Impact of cetuximab on chemoradiation use in older patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6594-6594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrujal S. Baxi ◽  
Eric Jeffrey Sherman ◽  
Coral L Atoria ◽  
Nancy Y. Lee ◽  
David G. Pfister ◽  
...  

6594 Background: The benefit of chemoradiation (CTRT) in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) declines in older and sicker patients. In 2006, the FDA approved cetuximab in LAHNC. Cetuximab with radiation has a perceived lower side effect profile compared to standard chemotherapies used in CTRT. Our objective was to examine the impact of cetuximab on the use of CTRT in elderly patients with LAHNC. Methods: We identified adults aged 66 and older diagnosed with LAHNC between 1999 and 2007 in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. Treatment was categorized as CTRT or other based on Medicare claims within 6 months of diagnosis. We excluded patients who did not receive definitive treatment. In patients who had CTRT, we identified use of cetuximab based on drug-specific billing codes. We assessed trends in the use of CTRT over the entire study period and in the use of cetuximab since 2006. We examined the influence of age and comorbidity on the likelihood of receiving CTRT before and after 2006 adjusting for clinical and demographic factors. Results: We identified 4,809 patients with LAHNC. One-fourth were ≥80 years and almost a fifth had a Charlson comorbidity score (CCS) of ≥2. Overall more than 20% of patients received CTRT. The use of CTRT more than tripled over time, from 10% of patients diagnosed in 1999 to 38% in 2007 (p<0.0001 for trend). Of the 336 patients who had CTRT since 2006, 45% received cetuximab. Prior to 2006, patients ≥80 years or those with a CCS of ≥2 were significantly less likely to be treated with CTRT compared to younger patients or those with a CCS of 0. In patients diagnosed in 2006 or later, age and comorbidity no longer predicted the likelihood of receiving CTRT. Conclusions: In this population-based cohort of older adults, the use of CTRT increased substantially over time. The availability of cetuximab, with a perceived gentler side effect profile, may have increased the use of CTRT, especially in older and sicker patients. [Table: see text]

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16500-16500
Author(s):  
C. J. Calfa ◽  
M. Escalon ◽  
S. Zafar ◽  
E. Lopez ◽  
V. Patel ◽  
...  

16500 Background: Self identified racial groups share an unequal burden of head and neck cancer . Recent evidence suggests that outcome among races is different and the causes are multifactorial. Nonetheless, differences among ethnic groups have not been reported. Herein, we decided to analyze differences in treatment response and outcome among our white and Hispanic patient population treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients were identified using the tumor registry. We reviewed retrospectively the data from medical records. 100 white Hispanics (WH) and 50 white non-Hispanics (WNH) diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck cancer and treated at our institution from 2004 to 2005, were eligible for the study. Standard statistical analysis, including Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard models were used. P value of <0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Results: Preliminary results reveal that, in our study population, median age at diagnosis, gender, performance status (ECOG 0–2) and squamous cell histology did not differ significantly between the two groups. Stage 4 at diagnosis was more commonly observed in Hispanics as opposed to WNH (85.7% vs 68.6%) (P = 0.1). Surgery was more commonly used as an initial treatment option in Hispanics than WNH (42.8% vs 28.6%) (P = 0.18) while chemotherapy was less likely to be used (78.6% vs. 91.4%) (P = 0.15). Hispanics were more likely to smoke than WNH (P = 0.0003) and were equally exposed to chronic alcohol use. Patients from the Hispanic group were more likely to respond to therapy than whites by Chi-squared analysis but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). No differences were seen in disease free survival. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 16 months for Hispanics vs. 25 months for whites but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.26). Final analysis will be available at the time of the annual meeting. Conclusion: In our experience, a trend for decrease overall survival was noted in the Hispanic ethnic group. This may be in part due to more advanced stage at presentation. Nonetheless, in order to definitively answer this question, further research is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Huong Ling ◽  
Kun-Yun Yeh ◽  
Shu-Hang Ng ◽  
Cheng-Hsu Wang ◽  
Chien-Hong Lai ◽  
...  

Study on the impact of pretreatment malnutrition on treatment outcomes in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients is still lacking. We prospectively collected various malnutrition assessment methods including nutrition indexes, inflammatory biomarkers, and lean body mass index (LBMI) data before treatments. The one year mortality rate was assessed, and the factors associated with this outcome were investigated. Furthermore, the association between malnutrition assessment methods was examined. A total of 113 patients were enrolled. By prognostic stratification based on the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) combination, the low PNI/high PLR group had highest and the high PNI/low PLR group had the lowest mortality rate. Furthermore, the PNI was positively correlated with the LBMI, and the PLR was inversely correlated with the LBMI. PNI and PLR were found to be independent prognostic factors of one year mortality and also associated with the loss of muscle.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6054-6054
Author(s):  
E. Burke ◽  
L. Goguen ◽  
R. Tishler ◽  
L. Wirth ◽  
M. Posner ◽  
...  

6054 Background: We examined the impact of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on swallowing function in a group of patients treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer in an ongoing randomized phase II study with concurrent CRT, with or without Ethyol. Methods: Chemotherapy consisted of weekly carboplatin AUC 1.5 and paclitaxel at 45 /m2 for 4 weeks. Radiation was delivered using a 3 field technique with a concomitant boost schedule to a total dose of 72 Gy. Patients were randomized to receive or not receive daily subcutaneous Ethyol. Patients had video swallow studies at the start of radiation and 8, 12, 24 and 52 weeks post chemoradiotherapy. Dysphagia and weight loss were monitored. Video swallow study reports were collected and the incidence of penetration, aspiration, pharyngeal residue and upper esophageal narrowing analyzed. Results: Baseline data were available for 31 patients out of 43 enrolled. 29% of the patients penetrated, 6.4% aspirated and 29% had pharyngeal residue. Patients on both arms of the study had a steady decline in swallowing function from onset until 24 weeks post radiation. Penetration, aspiration and pharyngeal residue were consistently noted at all time points and improvements in deglutition were seen on the 52-week post radiation video swallow. Forty percent of the patients (17/43) had narrowing in the upper esophagus. On average, a third of the patients examined required dilations. The remaining patients with esophageal narrowing were able to advance their diet and have their feeding tubes removed without dilations. The average time from the end of the treatment to PEG removal was 219 days. Conclusion: Based on the video swallow studies that were conducted, patients had a gradual decline in swallowing function from initiation of CRT until 24 weeks post. Esophageal narrowing was common, often requiring dilation. Given that it takes 7 months on average for the feeding tubes to come out, we recommend that these patients undergo intensive swallowing therapy and continuous long term follow up and assessment at two and possibly three years post CRT. Study is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document