Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC): 18-month update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9037-9037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Sekulic ◽  
Michael R. Migden ◽  
Nicole Basset-Seguin ◽  
Claus Garbe ◽  
Anja Gesierich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hedgehog Pathway ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Weight Decrease

9037 Background: Therapies for aBCC, which includes metastatic (m) and locally advanced (la) BCC, are limited. Abnormal Hedgehog pathway signaling is a key driver in BCC pathogenesis. Primary analysis of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC trial of vismodegib, an oral hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 30% and 43%, in mBCC and laBCC patients, respectively, with a median duration of response (DOR) of 7.6 months. We present safety and investigator (INV) assessed efficacy results 18 months (29 May 2012) after primary analysis (26 Nov 2010). Methods: Multicenter, international, nonrandomized study in patients (N=104) with radiographically measurable mBCC or laBCC (surgery inappropriate due to multiple recurrence, or substantial morbidity or deformity anticipated) receiving 150 mg oral vismodegib daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Key secondary endpoints included INV-assessed ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), DOR, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At data cutoff, 21 patients continued to undergo protocol-specified assessments and 56 patients were in survival follow-up. The median dose intensity was comparable with primary analysis. ORR was 48.5%, mBCC; 60.3%, laBCC, comparable with primary analysis. However, median DOR improved (mBCC=14.7; laBCC=20.3 months). The median OS for mBCC was 30.9 months but not estimable in laBCC. Adverse events remained consistent, with muscle spasm, alopecia, dysgeusia, weight decrease, and fatigue most frequently reported. Eleven more deaths were reported in the update period after primary analysis; these occurred in survival follow-up and were not drug-related. Conclusions: Vismodegib is the first FDA-approved HPI; thus, long-term efficacy and safety data are particularly relevant. 18-month update data confirmed prolonged responses and consistent safety in vismodegib-treated aBCC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00833417.

ERDAFITINIB in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Long-term outcomes in BLC2001.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5015-5015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Jesús García-Donas ◽  
Robert A Huddart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Optimal Schedule ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Serum Phosphate Level ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

5015 Background: Erdafitinib (JNJ-42756493; ERDA) is the only pan-FGFR kinase inhibitor with US FDA approval for treatment of adults with mUC with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations (alt) and who progressed on ≥ 1 line of prior platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo). Approval was based on data from the primary analysis of the pivotal BLC2001 trial1. Here we report long-term efficacy and safety data from the 8 mg/d continuous dose regimen in BLC2001. Methods: BLC2001 (NCT02365597) is a global, open-label, phase 2 trial of pts with measurable mUC with prespecified FGFR alt, ECOG 0-2, and progression during/following ≥ 1 line of prior chemo or ≤ 12 mos of (neo)adjuvant chemo, or were cisplatin ineligible, chemo naïve. The optimal schedule of ERDA determined in the initial part of the study was 8 mg/d continuous ERDA in 28-d cycles with uptitration to 9 mg/d (ERD 8 mg UpT) if a protocol-defined target serum phosphate level was not reached and if no significant treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred. Primary end point was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR=% complete response + % partial response). Key secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS). Results: Median follow-up for 101 patients treated with ERDA 8 mg UpT was ~24 months. Confirmed ORR was 40%. Median DOR was 5.98 mos; 31% of responders had DOR ≥ 1 yr. Median PFS was 5.52 mos, median OS was 11.3 mos. 12-mos and 24-mos survival rates were 49% and 31%, respectively. Median treatment duration was 5.4 mos. The ERDA safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis. No new TRAEs were seen with longer follow-up. Central serous retinopathy (CSR) events occurred in 27% (27/101) of patients; 85% (23/27) were Grade 1 or 2; dosage was reduced in 13 pts, interrupted for 8, and discontinued for 3. On the data cut-off date, 63% (17/27) had resolved; 60% (6/10) of ongoing CSR events were Grade 1. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of 2 yrs, ERDA in mUC + FGFR alt showed a manageable safety profile and consistent efficacy, with median OS of 11.3 mos. 31% had a DOR ≥12 mos and 31% were alive at 24 mos. ERDA monotherapy vs. immune checkpoint inhibitor (PD-1) or chemo is being further analyzed in a randomized control study (THOR; NCT03390504).Reference: Loriot Y, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:338-48. Clinical trial information: NCT02365597 .

Nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma: Efficacy and safety update from CheckMate 275.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4524-4524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

4524 Background: In the open-label, single-arm, phase 2 CheckMate 275 trial, objective response rate (ORR) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with nivolumab (NIVO) was 20.4% with minimum follow-up of 21.3 mo. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data with minimum follow-up of 33.7 mo. Methods: Pts with platinum-resistant locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma received NIVO 3 mg/kg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was ORR by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) by RECIST v1.1 (including duration of response [DOR]). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) by BIRC, overall survival (OS), and ORR per investigator. Efficacy was evaluated in all treated pts and by tumor PD-L1 expression. Safety and PFS by investigator were exploratory endpoints. Results: ORR by BIRC was 20.7% (95% CI 16.1–26.1) including 18 (7%) complete responses (CR; with 1 additional CR since the last report; Table). ORR per investigator was similar (24.8%). Median DOR by BIRC was 20.3 mo (95% CI 11.5–31.3). Of 56 pts with best overall response (BOR) of CR or partial response (PR), 59% had a DOR ≥12 mo. Median PFS (mPFS) was 1.9 mo per BIRC (95% CI 1.9–2.3; Table) and 2.0 mo per investigator (95% CI 1.9–2.5). Median OS (mOS) was 8.6 mo (95% CI 6.1–11.3; Table). 12, 24, and 36-mo OS rates were 40%, 30%, and 22%. While efficacy was numerically higher in pts with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1%, efficacy was observed in all pts (Table). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in 69% of pts (grade 3–4, 25%), mostly (59%) within the first 3 mo of initiating therapy. Conclusions: With long-term follow-up from CheckMate 275, NIVO continues to provide durable antitumor activity in pts with mUC. No new safety signals were noted. Clinical trial information: NCT02387996. [Table: see text]

Final analysis of the CheckMate 025 trial comparing nivolumab (NIVO) versus everolimus (EVE) with >5 years of follow-up in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 617-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Scott S. Tykodi ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

617 Background: CheckMate 025 demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) in previously treated patients (pts) with aRCC, with improved safety and tolerability in the NIVO arm compared with EVE. The primary analysis was based on 14-months minimum follow-up. Here, we report an updated, final analysis with an extended minimum follow-up of 64 months. Methods: Previously treated pts with predominantly clear cell aRCC were randomized (1:1) to NIVO 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks or EVE 10 mg orally once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Confirmed ORR and PFS were per investigator (inv) using RECIST v1.1. Results: Overall, 410 vs 411 pts were randomized to NIVO vs EVE, respectively. OS benefit was maintained and PFS favored NIVO vs EVE with long-term follow-up (HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.99). (Table) ORR was higher (23% vs 4%) with NIVO vs EVE and median duration of response (DOR) was longer (18.2 vs 14.0 months). Ongoing response was observed in 28% vs 18% of pts with NIVO vs EVE. Most pts received subsequent systemic anticancer therapy: 276 pts in the NIVO arm (67%; most commonly EVE [35%] or axitinib [33%]) and 296 pts in the EVE arm (72%; most commonly axitinib [41%] or NIVO [26%]). No new safety signals or treatment-related deaths emerged with long-term follow-up in either arm. More pts in the EVE arm (37%) experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-related AE compared with pts in the NIVO arm (21%). Conclusions: At >5-years minimum follow-up, response rates and survival remain superior with NIVO vs EVE, and 28% of responses to NIVO are ongoing. Long-term follow-up highlights the efficacy and safety of NIVO monotherapy in pts with aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01668784. [Table: see text]

