Amrubicin and carboplatin with pegfilgrastim in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): A phase II study of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7100-7100
Author(s):  
Dianna Shipley ◽  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
Tarek Mekhail ◽  
John D. Zubkus ◽  
Douglas B. Flora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
Elderly Japanese ◽  
Ecog Ps

7100 Background: Amrubicin is a novel anthracycline associated with high objective response rates (ORR) in patients (pts) with relapsed SCLC. Amrubicin improved the ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed SCLC vs. topotecan, but not overall survival (OS) in a phase III study. Amrubicin with cisplatin/carboplatin for elderly Japanese pts was safe and active. We conducted a multicenter phase II study evaluating amrubicin and carboplatin in newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. Methods: Eligible pts had untreated ES-SCLC, measurable/evaluable disease (RECIST v. 1.1) and an ECOG PS <2. Pts received 4 cycles of amrubicin 30 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and carboplatin AUC=5 both IV day 1 every 21 days with restaging every 6 weeks. Pegfilgrastim 6 mg sq was administered on day 4 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was 1-year OS. Secondary endpoints included ORR, PFS, OS, and toxicity. Results: 78 pts were enrolled from 3/2010 to 7/2011. Baseline characteristics included: median age 65 yrs (range 45-84); 56% female. 64% completed 4 cycles of treatment. Eleven (14%) pts showed complete responses and 47 (60%) pts partial responses, for an ORR of 74% (95% confidence interval 65%-82%). Twelve (15%) pts had stable disease. Median PFS and OS were 5.3 and 9.5 months, respectively. The 1-year OS was 36%. Grade 3/4 myelosuppression was the most common toxicity (thrombocytopenia 44%, neutropenia 34%, febrile neutropenia 12%, anemia 26%), but was manageable. Severe non-hematologic toxicities (>5%) included hypokalemia 17%, fatigue 13%, dehydration 10%, hyponatremia 10%, pneumonia 9%, and nausea/vomiting 8%. 1 pt died from sepsis and another from aspiration pneumonia. Conclusions: First-line ES-SCLC treatment with amrubicin and carboplatin induced several complete responses and is considered highly active. Myelosuppression was managed effectively with growth factor support. These results are comparable to historical data with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. A larger randomized study would be required to best assess this regimen’s impact on survival.

Phase II study of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (OX) at dose of 130 mg/m2 (SOX130) in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Yosuke Kito ◽  
Nozomu Machida ◽  
Satoshi Hamauchi ◽  
Takahiro Tsushima ◽  
Akiko Todaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Completion Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Α Level ◽  
Ecog Ps

112 Background: The phase III G-SOX trial had adopted SOX100 due to high incidence of thrombocytopenia in the previous phase I/II study, and failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of SOX100 to S-1 plus cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve Japanese pts with AGC. However, OX 130 mg/m2 has been approved for AGC in Japan since Sep 2014 on the evidence of the REAL-2 trial. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the feasibility of SOX130 in Japanese AGC pts. Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study. Pts with unresectable or recurrent adenocarcinoma of stomach, no prior chemotherapy and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were treated with SOX130 (S-1 80-120 mg/day according to BSA for 2 weeks, OX 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the 3-cycle completion rate, defined as the proportion of pts who receive at least 80% of the planned OX dose for the first 3-cycle. We set the threshold 3-cycle completion rate at 50% and the expected rate at 75%. A sample size of 23 pts was needed with 80% power at a 5% α-level (one-sided). Results: From April 2015 to June 2016, 25 pts were enrolled. Pts’ characteristics were as follows: median age 64.5 years (range, 32-76), male/female 21/4, PS 0/1 15/10, unresectable/recurrent 21/4, and intestinal/diffuse 7/18. The 3-cycle completion rate was 72.0% (90% CI 53.8-86.1%). Among the 12 pts with measurable lesions, objective response rate and disease control rate were 58.3% and 83.3%, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 5.2 months, median progression-free survival was 7.5 months. Grade 3 adverse events were anorexia (n = 5), anemia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), neutropenia (n = 1) and nausea (n = 1). No treatment-related death was observed. Conclusions: SOX130 could be a first-line treatment option even in Japanese AGC pts. Clinical trial information: UMIN000016973.

