scholarly journals Phase I Trial of a Novel Anti-GD2 Monoclonal Antibody, Hu14.18K322A, Designed to Decrease Toxicity in Children With Refractory or Recurrent Neuroblastoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (14) ◽  
pp. 1445-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariba Navid ◽  
Paul M. Sondel ◽  
Raymond Barfield ◽  
Barry L. Shulkin ◽  
Robert A. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hypertensive Encephalopathy ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Single Point Mutation ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The addition of immunotherapy, including a combination of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody (mAb), ch14.18, and cytokines, improves outcome for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. However, this therapy is limited by ch14.18-related toxicities that may be partially mediated by complement activation. We report the results of a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety profile, and pharmacokinetics of hu14.18K322A, a humanized anti-GD2 mAb with a single point mutation (K322A) that reduces complement-dependent lysis. Patients and Methods Eligible patients with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma received escalating doses of hu14.18K322A ranging from 2 to 70 mg/m2 per day for 4 consecutive days every 28 days (one course). Results Thirty-eight patients (23 males; median age, 7.2 years) received a median of two courses (range, one to 15). Dose-limiting grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in four of 36 evaluable patients and were characterized by cough, asthenia, sensory neuropathy, anorexia, serum sickness, and hypertensive encephalopathy. The most common non–dose-limiting grade 3 or 4 toxicities during course one were pain (68%) and fever (21%). Six of 31 patients evaluable for response by iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine score had objective responses (four complete responses; two partial responses). The first-course pharmacokinetics of hu14.18K322A were best described by a two-compartment linear model. Median hu14.18K322A α (initial phase) and β (terminal phase) half-lives were 1.74 and 21.1 days, respectively. Conclusion The MTD, and recommended phase II dose, of hu14.18K322A is 60 mg/m2 per day for 4 days. Adverse effects, predominately pain, were manageable and improved with subsequent courses.

Phase I trial of murine monoclonal antibody 14G2a administered by prolonged intravenous infusion in patients with neuroectodermal tumors.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
J L Murray ◽  
J E Cunningham ◽  
H Brewer ◽  
K Mujoo ◽  
A A Zukiwski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Murine Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Significant Toxicity ◽  
Neurologic Sequelae

PURPOSE The purpose of this phase I trial was to determine the toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of murine monoclonal antibody (Mab) 14G2a (anti-GD2) in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Following tracer doses of iodine-131-labeled 14G2a to determine tumor uptake, 18 patients with refractory melanoma, neuroblastoma, or osteosarcoma received unlabeled 14G2a at total concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 mg/m2 administered as daily 24-hour infusions for 5 days. RESULTS The overall sensitivity of external immunoscintigraphy was 64 of 74 known metastases (86%). Toxicity from prolonged infusion of 14G2a consisted of severe generalized pain, hyponatremia, fever, rash, paresthesias, weakness, and chronic refractory postural hypotension (two patients). Toxicity was less severe in pediatric patients. The MTD of Mab was 100 mg/m2. Sixteen of 18 patients developed human antimouse antibodies (HAMA) to 14G2a. Terminal-phase half-life (T1/2) of unlabeled Mab was 6.6 +/- 1.8 hours for patients receiving 50 mg/m2 and 39.5 +/- 13.3 hours at the 100-mg/m2 level. Tumor biopsies from six melanoma patients were positive for GD2 antigen, but only two of six had trace amounts of 14G2a present. Three mixed responses (two melanoma, one osteosarcoma) and two partial responses (PRs; neuroblastoma) were observed. CONCLUSION Mab 14G2a has modest antitumor activity at the expense of significant toxicity. Dose-limiting neurologic sequelae may significantly limit phase II studies other than in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma.

