Phase II study of sorafenib with gemcitabine and erlotinib (GES) in first-line advanced pancreatic cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 266-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Cohen ◽  
L. P. Leichman ◽  
E. Love ◽  
T. Ryan ◽  
C. G. Leichman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Gi Bleed

266 Background: Addition of erlotinib (E) to gemcitabine (G) results in improved OS for patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer. Many pancreatic tumors have constitutively activated ras/raf pathways and overexpress VEGF. Sorafenib (S), a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, including VEGR 1-3, PDGFR-α and β and the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, when combined with G and E may synergize, resulting in a more complete blockade of the signal transduction cascade in pancreatic cancer growth and progression, and improved outcome. Methods: Pts with previously untreated, histologically confirmed, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, PS 0-1, and adequate organ function were eligible and received G 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min qw x 3 every 4w. E 150 mg PO daily and S 400 mg PO bid were given continuously. CT scans were performed every 2 cycles (8w). Primary endpoint included PFS at 4 mos and secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability of the novel combination, RR, and OS. Results: 45 pts enrolled, 44 evaluable for toxicity(1 not treated), and 30 evaluable for response. Median age was 64 (45-84), 32 males (71%), 43 (96%) had metastatic disease, PS was 0 in 26 (58%). Median number of cycles was 2 (0-10). Grade (gr) 3 toxicity included: thrombocytopenia 5; diarrhea 4; vomiting 4; HFS, hyperbilirubinemia, hyperglycemia and SOB each 3 pts; 1 bowel perforation and 1 epistaxis. Gr 4 toxicity included 1 each: bowel perforation, GI bleed, transaminitis, hyperglycemia and sepsis with hypotension. 2 patients only required dose reduction of S for HFS. There were 2 PR (7%), 13 SD (43%), overall RR of 7% and DCR of 50%. Median TTP 111 days (95% CI = 53-175) and median OS 195 days (144-290). PFS at 16 weeks was 49%, just reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: The combination of G and E plus S in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer is a well tolerated regimen without significant increased toxicity as compared to G alone, except for very manageable cutaneous reactions. While the primary endpoint met our pre-determined criteria (compared with NCIC PA.3), this study does not suggest a major benefit for addition of S to G-E when compared to published data. Supported in part by grants from Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals/Onyx and OSI. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and tolerability of combined gemcitabine (G) and erlotinib (E) plus sorafenib (S) in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15594-e15594 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Cohen ◽  
T. Ryan ◽  
T. Moskovits ◽  
N. Cazeau ◽  
E. Newman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Ecog Ps

e15594 Background: The addition of E to G results in improved survival for patients(pts) with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Many pancreatic tumors have constitutively activated ras/raf pathways and overexpress VEGF. Sorafenib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor which targets VEGR 1–3, PDGFR-α and β and the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, when combined with G and E may synergize with these agents resulting in a more complete blockade of the signal transduction cascade in pancreatic cancer growth and progression and therefore improve outcome. Methods: Pts with previously untreated, histologically confirmed, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0–1, and adequate organ function were eligible and received G 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min weekly × 3 every 4 weeks. E 150 mg PO daily and S 400 mg PO bid were given continuously. CT scans were performed every 2 cycles (8 weeks). Endpoints included safety and tolerability of the novel combination, PFS at 4 months, response rate, and OS. Results: Between 9/07–12/08 19 pts were enrolled with a median age 59 (range 45- 75), M/F 13/6, PS (0/1) 14/5. All 19 had metastatic disease. 17 pts are evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. The median number of cycles on treatment was 2 (range 1–10). The most common grade (gr) 3 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (24%), venous thrombosis (12%), and hyperbilirubinemia (12%). The most common gr 4 toxicity was infection (12%). 1 pt each experienced gr 3 HFSR, gr 3 diarrhea, gr 3 bleeding (epistaxis) and 1 had a non-fatal bowel perforation. There was 1 PR and 6 SD for an overall RR of 6% and a DCR of 41%. Conclusions: The combination of G and E plus S in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer is a well tolerated regimen without significant increased toxicity as compared to gemcitabine alone, except for very manageable cutaneous reactions. Further follow up is required to determine the combination's efficacy, though some patients have achieved prolonged disease stabilization. Supported in part by grants from Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals/Onyx and OSI. [Table: see text]