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

SPIRITT (study 20060141): A randomized phase II study of FOLFIRI with either panitumumab (pmab) or bevacizumab (bev) as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 454-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Randolph Hecht ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Mansoor N. Saleh ◽  
Bilal Piperdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Previously Treated

454 Background: Pmab has demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with WT KRAS mCRC as 2nd-line tx in a phase III trial comparing pmab + FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone. Here, we describe the results of SPIRITT, a multicenter, randomized phase II study evaluating pmab + FOLFIRI and bev + FOLFIRI in pts with WT KRAS mCRC previously treated with a 1st-line bev + oxaliplatin (Ox)-based chemotherapy regimen. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to pmab 6.0 mg/kg + FOLFIRI Q2W or to bev 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg + FOLFIRI Q2W. Eligibility criteria included: WT KRAS mCRC, ECOG ≤ 1, no prior irinotecan or anti-EGFR tx, and tx failure of prior 1st-line bev + Ox-based therapy (≥ 4 cycles). The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. No formal hypothesis was tested. Results: 182 pts with WT KRAS mCRC were randomized. All pts received tx. Efficacy results are shown (table). Worst grade of 3/4 adverse events (AE) occurred in 78% of pts in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 65% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Grade 5 AEs occurred in 7% of pts in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 7% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Tx discontinuation due to any AE was 29% in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 25% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Conclusions: In this estimation study of pts with WT KRAS mCRC that previously received bev + Ox-based tx, the PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.68 - 1.50). The OS HR was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.75 - 1.49). The observed ORR was higher in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm. 54% of bev + FOLFIRI pts received subsequent anti-EGFR tx. The safety profile for both arms was similar to previously reported studies. Tx discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar between the arms. Clinical trial information: NCT00418938. [Table: see text]

Multicenter phase II trial of temsirolimus (TEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 260-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Hobday ◽  
Rui Qin ◽  
Diane Lauren Reidy ◽  
Malcolm J Moore ◽  
Jonathan R. Strosberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Ecog Ps

260 Background: Recent placebo-controlled phase III trials of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the VEGF/ PDGF receptor inhibitor sunitinib in PNET noted improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, objective response rates (RR) with these agents are <10%. Preclinical studies suggest enhanced anti-tumor effects with combined mTOR and VEGF targeted therapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor TEM (25 mg IV q week) and the VEGF-A monoclonal antibody BEV (10 mg/kg IV q 2 weeks) in patients (pts) with well or moderately differentiated PNET and progressive disease by RECIST within 7 months of study entry. Co-primary endpoints were RR and 6-month PFS. Planned enrollment is 50 patients, with interim analysis after the first 25 evaluable pts. Pts had no prior mTOR or VEGF targeted agents, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Continued octreotide was allowed, but not required. Prior interferon, embolization, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens were allowed. Results: Confirmed PR was documented in 11 of the first 25 (44%) evaluable patients. 20 of 25 (80%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. Both endpoints exceeded pre-defined criteria to continue enrollment. For 35 evaluable patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to therapy were leukopenia (12%), hypertension (12%), hyperglycemia (12%), mucositis (9%), and fatigue (9%). Conclusions: The combination of TEM/BEV has substantial activity in a multi-center phase II trial with RR of 44%, well in excess of single targeted agents in PNET. 6-month PFS was a notable 80% in a population of patients with RECIST criteria progression within 7 months of study entry. Accrual is ongoing. Supported by NCI N01 Contracts: 662205, 62203, 62208, 62209, 62206, 62204, 62207, 62201.

SPIRITT (study 20060141): A randomized phase II study of FOLFIRI with either panitumumab (pmab) or bevacizumab (bev) as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3616-3616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
J. Randolph Hecht ◽  
Shaker Dakhil ◽  
Mansoor N. Saleh ◽  
Bilal Piperdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Previously Treated

3616 Background: Pmab has demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with WT KRAS mCRC as 2nd-line tx in a phase III trial comparing pmab + FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone. Here, we describe the results of SPIRITT, a multicenter, randomized phase II study evaluating pmab + FOLFIRI and bev + FOLFIRI in pts with WT KRAS mCRC previously treated with a 1st-line bev + oxaliplatin (Ox)-based chemotherapy regimen. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to pmab 6.0 mg/kg + FOLFIRI Q2W or to bev 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg + FOLFIRI Q2W. Eligibility criteria included: WT KRAS mCRC, ECOG ≤ 1, no prior irinotecan or anti-EGFR tx, and tx failure of prior 1st-line bev + Ox-based therapy (≥ 4 cycles). The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. No formal hypothesis was tested. Results: 182 pts with WT KRAS mCRC were randomized. All pts received tx. Efficacy results are shown (Table). Worst grade of 3/4 adverse events (AE) occurred in 78% of pts in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 65% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Grade 5 AEs occurred in 7% of pts in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 7% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Tx discontinuation due to any AE was 29% in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 25% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Conclusions: In this estimation study of pts with WT KRAS mCRC that previously received bev + Ox-based tx, the PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.68 - 1.50). The OS HR was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.75 - 1.49). The observed ORR was higher in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm. 54% of bev + FOLFIRI pts received subsequent anti-EGFR tx. The safety profile for both arms was similar to previously reported studies. Tx discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar between the arms. Clinical trial information: NCT00418938. [Table: see text]