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final results from a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study (DESTINY-CRC01).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3505-3505
Author(s):  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label

3505 Background: T-DXd is an antibody–drug conjugate of a humanized anti-HER2 antibody bound to a topoisomerase I inhibitor by a cleavable linker. The primary analysis of DESTINY-CRC01 (DS8201-A-J203; NCT03384940), a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of T-DXd in pts with HER2-expressing mCRC showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile (cohort A median follow-up [FU], 27.1 weeks; Siena S, ASCO 2020). We present updated longer-term efficacy and safety data. Methods: Pts had centrally confirmed HER2-expressing, RAS wild-type mCRC that progressed after ≥2 prior regimens. 6.4 mg/kg of T-DXd was administered every 3 weeks (Q3W) in 3 cohorts (A: HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+; B: IHC2+/ISH−; C: IHC1+). The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review in cohort A. Secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + SD), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: At data cutoff (Dec 28, 2020), 86 pts (A, 53; B, 15; C, 18) received T-DXd. Median age was 58.5 y (range, 27-79), 53.5% were male, and 90.7% had left colon or rectum cancer. Median prior regimens for metastatic disease was 4 (range, 2-11). All pts had prior irinotecan; 30.2% in cohort A had prior anti-HER2 therapy. Median (m) treatment duration (all pts) was 3.0 mo (95% CI, 2.1-4.1; cohort A, 5.1 mo [95% CI, 3.9-7.6]). In cohort A (median FU, 62.4 weeks), confirmed ORR was 45.3% (24/53 pts; 95% CI, 31.6-59.6), DCR was 83.0% (44/53 pts; 95% CI, 70.2-91.9), mDOR was 7.0 mo (95% CI, 5.8-9.5), mPFS was 6.9 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) with 37 (69.8%) PFS events, and mOS was 15.5 mo (95% CI, 8.8-20.8) with 36 (67.9%) OS events. These results are consistent with the primary analysis. Confirmed ORR was 43.8% (7/16 pts; 95% CI, 19.8-70.1) in pts with prior anti-HER2 therapy, 57.5% (23/40 pts; 95% CI, 40.9-73.0) in pts with IHC3+ status, and 7.7% (1/13 pts; 95% CI, 0.2-36.0) in pts with IHC2+/ISH+ status. In cohorts B and C, mPFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI, 1.4-4.1) and 1.4 mo (95% CI, 1.3-2.1); mOS was 7.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-NE) and 7.7 mo (95% CI, 2.2-13.9), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade (G) ≥3 occurred in 65.1% of pts (56/86); the most common TEAEs were hematologic and gastrointestinal. TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 13 pts (15.1%). 8 pts (9.3%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD) adjudicated by an independent committee as related to T-DXd (4 G2; 1 G3; 3 G5). Conclusions: T-DXd at 6.4 mg/kg Q3W showed promising activity and durability with longer-term FU in this pt population. The safety profile was consistent with prior results; ILD continues to be recognized as an important identified risk that requires careful monitoring and intervention as needed. These results support continued exploration of T-DXd in pts with HER2-overexpressing mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03384940.

Long-term follow-up of bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6020-6020
Author(s):  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Amaury Daste ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Sébastien Salas ◽  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Bifunctional Fusion Protein