Randomized phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (JCOG1407).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4017-4017
Author(s):  
Masato Ozaka ◽  
Makoto Ueno ◽  
Hiroshi Ishii ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Hiroshi Katayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

4017 Background: FOLFIRINOX, consisting of leucovorin (LV), fluorouracil (FU), irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), and GnP, consisting of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nPTX), have shown superior efficacy over GEM in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Although several studies have reported the efficacy of FOLFIRINOX or GnP for pts with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), no randomized controlled trial to compare the two regimens has been conducted in those pts. To select the most promising chemotherapy for LAPC, a randomized phase II selection design trial (JCOG1407) was conducted to compare between modified FOLFIRINOX (FOLFIRINOX with dose reduction of IRI and without bolus FU; Arm A) and GnP (Arm B) for pts with LAPC. Methods: In Arm A, 85 mg/m2 of L-OHP, 200 mg/m2 of l-LV, 150 mg/m2 of IRI, followed by 2,400 mg/m2 of continuous FU over 46 hours are infused every 2 weeks. In Arm B, 125 mg/m2 of nPTX followed by 1,000 mg/m2 of GEM are infused on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (the proportion of 1-year OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) and response rate in pts with target lesions. The planned sample size was 124 pts to select more effective regimen in 1-year OS with a probability of at least 0.85 and to test the null hypothesis of 53% in 1-year OS with a one-sided alpha of 5% and 80% Results: From 2015 to 2019, a total of 126 pts was enrolled from 29 Japanese institutions, and were allocated to Arm A (n = 62) or Arm B (n = 64). The median (range) age was 66 (44-75) years and 58.7% were male. At the analysis, after a median (range) follow-up of 1.52 (0.55-3.99) years, 75 (59.5%) pts died. The proportion of 1-year OS was better in Arm B, 77.4% [95% CI 64.9–86.0] vs. 82.5% [95% CI 70.7–89.9], but 2-year OS was better in Arm A, 48.2% [95% CI 33.3–61.7] vs. 39.7% [95% CI 28.6–52.5]. Median OS was 2.0 years [95% CI 1.6-2.7] in Arm A and 1.8 years [95% CI 1.5-2.0] in Arm B. 1-year PFS for Arm A/B was 47.5 % [95% CI 34.5-59.4]/40.2% [95% CI 27.8-52.3], and 1-year MFS was 64.2 % [95% CI 50.9-74.8]/57.3% [95% CI 43.9-68.6]. Arm A was better OS in pts with CA19-9 <1000 U/mL and the opposite trend was observed in pts with CA19-9>1000 U/mL. Response rate was 30.9% [95% CI 19.1-44.8] in Arm A, and 41.4% [95% CI 28.6-55.1]) in Arm B. Incidences of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities for Arm A and Arm B were 66.1% and 67.2%, respectively. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: This study was the first randomized trial comparing the two regimens. The 1-year OS of the primary endpoint in GnP was better than mFOLFIRINOX, but mFOLFIRINOX achieved longer survival in 2-year OS. It is required to confirm longer OS and safety profiles which regimen should be selected as a standard regimen in LAPC. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180085.