A randomized phase II study comparing mFOLFOX-6 combined with axitinib or bevacizumab or both in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 485-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Infante ◽  
A. L. Cohn ◽  
T. R. Reid ◽  
W. J. Edenfield ◽  
T. Cescon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
C 32 ◽  
Ecog Ps

485 Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, including axitinib (AG-013736), may be useful in treating patients with mCRC. The goals of this study were to estimate the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety in patients with mCRC treated with mFOLFOX-6 combined with axitinib or bevacizumab or both. Methods: Patients with mCRC untreated with any systemic chemotherapy >12 months prior to enrollment, ECOG PS 0/1, adequate organ function, and controlled hypertension were eligible for this randomized, open-label, phase II study. Patients receiving prior treatment with antiangiogenic agents or those who were pregnant were ineligible. All patients received standard mFOLFOX-6 treatment and were randomized to receive either axitinib 5 mg (Arm A), or bevacizumab 5 mg/kg (Arm B), or axitinib 5 mg + bevacizumab 2 mg/kg (Arm C). Axitinib was administered orally twice daily. Efficacy was determined by RECIST criteria. Results: A total of 42, 43, and 41 patients were enrolled in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. The ORR was 29%, 49%, and 39% for Arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median PFS was 315 days, 350 days, and 377 days, with 1-year survival of 72%, 79%, and 80% for Arms A, B, and C, respectively. Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) were more common in Arm A (36%), than in Arms B (19%) or C (32%). More patients withdrew from Arm A (18%) than from Arms B (5%) or C 12%). The rates of grade 3 AEs were similar across arms, except for hypertension and fatigue which were more common in Arms A (15% and 12%) and C (21% and 29%) compared with Arm B (2% and 12%). Serious AEs were reported by 41%, 40%, and 56% of patients in Arms A, B, and C, respectively; the most common were gastrointestinal disorders (21%, 16%, 15%, respectively). Conclusions: In combination with mFOLFOX-6 chemotherapy, treatment with axitinib resulted in a lower ORR but comparable survival to bevacizumab and this did not appear to improve significantly in the presence of both agents. This result may have been affected by the higher numbers of discontinuations and withdrawals in Arm A compared with the other 2 arms. [Table: see text]

PEAK (study 20070509): A randomized phase II study of mFOLFOX6 with either panitumumab (pmab) or bevacizumab (bev) as first-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with unresectable wild‑type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 446-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Steven Schwartzberg ◽  
Fernando Rivera ◽  
Meinolf Karthaus ◽  
Gianpiero Fasola ◽  
Jean-Luc Canon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

446 Background: Pmab has demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with WT KRAS mCRC as 1st-line tx in a phase III trial comparing pmab + FOLFOX4 vs FOLFOX4 alone. Here, we describe the results of PEAK, a multicenter, randomized phase II study evaluating pmab + mFOLFOX6 and bev + mFOLFOX6 in pts with previously untreated WT KRASmCRC. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to pmab 6.0 mg/kg + mFOLFOX6 Q2W or bev 5.0 mg/kg + mFOLFOX6 Q2W. Pt eligibility criteria included: WT KRASmCRC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no prior chemotherapy, anti-VEGF tx, or anti-EGFR tx for mCRC. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. No formal hypothesis was tested. Results: 285 pts with WT KRASmCRC were randomized and 278 pts received tx. Demographics were balanced between arms. Intent-to-treat efficacy results are shown (Table). Worst grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) occurred in 86% of pts in the pmab + mFOLFOX6 arm vs 76% of pts in the bev + mFOLFOX6 arm. Grade 5 AEs occurred in 5% of pts in the pmab + mFOLFOX6 arm and 6% of pts in the bev + mFOLFOX6 arm. Tx discontinuation due to any AE was 24% in the pmab + mFOLFOX6 arm and 27% in the bev + mFOLFOX6 arm. Conclusions: In this estimation study of pts with WT KRASmCRC without any prior therapy for mCRC, PFS and ORR were similar between arms. The median OS was not reached in the pmab + mFOLFOX6 arm. The safety profile for both arms was consistent with previously reported studies of either combination. Tx discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar between arms. Clinical trial information: NCT00819780. [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Mucosal Melanoma

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.00902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xieqiao Yan ◽  
Xinan Sheng ◽  
Zhihong Chi ◽  
Lu Si ◽  
Chuanliang Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mucosal Melanoma ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

PURPOSE Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a highly vascularized tumor with an extremely poor prognosis. In this randomized, open-label, phase II study, we characterized the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CPB) in patients with previously untreated advanced MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) once every 4 weeks in combination with (CPB arm, 5 mg/kg) or without (CP arm) bevacizumab once every 2 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and adverse events. RESULTS We recruited 114 patients to our study. The median PFS was significantly longer in the CPB arm (4.8 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.0 months) than in the CP arm (3.0 months; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.3 months) (hazard ratio, 0.461; 95% CI, 0.306 to 0.695; P < .001). Objective response rates were 19.7% and 13.2%, respectively ( P = .384). The median OS was also significantly longer in the CPB arm than in the CP arm (13.6 v 9.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.611; 95% CI, 0.407 to 0.917; P = .017). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION PFS and OS were significantly better in patients with metastatic MM who received bevacizumab in addition to CPB than in those who received CPB alone. A phase III study should be performed to confirm these benefits (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02023710 ).