Phase I trial of a human-mouse chimeric anti-disialoganglioside monoclonal antibody ch14.18 in patients with refractory neuroblastoma and osteosarcoma.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2169-2180 ◽  
Author(s):  
A L Yu ◽  
M M Uttenreuther-Fischer ◽  
C S Huang ◽  
C C Tsui ◽  
S D Gillies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity ◽  
Clinical Responses

PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics of a human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) ch 14.18 directed against disialoganglioside (GD2) and to obtain preliminary information on its clinical efficacy, we conducted a phase I trial in 10 patients with refractory neuroblastoma and one patient with osteosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eleven patients were entered onto this phase I trial. They received 20 courses of mAb ch 14.18 at dose levels of 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 mg/m2. Dose escalation was performed in cohorts of three patients; intrapatient dose escalation was also permitted. RESULTS The most prevalent toxicities were pain, tachycardia, hypertension, fever, and urticaria. Most of these toxicities were dose-dependent and rarely noted at dosages of 20 mg/m2 and less. Although the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached in this study, clinical responses were observed. These included one partial (PR) and four mixed responses (MRs) and one stable disease (SD) among 10 assessable patients. Biologic activity of ch 14.18 in vivo was shown by binding of ch 14.18 to tumor cells and complement-dependent cytotoxicity of posttreatment sera against tumor target cells. An anti-ch 14.18 immune response was detectable in seven of 10 patients studied. CONCLUSION In summary, with the dose schedule used, ch 14.18 appears to be clinically safe and effective, and repeated mAb administration was not associated with increased toxicities. Further clinical trials of mAb ch 14.18 in patients with neuroblastoma are warranted.

A Phase I Trial of Two Sequence-Specific Schedules of Decitabine and Vorinostat in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 908-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen W.L. Yee ◽  
Mark D. Minden ◽  
Joseph Brandwein ◽  
Aaron Schimmer ◽  
Andre Schuh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Concurrent Schedule ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Sequential Schedule ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Epigenetic silencing of genes has been documented in AML. This phase I trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of two schedules of administration of the hypomethylating agent decitabine in combination with the pan-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat. Methods: Patients receive escalating doses of oral vorinostat administered either sequentially [100 mg bid (n=4), 200 mg bid (n=4), or 200 mg tid (n=8) Days 6–21] or concurrently [100 mg (n=3) or 200 mg (n=6) bid Days 1–21 or 200 mg tid (n=2) Days 1–14] with decitabine (20 mg/m2/d IV Days 1–5) every 28 days. Results: Twenty-seven patients with AML have been treated. Median age was 67 years (range, 32–82 years). Median ECOG status 1 (range, 0 to 2). Eighteen patients (67%) had received prior therapy (median, 1 regimen; range, 0 to 4 regimens); 3 had received a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. A total of 85 cycles have been administered, with a median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 13 cycles); 10 patients (37%) have received 3 or more cycles of therapy. One of 7 patients treated at dose level 3 of the sequential schedule developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), consisting of grade 3 fatigue, weakness, and mucositis. Therefore, the MTD was not reached in the 3 planned dose levels of the sequential schedule. One DLT (grade 3 fatigue) occurred in 6 patients treated at dose level 2 of the concurrent schedule. Most common drug-related non-hematological toxicities of any grade (all CTCAE grades 1 or 2) were nausea (71%), fatigue (54%), diarrhea (54%), vomiting (42%), anorexia (25%), constipation (13%), abdominal pain (13%), dehydration (13%), and headache (13%). No other non-hematological grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Of the 25 evaluable patients, one patient achieved an incomplete CR (without neutrophil recovery), one a morphologic leukemia-free state (without blood count recovery), and three partial remissions (1 achieved red cell transfusion independency and a second normalization of platelet counts). Seven of these patients remain on study for 2.7 to 13.5+ months. Correlative studies examining histone acetylation and gene promoter methylation in leukemic cells at baseline and after treatment, as well as plasma pharmacokinetic levels for both decitabine and vorinostat are being evaluated. Conclusions: The combination of decitabine and vorinostat is safe, well-tolerated, and has clinical activity in patients with AML. Enrollment is ongoing.