Anlotinib Plus Toripalimab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Study Protocol for An Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Phase II Study (ATNPA)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingwen Chen ◽  
Yiqian Liu ◽  
Yizhi Zhu ◽  
Shiyun Cui ◽  
Chongqi Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Combination Strategy

Abstract Background There have not been standard second-line or maintenance regimens with definite survival benefits so far for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who have lost the opportunity of curable resections or failed first-line chemotherapy. Anlotinib, a potent small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exhibits anti-angiogenic and anti-tumour effects by specifically binding to multiple targets such as VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, c-Kit and Ret. Toripalimab, a novel anti-PD-1 mAb, has been proved to significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in various solid tumours with manageable toxicities when combining with cytotoxic chemotherapy. We design this study to assess the combination of anlotinib, toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel as a second-line or maintenance therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). Patients and Methods: This is an open-label, non-randomized, single-arm phase Ⅱ study, aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety profile of the above-mentioned combination strategy in first-line therapy-failed LAPC or MPC. Totally 53 patients are to be enrolled and receive anlotinib (12 mg, po. qd.) plus toripalimab (240 mg, ivgtt. q3w.) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1, d8) every 3 weeks as a cycle until disease progression or intolerable adverse events. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary end points include OS, disease control rate (DCR), object response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL) and safety. Enrollment started in April 2021, and follow-up will be finished in April 2023. Discussion and Significance: Combination of anlotinib, toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel may promote vessel normalization and drug delivery, and activate the immune response, thus exerting synergistic anti-tumour effects and counteracting the immunosuppressive microenvironment of pancreatic cancer. As the first intending to assess this combination in pancreatic cancer, this study will provide comprehensive evidence for second-line or maintenance therapy of LAPC and MPC. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: ATNPA, NCT04718701. Registered January 22, 2021. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04718701?term=NCT04718701&draw=2&rank=1)

A phase I study of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor vatalanib (PTK787/ZK 222584) and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4122-4122 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kuo ◽  
A. Fitzgerald ◽  
H. Kaiser ◽  
B. I. Sikic ◽  
G. A. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Patient Cohort ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

4122 Background: The VEGF pathway is the predominant mediator of angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer. Vatalanib (PTK787/ZK 222584) is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of all known VEGF receptors. We initiated a phase I study of vatalanib and gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Previous adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with fluorouracil was allowed. Gemcitabine was given by fixed-dose rate infusion weekly x 3 in a 28-day cycle, and vatalanib was given orally daily. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are defined as any grade 3/4 toxicity during the first cycle. The dose levels are as follows: Results: To date, 11 patients are evaluable for toxicity (5M/6F; median age 62 years, range 40–82 years; median KPS 90%). Thus far, 42 cycles have been given, with a median of four cycles per patient. Two patients have experienced DLT. The first patient (cohort 1) experienced grade 3 diarrhea and hypokalemia and grade 4 neutropenia occurring simultaneously and treated without sequelae. The second patient (cohort 3) developed grade 3 deep vein thrombosis. Beyond the first cycle, grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (1), anemia (3), thrombocytopenia (1), hypertension (2), diarrhea (1), hypokalemia (1), thrombosis (1), and proteinuria (1). Three of eleven patients (27%) did not complete treatment to the first evaluation timepoint (2 cycles); two discontinued due to toxicity and one discontinued due to disease progression. Two of eleven patients (18%) had a partial response by RECIST. Six of eleven patients (55%) had stable disease as the best response ranging from 2–6 months. Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and vatalanib is generally well-tolerated with most grade 3/4 toxicities occurring late in the treatment course. Antitumor responses have been observed at initial dose levels and accrual to the final cohort with BID dosing of vatalanib continues. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Irinotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15111-15111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Park ◽  
S. Yi ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
I. Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

15111 Background: The aim of this phase II study was to determine whether second line therapy with single agent irinotecan could provide any clinical benefit in patients with gemcitabine- pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: From January 2004 to October 2006, patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine alone or combination were treated with single agent irinotecan(150 mg/m2, biweekly), until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was response rate with single stage design. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled(22 male, 6 female, median age : 54.5 years (39–76)). Nine patients are still alive and 3 remain on therapy with stable disease. The median number of cycles was 3.5(1–12). Twenty-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 21 for response. The most common toxicities was diarrhea (grade 3, 12.5%). Grade 3 neutropenia in 1 patient was observed. Other hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Partial responses were observed in 3 patients (3/21, 14%). An additional 9 patients (9/21, 43%) had stable disease as their best response. 12 patients have progressed with a median time-to-progression of 4.0 months. Conclusions: Single-agent irinotecan was tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering encouraging activity as second-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, refractory to gemcitabine. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225, a monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-r) : Eastern Cooperative Oncology

