Norris Cotton Cancer Center (NCCC) neuro-oncology glioma tumor quality improvement project.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 137-137
Author(s):  
Evelyn Schlosser ◽  
Camilo E. Fadul ◽  
Jennifer Snide ◽  
Karen Homa
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
The Individual

137 Background: Glioma patients represent 30% of the primary brain tumor population at NCCC, and often require surgical intervention prior to medical management. In order to ensure coordinated, comprehensive and timely care, reliable referral to the neuro-oncology program is needed. Earlier quality improvement efforts identified 10 best practices designed to facilitate referral into the neuro-oncology program, though over the years these practices lapsed. A manual record review of 2010 cases revealed 43 glioma patients, of which compliance with best practices ranged from 29% to 93%, and none of the patients had all best practices when indicated. Additionally, the percentage of 9 out of the 10 best practices (excluding post-operative order sets) completed for all consecutive patients from January 2010 to May 2011 was 63%. Methods: A project was chartered by leadership and a multidisciplinary team was convened twice a month from May to October 2011. The team was organized into three groups (entry into the system, surgical, and post-op care, and continuing care) and assigned a coach with instructions to flowchart the current processes and identify factors that contributed to poor performance. The three process maps were then combined to create one system map by which the team brainstormed improvement ideas to pilot. Results: Concurrent review of the individual case-level data during the project team meetings was helpful in identifying process weaknesses as changes were being piloted. Performance of best practices improved significantly when measured several months following completion of the project; furthermore, best practices completed for consecutive patients from June 2011-May 2012 was 87%. Conclusions: The team was challenged to identify changes in process that were not dependent upon individual providers/staff members and that took advantage of a newly implemented electronic medical record. Manual chart abstraction was replaced by electronic data abstraction. Sustained measurement and reporting of performance is essential and has been incorporated into the Neuro-Oncology Tumor Board meetings on a quarterly basis.

scholarly journals Importance of Individual Elements for Perineal Protection in Childbirth: An Interventional, Prospective Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. e289-e294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Rasmussen ◽  
Annika Yding ◽  
Finn Lauszus ◽  
Charlotte Andersen ◽  
Jacob Anhøj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Five Elements ◽  
The Individual

Objective To analyze the association between each element of a hands-on intervention in childbirth and the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Study Design We conducted a prospective, interventional quality improvement project and implemented a care bundle with five elements at an obstetric department in Denmark with 3,000 deliveries annually. We aimed at reducing the incidence of OASIS. In the preintervention period, 355 vaginally delivering nulliparous women were included. Similarly, 1,622 nulliparous women were included in the intervention period. The association of each element with the outcome was estimated using a regression analysis. Results The incidence of OASIS went down from 7.0 to 3.4% among nulliparous women delivering vaginally (p = 0.003; relative risk = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30–0.76). Number needed to treat was 28. Logistic regression analysis showed that using hand on the head of the child significantly reduced the risk of OASIS (odds ratio = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14–0.58). Conclusion Using a quality improvement framework, we documented the individual elements of the intervention. Hand on the infant's head reduced the risk of OASIS.

scholarly journals Assessing Nurses’ Knowledge of Noise in the Intensive Care Unit: An Educational Intervention Project

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Fortes
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Noise in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been studied for over thirty years, but it continues to be a significant problem and a top complaint among patients. Staff members are now reporting detrimental health effects from excessive noise. One of the significant factors of inadequate noise control in the ICU is that nurses have insufficient awareness regarding the hospital noise issue and its negative impact on health status. The level of knowledge of clinical staff on the topic of noise is not known. A quality improvement project to explore noise in the ICU could facilitate better understanding of the phenomenon and formulation of new ways to continue to reduce noise at a community hospital in Massachusetts. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate nurses’ knowledge of the potentially harmful effects of noise on patients as well as on nurses, to identify opportunities for improvement of the environment, and to conduct an educational intervention aimed at reducing noise in the intensive care unit. The methodology for this project included a pre-test, followed by an educational session, and completion of a post-test. The participants included registered nurse staff members in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the Critical Care Unit (CCU). Exclusion criteria included staff members who are not registered nurses. The project posed minimal risk. No identifying or biographical data was collected, and results included analysis of aggregate data. Descriptive statistics were used to assist with analysis. Results were disseminated to the staff of the ICU and CCU, posted on a bulletin board in the critical care area, presented as a poster presentation at the Spring RIC MSN Symposium, and available as a manuscript on the RIC Digital Commons.

