Health care utilization and costs among HER2-negative, HR-positive, elderly women with metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11571-e11571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manjiri Pawaskar ◽  
Sudeep Karve ◽  
Tapashi Dalvi ◽  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Robert Deeter

e11571 Background: Limited data exist on the cost burden of elderly women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We therefore assessed this cost burden in a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database (2000-2009). Methods: Women aged ≥65 years diagnosed with MBC or early-stage breast cancer who progressed to MBC with HER2 negative, HR positive status were selected. MBC diagnosis date or date of progression to MBC was the index date. The study included non-HMO patients who had continuous Medicare (Part A and B) enrollment for ≥12 months before index date to death or end of database (2009). All-cause and MBC-related (claims for MBC diagnoses or MBC-related treatments) healthcare utilization and costs were assessed descriptively and then annualized based on follow-up duration. Results: In total, 13,170 women met the inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age 76.7 [7.0] years, 88% white, 77% both ER and PR positive). Mean [SD] post-index follow-up duration was 38.5 [28.1] months. On average, patients had 2.5 hospitalizations (mean length-of-stay: 16 days) and 3 emergency department (ED) visits. Mean [SD] annual all-cause costs (in 2011 $) per patient were $34,264 [$33,429], half of which $16,397 [$18,284] were attributable to MBC. Hospitalizations, hospital outpatient visits, and physician office visits accounted for over three-quarters of total all-cause costs (mean [SD]: $13,804 [$22,589] $4,171 [$6,509], and $8,676 [$11,065], respectively) and 75% of MBC-related costs (mean [SD]: $4,449 [$9,436], $2,844 [$5,383], and $5,799 [$9,945], respectively). Within MBC-related costs, mean [SD] annual costs of chemotherapy, radiation, and hormone therapy were $1,442 [$4,095], $1,872 [$4,086], and $579 [$1,197], respectively. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that HR positive, HER2 negative elderly women with MBC have a substantial economic burden on the Medicare system with primary costs drivers being inpatient, hospital outpatient and physician office visit costs.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16521-e16521
Author(s):  
Zhixiao Wang ◽  
Xuan Li ◽  
Claudio Faria

e16521 Background: The costs of treating patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have been examined in several studies, but there is very limited information regarding healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs of mBC among Medicaid beneficiaries. The objective of this study was to characterize HCRU and costs in Medicaid among women with mBC. Methods: Women with mBC who were younger than 65 were identified using Thomson Reuters’ Medicaid claims data from 12-13 states (2005-2009). Overall HCRU and medical costs were estimated in those patients and compared to breast cancer (BC) patients without metastasis identified in the same population. Index date is the date of BC (or mBC) diagnosis and patients were followed to the date of disenrollment or the end of the study period, whichever occurred first. Mean (95% CI) cumulative healthcare costs were estimated using Kaplan-Meier Sample Average method. Results: 4,745 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 3,767 were BC patients without metastasis and 978 with mBC. During an average of 14 months of follow up time, mBC patients on average incurred 1.56 hospital admissions, 9.01 inpatient days, and 1.97 emergency room (ER) visits, 25.54 physician office visits, 21.43 hospital outpatient visits, and 40.96 prescriptions. The total medical cost averaged at $63,068 (95% CI: $59,504, $66,624) per mBC patient, of which 33.0% were hospitalization costs, followed by hospital outpatient cost (27.4%) and physician office visit cost (14.8%). The average follow up time for BC patients was 18 months, during which BC patients on average incurred 0.69 hospital admissions, 3.79 inpatient days, 1.96 ER visits, 19.96 physician office visits, 12.27 hospital outpatient visits, and 40.89 prescriptions, and the total cost averaged at $29,776 (95% CI: $28,795, $30,762). Major cost drivers by type of service are similar to mBC. Conclusions: Overall HCRU and costs are substantially higher in mBC patients compared to BC patients of earlier stages in the Medicaid population, and the major cost drivers are similar in mBC and BC. Continuous Medicaid coverage is essential for BC/mBC patients in financial disadvantage to have access to quality medical care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-413
Author(s):  
Ami M. Vyas ◽  
Hilary Aroke ◽  
Stephen Kogut

Background: It is crucial to identify whether women with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are treated according to treatment guidelines and whether treatment disparities exist. This study examined guideline-concordant treatment among women with HER2+ MBC and determined the magnitude of differences in treatment between those with positive and negative hormone receptor (HR) status using a nonlinear decomposition technique. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the SEER-Medicare linked database. The study cohort consisted of women aged ≥66 years diagnosed with HER2+ MBC in 2010 through 2013 (n=241). Guideline-concordant initial treatment after cancer diagnosis was defined based on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Breast Cancer. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify significant predictors of guideline-concordant treatment. A postregression decomposition was conducted to identify the magnitude of disparities in treatment by HR status. Results: Of 241 women included in the study, a total of 76.8% received guideline-concordant treatment. These women were significantly more likely to have positive HR status (P=.0298), have good performance status (P=.0009), and more oncology visits (P<.0001). With 1-year increments in age at cancer diagnosis, the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant treatment reduced by 5% (P=.0356). The decomposition analysis revealed that 19.0% of the disparity in guideline-concordant treatment between women with positive and negative HR status was explained by differences in their characteristics. Enabling characteristics (marital status, income, and education) explained the highest (22.8%) proportion of the disparity. Conclusions: Nearly one-quarter of the study cohort did not receive guideline-concordant treatment. Our findings suggest opportunities to improve cancer care for elderly women with negative HR status who are unpartnered or have lower socioeconomic status. The high unexplained portion of the disparity by HR status can be due to patient treatment preferences, propensity to seek care, and organizational and physician-level characteristics that were not included in the study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11570-e11570
Author(s):  
Sudeep Karve ◽  
Manjiri Pawaskar ◽  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Tapashi Dalvi ◽  
Robert Deeter