Phase I Trial Examining Addition of Gemcitabine to CHOP in Intermediate Grade NHL.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4765-4765
Author(s):  
John L. Reagan ◽  
James N. Butera ◽  
Alan G. Rosmarin ◽  
Ahmed Nadeem ◽  
Fred J. Schiffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Chop Chemotherapy ◽  
Intermediate Grade ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Abstract Abstract 4765 BACKGROUND Gemcitabine induces a 20% response as single agent therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. We report phase I findings of gemcitabine in combination with standard CHOP chemotherapy with G-CSF support for intermediate grade NHL. The protocol was modified during enrollment to include rituximab in CD 20+ lymphomas. METHODS Patients received CHOP plus gemcitabine at 500 mg/m2 (Cohort 1) or 750 mg/m2 (Cohort 2) on days 1,4 of each 21 day cycle. Accrual was suspended once each cohort was filled. Dose escalation occurred after all patients in the cohort were determined to not have a dose limiting toxicity. RESULTS Between 4/02 and 5/04 10 patients were enrolled and completed the study treatment (6 in cohort 1, 4 in cohort 2). In Cohort 1, grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia, anemia, neuropathy, and constipation. Grade 4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. In Cohort 2, grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, anemia and intestinal obstruction. Grade 4 toxicities included febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. One patient developed MDS 36 months after chemotherapy. Three of four patients in Cohort 2 developed dose limiting toxicities (mucositis and thrombocytopenia) requiring dose reduction of gemcitabine after cycle 1. Overall, the survival rate at 2.5 years was 71%. CONCLUSIONS This Phase I trial concludes that gemcitabine 500mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 of each 21 day cycle is the maximum tolerated dose when combined with standard CHOP chemotherapy with G-CSF support for intermediate grade NHL. Response rates are encouraging for this novel chemotherapeutic regimen. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Gemcitabine was added to standard CHOP chemotherapy in this trial.. Sikov:Eli Lilly: Honoraria.

Final results from a phase I trial of ixabepilone in patients with advanced malignancies and lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
O. O’Connor ◽  
M. Cohen ◽  
R. Peck ◽  
H. Burris
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

2039 Background: Ixabepilone is the first analog in a new class of antineoplastic agents, the epothilones, which stabilizes microtubules and induces apoptosis. Ixabepilone has shown clinical activity in a broad range of tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone when administered as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed non-hematologic cancer, or a pathologic diagnosis of relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) or relapsed/primary refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with ≤CTC Grade 1 neuropathy. Ixabepilone doses ranged from 7.5–65 mg/m2. Response was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST. DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, ≥Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of >2 weeks due to delayed recovery. Results: Of 61 patients (median age 58, range 18–81), 75% had solid tumors; 25% had lymphoma. 98% and 67% of patients had received one or ≥ two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively. The MTD of ixabepilone as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks was established as 50 mg/m2. The most common DLTs were neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and stomatitis/pharyngitis. A total of eight patients (13%) achieved a durable objective response. Complete responses were achieved in two patients with primary peritoneal cancer and NHL. A partial response was seen in six patients. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (only observed at doses ≥40 mg/m2) were sensory neuropathy (13%), fatigue (13%), myalgia (10%), arthralgia (7%), nausea (5%), febrile neutropenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Recovery to baseline or ≤Grade 1 neuropathy occurred in some patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of ixabepilone for the initiation of Phase II studies based on this study is 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone demonstrates promising safety in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who have failed standard therapy. Encouraging activity was reported in several tumor types. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly everolimus (RAD001) in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1066-1066
Author(s):  
S. L. Moulder ◽  
E. Rivera ◽  
J. Ensor ◽  
A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
M. Christofanilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Interpatient Variability ◽  
Grade 3

