Interim analysis of a phase I/II study of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2013-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eudocia Quant Lee ◽  
David A. Reardon ◽  
David Schiff ◽  
Jan Drappatz ◽  
Alona Muzikansky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Deacetylase Inhibitor ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

2013 Background: Bevacizumab is frequently used to treat recurrent GBM, but responses are generally not durable. Panobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with anti-neoplastic and anti-angiogenic effects in GBM and may work synergistically with bevacizumab. We conducted a multicenter phase I/II trial of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent GBM. Methods: In the phase II trial, patients with recurrent GBM were treated with oral panobinostat 30 mg three times per week, every other week, in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every other week. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) and the study was powered to discriminate between a 35% and 55% PFS6 rate (85% power at an alpha level of 0.07). A planned interim analysis specified suspension of accrual and careful data review if 12 or more of the first 21 patients accrued to the study progress within 6 months of initiating treatment. Patients with recurrent GBM enrolled in the phase I study at the maximum tolerated dose (which is the phase II dose) were eligible for inclusion in the interim analysis. Results: Thirteen of the first 21 patients accrued to the GBM arm of the study had progressed within 6 months of initiating study treatment. The study was closed to further accrual and a planned interim analysis was performed. Median age was 53 (range 22-66) and median KPS was 80% (60%-100%). PFS6 rate was 33.9% [95% CI 12.8, 56.5), median was PFS 5 months [95% CI 3 months, NR], and median OS was 342 days [95% CI 203 days, NR]. Five patients (23.8%) achieved partial responses. Conclusions: Although reasonably well-tolerated, this phase I/II study of panobinostat and bevacizumab in recurrent GBM did not meet criteria for continued accrual and the study was closed. Updated outcome and safety data will be presented at the meeting. Study Supported by: Novartis and Genentech Clinical trial information: NCT00859222.

scholarly journals ACTR-01. PHASE I/II STUDY OF TEMOZOLOMIDE PLUS NIMUSTINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT GLIOMAS: KYOTO NEURO-ONCOLOGY GROUP

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi12-vi12
Author(s):  
Tomokazu Aoki ◽  
Yoshiki Arakawa ◽  
Tetsuya Ueba ◽  
Masashi Oda ◽  
Namiko Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Abstract The objective of this phase I/II study was to examine the efficacy and toxicity profile of temozolomide (TMZ) plus nimustine (ACNU). Patients who had received a standard radiotherapy with one or two previous chemoregimens were enrolled. In phase I, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) by TMZ (150 mg/m2/day) (Day 1–5) plus various doses of ACNU (30, 35, 40, 45 mg/m2/day) (Day 15) per 4 weeks was defined on a standard 3 + 3 design. In phase II, these therapeutic activity and safety of this regimen were evaluated. Forty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 50 years-old. Eighty percent had a KPS of 70–100. Histologies were glioblastoma (73%), anaplastic astrocytoma (22%), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (4%). In phase I, 15 patients were treated at four cohorts by TMZ plus ACNU. MTD was TMZ (150 mg/m2) plus ACNU (40 mg/m2). In phase II, 40 patients were treated at the dose of cohort 3 (MTD). Thirty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities, mainly hematologic. The overall response rate was 11% (4/37). Sixty-eight percent (25/37) had stable disease. Twenty-two percent (8/37) showed progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 6 and 12 months were 24% (95% CI, 12–35%) and 8% (95% CI, 4–15%). Median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 9.2–17.2 months). Overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 were 78% (95% CI, 67–89%) and 49% (95% CI, 33–57%). Median OS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.2–14.5 months). This phase I/II study showed a moderate toxicity in hematology and may has a promising efficacy in OS, without inferiority in PFS.

CTIM-26. PHASE I/II STUDY OF THE COMBINATION OF PEMBROLIZUMAB (MK-3475) AND LASER INTERSTITIAL THERMAL THERAPY (LITT) IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi56-vi56
Author(s):  
Jian Campian ◽  
Omar Butt ◽  
Ashley Ghinaseddin ◽  
Maryam Rahman ◽  
Milan Chheda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Thermal Therapy ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy ◽  
Cns Penetration

