Number of lymph nodes recovered as an independent prognostic factor in predicting outcome in patients with pathologically node-negative rectal cancer following preoperative chemo/radiotherapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 606-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sree Lakshmi Rodda ◽  
Amandeep Singh Dhadda ◽  
Peter D. Dickinson ◽  
Abed M Zaitoun ◽  
Eric M Bessell

606 Background: To determine the importance of number of lymph nodes recovered on outcome in pathological node negative rectal cancer patients who had received chemo/radiotherapy prior to surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from 262 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received pre-operative chemo/radiotherapy at Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham and Nottingham University Hospital between 2001 and 2008. Patients were treated with CT planned radiotherapy to a dose of 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Surgery was normally performed at an interval of 6-8 weeks. There were 152 patients who were found to be pathologically node negative for further analysis. Median follow-up was 51.5 months Patients were grouped into < 10 nodes recovered or > 10 nodes recovered. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Log rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox-regression analysis. Results: Of the 152 patients analysed, 67.1 % (n=102 ) had fewer than 10 nodes recovered and 32.8% (n=50) had greater than 10 nodes recovered. The median number of nodes recovered was 7 (range 0-39). There was a improvement in 5 year DFS and OS in group who had more than 10 nodes recovered compared to group with less than 10 nodes recovered ( DFS at 5yrs :86.5% vs. 61.5%, p=0.01, OS at 5 yrs : 77.8% vs. 67.4% , P =0.059). On multivariate analysis pathological T-stage , circumferential resection margin (CRM) status and number of lymph nodes recovered were found to be independent predictors of disease free survival (p=0.002). Conclusions: The number of lymph nodes retrieved following surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer patients following chemo/radiotherapy is an independent prognostic factor in pathologically node negative patients. This may need to be considered when making subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy decisions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Z. Z. Mamedli ◽  
A. V. Polynovskiy ◽  
D. V. Kuzmichev ◽  
S. I. Tkachev ◽  
A. A. Aniskin

The aim of the study: to increase the frequency of achieving pathologic complete response and increase disease-free survival in the investigational group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer T3(MRF+)–4N0–2M0 by developing a new strategy for neoadjuvant therapy.Materials and methods. In total, 414 patients were assigned to treatment. Control group I included 89 patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week. Control group II included 160 patients who underwent RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week and oxaliplatin once a week, during the course of RT. Study group III consisted of 165 patients. This group combined RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week and additional consecutive CapOx cycles. This group was divided into 2 subgroups: subgroup IIIa included 106 patients with consolidating chemotherapy (after CRT); subgroup IIIb included 59 patients who underwent “sandwich” treatment. Therapy consisted of conducting from 1 to 2 cycles of induction CapOx (up to CRT) and from 1 to 2 cycles of consolidating CapOx with an interval of 7 days. In the interval between the courses of drug therapy, RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions was performed. According to the results of the control examination, further treatment tactics were determined. The primary end points were 5-year disease-free survival and the achievement of a pathologic complete response.Results. Pathologic complete response was significantly more often recorded in patients in the investigational group III (17.48 %; p = 0.021) compared with control groups (7.95 % in the I group and 8.28 % in the II group). 5-year disease-free survival in patients in the study groups was: 71.5 % in the III group, 65.6 % in the II group and 56.9 % in the I group.Conclusion. The shift in emphasis on strengthening the neoadjuvant effect on the tumor and improving approaches to drug therapy regimens have significantly improved disease-free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Shahab Hajibandeh ◽  
Shahin Hajibandeh

Background. Recent meta-analysis of 21 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) supports the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for nonmetastatic rectal carcinoma. In order to define a subgroup of patients who can potentially benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, this study aims to review trials investigating adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to stage of disease in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had undergone surgery for cure (stage II and stage III). Methods. We searched electronic information sources to identify randomised trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stages II and III rectal cancer with overall survival or disease-free survival as outcomes. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network notes on methodology were used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. Eight studies reporting total of 5527 patients were selected for analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival and overall survival compared to surgery alone in both stage II and stage III cancer. Conclusions. This study indicates that both stage II and stage III rectal cancer patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who already had neoadjuvant chemoradiation still remain unknown.


Oncotarget ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 8123-8135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Gaedcke ◽  
Andreas Leha ◽  
Rainer Claus ◽  
Dieter Weichenhan ◽  
Klaus Jung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document