the next course could be given safely after dose reduction. Three patients had grade 3 diarrhea, but therapy could be continued with addition of an antidiarrheal drug. No other serious adverse reactions occurred (either hematological or non-hematological), and all patients could receive therapy safely on an outpatient basis. Interim analysis suggested excellent results, with a response rate of 50%. To date, 231 cycles (median 8, range 1–19) have been administered. Median relative dose intensity was 97% for S-1 and 87% for irinotecan. 36 pts are evaluable for efficacy: RR was 47.2% (95% CI, 30.9–63.5%) and Disease Control Rate (PR + SD) was seen in 94.4% of pts. PFS of this regimen is 320 days. MST is not reached. Conclusions: IRIS therapy achieved a high response rate and could be given safely. These findings suggest that the therapy has potential as first-line treatment for inoperable advanced recurrent colorectal cancer. It seems that IRIS is a good treatment equal to FOLFIRI. In addition, this regimen could qualify as a candidate for future combination therapy with a molecular-targeting drug. The latest data will be reported at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Multicenter Phase II Study of a New Effective S-1 and Irinotecan Combination Schedule in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. CMO.S10769 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Yutaka Ogata ◽  
Takaho Tanaka ◽  
Yoshito Akagi ◽  
Nobuya Ishibashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction This multicenter phase II study determined the efficacy and safety of new daily oral S-1 and weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) combination schedule in patients with previously untreated advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients received first-line chemotherapy comprising S-1 80 mg/m2/day given on days 3 to 7, 10 to 14, and 17 to 21 and 60 mg/m2 CPT-11 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results A total of 45 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate was 48.9%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival was 8.1 months and 20.9 months, respectively. The rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were as follows: neutropenia, 8.9%; anemia, 4.4%; anorexia, 6.7%; and diarrhea, 6.7%. Conclusions This new S-1 and irinotecan combination schedule appeared to be an effective, well-tolerated, and convenient regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer as compared with conventional regimens such as FOLFIRI and IRIS.

Phase II Study of Uracil-Tegafur With Leucovorin in Elderly (≥ 75 years old) Patients With Colorectal Cancer: ECOG 1299

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (34) ◽  
pp. 5397-5402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Weixiu Luo ◽  
Elizabeta C. Popa ◽  
Bruce T. Lyman ◽  
Mary Mulcahy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Gi Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of uracil-tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients ≥ 75 years of age with previously untreated colorectal cancer were eligible for this phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter cooperative group clinical trial. UFT 100 mg/m2 plus LV 30 mg orally every 8 hours for 28 days every 35 days was administered until progression. Results Fifty-eight patients were enrolled between June 2000 and July 2001, and 55 were treated. The median age of treated patients was 81 years (range, 75 to 90 years), 26 patients were (47%) women, and 80% had good performance status (0 to 1). The observed overall response rate was 22% (95% CI, 11.8% to 35.0%). The estimated median overall survival time was 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 17.4 months), and median progression-free survival time was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.7 months). Among the 56 treated patients (including one ineligible patient), 31 (55%) experienced grade 3 to 4 toxicities, most commonly diarrhea (25%) and GI toxicity (36%), with patients older than 85 years of age at highest risk. Conclusion The results of this trial support the efficacy of oral UFT/LV in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. The regimen is tolerated moderately well overall, particularly as compared with other fluoropyrimidine regimens, although there is increased GI toxicity in the most elderly. These results suggest that studies using newer oral fluoropyrimidine analogs should be investigated in this patient population.

An Increasing Role for Trabectedin in Gynecological Cancers: Efficacy in Uterine Sarcomas

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supp 1) ◽  
pp. S3-S5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uterine Leiomyosarcoma ◽  
Uterine Sarcomas ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
To Receive ◽  
A Current

Trabectedin is indicated for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after failure of treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide or for patients who are unsuited to receive these agents. The agent has shown activity in patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma, with an acceptable safety profile. Thus, the results of phase II studies have shown that treatment with trabectedin results in 30% progression-free survival at 6 months. More than 50% of these pretreated patients were alive at 1 year. The response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared favorably with other single agents (eg, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and gemcitabine), with clinical benefit in 50% of patients in second-line treatment. These results are being confirmed in a current prospective phase II study in first-line uterine leiomyosarcoma combining trabectedin with doxorubicin.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib Combined with Toripalimab in the Third-Line and beyond Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Wei Yu ◽  
Qiaomeng Tao ◽  
Yufeng Zhang ◽  
Fengming Yi ◽  
Long Feng
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Line