Abstract BACKGROUND The blood brain barrier (BBB) remains a potential barrier to central nervous system (CNS) penetration of novel immunotherapies in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) was recently demonstrated to induce BBB disruption. When combined with anti-PD1 blockade, LITT may therefore potentiate host T-cell mediated cytotoxicity. This phase I/II study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining LITT and the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab for rGBM. METHODS Phase I treated eligible bevacizumab-naïve high grade glioma patients with LITT and the anti-PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab at 3 dose levels (100, 150, and 200 mg IV Q3W; 3 patients at each level), while phase II was restricted to rGBM patients only with the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of pembrolizumab. Phase II was initially designed to randomize rGBM to either pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab+LITT but was later amended to receive only pembrolizumab+LITT after 16 patients were randomized (10 pembrolizumab+LITT arm, 6 pembrolizumab-alone arm). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan Meier method, and adverse events (AE) documented. RESULTS Phase I enrolled 9 patients (7 rGBM and 2 anaplastic astrocytomas, 33% IDH-mut, 44% MGMTp-methylated) with no dose limiting toxicities (DLT), prompting selection of 200mg Q3W as the RP2D. Phase II interim analysis included 34 rGBM patients (9% IDH-mut, 50% MGMTp-methylated; 6 receiving pembrolizumab alone and 28 pembrolizumab+LITT) plus two Phase I rGBM patients who received RP2D. On per-protocol analysis, pembrolizumab+LITT cohort had improved PFS (median PFS 10.5 months vs 2.1 months) and OS (median OS 11.4 months vs 5.2 months) than pembrolizumab alone. A single treatment-related grade 3 AE was noted (respiratory infection). CONCLUSION: LITT may be safely combined with pembrolizumab for rGBM with promising clinical outcomes on interim analysis. Enrollment for Phase II, correlative studies, and continued AE documentation are ongoing. Clinical Trial ID NCT02311582.

scholarly journals CTNI-32. PHASE I/II STUDY OF TEMOZOLOMIDE PLUS NIMUSTINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT GLIOMAS: KYOTO NEURO-ONCOLOGY GROUP

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii49-ii50
Author(s):  
Tomokazu Aoki ◽  
Yoshiki Arakawa ◽  
Tetsuya Ueba ◽  
Masashi Oda ◽  
Namiko Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Abstract The objective of this phase I/II study was to examine the efficacy and toxicity profile of temozolomide (TMZ) plus nimustine (ACNU). Patients who had received a standard radiotherapy with one or two previous chemo-regimens were enrolled. In phase I, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) by TMZ (150 mg/m2/day) (Day 1–5) plus various doses of ACNU (30, 35, 40, 45 mg/m2/day) (Day 15) per 4 weeks was defined on a standard 3 + 3 design. In phase II, these therapeutic activity and safety of this regimen were evaluated. Forty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 50 years-old. Eighty percent had a KPS of 70–100. Histologies were glioblastoma (73%), anaplastic astrocytoma (22%), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (4%). In phase I, 15 patients were treated at four cohorts by TMZ plus ACNU. MTD was TMZ (150 mg/m2) plus ACNU (40 mg/m2). In phase II, 40 patients were treated at the dose of cohort 3 (MTD). Thirty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities, mainly hematologic. The overall response rate was 11% (4/37). Sixty-eight percent (25/37) had stable disease. Twenty-two percent (8/37) showed progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 6 and 12 months were 24% (95% CI, 12–35%) and 8% (95% CI, 4–15%). Median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 9.2–17.2 months). Overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 were 78% (95% CI, 67–89%) and 49% (95% CI, 33–57%). Median OS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.2–14.5 months). This phase I/II study showed a moderate toxicity in hematology and may has a promising efficacy in OS, without inferiority in PFS.