e11570 Background: Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a leading cause of death in elderly women, there is limited population-based data available on treatment patterns and survival in post-menopausal women with HER2 negative, hormone receptor (HR) positive MBC. This study therefore examined real-world treatment patterns and survival in this population Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, which comprised 13,170 women aged ≥65 years diagnosed with HER–, HR+ MBC between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2009. The index date was defined as MBC diagnosis date or date of progression to MBC. Patients were followed from index date to death or end of database. Absence of trastuzumab and lapatinib treatment, and use of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization tests, was utilized as a proxy measure for HER2– status. Descriptive statistics were used to assess treatment patterns. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine survival in this patient population. Results: Over 78% of women (mean age 76.7 years, 88% white) were both ER+ and PR+ and 61% had ductal histology. The majority of patients had surgery (54%), followed by radiation (50%), hormone therapy (49%) and chemotherapy (40%). Among patients receiving hormonal therapy, megestrol (20%), anastrazole (16%) and fulvestrant (11%) were the most commonly used agents. Among patients receiving chemotherapy, cyclophosphamide (21%), doxorubicin (17%) and paclitaxel (14%) were most common agents. Median overall survival in these patients was 50 months and the 5-year survival rate was 45%. Median survival was lowest for patients aged >85 years (25 months), ER– PR+ (24 months), and distant stage at diagnosis (21 months). Conclusions: In spite of advances in treatment of MBC, survival remains lower in older and ER– PR+ women with MBC. This could be due to the limited access to effective treatments in elderly with HER2– and HR+ MBC patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Kuksis ◽  
Yizhuo Gao ◽  
William Tran ◽  
Christianne Hoey ◽  
Alex Kiss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are living longer, but development of brain metastases often limits their survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of brain metastases in this patient population. Methods Articles published from January 2000 to January 2020 were compiled from four databases using search terms related to: breast cancer, brain metastasis, and incidence. The overall and per patient-year incidence of brain metastases were extracted from studies including patients with HER2+, triple negative, and hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- MBC; pooled overall estimates for incidence were calculated using random effects models. Results 937 articles were compiled, and 25 were included in the meta-analysis. Incidence of brain metastases in patients with HER2+ MBC, triple negative MBC, and HR+/HER2- MBC was reported in 17, 6, and 4 studies, respectively. The pooled cumulative incidence of brain metastases was 31% for the HER2+ subgroup (median follow-up: 30.7 months, IQR: 24.0 – 34.0), 32% for the triple negative subgroup (median follow-up: 32.8 months, IQR: 18.5 – 40.6), and 15% among patients with HR+/HER2- MBC (median follow-up: 33.0 months, IQR: 31.9 – 36.2). The corresponding incidences per patient-year were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.10 – 0.16) for the HER2+ subgroup, 0.13 (95%CI: 0.09 – 0.20) for the triple negative subgroup, and only 0.05 (95%CI: 0.03 – 0.08) for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. Conclusion There is high incidence of brain metastases among patients with HER2+ and triple negative MBC. The utility of a brain metastases screening program warrants investigation in these populations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 2190-2198
Author(s):  
Dalia Kamel ◽  
Veronica Youssef ◽  
Wilma M. Hopman ◽  
Mihaela Mates

Background: In 2012, the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) identified five key opportunities in oncology to improve patient care, recommending against imaging tests for the staging of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) at low risk for metastases. Similarly, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline does not support radiological staging in asymptomatic EBC (aEBC). The purpose of this study was to assess local practice and outcomes of staging investigations (SIs) in aEBC at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO). Methods: A retrospective electronic and paper chart review was undertaken to identify all aEBC patients treated at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014. Patients with pathological staging of T1-T2 and N0-1 with any receptor status were included. We collected patient demographics, treatment and pathologic tumor characteristics. The use and outcomes of initial and follow-up SIs were recorded. Data were analyzed to determine associations between the use of SIs and clinical characteristics (chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests). Results: From 2012 to 2014, 295 asymptomatic EBC patients were identified. The mean age was 64, 81% were postmenopausal and 76% had breast conserving surgery. Stage distribution was as follows: stage I 42%, stage IIA 37% and stage IIB 21%. Receptor status was as follows: ER+ 84%, HER2+ 13% and triple negative 12%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 36%, Trastuzumab by 10% and endocrine therapy by 76% of patients. Baseline SIs were performed in 168 patients (57%) for a total of 332 tests. Overt metastatic disease was found in five patients (one bone scan and four CT scans). Seventy-one out of the 168 patients (42%) who received initial staging imaging underwent 138 follow-up imaging tests, none of which were diagnostic for metastases. Nine patients with suspicious CT findings underwent biopsies, of which four were malignant (one metastatic breast cancer and three new primaries). Factors significantly associated with SI were as follows: younger age (p = 0.001), premenopausal status (p = 0.01), T2 stage (p < 0.001), N1 stage (p < 0.001), HER2 positive (p < 0.001), triple negative status (p = 0.007) and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over a 3-year period at our institution, more than 50% of aEBC patients underwent a total of 470 initial and follow-up staging tests, yielding a cancer diagnosis (metastatic breast cancer or second primary cancer) in four patients. We, therefore, conclude that routine-staging investigations in aEBC patients have low diagnostic value, supporting current guidelines that recommend against the routine use of SI in this population.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Antoni ◽  
Jamie M. Jacobs ◽  
Laura C. Bouchard ◽  
Suzanne C. Lechner ◽  
Devika R. Jutagir ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document