What is the benefit for patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after bevacizumab-based regimen (BBR), cetuximab-based regimen (CBR), and panitumumab (P)?

595 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) management has been clearly improved by targeted therapies such as anti VEGF and /or anti-HER1 drugs. The evaluation of the use of targeted therapies in the real world is strategic to assess health politics. OMIT Bretagne-Pays de la Loire is a network of private and public cancer centers that has been leading cohort studies evaluating Folfiri-bevacizumab treatment, the cost of targeted therapies and the succession of targeted therapies. Methods: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit and safety of three consecutive targeted therapies in patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable mCRC. Sex, age, localization of the primary tumor site, successive chemotherapeutic regimens, toxicities, response rates, progression free survival and overall survival have been studied. Results: 34 patients (22 men, 12 women, median age 63 years [43-82]) have been prospectively recruited between 2003 and 2010. All of them received bevacizumab specially in association with FOLFIRI, cetuximab in association with irinotecan, panitumumab as monotherapy and others chemotherapies than FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, XELOX. The primary tumor site was colon (71%), junction (5%), and rectum (24%). 22 patients had metastatic colorectal tumor, 28 were operated on their primary tumor and 12 underwent resection after one line of treatment. Patients received successively 3 to 8 different lines of treatment for progressive mCRC. Toxicities of targeted therapies were manageable. Objective responses were observed in 38% (13) of the patients treated with BBR, 37% (11) treated with CBR and 25% (6) treated with P. Disease stabilization was achieved in 32% (11) of the patients treated with BBR, in 10% (3) with CBR and in 8% (2) with P. PFS at 80 months is 15%. Median OS from first metastatic line at death was 47.43 months (24.23-70.84). PFS and OS curves will be shown during the meeting. Conclusions: Our study clearly shows that patients receiving successively the three schedules (BBR, CBR, P) have a high overall survival with manageable side effects. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Predictors of survival during treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with an intermittent chemotherapy regimen.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e14063 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14063-e14063

Author(s):

Camilla J S Kronborg ◽

Anni Ravnsbæk Jensen

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Treatment Regimen ◽

Primary Tumor ◽

Local Treatment ◽

Intermittent Treatment ◽

Primary Tumor Site ◽

Unselected Cohort ◽

Improved Outcome

e14063 Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergo month to year-long therapy with different chemotherapy regimens and biological agents. We aimed to identify predictors of mortality during an intermittent treatment regimen in an unselected cohort of patients with mCRC. Methods: Consecutive patients, treated from August 2007 until June 2011, were included. Standard 1st line treatment was biweekly FLIRI plus Bevacizumab. Clinical information was obtained from patient files. The outcome was overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of outcome. We analyzed reduction in chemotherapy dosage (no reduction, ≤75% or >75%), administration of Bevacizumab to ≤50% of chemotherapy treatments, best response during the first 6 months of treatment (NC, RD or PD), and local treatment of metastases (any type). We adjusted for following baseline variables: Gender, age, PS, primary tumor site, resection of primary tumor, metachronous metastases, more than two metastatic sites, liver-only metastases, and low albumin Results: We included 314 patients (median age 64.5 IQ (57-70) years, 194 (61.8%) male). Median follow-up for survival was 471 IQ (257-708) days. One-year survival was 79%, CI (74-84%). Median overall survival was 676 days, CI (577-750). Chemotherapy reduction did not influence outcome, ≤75%: HR 1.08 CI (0.64-1.83), p=0.77, >75%: HR 0.66 CI (0.29-1.5), p=0.32. Local treatment of metastases was borderline significant: HR 0.45 CI (0.20-1.00), p=0.051. Bevacizumab was administered in 262 patients and a reduction in bevacizumab treatments was associated with increased mortality: HR 1.90 CI (1.12-3.23), p=0.018. Regression vs. NC improved outcome HR 0.48 (0.30-0.78), p=0.003, whereas PD vs. NC increased mortality HR 3.84 (1.75-8.42), p=0.001. Conclusions: In an unselected cohort of mCRC patients, using an intermittent treatment regimen, administration of Bevacizumab to less than 50% of chemotherapy treatments and PD were associated with increased mortality. Regression improved outcome compared to stable disease. Local treatment of metastases was borderline significant. Reduction in chemotherapy dosage did not influence outcome.

Download Full-text

Baseline predictors of survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e14105 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14105-e14105

Author(s):

Anni Ravnsbæk Jensen ◽

Camilla J S Kronborg

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Primary Tumor ◽

Palliative Chemotherapy ◽

Performance Status ◽

Tumor Site ◽

Primary Tumor Site ◽

Metastatic Sites ◽

Resected Primary Tumor ◽

Metachronous Metastases

e14105 Background: Patients with non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer can survive several years with palliative chemotherapy and newer biological agents. However, survival varies greatly within this group. The aim of the present study was to identify baseline predictors of overall mortality in an unselected cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Clinical information was collected from patient files in consecutive patients treated with palliative chemotherapy from August 2007 until June 2011. The primary outcome was overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the effect of predictive variables on time to outcome. The variables analysed were: Gender, age, performance status, primary tumor site (colon or rectum), status of primary tumor (resected or un-resected), metachronous metastases, more than two metastatic sites, liver-only metastases, and low albumin. Results: We included 314 patients (Median age 64.5 IQ (57-70) years, 194 (61.8%) male). Median follow-up for survival was 471 days IQ (257-708). One-year survival was 79%, CI (74-84%). Median overall survival was 676 days, CI (577-750). Following baseline variables were independent predictors of all-cause mortality: Primary tumor site colon HR: 1.49, CI (1.03-2.16), p=0.036, un-resected primary tumor HR 2.92, CI (1.85-4.62), p<0.001, metachronous metastases HR 1.72, CI (1.06-2.79), p=0.027 and more than two metastatic sites HR 3.46, CI (1.71-6.99), p=0.001. Both Performance status and low albumin were statistically significant in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In daily clinical practice, baseline predictors of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer were colon as the primary tumor site, un-resected primary tumor, metachronous metastases, and more than two metastatic sites.

Download Full-text