6020 Background: Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. A previous report of an expansion cohort from a phase 1 study (NCT02517398) suggested that bintrafusp alfa had a manageable safety profile and early signs of clinical activity in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced SCCHN after a median follow-up of 86.4 weeks. Here we report long-term efficacy and safety for this cohort. Methods: Patients with advanced SCCHN that progressed/recurred after platinum therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting, or < 6 months after platinum therapy in the locally advanced setting, received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg every 2 weeks until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed best overall response assessed per RECIST 1.1 assessed by independent review committee (IRC); safety was a secondary endpoint. Results: As of May 15, 2020, 32 patients had received bintrafusp alfa for a median of 2.8 months (range, 0.5-29.9 months), no patient remained on treatment, and median follow-up to data cutoff was 41.7 months (range, 39.8-43.5 months). The objective response rate (ORR; 13%) was unchanged since the previous report; median duration of response (DOR) was increased at 21.4 months (95% CI, 5.5 months to not reached [NR]). While the clinical activity of bintrafusp alfa may be improved in patients with HPV-positive tumors (Table), outcomes were generally similar between PD-L1 subgroups (≥1% vs < 1% tumor cells). The overall safety profile was consistent with the previous report for this cohort, without grade 4 nor 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); no new TRAEs of grade 3 or that led to discontinuation of bintrafusp alfa were reported. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of over 3 years in patients with heavily pretreated advanced SCCHN, bintrafusp alfa showed sustained clinical activity and 3-year OS of 24.0%, which compares favorably to historical data. Clinical activity appeared to be greater in patients with HPV-positive tumors than those with HPV-negative tumors. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with earlier analysis. Further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in SCCHN and other HPV-associated cancers is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02517398. [Table: see text]

E4201: Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with radiation therapy versus gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, pancreatic cancer (LAPC): Quality-of-life (QOL) analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4627-4627
Author(s):  
H. R. Cardenes ◽  
M. Powell ◽  
P. J. Loehrer ◽  
L. I. Wagner ◽  
D. F. Cella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Subscale Score ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Overall Survival Benefit

4627 Background: E4201 compared radiation and gemcitabine (RT+Gem) versus Gem alone in LAPC. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary objectives included: objective response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and QOL. We previously reported that RT+Gem was associated with improved overall survival compared with Gem alone [median survival time, 11 months and 9.2 months, respectively; p=0.034], without impact in RR or PFS. (ASCO 2008, abstract # 4506). We now report on QOL as measured by the Hep subscale from the FACT-Hepatobiliary [FACT-Hep] between both arms. Methods: Eligible patients had LAPC adenocarcinoma, PS <2, without prior therapy. They were randomized to Arm A: Gem alone (1,000 mg/m2/week x 3, every 4 weeks, 7 cycles), or Arm B: RT (50.4Gy/28 fractions) plus Gem (600 mg/m2/weekly x 6) followed by 5 cycles of Gem alone (1,000 mg/m2/weekly x 3 every 4 wks). The FACT-Hep was administered at baseline (before starting induction), 6 weeks (immediately after completing induction), week 16 (Arm A) or week 15 (Arm B) mid-consolidation, and at 9 months. Results: From April, 2003 to December, 2005, 74 patients were enrolled, 71 were eligible [37 Arm A; 34 Arm B]. Grade ≥3 was reported in 80% and 82.4% in ARM A and B, respectively (p=1.00). Grade IV toxicities, mainly gastrointestinal and hematologic, were more common in ARM B (41.2% vs 5.7%, p=<0.0001). QOL compliance declined over time, most commonly attributable to either patients or staff choosing not to complete or administer the instrument due to declining health (96%, 69%, 60%, and 40% at baseline, week 6, 15/16 weeks and 9 months, respectively). Within Arm B, QoL scores dropped significantly from baseline to 6 weeks. By week 15, QoL scores for patients on Arm B rebounded to levels similar to baseline. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum tests failed to suggest differences in median FACT-Hep subscale score between treatment arms at any of the four time-points (alpha = 0.10). Conclusions: RT+Gem is associated with an overall survival benefit without apparent long term adverse impact on QOL when compared with Gem alone. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase (Ph) I/II study of elotuzumab (Elo) plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Len/dex) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RR MM): Updated Ph II results and Ph I/II long-term safety.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8542-8542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Andrzej J. Jakubowiak ◽  
Marc S. Raab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Killer Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

