Frequency of TLE3 overexpression in breast carcinoma subtypes including a large cohort of triple-negative patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1040-1040
Author(s):  
Gargi D. Basu ◽  
Anatole Ghazalpour ◽  
David Arguello ◽  
Raheela Ashfaq ◽  
Zoran Gatalica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Large Cohort ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Triple Negative Subtype

1040 Background: The taxanes are an important class of agents for the treatment of a broad range of malignancies including breast cancer. They improve survival in patients with early stage and metastatic breast cancer. Transducin-like enhancer of split 3 (TLE3) is a transcriptional repressor which influences growth and microtubule stability and its expression has been implicated in response to taxane therapy in breast cancer. We investigated the tumor expression of TLE3 in breast cancer patients, including a large cohort of the triple negative subtype. Methods: We analyzed TLE3 (M-201), ER(1D5), PR(PgR636) and HER2/neu(Polyclonal) expression by immunohistochemistry in 978 breast cancer patients. Immunoreactivity was assessed by scoring the percentage of cells stained in each field and by the intensity of staining. Results: To sub-classify the 978 breast cancer patients, we utilized hormone receptors (ER and PR) and HER2 expression/amplification. Overall, 36% of the total breast cancer patients were hormone receptor positive, 15% were HER2 positive and 49% were triple negative. The percentage of triple negative patients was higher in our cohort, given the fact that molecular profiling services are used more frequently for this subtype. A total of 477 patients were triple negative of which 61% stained positive for TLE3 expression. Of the 150 HER2 positive patients, 73% stained positive for TLE3 expression as compared with 82% TLE3 positivity in the 351 hormone receptor positive patients. By pairwise comparison, the hormone receptor positive vs triple-negative subtype showed the highest statistical significance in ratios of TLE3 positives (p =2.5e-10). Conclusions: Our results show that TLE3 is over-expressed in the majority of HER2 positive and hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients. Interestingly, the frequency of over-expression of TLE3 was lowest in the triple negative subtype thereby making it more important to identify those patients in this group who are most likely to respond to taxanes prior to therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first study providing a comprehensive review of TLE expression in breast cancer subtypes.

Outcome of palbociclib based therapy in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients after treatment with everolimus.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1054-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Dhakal ◽  
Christina Matthews ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Ellis Glenn Levine ◽  
Stephen B. Edge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Metastatic Setting

1054 Background: Resistance mechanisms to CDK 4/6 inhibition are not well defined. Outcome data on hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer patients (MBCP) treated with palbociclib (PA) after treatment with everolimus (EV) are lacking. The PALOMA 3 trial (P3) showing benefit of PA plus fulvestrant (FU) compared to FU in HR+ MBCP after progression on endocrine therapy excluded women previously treated with EV. The aim of our study was to investigate the outcomes of HR+ MBCP with prior EV treatment on PA based therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective, single institute review of HR+, HER 2 nonamplified MBCP from Jan 2014 - Nov 2016 treated with PA after treatment with EV. Women who received EV for < 1 month or PA < 14 days were excluded. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the initiation of PA to the date of progression as determined by treating physician based on radiological, biochemical and/or clinical criteria. Response rates were determined based on available radiological data. Clinical benefit was defined as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease of at least 24 weeks. Results: 23 patients with mean age 67 years (42 to 81) were identified. 95% were postmenopausal, 81% had ECOG performance status 0 or 1, 83% had visceral metastases, 95% had > 2 lines of prior endocrine therapy (ET), 82% shown prior sensitivity to ET, 82% received prior chemotherapy, of which 84% were in metastatic setting. Kaplan Meier estimate showed median PFS of 2.9 months (95% CI 2.0-4.2); median PFS of P3 PA cohort was 9.5 months (95% CI 9.2-11.0). Fisher’s exact test comparing study cohort with P3 PA cohort showed statistically significant differences in objective response (CR or PR) rates of 0/23 (0%) vs. 66/347 (19%, p = 0.02) & clinical benefit ratio of 4/23 (17.4%) vs. 231/347 (66.5%, p = 0.00). Conclusions: Outcomes with PA in HR+ EV treated MBCP were worse when compared to the P3 PA cohort data. Treatment with EV may lead to resistance to CDK inhibition. Though limited by size, our data suggests that use of PA after EV is associated with low response & clinical benefit rates. Further studies are necessary to confirm the findings to determine sequencing of targeted therapies.