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4519-4519 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Burtness ◽  
M. Powell ◽  
J. Berlin ◽  
D. Liles ◽  
A. Chapman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Ecog Ps

4519 Background: Gemcitabine (G) is standard for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC), with median survivals of 6 months (m). Second cytotoxic or biologic agents do not substantially advance survival. EGFR is expressed on PC and a phase II trial of G plus cetuximab (C) resulted in favorable 1 year survival. A phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel (I/D) chemotherapy reported a median survival for metastatic patients (pts) of 9 m. We conducted this randomized phase II trial to confirm the activity of this non-G regimen, and determine whether combining it with C was feasible and active. The primary endpoint was response. Methods: Pts required histologic confirmation of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, evidence of distant metastases, ECOG PS 0–1, normal bilirubin, written informed consent, and were randomly assigned to Arm A (N=47) or B (N=45). Imaging with CT or MR within 4 weeks (wk) was used for tumor measurement. Dexamethasone was given 12 hours (h), 1 h before and 12 h after chemotherapy. Pts on Arm A received D 35 mg/m2 over 1 h and I 35 mg/m2 over 30 minutes weekly x 4 in a 6 wk cycle. Pts on Arm B received the same therapy, but C (loading dose 400 mg/m2 wk 1, 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter) was given before D. Pts not receiving therapeutic anticoagulation received enoxaparin 40 mg per day. Pts were restaged (RECIST) after 2 cycles. Results: Median age Arm A: 59.9, Arm B: 60.2 years. Arm A 55% male, 32% PS 0, 97% EGFR immuno+. Arm B 84% male, 42% PS 0, 97% EGFR +. Median number of cycles for each arm 2 (1 -10). >4 cycles were delivered to 10.5% of pts Arm A, 20.9% Arm B. Grade ¾ neutropenia 26% Arm A, 33% Arm B. Grade 3 nausea 28% Arm A, 18% Arm B; Grade ¾ diarrhea 33% Arm A, 44.4% Arm B. 1 treatment-related death per arm. Median overall survival (OS), with 70.2% of pts known to have died, 6.5m [(95% CI (4.8, 8.6)] in Arm A. With 86.7% of pts known to have died in Arm B, OS 7.4 m [95% CI (4.4, 10.7)]. Response/progression data will be available at time of presentation. Conclusions: Weekly I/D ± C is associated with high rates of grade ¾ neutropenia/diarrhea. Median survival is 6.5m for I/D and 7.4m for I/D/C. Non-G containing therapy is active in metastatic PC. [Table: see text]