scholarly journals A Bayesian adaptive randomized phase II multicenter trial of bevacizumab with or without vorinostat in adults with recurrent glioblastoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1505-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay K Puduvalli ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
Terri S Armstrong ◽  
Elizabeth Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Bayesian Adaptive Design ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract Background Bevacizumab has promising activity against recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, acquired resistance to this agent results in tumor recurrence. We hypothesized that vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with anti-angiogenic effects, would prevent acquired resistance to bevacizumab. Methods This multicenter phase II trial used a Bayesian adaptive design to randomize patients with recurrent GBM to bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab plus vorinostat with the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and clinical outcomes assessment (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor module [MDASI-BT]). Eligible patients were adults (≥18 y) with histologically confirmed GBM recurrent after prior radiation therapy, with adequate organ function, KPS ≥60, and no prior bevacizumab or HDAC inhibitors. Results Ninety patients (bevacizumab + vorinostat: 49, bevacizumab: 41) were enrolled, of whom 74 were evaluable for PFS (bevacizumab + vorinostat: 44, bevacizumab: 30). Median PFS (3.7 vs 3.9 mo, P = 0.94, hazard ratio [HR] 0.63 [95% CI: 0.38, 1.06, P = 0.08]), median OS (7.8 vs 9.3 mo, P = 0.64, HR 0.93 [95% CI: 0.5, 1.6, P = 0.79]) and clinical benefit were similar between the 2 arms. Toxicity (grade ≥3) in 85 evaluable patients included hypertension (n = 37), neurological changes (n = 2), anorexia (n = 2), infections (n = 9), wound dehiscence (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (n = 2), and colonic perforation (n = 1). Conclusions Bevacizumab combined with vorinostat did not yield improvement in PFS or OS or clinical benefit compared with bevacizumab alone or a clinical benefit in adults with recurrent GBM. This trial is the first to test a Bayesian adaptive design with adaptive randomization and Bayesian continuous monitoring in patients with primary brain tumor and demonstrates the feasibility of using complex Bayesian adaptive design in a multicenter setting.

A Phase I–II Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade) (Vc) and Oral Cyclophosphamide (CY) Plus Prednisone (P) for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Giovanni Piza ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Abstract We have previously reported that a simple, well-tolerated regimen of weekly oral CY (500mg) and alternate day prednisone (50–100mg) produced partial responses (PR) in 40% of 56 patients (pts) in relapse after ASCT; median progression-free survival was 18.6 months (Blood2004; 104[11]: 311b). To build upon these favorable results, we have designed an ongoing phase I–II trial adding Vc to this regimen. CY was given p.o. once weekly on days 1,8,15 and 22 of each 28 day cycle while prednisone was given every other morning. CY was given before Vc on appropriate days. A maximum of 8 cycles was administered. Sixteen pts have been entered so far. Patients characteristics: Median age was 59 (48–74) years; 9 were male. The Ig subtypes were: IgG kappa:lambda = 9:2, IgA kappa:lambda = 1:2; kappa light chain = 2. All had received VAD, i.v. CY (2.5 g/m2) + G-CSF mobilization followed by ASCT and 2 had undergone a second ASCT; other prior regimens included melphalan and prednisone in 5 pts, thalidomide in 10, lenalidomide in 1, α-interferon in 3, vaccine therapy in 1 and oral CY + P in 8. The median pretreament ß2-microglobulin level was 279 (147 – 875) nm/L, albumin 39 (30–42) g/L and creatinine 91 (60–112) umol/L. The dose escalation schedule to date is as follows: Dose Level N P dose CY dose (mg/m2) Vc dose (mg/m2) 1 6 100 150 0.7 d 1,8,15 2 3 100 300 0.7 d 1,8,15 3 3 100 300 1.0 d 1,8,15 4 4 100 300 1.0 d 1,4,8,11 Three further dose escalations to a maximum Vc dose of 1.5 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 are allowed if dose limiting toxicity does not occur. Toxicities during cycle 1: All pts have completed cycle 1. Three episodes of grade (gr) 3 sinopulmonary infection occurred during a community outbreak at dose level 1; levofloxacin prophylaxis during the first cycle was added and no further infections during the initial cycle were observed. One pt at dose level 3 experienced transient gr 4 hypophosphatemia which reversed without therapy. At dose level 4, cycle 1 was interrupted in one pt due to gr 4 leukopenia (gr 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) related to disease, while a second pt developed grade 4 elevation in transaminases which recovered quickly when Vc was held on d 8. Pt accrual continues. Toxicities of subsequent cycles: To date, 47 additional cycles have been given. SAE’s consisted of pneumonia during cycle 2 in the same 3 patients with infection during cycle 1 and one of these with progressive disease had another bout during cycle 3. Gr 3 toxicities included anemia in 2 cycles, leucopenia in 2, neutropenia in 4, hypophosphatemia in 1 and hyperglycemia in 2; reversible gr 4 hypophosphatemia recurred in the pt mentioned above in 1 other cycle. No liver or other organ toxicity was observed. Maximum gr of peripheral neuropathy was 1. Responses: Responses were assessed after cycles 2, 4, 6 and 8. Best response included near CR (1), PR (4), MR (4), stable disease (5), progression (1) and too early (1). Two pts have completed all 8 cycles, while 4 have progressed; 10 remain on study. Preliminary Conclusions: 1) Vc can be added to a continuous program of oral CY + P with acceptable hematologic toxicity; 2) no neurotoxicity > gr 1 has been observed; 3) the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination regimen has not yet been defined; 4) future plans include a randomized National Cancer Institute of Canada trial comparing the the MTD of this combination to Vc in relpased MM pts.