Efficacy and safety of continuous daily sunitinib dosing in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from a phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7542-7542 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Brahmer ◽  
R. Govindan ◽  
S. Novello ◽  
R. Rosell ◽  
C. P. Belani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Continuous Dosing

7542 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU), an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, has demonstrated activity in recurrent advanced NSCLC on the 4/2 schedule (4 weeks [wks] on treatment followed by 2 wks off), with a partial response (PR) rate of 11% (Socinski, ESMO 2006). A continuous dosing (CD) schedule of SU was additionally evaluated for safety and efficacy in this multicenter phase II study. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had stage IIIB/IV NSCLC previously treated with 1–2 chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS =1, and adequate organ function. Pts with brain metastases or recent gross hemoptysis were excluded. Pts received oral SU 37.5 mg/day continuously in 4-wk cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Results: Forty-seven pts were treated on the CD schedule: median age 60 yrs (range 37–81); male 57%; ECOG PS 0/1/2 49%/49%/2%; adenocarcinoma 53%, squamous cell carcinoma 15%, other 32%; median number of SU cycles initiated: 3 (range 1–10). One pt (2%) had a confirmed PR and 8 pts (17%) had stable disease >3 months. Median PFS was 12.1 wks (95% CI: 8.6–13.7). SU was generally well tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2 and included fatigue/asthenia, pain/myalgia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, and stomatitis/mucosal inflammation. Grade =3 AEs included fatigue/asthenia (15%), hypertension (6%), hypoxia (6%), dyspnea (4%), and hemoptysis (2%). Treatment-related serious AEs included congestive heart failure (CHF; 1 pt), gastrointestinal bleeding (1 pt), hypomagnesemia (1 pt), and hypoxic respiratory failure (1 pt). One pt died due to possible treatment-related CHF. Conclusions: SU on a CD schedule is associated with an acceptable safety profile when administered to previously treated NSCLC pts, and there is documented preliminary evidence of activity, with 1 PR and a median PFS of 12.1 wks. These data support further study of continuous dosing of SU in combination with other treatments for NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of tivantinib monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4082-4082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Muro ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Hirofumi Yasui ◽  
Tomohiro Nishina ◽  
Baek-Yeol Ryoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Safety Concern ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Ecog Ps

4082 Background: Tivantinib is a selective, non-ATP competitive, small-molecule inhibitor of c-MET and is under development in several cancers such as NSCLC and HCC. Elevated expressions of c-MET and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, have been frequently found in gastric cancer, and are associated with a more aggressive phenotype. In this single-arm phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy of tivantinib monotherapy in Asian patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). This is the first clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a selective c-MET inhibitor for MGC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included MGC with at least 1 measurable lesion per RECIST; 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens; ECOG PS 0 or 1; and normal CYP2C19 metabolism. Tivantinib was daily administered 360 mg bid orally. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) defined as CR, PR or SD after 8 weeks administration. Pretreatment tumor tissue collection was required to evaluate the relationship between biomarkers and efficacy. Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation was also conducted. Results: Thirty patients received tivantinib and were eligible for analysis: median age 62.5 (41-70) years; ECOG PS 0/1 (8/22); 1/2 prior regimen (16/14); 12 pts (40%) with prior gastrectomy. No objective response was observed, and DCR was 36.7% (11/30 pts). Median progression-free survival was 43 (95% CI: 29.0-92.0) days. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 13 pts (43.3%), in which neutropenia (n = 4) and anemia (n = 4) were recognized as drug-related. Only 2 pts discontinued due to AEs. There is no treatment-related death and novel safety concern. c-MET gene amplification (≥ 5 copies/cell) was observed in 4 pts (13.3%). No obvious relationship of treatment outcome with biomarkers including c-MET gene amplification, c-MET, p-c-MET and HGF expression in tumor and serum HGF was identified. Gastrectomy and/or ethnicity (Korean or Japanese) did not affect PK parameters. Conclusions: Tivantinib as a monotherapy showed only a modest efficacy in previously treated MGC, and further trial testing in combination would be warranted in MGC. It would be an important finding that gastrectomy do not affect PK profile of tivantinib.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document