Comparison of therapy benefit from standard anti-HER2 directed approaches in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) between initially HER2-positive patients and patients initially HER2-negative with switch to HER2-positive.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1040-1040
Author(s):  
Hans-Christian Kolberg ◽  
Özlem Yüksel ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
Sara Brucker ◽  
Hans Tesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

1040 Background: Metaanalyses have demonstrated that 5% of initially HER2 negative breast cancer patients switch to HER2 positive during the course of the disease. Whether there is a difference in benefit from standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients initially HER2 positive and patients switching from negative to positive is unclear. We used data from the PRAEGNANT registry to compare the outcome of those patients. Methods: PRAEGNANT is a prospective advanced breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis compared progression-free survival (PFS) with standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients with tumors initially HER2 negative and switched to HER2 positive and patients with tumors that were initially HER2 positive adjusted for age and hormone receptor status. Results: At the time of this analysis 4061 patients with MBC were included in the PRAEGNANT registry, 49 of which met the requirements for this analysis. Median age was 56 (IQR 48-64) years and 87.8% of the patients were hormone receptor positive. At first diagnosis 15 patients were HER2 negative and 34 patients were HER2 positive. Within a median observation time of 9 months (95%CI: 3.8, 23.7) 35 PFS events occurred. Median observation time was 9 months (95% CI: 3.8, 23.7). Initially HER2 positive patients had a longer progression-free survival (HR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.24, 1.03), p = 0.07) as compared to initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive. The 1- and 2-year-PFS rates were also higher for patients initially HER2 positive: 1-year-PFS: 52% (95% CI: 36%, 73%) versus 26 % (95% CI: 12%, 52%); 2-year-PFS: 44% (95% CI: 29%, 67%) versus 19% (95% CI: 7%, 50%). Conclusions: Median PFS and 1- and 2-year PFS rate seem to be better in patients HER2 positive at initial diagnosis receiving standard HER2 directed therapies. Although our result has to be interpreted with caution because of the small cohort and the retrospective nature of our analysis, it justifies prospective research including the group of initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive as a distinct entity. Clinical trial information: NCT02338167 .

Discordance in clinical versus pathological staging in breast cancer: Are we undermining the significance of accurate preoperative staging in the present era?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Shina Goyal ◽  
Linu Abraham Jacob ◽  
D. Lokanatha ◽  
M.C. Suresh Babu ◽  
K.N. Lokesh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Preoperative Staging ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Pathological Staging

BACKGROUND: The present era of individualized treatment for breast cancer is influenced by the initial disease status including the anatomical extent, grade, and receptor status. An accurate preoperative staging is the basis of treatment planning and prognostication. Our study aims to determine the discordance between the preoperative clinical and the postoperative pathological stages of breast cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: The medical records of all non-metastatic breast cancer patients from January 2017 to December 2018 who underwent upfront surgery were reviewed. They were staged as per the eighth AJCC and the concordance between the clinical (c) and pathological T (tumor), N (nodal), and final AJCC stage was studied. A Chi-square test was used to determine factors that significantly correlate with disease discordance. RESULTS: A total of 307 breast cancer patients were analyzed. Among these, 43.3% were hormone receptor-positive, 30.6% were Her2 positive and 26% were triple-negative. Overall stage discordance was seen in 48.5% (n = 149) patients (upstaging in 22.1%, downstaging in 26.4%). The discordance rate was 48.9% for T stage (cT versus pT) and 57.4% for N stage (cN versus pN). Among patients with clinically node-negative disease, 53.4% were found to have positive nodes on histopathology, while 27.2% had vice versa. Overall, the factors associated with upstaging were ER-positive, Her2 positive and triple-negative status (all p < 0.05), while none of the factors showed significant association with downstaging. CONCLUSIONS: About half of breast cancer patients had discordance between clinical and pathological staging with higher discordance in the nodal stage. This changes the disease prognosis, and may also affect the offered surgical treatment and radiotherapy. Thus highlighting the need for a precise pre-operative staging. Also, this information will aid clinicians in discussions with patients, keeping in mind the likelihood of change in disease staging and management. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document