8542 Background: Elotuzumab (Elo) is a humanized anti-CS1monoclonal antibody that enhances natural killer cell mediated antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity of CS1 expressing myeloma cells. This study included a dose finding Ph I cohort (N=28) and a Ph II cohort (N=73). Here we update Ph II data and provide long term safety data from both cohorts. Methods: Patients (pts) treated with ≥1 (Ph I) or 1–3 (Ph II) prior therapies received Elo + Len/dex as described previously (Lonial JCO 2012; Richardson ASH 2012) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. All pts received a premedication regimen including methylprednisolone, diphenhydramine or equivalent, ranitidine or equivalent, and acetaminophen to mitigate infusion reactions. Adverse events (AEs) in Ph I/II pts occurring ≤18 months (mo) (N=98) were compared to AEs with a >18 mo onset in a subgroup of pts treated >18 mo (n=49). This safety analysis excluded 3 Ph I pts treated with Elo 5 mg/kg. Results: In the Ph II cohort (median 63 yr), objective response rate (ORR) was 84%; 92% with 10 mg/kg (n=36) and 76% with 20 mg/kg (n=37). At a median follow-up of 20.8 mo, median progression free survival (PFS) was not reached (10 mg/kg) and 18.6 mo (20 mg/kg). Most common treatment emergent grade ≥3 AEs were lymphopenia (19%), neutropenia (18%), thrombocytopenia (16%) and anemia (14%). Most common grade 3/4 AEs emerging ≤18 vs >18 mo in Ph I/II cohorts are shown (Table). 15 pts discontinued due to AEs; none after 18 mo of treatment. There were 4 second primary malignancies; none were reported after 18 mo. Conclusions: Elo 10 mg/kg + Len/dex was generally well tolerated and resulted in a high ORR and encouraging PFS in pts with RR MM. AEs emergent after 18 mo of therapy were consistent with AEs during the initial 18 mo. Updated Ph II safety/efficacy data and long term safety data from Ph I/II cohorts will be presented.

LOTUS (NCT02162719): A double-blind placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized phase II trial of first-line ipatasertib (IPAT) + paclitaxel (P) for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Alexandra Dent ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Marc Espie ◽  
Sibel Blau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Akt Inhibitor ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Median Cumulative Dose

1009 Background: The oral Akt inhibitor IPAT is being evaluated in cancers with a high prevalence of PI3K/Akt pathway activation, including TNBC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had measurable inoperable locally advanced/metastatic TNBC previously untreated with systemic therapy. Pts were stratified by prior (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval and tumor PTEN status, and randomized 1:1 to P 80 mg/m2 (d1, 8 & 15) with either IPAT 400 mg or PBO (d1–21) q28d until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in the ITT population and pts with PTEN-low tumors by IHC. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and overall survival in the ITT and IHC PTEN-low populations, efficacy in pts with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Efficacy is shown below. The most common grade ≥3 AEs (grouped terms) were diarrhea (23% IPAT+P vs 0% PBO+P; no grade 4 or colitis in either arm), neutropenia (18% vs 8%), asthenia (5% vs 6%), peripheral neuropathy (5% vs 5%) and pneumonia (5% vs 0%). More pts receiving IPAT+P than PBO+P had an AE leading to dose reduction of IPAT/PBO (21% vs 6%) or P (38% vs 11%) but median cumulative dose intensity was similar (IPAT/PBO: 99% vs 100%; P: 100% vs 100%). AEs led to IPAT/PBO discontinuation in 13% vs 11% of pts, respectively; 2 pts (3%) discontinued IPAT for grade 3 diarrhea. Conclusions: Adding IPAT to P for TNBC modestly improved PFS in the ITT pts. The effect was more pronounced in the prespecified subgroup with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations, warranting further evaluation of IPAT in these pts. AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT02162719. [Table: see text]

