Critical Impact of Radiotherapy Protocol Compliance and Quality in the Treatment of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Results From TROG 02.02

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 2996-3001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester J. Peters ◽  
Brian O'Sullivan ◽  
Jordi Giralt ◽  
Thomas J. Fitzgerald ◽  
Andy Trotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Protocol Compliance ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To report the impact of radiotherapy quality on outcome in a large international phase III trial evaluating radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin plus tirapazamine for advanced head and neck cancer. Patients and Methods The protocol required interventional review of radiotherapy plans by the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC). All plans and radiotherapy documentation underwent post-treatment review by the Trial Management Committee (TMC) for protocol compliance. Secondary review of noncompliant plans for predicted impact on tumor control was performed. Factors associated with poor protocol compliance were studied, and outcome data were analyzed in relation to protocol compliance and radiotherapy quality. Results At TMC review, 25.4% of the patients had noncompliant plans but none in which QARC-recommended changes had been made. At secondary review, 47% of noncompliant plans (12% overall) had deficiencies with a predicted major adverse impact on tumor control. Major deficiencies were unrelated to tumor subsite or to T or N stage (if N+), but were highly correlated with number of patients enrolled at the treatment center (< five patients, 29.8%; ≥ 20 patients, 5.4%; P < .001). In patients who received at least 60 Gy, those with major deficiencies in their treatment plans (n = 87) had a markedly inferior outcome compared with those whose treatment was initially protocol compliant (n = 502): −2 years overall survival, 50% v 70%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.99; P < .001; and 2 years freedom from locoregional failure, 54% v 78%; HR, 2.37; P < .001, respectively. Conclusion These results demonstrate the critical importance of radiotherapy quality on outcome of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Centers treating only a few patients are the major source of quality problems.

scholarly journals Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enis Tinjak ◽  
Velda Smajlbegović ◽  
Adnan Beganović ◽  
Mirjana Ristanić ◽  
Halil Ćorović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Adaptive Radiotherapy ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Parotid Glands ◽  
Image Guided Radiotherapy ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Radiation therapy has long played an integral role in the manage¬ment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), both for organ preservation and to improve tumor control in the postoperative setting. The aim of this research is to investigate the effects of adaptive radiotherapy on dosimetric, clinical, and toxicity outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy treatment. Many sources have reported volume reductions in the primary target, nodal volumes, and parotid glands over treatment, which may result in unintended dosimetric changes affecting the side effect profile and even efficacy of the treatment. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is an interesting treatment paradigm that has been developed to directly adjust to these changes.Material and methods: This research contains the results of 15 studies, including clinical trials, randomized prospective and retrospective studies. The researches analyze the impact of radiation therapy on changes in tumor volume and the relationship with planned radiation dose delivery, as well as the possibility of using adaptive radiotherapy in response to identified changes. Also, medical articles and abstracts that are closely related to the title of adaptive radiotherapy were researched.Results: The application of ART significantly improved the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer, as well as two-year locoregional control of the disease. The average time to apply ART is the middle of the treatment course approximately 17 to 20 fractions of the treatment.Conclusion: Based on systematic review of the literature, evidence based changes in target volumes and dose reduction at OAR, adaptive radiotherapy is recommended treatment for most of the patients with head and neck cancer with the support of image-guided radiotherapy.

Beyond race: The impact of ethnicity on the treatment outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16500-16500
Author(s):  
C. J. Calfa ◽  
M. Escalon ◽  
S. Zafar ◽  
E. Lopez ◽  
V. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact

16500 Background: Self identified racial groups share an unequal burden of head and neck cancer . Recent evidence suggests that outcome among races is different and the causes are multifactorial. Nonetheless, differences among ethnic groups have not been reported. Herein, we decided to analyze differences in treatment response and outcome among our white and Hispanic patient population treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients were identified using the tumor registry. We reviewed retrospectively the data from medical records. 100 white Hispanics (WH) and 50 white non-Hispanics (WNH) diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck cancer and treated at our institution from 2004 to 2005, were eligible for the study. Standard statistical analysis, including Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard models were used. P value of <0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Results: Preliminary results reveal that, in our study population, median age at diagnosis, gender, performance status (ECOG 0–2) and squamous cell histology did not differ significantly between the two groups. Stage 4 at diagnosis was more commonly observed in Hispanics as opposed to WNH (85.7% vs 68.6%) (P = 0.1). Surgery was more commonly used as an initial treatment option in Hispanics than WNH (42.8% vs 28.6%) (P = 0.18) while chemotherapy was less likely to be used (78.6% vs. 91.4%) (P = 0.15). Hispanics were more likely to smoke than WNH (P = 0.0003) and were equally exposed to chronic alcohol use. Patients from the Hispanic group were more likely to respond to therapy than whites by Chi-squared analysis but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). No differences were seen in disease free survival. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 16 months for Hispanics vs. 25 months for whites but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.26). Final analysis will be available at the time of the annual meeting. Conclusion: In our experience, a trend for decrease overall survival was noted in the Hispanic ethnic group. This may be in part due to more advanced stage at presentation. Nonetheless, in order to definitively answer this question, further research is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Impact of cetuximab on chemoradiation use in older patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6594-6594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrujal S. Baxi ◽  
Eric Jeffrey Sherman ◽  
Coral L Atoria ◽  
Nancy Y. Lee ◽  
David G. Pfister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Side Effect Profile ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

6594 Background: The benefit of chemoradiation (CTRT) in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) declines in older and sicker patients. In 2006, the FDA approved cetuximab in LAHNC. Cetuximab with radiation has a perceived lower side effect profile compared to standard chemotherapies used in CTRT. Our objective was to examine the impact of cetuximab on the use of CTRT in elderly patients with LAHNC. Methods: We identified adults aged 66 and older diagnosed with LAHNC between 1999 and 2007 in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. Treatment was categorized as CTRT or other based on Medicare claims within 6 months of diagnosis. We excluded patients who did not receive definitive treatment. In patients who had CTRT, we identified use of cetuximab based on drug-specific billing codes. We assessed trends in the use of CTRT over the entire study period and in the use of cetuximab since 2006. We examined the influence of age and comorbidity on the likelihood of receiving CTRT before and after 2006 adjusting for clinical and demographic factors. Results: We identified 4,809 patients with LAHNC. One-fourth were ≥80 years and almost a fifth had a Charlson comorbidity score (CCS) of ≥2. Overall more than 20% of patients received CTRT. The use of CTRT more than tripled over time, from 10% of patients diagnosed in 1999 to 38% in 2007 (p<0.0001 for trend). Of the 336 patients who had CTRT since 2006, 45% received cetuximab. Prior to 2006, patients ≥80 years or those with a CCS of ≥2 were significantly less likely to be treated with CTRT compared to younger patients or those with a CCS of 0. In patients diagnosed in 2006 or later, age and comorbidity no longer predicted the likelihood of receiving CTRT. Conclusions: In this population-based cohort of older adults, the use of CTRT increased substantially over time. The availability of cetuximab, with a perceived gentler side effect profile, may have increased the use of CTRT, especially in older and sicker patients. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document