Background. The most effective treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is restricted in microsatellite instability (MSI-H) subsets of advanced colorectal cancer, but MSI-H only accounts for 4-5% among them. ICIs are completely ineffective in advanced colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), according to literatures published. Regorafenib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) that could normalize tumor blood vessels by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and its downstream, thus improving cytotoxic T cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment, which has a synergistic effect with ICIs. Toripalimab is a type of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody produced by Junshi Biosciences in China. Herein, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Methods. We evaluated the outcomes of MSS patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2019 to January 2021. These patients had previously received at least second-line treatment; the regimens were oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and/or accompanied with bevacizumab or cetuximab. Thirty-three patients were treated orally with regorafenib 80 mg or 120 mg once daily for 21 days, 28 days as a cycle, combined with intravenous toripalimab until disease progression or intolerant to adverse reactions. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the rate of progression-free survival (PFS) and log-rank method to do a statistical test of the survival curve. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the influence of multiple factors on PFS. The primary endpoints were objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse reactions and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Results. The evaluation of treatment effects was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Four patients (12.12%) got partial response, twelve patients (36.36%) experienced stable disease, and seventeen patients (51.52%) suffered progressive disease. ORR was 12.12% and DCR was 48.48%. mPFS was 113 days (95% CI: 0–272.1). In univariate analysis, patients who had previously received second-line treatment were significantly better than those who had received third-line or more treatment ( p = 0.005 ). Lung metastasis was a negative factor in combined therapy ( p = 0.032 ). Five patients without previous treatment of bevacizumab were effective. Previous treatment without bevacizumab showed a trend of effective when combination therapy ( p = 0.034 ). It was also a positive factor that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) score was 0 ( p = 0.034 ). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed the number of previous chemotherapy lines and excision of primary lesions were independent prognostic factors. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were hand-foot syndrome (33.33%), liver dysfunction (27.27), hypothyroidism (24.24%), fever (24.24%), fatigue (21.21%), leukopenia (15.15%), hypertension (12.12%), platelet count decreased (6.06%), diarrhea (3.03%), and myocarditis (3.03%); one patient stopped treatment as myocarditis. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions was 9.09%. Conclusions. Regorafenib combined with toripalimab has a promising effect in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In the early use of combination therapy, excision of primary lesions can have a positive impact in regorafenib and toripalimab combination. This treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerant in combined therapy.

scholarly journals Efficacy of First-Third generation EGFR inhibitor combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in a real-world setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Wei Chen Ming-Wei Chen ◽  
An-Tai He . ◽  
Yi Pei .
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mean Survival Time ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
To Receive

Abstract BackgroundTo explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients who harbor sensitive EGFR mutations, a head-to-head study was performed to compare chemotherapy and gefitinib-erlotinip, osimertinib treatment in combination or with either agent alone as first-line therapy, in terms of efficacy and safety.MethodsA total of 200 untreated patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who harbored sensitive EGFR mutations were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib-erlotinip combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin group, gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin group, pemetrexed plus carboplatin alone group, or gefitinib-erlotinip alone group, osimertinib alone group.ResultsThe progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the gefitinib-erlotinip combination group Mean Survival Time PFS 22.00 month,95%CI[16.29,27.70] and osimertinib gefitinib-erlotinip combination group Mean Survival Time PFS 40.00 month,95%CI[28.12,51.87]was longer than that of patients in the chemotherapy alone group PFS10,81 months, 95% CI,[ 8.99–12.64],gefitinib-erlotinip alone group PFS14.00 month.95%CI[11.98-20.01], osimertinib alone group PFS 26.66 month 95%CI[24.77-29.22].The gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib combinational resulted in longer overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.46, p = 0.016) or gefitinib-erlotinip alone (HR = 0.36, p = 0.01). osimertinib alone (HR = 0.26, p = 0.01).ConclusionsOur finding suggested that treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib-erlotinip and pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib group could provide better survival benefits for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document