The usefulness of UGT1A1 polymorphism testing before starting irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11055-11055
Author(s):  
Taishi Harada ◽  
Haruhiro Saito ◽  
Makiko Sugiura ◽  
Shuji Murakami ◽  
Tetsuro Kondo ◽  
...  

11055 Background: A few studies have revealed an association between UGT1A1 genotype and irinotecan-induced neutropenia. However, the usefulness of UGT1A1 polymorphism testing before starting irinotecan-based chemotherapy is controversial, even now. We assessed the clinical usefulness of UGT1A1 polymorphism testing before chemotherapy. Methods: 136 lung cancer patients were treated with nedaplatin and irinotecan combination chemotherapy as initial chemotherapy. Except for the patients with low enzyme activity of UGT1A1, 70 patients were treated after UGT1A1 polymorphism testing. (test group) 66 patients were treated without UGT1A1 polymorphism testing. (non-test group) We retrospectively analyzed adverse events and compared the test group with non-test group. Results: We could not confirm any reduction in hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity statistically in the test group. In 9 patients with non-hematologic toxicity of grade 4 and 5, 6 patients had febrile neutropenia (FN). All patients with FN were older than 70 years old. Adverse events in elderly patients were significantly more frequent than in the non-elderly. Conclusions: In patients treated with nedaplatin and irinotecan combination chemotherapy, UGT1A1 polymorphism testing before starting chemotherapy did not reduce adverse events. With UGT1A1 polymorphism testing only, it was difficult to predict the onset of severe adverse events. Therefore, it is more important to manage adverse events carefully, especially in elderly patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. S150-S151
Author(s):  
H. Hubbeling ◽  
E. Schapira ◽  
A. Shaw ◽  
K.S. Oh ◽  
J. Gainor ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1917-1927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Alessandrino ◽  
Sonia Sahu ◽  
Mizuki Nishino ◽  
Anika E. Adeni ◽  
Sree Harsha Tirumani ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Jin Kim ◽  
Tae Gyoon Kim ◽  
Hyun Jeong Lee ◽  
Jee Ho Kim ◽  
Byung Hoon Lim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14140-e14140
Author(s):  
David Andrew Bender ◽  
Catherine Spina ◽  
Samuel P. Heilbroner ◽  
Eric Xanthopoulos ◽  
Tony J. C. Wang ◽  
...  

e14140 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are known to cause immune-related adverse events. Patients with autoimmune diseases (AID) were excluded from most ICI clinical trials due to the potentially high risk of adverse effects. Data on the safety of ICIs in patients with a diagnosis of AID is therefore limited. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a de-identified large oncology health care and pharmacy claims database with data from March 2010 until April 2017. Patients analyzed had a diagnosis of either melanoma or lung cancer and were treated with either of the anti-PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab or pembrolizumab. We assessed whether patients with AID compared with no AID were more likely to require medical interventions within 180 days of ICI therapy. We determined the percentage of patients receiving oral prednisone, IV methylprednisolone, or were hospitalized, which may represent responses to ICI toxicity. Results: 16.7% (16/96) of patients with either melanoma or lung cancer and AID received oral prednisone treatment within 180 days of ICI treatment, while 8.3% (131/1573) of patients without AID received oral prednisone during the same period. 8.4% (16/190) of patients with AID received IV methylprednisolone compared to 3.6% (79/2190) of patients without AID. Among melanoma patients, 24.1% (13/54) of patients with AID were hospitalized following ICI treatment, compared to 5.8% (28/480) of patients without ICI. Among lung cancer patients, 38.2% (52/136) of patients with AID were hospitalized compared to 31.6% (541/1711) of patients without AID. All comparisons are significant at p < 0.05 except hospitalizations in lung cancer patients. Conclusions: Patients with AID were more likely to receive interventions after ICI treatment that may represent responses to immune-related adverse events, suggesting that patients with AID are at increased risk for toxicity when being treated with ICIs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document