Phase II study of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) in recurrent glioblastoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2066-2066
Author(s):  
T. Aoki ◽  
K. Nojima ◽  
T. Mizutani ◽  
M. Ishikawa ◽  
A. Takasu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

2066 Background: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide ( ICE ) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: This was an open-label, single-center phase II trial. Forty-two patients with first recurrent glioblastoma after surgery, standard radiotherapy and a first-line temozolomide-based or ACNU-based chemotherapy, were enrolled.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months ( PFS-6 ), and secondary endpoints were response rate, toxicity, and survival. Chemotherapy consisted of Ifosfamide ( 700 mg / m2 on day 1, 2 and 3 ), carbopaltin ( 100 mg / m2 on day 1 ), etoposide ( 70 mg / m2 on day 1, 2, and 3 ), every 6 weeks. Results: PFS-6 was 37 %. The median PFS was 17 weeks. Response rate was 27 %. Adverse events were generally mild ( grade 1 or 2 ) and consisted mainly of alopecia. Conclusions: This regimen is well tolerated and has activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I trial of docetaxel (D), cisplatinum (C), and continuous capecitabine (CAP) (TCX) in advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14587-e14587
Author(s):  
Simon Gollins ◽  
Arwel Lloyd ◽  
Jackie Morris ◽  
Nick Smith ◽  
Brian Haylock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

e14587 Background: This phase I study assessed the combination of D, C, and continuous CAP in AEC to develop a regimen of acceptable toxicity to take forward to phase II study. Methods: Patients with AEC were treated in cohorts of 3, at one of 3 dose levels (DL). DL0: D at 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1, C at 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1, CAP at 1,000 mg/m2 per day in two divided doses days 1-21, every 3 weeks. DL1: CAP increased to 1,250 mg/m2 per day. DL2: D increased to 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 and CAP to 1,250 mg/m2 per day. Prophylactic colony stimulating factors were not used. Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles. Blood counts and biochemistry were assessed twice weekly and daily for grade 3/4 abnormality. Results: Between 1.11.07 and 24.6.09 15 patients were enrolled: male/female:14/1, WHO PS:0/1:10/5, median age 63 yr (range 46-69), primary site oesophagus/GOJ/stomach:7/3/5, adeno/squamous:14/1, T2/3/4:2/9/4, N0/1/2:1/13/1, M0/1:1/14. 6 patients were treated at DL0, 6 at DL1 and 3 at DL2. All patients received 6 cycles apart from 2 at DL 1 who received 3 because of disease progression. Dose intensity: DL0: D 95%, C 100%, CAP 85%; DL1: D 91%, C 98.2%, CAP 79%; DL2: D 86%, C 100%, CAP 79%. There were no deaths on chemotherapy or within 30d of the last dose. The main dose limiting toxicity was febrile or infective neutropenia developing in 1/6 DL0, 2/6 DL1 and 3/3 DL2 (see table of most common treatment-related adverse events below: serious toxicity is gr 3 unless specified gr 4). The maximum length of gr 4 neutropenia was 5d. Best response (RECIST): 1 CR, 11PR, 2 SD and 1PD. 11 patients received second-line chemotherapy. Median and 1 yr overall survival: 17.5m and 60%. Median and 1 yr progression-free survival: 7m and 27%. Conclusions: TCX DLO is recommended for further study in a phase II trial. Encouraging response and survival were seen. [Table: see text]

Nivolumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma progressing on bevacizumab: A retrospective case series.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13538-e13538
Author(s):  
Marc C. Chamberlain ◽  
Bryan T. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Unmet Need ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
First Recurrence ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

