Treatment of colorectal liver metastasis: Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and hepatic resection.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 637-637
Author(s):  
Min Yong Yoon ◽  
Hyung Ook Kim
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen

637 Background: Hepatic resection is the mainstay of management for colorectal liver metastases. But, the treatment for colorectal liver metastases requires a multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy. The aim of this study was to compare recurrence and survival rates for patients treated with hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for colorectal liver metastases. Methods: Between July 2002 and September 2010, 52 patients underwent hepatic resection and 58 underwent RFA for synchronous or metachronous colorectal liver metastases. A retrospective analysis was performed. Patients with extrahepatic metastases were excluded. Results: The two groups had similar mean age, comorbid medical conditions, primary disease stage, and number of tumors. Preoperative median serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was significantly higher in the resection group (13.8 ng/mL vs. 3.1 ng/mL; p = 0.001). Median diameter of main tumors was significantly greater in resection group (4.1 cm vs. 2.0 cm; p = 0.002). Recurrence rate after treatment was 46.2% (24/52) in the resection group and 70.7% (41/58) in the RFA group. Marginal recurrence after resection or RFA was observed in 7.6% (4/52) and 46.6% (27/58), respectively (p = 0.003). Median recurrence free survival (28.0 vs. 12.0 months; p = 0.007) and median overall survival (43.0 vs. 26.0 months; p = 0.023) were significantly longer in the resection group. Conclusions: Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases. RFA for colorectal liver metastases was associated with higher marginal recurrence rate and shorter recurrence free and overall survival.

Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Liver Resections ◽  
Multi Stage

Introduction: Radical liver resection is the only method for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, only 20–30% of patients with CLMs can be radically treated. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the possible methods of palliative treatment in such patients. Methods: RFA was performed in 381 patients with CLMs between 01 Jan 2001 and 31 Dec 2018. The mean age of the patients was 65.2±8.7 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Open laparotomy was done in 238 (62.5%) patients and the CT-navigated transcutaneous approach was used in 143 (37.5%) patients. CLMs <5 cm (usually <3 cm) in diameter were the indication for RFA. We used RFA as the only method in 334 (87.6%) patients; RFA in combination with resection was used in 36 (9.4%), and with multi-stage resection in 11 (3%) patients. We performed RFA in a solitary CLM in 170 (44.6%) patients, and in 2−5 CLMs in 211 (55.6%) patients. We performed computed tomography in each patient 48 hours after procedure. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. Complications were present in 4.8% of transcutaneous and in 14.2% of open procedures, respectively, in the 30-day postoperative period. One-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94.8, 66.8, 43.9 and 16.6%, respectively, in patients undergoing RFA, and 90.6, 69.1, 52.8 and 39.2%, respectively, in patients with liver resections. Disease free survival was 63.2, 30.1, 18.4 and 13.1%, respectively, in the same patients after RFA, and 71.1, 33.3, 22.8 and 15.5%, respectively, after liver resections. Conclusion: RFA is a palliative thermal ablation method, which is one of therapeutic options in patients with radically non-resectable CLMs. RFA is useful especially in a non-resectable, or resectable (but for the price of large liver resection) solitary CLM <3 cm in diameter and in CLM relapses. RFA is also part of multi-stage liver procedures.

Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on overall survival for borderline resectable colorectal liver metastases

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 365-365
Author(s):  
Akio Saiura ◽  
Yosuke Inoue ◽  
Yoshihiro Mise ◽  
Yu Takahashi ◽  
Takafumi Ichida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Surgical Failure ◽  
The Impact

365 Background: Treatment for borderline colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is often started with chemotherapy. However, the impact on overall survival (OS) is still unknown. Aims: The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome for up-front resectable borderline CLMs (BLR-CLM). Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 169 patients who underwent liver resection of BLR-CLM among 510 patients underwent liver resection for CLM between 2005 and 2013. BLR-CRLM was defined as CRLM of four or more nodules or 5cm or larger nodule. Time to surgical failure (TSF) was defined as the time until unresectable relapse or death. OS, recurrence free survival (RFS) and TSF were compared between BLR-CLM treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and up-front surgery (US). Results: After median follow-up period of 38 months, 5-year survival rate after liver resection of resectable cases (n = 263), BLR-CLM (n = 169), and initially unresectable CLM (n = 78) are 67.7%, 47.5% and 32.6%, respectively. For patients with BLR-CLM, 22 patients with early recurrence during or early after postoperative chemotherapy for the primary were excluded. In the remaining 147 patients, 75 patients were treated with NAC and 72 with US. Cumulative 5-year overall survival rates, progression free survival rates, and time-to surgical failure in NAC and US group are as follows: OS (60.1% vs 47.7%, p = 0.084), PFS (23.1% vs 15.5%, p < 0.0001), TSF (38.0% vs 34.4%, p = 0.020). Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy for BLR-CLM could improve PFS and TSF. The impact on OS was still marginal. Prospective controlled study will be necessary.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes Following Hepatic Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases

HPB Surgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew McKay ◽  
Katherine Fradette ◽  
Jeremy Lipschitz
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Study Support

Recently some have called for randomized controlled trials comparing RFA to hepatic resection, particularly for patients with only a few small metastases. The objectives were to compare local recurrence and survival following RFA and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. This was a retrospective review of open RFA and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases between January 1998 and May 2007. All patients who had RFA were considered to have unresectable disease. 58 patients had hepatic resection and 43 had RFA. A 5-year survival after resection was 43% compared to 23% after RFA. For patients with solitary lesions, a 5-year survival was 48% after resection and 15% after RFA. Sixty percent of patients suffered local recurrences after RFA compared to 7% after hepatic resection. RFA is inferior to resection. The results observed in this study support the consensus that RFA cannot be considered an equivalent procedure to hepatic resection.

scholarly journals Phase II/III Study of Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells Treating Colorectal Liver Metastases

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Li ◽  
Xichao Dai ◽  
Liangrong Shi ◽  
Yong Jiang ◽  
Xuemin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Cik Cells ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Purpose: This phase II/III, non-randomized clinical trial aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells transfusion for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Experimental Design: A total of 60 eligible patients with CRLMs were enrolled and divided into Group A (RFA alone, n = 30) and Group B (RFA plus CIK, n = 30), and following enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay was performed in 8 patients with CEA > 50 ng/mL pre-RFA and 7 days post-RFA and CIK treatment, respectively. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) times of Group A and Group B were 18.5 months and 23 months, respectively (P = 0.0336). The 3-year progression-free rates were 13.3% in Group A and 20.3% in Group B, respectively. The median overall survival time was 43 months in Group A, and not reached in Group B. The 3-year survival rates were 64.6% in Group A and 81.0% in Group B, respectively (P = 0.1187). Among the 8 patients with CEA > 50ng/mL, 6 had increase of circulating CEA-specific T cells after RFA (P = 0.010). After CIK cell therapy, the number of CEA-specific T cells increased in all the 8 patients comparing with that pre-treatment (P = 0.001) and in 7 patients comparing with that post-RFA (P = 0.028). Conclusions: We firstly confirm that the combination of RFA and CIK cells boosts CEA-specific T cell response and shows to be an efficacious and safe treatment modality for patients with CRLMs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document