The predictive role of CA 19–9 kinetics for time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving palliative first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15637-e15637
Author(s):  
M. Haas ◽  
S. Boeck ◽  
P. Stieber ◽  
R. P. Laubender ◽  
H. Buchner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Predictive Role ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e15637 Background: Previous studies showed contradictory results for a predictive role of CA 19–9 kinetics during chemotherapy in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study in order to evaluate the role of CA 19–9 as a biomarker for TTP and OS in PC. Main inclusion criteria: histological confirmed diagnosis of PC, treatment with first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease, pre-treatment CA 19–9 level of > 5.2 U/ml. As CA 19–9 measurements were conducted in different laboratories using different commercial assays, we defined a subgroup of pts where CA 19–9 was assessed exclusively by the Elecsys assay (Roche Diagnostics). For the analysis of CA 19–9 kinetics, at least one follow-up measurement between day 20 and 64 during first-line chemotherapy had to be available. Pts were divided into two subgroups of CA 19–9 responders and non-responders by cut-offs of a 25% and 50% decline, respectively. OS and TTP were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier-Method, differences between the subgroups were analyzed by using the log-rank test. Results: One hundred and eighty-six pts were included, 83 of them were tested with the Elecsys method. Median age was 63 years, 90 % of the pts were treated within prospective clinical trials. Median pre-treatment CA 19–9 was 1076 U/ml (range 5.7–100,000 U/ml), the median bilirubin was 0.6 mg/dl. Median OS and TTP were 9.8 months (mo) and 5.4 mo, respectively. In univariate analysis, pts with a CA 19–9 decline of at least 25% during chemotherapy lived significantly longer (11.9 mo vs. 8.2 mo, p=0.003) and had a significantly prolonged TTP (5.8 mo vs. 4.4 mo, p=0.018) than those with a lower decline or even CA 19–9 increase. Data for the Elecsys-measurements were comparable (OS: 13.4 mo vs. 8.6 mo, p=0.004; TTP: 7.0 mo vs. 2.6 mo, p=0.003). None of the analyses demanding a CA 19–9 drop of at least 50% reached the level of statistical significance. Conclusion: An early CA 19–9 decline of 25% during first-line chemotherapy may predict OS and TTP in pts with advanced PC. Innovative statistical methods are required to improve our understanding of the utility of CA 19–9 as a predictive biomarker in PC. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of gene-mediated cytotoxic immunotherapy in combination with chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 195-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bloomston ◽  
C. Marsh ◽  
J. Walker ◽  
W. Coyle ◽  
H. Marx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Tumor Vaccine ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Kinase Gene ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Cell Immunity ◽  
Dose Levels

195 Background: More than 80% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with locally advanced or metastatic disease and have a median survival of only 6 months. Immunotherapy approaches may improve outcomes. Gene Mediated Cytotoxic Immunotherapy (GMCI) is an approach that generates a systemic anti-tumor vaccine effect through intra-tumoral delivery of an adenoviral vector expressing the HSV-thymidine kinase gene (AdV-tk) followed by anti-herpetic prodrug and synergy with chemoradiation. The mechanisms of action involve tumor cytotoxicity, activation of antigen presenting cells and stimulation of systemic anti-tumor T-cell immunity. Safety with potential efficacy has been demonstrated in multiple clinical studies. This is the first application of GMCI in pancreatic cancer. Methods: This study evaluated 4 dose levels of AdV-tk (3x1010 to 1x1012 vector particles) injected into locally advanced tumors via EUS or CT-guidance before and during week 3 of standard 5-FU-chemoradiation. Valacyclovir (Valtrex, GSK) prodrug was given for 14 days after each of 2 AdV-tk injections. Results: The study completed accrual with 13 patients enrolled and 12 completing therapy with 3 at each of the 4 dose levels. One patient refused further participation during course 1 after recovering from azotemia. Median age was 64 years (range 55-81) and median baseline CA19-9 was 1634 U/ml. No dose limiting toxicities and no injection related complications occurred. Possibly related grade 3-4 toxicities, all of which were transient, included dehydration, azotemia and worsening elevation of bilirubin and AST. Kaplan-Meier estimated median survival is 12.2 months with 6 patients still alive at 8-20 months. Two patients achieved a partial response by RECIST criteria. One occurred in week 6 despite discontinuing 5-FU/radiation during week 1. The other had gradual decrease of a 7 cm tumor over 11 months. Serum CA19-9 levels decreased in 8/8 evaluable patients by 32-91% at 3 months after treatment initiation. Conclusions: AdV-tk can be safely injected into pancreatic tumors and combined with standard chemoradiation. Early results are highly encouraging and justify further evaluation in a phase II study. [Table: see text]

Updated results of the GEST study: Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4035-4035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Fukutomi ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
Kazuya Sugimori ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Locally Advanced Disease ◽  
Phase Iii Study