IMPLEMENTATION OF A CLINICAL FRAILTY PATHWAY AT A CANCER CENTER: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. S24
Author(s):  
F. Gomes ◽  
K. Baker ◽  
J. Bruce ◽  
M. Eaton ◽  
J. Woods ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Improvement Project

scholarly journals Oncology Fellow–Led Quality Improvement Project to Improve Rates of Palliative Care Utilization in Patients With Advanced Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e814-e822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Arjun Gupta ◽  
Mirat Shah ◽  
Melinda Hsu ◽  
Marcus Messmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
First Year ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Leadership Support ◽  
Ancillary Staff

PURPOSE: ASCO guidelines recommend palliative care (PC) referral for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. Despite this, implementation has considerable hurdles. First-year oncology fellows at our institution identified low rates of PC utilization in their longitudinal clinic as a metric needing improvement. METHODS: A fellow-led multidisciplinary team aimed to increase PC utilization for patients with advanced cancer followed in he first-year fellows’ clinic from a baseline of 11.5% (5 of 43 patients, July to December of 2018) to 30% over a 6-month period. Utilization was defined as evaluation in the outpatient PC clinic hosted in the cancer center. The team identified the following barriers to referral: orders difficult to find in the electronic medical record (EMR), multiple consulting mechanisms (EMR, by phone, or in person), EMR request not activating formal consult, no centralized scheduler to contact or confirm appointment, and poor awareness of team structure. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented based on identified opportunities. Data were obtained from the EMR. RESULTS: The first PDSA cycle included focus groups with stakeholders, standardizing referral process via single order set, identifying a single scheduler with bidirectional communication, and disseminating process changes. PDSA cycles were implemented from January to June of 2019. Rates of PC use increased from 11.5% before the intervention to 48.4% (48 of 99 patients) after the intervention. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach and classic quality improvement methodology improved PC use in patients with advanced cancer. The pilot succeeded given the small number of fellows, buy-in from stakeholders, and institutional and leadership support. Straightforward EMR interventions and ancillary staff use are effective in addressing underreferrals.

Emergency department surge and overcrowding: An interdisciplinary solution for an institutional issue.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 242-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Gaeta ◽  
Toni Edwards ◽  
Sorayah Bourenane ◽  
Carmen E. Gonzalez ◽  
Karen McFarland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Safety Risks ◽  
Ed Overcrowding ◽  
Systematic Solution ◽  
Md Anderson

242 Background: Emergency Department (ED) surges at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) lead to overcrowding, safety risks, privacy concerns, staff burnout, and adverse events associated with delays in care, including death. In 2015, the ED Interdisciplinary Quality & Safety Committee (EDIQSC) at MDACC was developed to review and address safety events. We report on the preliminary results of a quality improvement project with a long-term goal of developing a systematic solution of proactively responding to ED surge and overcrowding (EDSO). Methods: First, EDIQSC reviewed the current literature regarding EDSO. Subsequently an ED Surge and ED Overcrowding Committee (EDSOC) was established to identify solutions to address patient safety risks and improve patient experience in the ED. Results: Literature review showed that NEDOCS (Weiss, SJ et al) was the best scoring tool to calculate ED Overcrowding levels. EDSOC’s weekly meetings facilitated by the Office of Performance Improvement (OPI) explored factors related to EDSO via FMEA a quality improvement tool that proactively evaluate process associated risks. In addition, the following immediate solutions were implemented in the ED: daily status reporting by ED to institutional leaders, a “fast-track” care area implementation, senior executive rounding during ED Surge, electronic medical record (EMR) configuration for high census accommodation, continuous ED Nursing Leadership unit needs assessment, and prioritization of needs based on hospital throughput. Additional interventions in current development include a real-time EMR dashboard accurately reflecting ED capacity, and a NEDOCS guided interdisciplinary operational action plan. Conclusions: ED Surge & Overcrowding is a complex issue with various external and internal contributing factors that cannot be solved with one approach. It is a dynamic, interdisciplinary system that requires vigilant planning, assessment of downstream change effects, stakeholder agility and continuous risk anticipation. EDSOC continues these efforts in an attempt to develop and implement a comprehensive, interdisciplinary tool to direct institutional operations during times of ED Surge & Overcrowding.

Scaling the Stressfulness of Gynecological Complaints

1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-325
Author(s):  
Virginia Patterson ◽  
Nancy Wilner
Keyword(s):  
Patient Group ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Professional Affiliation ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
The Individual

The present study determines the amount of agreement among staff members of a gynecology service in assessing the stressfulness of various gynecological conditions, and the efficacy of these estimates in predicting stress symptomatology among patients. Subjects were 103 patients attending a gynecology clinic during a two month period. We found that the gynecological conditions could be consensually ranked according to stressfulness by staff of the gynecology service but assessments of the magnitude of the stress differed according to the sex and professional affiliation of the rater. Judgments of stressfulness did predict the presence of certain kinds of emotional reactions among the patient group but the correlations were not high enough to warrant prediction for the individual case.

scholarly journals Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (01) ◽  
pp. 041-053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Stringfield ◽  
Stefan Holubar ◽  
Samuel Eisenstein
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Colon And Rectal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Methodological Considerations

AbstractThe American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) is probably the most well-known surgical database in North American and worldwide. This clinical database was first proposed by Dr. Clifford Ko, a colorectal surgeon, to the ACS, and NSQIP first started collecting data ca. 2005 with the intent of comparing hospitals (benchmarking) and for hospital-level quality improvement projects. Since then, its popularity has grown from just a few participating hospitals in the United States to more than 708 participating hospitals worldwide, and collaboration allows regional or disease-specific data sharing. Importantly, from a methodological perspective, as the number of hospitals has grown so has the hospital heterogeneity and thus generalizability of the results and conclusions of the individual studies. In this article, we will first briefly present the structure of the database (aka the Participant User File) and other important methodological considerations specific to performing clinical research. We will then briefly review and summarize the approximately 60 published colectomy articles and 30 published articles on proctectomy. We will conclude with future directions relevant to colorectal clinical research.