e13538 Objective: A single institution retrospective evaluation of nivolumab following disease progression on bevacizumab in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with an objective of determining progression free survival (PFS). Background: There is no accepted therapy for recurrent GBM after failure of bevacizumab. Methods: 16 adults, ages 52-72 years (median 62), with recurrent GBM were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, and post-radiotherapy temozolomide. Bevacizumab (with or without lomustine) was administered to all patients at first recurrence. Patients were treated with nivolumab only (3mg/kg) once every 2 weeks at second recurrence. One cycle of nivolumab was defined as 2 treatments. Neurological evaluation was performed bi-weekly and neuroradiographic assessment every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 37 treatment cycles (median 2) were administered of nivolumab in which there were 14 Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) and Grade 3 AEs in 2 patients. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were seen. Following 1 month of nivolumab, 7 patients’ demonstrated progressive disease and discontinued therapy. No patient demonstrated a response though 9 patients demonstrated neuroradiographic stable response. Survival in the entire cohort ranged from 2 - 6 months with a median of 3.5 months (CI: 2.8, 4.2). Median and 6-month PFS at 6 months was 2.0 months (range 1-5 months; CI: 1.3, 2.7) and 0% respectively. Conclusions: Nivolumab salvage therapy demonstrated no survival advantage in patients with recurrent bevacizumab refractory GBM emphasizing a continued unmet need in neuro-oncology.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of the Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A NANT (New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy) Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1368-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. DuBois ◽  
Araz Marachelian ◽  
Elizabeth Fox ◽  
Rachel A. Kudgus ◽  
Joel M. Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Aurora A Kinase ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Alisertib is an oral Aurora A kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity in neuroblastoma. Irinotecan and temozolomide have activity in patients with advanced neuroblastoma. The goal of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of alisertib with irinotecan and temozolomide in this population. Patients and Methods Patients age 1 to 30 years with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma were eligible. Patients received alisertib tablets at dose levels of 45, 60, and 80 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 7 along with irinotecan 50 mg/m2 intravenously and temozolomide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 5. Dose escalation of alisertib followed the rolling six design. Samples for pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic testing were obtained. Results Twenty-three patients enrolled, and 22 were eligible and evaluable for dose escalation. A total of 244 courses were administered. The MTD for alisertib was 60 mg/m2, with mandatory myeloid growth factor support and cephalosporin prophylaxis for diarrhea. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia of any grade were seen in the majority of courses (84% and 69%, respectively). Diarrhea in 55% of courses and nausea in 54% of courses were the most common nonhematologic toxicities. The overall response rate was 31.8%, with a 50% response rate observed at the MTD. The median number of courses per patient was eight (range, two to 32). Progression-free survival rate at 2 years was 52.4%. Pharmacokinetic testing did not show evidence of drug-drug interaction between irinotecan and alisertib. Conclusion Alisertib 60 mg/m2 per dose for 7 days is tolerable with a standard irinotecan and temozolomide backbone and has promising response and progression-free survival rates. A phase II trial of this regimen is ongoing.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of pathotropic nanoparticles bearing a dominant negative cyclin G1 construct for chemoresistant osteosarcoma and other sarcomas: Phase I, II, and III studies

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10513-10513 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Chawla ◽  
V. S. Chua ◽  
L. Fernandez ◽  
D. Quon ◽  
A. Saralou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Relationship ◽  
Dose Response Relationship ◽  
Free Survival

10513 Background: (1) To evaluate the safety/anti-tumor potential of intravenous (i.v.) Rexin-G in chemotherapy-resistant sarcoma (Phase I/II), and (2) to confirm the efficacy/safety of i.v. Rexin-G in chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma (Phase II). Methods: Twenty patients in the Phase I/II study and 22 patients in the Phase II study received 1–2 × 10e11 cfu Rexin-G i.v., 2–3 times a week for 4 weeks. Treatment was continued if the patient had < Grade 1 toxicity. Results: Treatment-related adverse events included chills (n=1), presyncope (n=1), photophobia (n=1) of Grade 1 severity, and fatigue (n=4) of Grade 1–2 severity. In the Phase I/II sarcoma study, 3/6 patients had stable disease at Dose Level 0, median progression free survival (PFS) was 5 weeks, and overall survival (OS) was 14 weeks, while 10/14 patients had stable disease at Dose Level I-II, median PFS was 16 weeks and median OS was 34 weeks. Cox regression analysis showed a dose-response relationship between PFS/OS and Rexin-G dosage (p = 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). The Table below shows the results for evaluable patients (n=17) in the Phase II study for osteosarcoma. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows a dose-response relationship between overall survival and Rexin-G dosage in the combined Phase I/II sarcoma and Phase II osteosarcoma studies (p = 0.02; n=42). Two patients achieved surgical remissions which are sustained for >26 weeks. Conclusions: These studies suggest that (i) intravenous Rexin-G is safe and well-tolerated, and (ii) Rexin-G controls tumor growth and prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival in a dose-dependent manner in chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma and sarcoma. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document