Orally administered CCR2 selective inhibitor CCX872-b clinical trial in pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 276-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Smith Noel ◽  
Aram F. Hezel ◽  
David Linehan ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Ferry Eskens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Primary Analysis

276 Background: CCR2 inhibition decreases tumor-associated macrophages and Treg cells, and increases CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in pancreatic tumors. Single oral doses of 150 mg CCX872-B were well tolerated in patients with pancreatic cancer. The first stage results of the multiple dose part of this study are presented. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, ECOG score ≤ 2 were studied. Patients received FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil [5-FU], leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) q2weeks for up to 24 wks plus 150 mg CCX872-B once or twice daily until disease progression or intolerance to CCX872-B. The primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 wks. Tumor control rate (TCR) and the objective response rate (ORR), a secondary endpoint, are presented. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled. Baseline: Mean ± SD age: 60 ± 8.6 years, male 52%; primary tumor location: head 57%, body/tail 41%, local recurrence 2%; metastatic disease 78%, ECOG score 0: 62%, ECOG score 1: 38%. Thirty five of 50 patients completed week 12. Most common reasons for early withdrawal were subject request (5 pts) and adverse events typically associated with FOLFIRINOX (4 pts). In the pre-specified analysis population, i.e., those with ≥ 1 post baseline CT scan, tumor control at wk 12 was achieved in 32 of 41 (78%) patients, with 15 of 41 (37%) partial responders, and 17 of 41 (41%) with stable disease. The ORR was 37% (all partial responders) in the primary analysis population (30% when all enrolled patients were included). Thirteen of 21 patients with available CT scan results at week 24 were progression-free. Mean trough CCX872 plasma level was ~8 μg/mL. CCR2 was covered 88% on average by CCX872-B based on receptor occupancy assays. CCX872-B appeared to be well tolerated and the incidence of ≥ Gr 3 AEs was not increased with CCX872-B plus FOLFIRINOX vs historical data with FOLFIRINOX alone. The complete set of PFS data will be available by the end of 2016. Conclusions: CCX872-B plus FOLFIRINOX resulted in a TCR of 78% and an ORR of 30 to 37% with no safety issues ascribed to CCX872-B use. Clinical trial information: NCT02345408.

Phase 2 study of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC; Group 1): 12-month follow-up.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9526-9526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander David Guminski ◽  
Annette May Ling Lim ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Chrysalyne D. Schmults ◽  
Leonel Fernando Hernandez-Aya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

9526 Background: Primary analysis (Oct 2017) of cemiplimab (REGN2810) in pts with mCSCC in a Phase 2 study demonstrated substantial antitumor activity, durable responses, and acceptable safety profile. We now report 12-month follow-up data from these pts (NCT02760498; data cutoff date: Sep 20, 2018). Methods: Pts with mCSCC received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W). Tumor measurements were performed Q8W. The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) according to independent central review (per RECIST 1.1 for scans; modified WHO criteria for photos). Results: 59 pts (median age: 71 years) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 16.5 months (range: 1.1–26.6). ORR by central review was 49.2% (95% CI: 35.9–62.5; 10 CRs and 19 PRs [4 CRs and 25 PRs by investigator-assessment (INV)]). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached. The longest DOR at data cut-off was 21.6 months and was still ongoing. Observed DOR exceeded 12 months in 22/29 pts (75.9%) with response. Durable disease control rate (stable disease or response for ≥16 weeks) was 62.7% (95% CI: 49.1–75.0). Median observed time to response was 1.9 months (range: 1.7–9.1). Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 7.3–not evaluable); median overall survival has not been reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades, Grade ≥3) were diarrhea (28.8%, 1.7%), fatigue (25.4%, 1.7%), and nausea (23.7%, 0%). By INV, grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 13.6% of pts. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates substantial antitumor activity and increasing DOR with cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W in pts with mCSCC. There were no new safety signals. These data strongly support the recent FDA approval of cemiplimab-rwlc for pts with mCSCC or locally advanced CSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document