Improving the referral rate of universal genetic counseling for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center: A quality improvement project.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Kanika G. Nair ◽  
Brandie Leach ◽  
Selina Sledge ◽  
Megan Kilbane ◽  
Jennifer Bates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Referral Rate ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Germline Testing

196 Background: While most PDAC are sporadic, up to 10% are inherited. In 2018, ASCO and NCCN guidelines were updated to recommend that all patients with PDAC be considered for genetic counseling (GC) and germline testing. Furthermore, interest in treating patients with targeted therapy, such as olaparib, for germline mutations is increasing. We implemented a quality improvement project to identify the referral rate to GC for patients with PDAC, with the goal of improving the referral rate to 60%. Methods: Barriers to GC referral were identified using quality improvement tools developed at the ASCO Quality Training Program. Three “plan, do, study, act” (PDSA) cycles were implemented: 1) updating the electronic order and tumor board template to include GC recommendation (Aug–Oct 2019), 2) physician education (Nov–Dec 2019) and 3) patient education and physician reinforcement (Jan–Feb 2020). Baseline data to evaluate impact of PDSA intervention (from April to June 2019) on documented discussions about GC and placement of the referral order was completed via chart review. Results: Between April 2019 to January 2020, 199 patients with PDAC were seen in medical oncology clinic as new patient visits. Thirteen patients had previously completed GC. For the remainder, baseline discussion and referral rates were 25% and 9%, respectively. Discussion and referral rates improved to 55% and 30% after PDSA 1, to 73% and 33% after PDSA 2, and to 95% and 58% after PDSA 3, respectively. Forty-nine patients were referred at the first visit and 23 were referred at a subsequent visit. Forty-six patients underwent GC. In patients who completed germline testing 8.9% (4/45) were found to have a pathogenic variant in BRCA2, TP53, ATM, and MUTYH. Conclusions: With increased physician and patient education, we were able to improve the GC discussion rate from 25% to 95% and referral rate from 9% to 58%. While we did not meet our aim of 60% GC referral rate, we identified obstacles and outlined an improved process for early GC referrals. Enacting processes to reinforce GC referrals for patients with PDAC is likely to increase detection of germline mutations in this population.

Abstract 34: Kentucky Stroke Encounter Quality Improvement Project Statewide Collaboration to Improve Alteplase Utilization, Decrease Door to Needle Times, and Impact Outcomes: A 10 Year Review

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari D Moore ◽  
Lynn Hundley ◽  
Polly Hunt ◽  
Bill Singletary ◽  
Allison Merritt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Systems Of Care ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Data Tracking ◽  
Stroke Systems Of Care

Background: Evidence shows systems change interventions improve care and outcomes for stroke patients. Geopolitical boundaries have been a barrier to improving regional systems of care. Despite efforts nationally, regionally, and locally alteplase use for ischemic stroke has remained low and door to needle (DTN) times exceeded 60 minutes. Kentucky created the Stroke Encounter Quality Improvement Project (SEQIP) in 2009 to share best practices and improve stroke systems of care across the Commonwealth. Purpose: The aim was to utilize and share best practice models among 23 SEQIP hospitals in KY to improve tPA utilization, decrease DTN times, and improve outcomes. Methods: Hospitals implemented a statewide quality improvement plan focused on identifying barriers, removing barriers, and implementing best practice strategies regarding thrombolytic therapy. Accountability was achieved with ongoing GWTG data tracking, teleconferences, and face to face meetings from January 2009 through December 2018 sharing strategies and solutions for best practice. Results: SEQIP’s participating hospitals achieved significant improvement in thrombolytic administration over 10 years. The percent of all AIS patients receiving tPA increased from 4.61% in 2009 to 8.80% in 2018 (OR=2.0, p <0.0001). Alteplase use in eligible patients arriving by 2 hours and treated by 3 hours improved from 59.6% to 88.5% (OR=5.2, p <0.0001). Alteplase use in eligible patients arriving by 3.5 hours to 4.5 hours increased from 24.9% to 55.1% (OR=5.0, p <0.0001). Median DTN times decreased from 74 minutes to 49 minutes (p<0.0001). Complication rates of symptomatic hemorrhage were consistent with NINDS data and < 6% from 2009-2018. The tPA in-hospital mortality rate in 2009 was 11.7% and by 2018, decreased to 3.6% (p=0.00016). In 2009, 28.4% of tPA patients were discharged home and by 2018, that had increased to 47.9% (p <0.00001). In 2009, 32.1% of tPA patients were able to walk independently at d/c and by 2018 had increased to 43.6% (p = 0.00359). Conclusions: Geopolitical boundaries can be overcome and collaboration can be sustained among competing hospitals through sharing of best practices to safely increase utilization of tPA in eligible patients, decrease DTN times, and improve outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document