4035 Background: The GEST study (Ioka et al. ASCO 2011, Abstract 4007) demonstrated the non-inferiority of S-1 to GEM with respect to the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). We now report the updated results of this study. Methods: The GEST study was a randomized, 3-arm, phase III study. Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable advanced PC, an ECOG Performance status (PS) of 0-1, and adequate organ functions were randomly assigned to receive GEM (1000 mg/m2, iv, d1, 8 and 15, q4w), S-1 (80/100/120 mg/day based on BSA, po, d1-28, q6w), or GS (GEM 1000 mg/m2, iv, d1 and 8 plus S-1 60/80/100 mg/day based on BSA po, d1-14, q3w). The primary endpoint was OS, used to assess the non-inferiority of S-1 and the superiority of GS to GEM. Patient information was updated in July 2011. Results: At the time of this follow-up analysis, median follow-up was 29.8 months with 795 OS events, compared with 18.4 months with 710 OS events out of 832 patients at the previous analysis. Median OS was 8.8 months (95% CI: 8.0–9.7) in the GEM group and 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.6-10.8) in the S-1 group (HR=0.96, 97.5% CI: 0.79-1.17, p<0.001 for non-inferiority), which is consistent with prior results (HR=0.96, 97.5% CI: 0.78-1.18, p<0.001). In the GS group, median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 9.0-11.2). The HR was 0.91 (97.5%CI: 0.75-1.11, p=0.28 for superiority versus the GEM group). On subgroup analysis, GS was associated with a non-statistically significant trend toward better OS compared with GEM among patients with locally advanced disease and those with a PS of 1. Median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 9.7–14.9) in the GEM group and 15.9 months (95% CI: 13.0-19.7) in the GS group (HR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.51-1.03) among patients with locally advanced disease, and 6.2 months (95% CI: 4.9–8.3) in the GEM group and 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.0-10.9) in the GS group (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.83) among patients with a PS of 1. Conclusions: The non-inferiority of S-1 to Gem in terms of the primary endpoint of OS was reconfirmed. Monotherapy with S-1 can be used as one of the standard treatments for advanced PC. As for GS therapy, there is room for further investigation.

A phase III randomized trial of chemoimmunotherapy comprising gemcitabine and capecitabine with or without telomerase vaccine GV1001 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4004-LBA4004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary William Middleton ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
Jonathan Wadsley ◽  
David Propper ◽  
Fareeda Y. Coxon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cell Trafficking ◽  
Concurrent Administration ◽  
Cross Presentation ◽  
Helper Epitope

LBA4004 Background: GV1001, a promiscuous class II epitope encompassing aa 611-626 of hTERT led to the development of CD4+ clones recognizing hTERT in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Preclinically gemcitabine increases antigen cross-presentation, enhances T cell trafficking/activation, and reduces MDSCs and Tregs. Methods: Patients with APC were randomized 1:1:1 to: Arm 1 GemCap; 2 GemCap for 8/52 followed by GV1001 followed by further GemCap if no PD at week 8; 3 concurrent administration of GemCap and GV1001. 735 (69.2%) had metastatic disease and 948 (89.3%) had ECOG PS=0 or 1. Randomization was stratified by stage and PS. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included ORR, TTP, and AEs. Recruitment target was 1,110 patients (780 deaths) to permit detection of a hazard ratio of 0.748 between either GV1001 arm and Arm 1 using a 2-sided α=0.025 level of significance with at least 80% power. Results: 1,062 pts from 51 centers were randomized. Trial maturity was high (72.7% patients died): median follow-up was 6.11 months. The overall response rates were Arm 1=17.6%; Arm 2=8.9% (p=0.001); Arm 3: 15.5% (p=0.460 compared with Arm 1). Conclusions: OS with concurrent GemCap/GV1001 was not different to that with GemCap alone. OS with sequential GV1001 was not statistically different to GemCap alone as it did not meet the criterion for statistical significance (p<0.0175). The addition of a T helper epitope vaccine to GemCap did not improve outcome compared to GemCap alone. Clinical trial information: 43482138. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document