A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of oral coenzyme Q10 to relieve self-reported cancer-treatment-related fatigue in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9006-9006 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Lesser ◽  
L. D. Case ◽  
N. Stark ◽  
S. K. Williford ◽  
J. K. Giguere ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie L. Ryan ◽  
Charles E. Heckler ◽  
Marilyn Ling ◽  
Alan Katz ◽  
Jacqueline P. Williams ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9027-9027
Author(s):  
Julie L. Ryan ◽  
Charles E Heckler ◽  
Marilyn N Ling ◽  
Jacqueline P Williams ◽  
Alice P Pentland ◽  
...  

9027 Background: Radiation dermatitis occurs in approximately 95% of patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer and often leads to pain and treatment delays. There is no standard treatment with demonstrated effectiveness for the prevention of radiation dermatitis. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control clinical trial to assess the efficacy of curcumin, a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory component of turmeric, to reduce radiation dermatitis in 30 breast cancer patients. Methods: Eligible patients included adult females with non-inflammatory breast cancer or carcinoma in situ prescribed radiation therapy without concurrent chemotherapy. After randomization, patients took four 500 mg capsules of curcumin or placebo three times daily throughout their course of radiation therapy (total daily dose = 6.0 g). Weekly assessments included Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score, presence/absence of moist desquamation, erythema measure, and McGill Pain and Symptom Inventory (SI) questionnaires. Results: The 30 evaluable patients were white (90%; mean age = 58.1 years) with ER+PR+ breast cancer (76.7%) who did not have total mastectomy (90%) or chemotherapy prior to start of radiation therapy (56.7%). No significant differences were observed between arms for demographics, compliance, erythema, pain, symptoms, or radiation skin dose. Standard pooled variances t-test showed that curcumin reduced RDS at end of treatment compared to placebo (mean RDS = 2.6 vs 3.4; p=0.008). Fisher’s exact test showed that curcumin significantly reduced the presence of moist desquamation at the end of radiation therapy (28.6% vs. 87.5 %; p=0.002). Repeated measures analysis confirmed divergence of RDS between curcumin and placebo arms at Week 5. Conclusions: Oral curcumin, 6.0 g daily during radiation therapy, reduced radiation dermatitis severity and moist desquamation in breast cancer patients. A multisite CCOP trial (N=700) is underway to confirm the effectiveness of curcumin to reduce radiation dermatitis severity during various radiation therapy regimens for breast cancer. Support: IND 75,444, Dermatology Foundation, KL2 RR024136, NCI PHS 1R25CA10618.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Lauren P. Wallner ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
Chandler McLeod ◽  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
...  

78 Background: Surgical treatment decisions for early-stage breast cancer patients are complex and often involve discussions with multiple oncology providers. However, with the increasing adoption of team-based cancer care models, it remains unknown to what extent primary care providers (PCPs) are participating in breast cancer treatment decisions and whether they feel they have enough knowledge to participate in these decisions effectively. Methods: A stratified random sample of PCPs identified by newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer patients who participated in iCanCare Study (Georgia and Los Angeles SEER registries) were surveyed about their experiences caring for cancer patients (N = 519, 58% current response rate). PCPs were asked how frequently they discussed which surgery a patient should have, how comfortable they were with these discussions, whether they had the necessary knowledge to participate in treatment decision making and their confidence in their ability to help with treatment decision making (5-item likert-type scales). The individual items were then categorized as somewhat/often/always vs. never/rarely for analyses. Results: In this preliminary sample, 62% of PCPs were not comfortable having a discussion about surgery options with a patient newly diagnosed with breast cancer, 41% did not feel that they had the necessary knowledge to participate in treatment decision-making, and 34% were not confident in the ability to help with treatment decision-making. One third (32%) of PCPs reported discussing surgical treatment options with their newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but 22% of these PCPs also reported that they were not comfortable having these discussions and 16% reported they did not have necessary knowledge to participate in decision-making. Conclusions: A minority of PCPs participate in breast cancer treatment decision-making and there are notable gaps in their self-reported knowledge about decision-making and confidence in their ability to help with these decisions. Efforts to increase PCP knowledge about the specifics of cancer treatments may be warranted, but further research is needed to assess the impact of PCP participation on treatment decision-making outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document