1066 Background: Inhibition of mTOR with everolimus (E) may improve efficacy in combination with docetaxel (D), but both drugs are metabolized by CYP3A4, thus a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction may also exist. Methods: 15 patients (pts) with MBC were treated with docetaxel and everolimus using the continuous reassessment method (CRM) to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Docetaxel doses were 40–75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Everolimus doses were 20–50 mg PO on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (except cycle 2, where only day 8 was given to allow single agent PK analyses of both drugs). Response was measured every 2 cycles using RECIST. Results: Median age= 58 years and 77% of pts had >2 prior chemotherapies for MBC. Initially 2 of 2 pts treated (D= 75 mg/m2, E= 30 mg) developed DLT (neutropenic fever/infection), prompting a mandatory PK evaluation for all pts enrolled in subsequent cohorts. A second cohort of 3 patients (D=60 mg/m2, E=20mg) had no DLT, but no pts received day 8 of E due to grade 3–4 neutropenia. PK analyses demonstrated a 42% lowered (-42%) D clearance at the 60 mg/m2 in the presence of E (n=1). Subsequent cohorts were accrued at D=40 mg/m2 with escalating doses of E (Table). For the entire group, an 18% decrease (-18%) in D clearance was observed when D was administered concomitantly with E. High interpatient variability of D clearance was observed (range +16% to -135%). No pts had CR/PR, but 6 had SD>4 cycles and 2 had SD=8 cycles. Conclusions: Weekly everolimus appears to cause widely variable and unpredictable changes in docetaxel clearance making this combination unfeasible. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I trial combining SCH 66336 to temozolomide (TMZ) for patients with grade 3 or 4 malignant gliomas (MG)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13004-e13004
Author(s):  
A. Desjardins ◽  
D. A. Reardon ◽  
S. Gururangan ◽  
K. Peters ◽  
S. Threatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Farnesyl Transferase ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Elevated Creatinine ◽  
Grade 3

e13004 Background: Ras plays a crucial role in the control of cellular proliferation and differentiation. Farnesylation is an essential step in the post-translational processing of Ras. SCH 66336 inhibits farnesyl transferase, the crucial enzyme in this process. We report a phase I trial of TMZ and SCH 66336. Methods: Eligibility included: adult patients with stable or recurrent MG (GBM, anaplastic astrocytoma [AA], anaplastic oligodendroglioma [AO]) previously treated with radiation therapy (RT) and with or without chemotherapy; interval of at least two weeks between prior RT, or four weeks between prior chemotherapy; Karnofsky ≥ 60%; and adequate hematologic, renal and liver function. Patients were divided in two strata: those receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAED) and those not receiving EIAED. Each patient was treated with TMZ for five days every 28 days, first cycle dosed at 150 mg/m2 and subsequent cycles at 200 mg/m2. SCH 66336 was dosed orally daily and was dose escalated. Responses were assessed after two cycles (8 weeks). The primary endpoints of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SCH 66336 when administered with TMZ, and the toxicity of this combination. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled (25 GBM, 6 AA, 3 AO). Fifteen patients have been accrued to the EIAED stratum at SCH 66336 doses of 125, 175, and 250 mg orally BID. Twenty-one patients have been accrued to the non-EIAED stratum at SCH 66336 doses of 75, 100, 150, and 200 mg orally BID. Dose-limiting toxicities were: deep venous thrombosis (1 grade 3); nausea and vomiting (1 grade 3); diarrhea (1 grade 3); elevated ALT (1 grade 3); elevated creatinine (1 grade 3); and fatigue (1 grade 3). Radiographic evaluation reported: 2 partial responses, 14 stable disease for at least 4 cycles, and 11 disease progression after either the first or second cycle. Sixteen patients have completed at least six cycles. One patient is still on treatment, completing cycle 12. The MTD of this combination for the EIAED stratum is 175 mg BID and the non-EIAED stratum is 150 mg BID. Conclusions: SCH 66336 in combination with TMZ is well-tolerated and shows promising response when administered to patient when stable on TMZ alone or after RT and TMZ. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I Evaluation of Sequential Doxorubicin Gemcitabine Then Ifosfamide Paclitaxel Cisplatin for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Transitional-Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelial Tract

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 840-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Dodd ◽  
John A. McCaffrey ◽  
Susan Hilton ◽  
Madhu Mazumdar ◽  
Harry Herr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Transitional Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE: This phase I trial sought to evaluate the toxicity of and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for the two-drug regimen doxorubicin and gemcitabine (AG) followed by the three-drug regimen of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) in patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received AG every other week for six cycles followed by ITP every 3 weeks for four cycles. Five AG dose levels were investigated, up to doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 2,000 mg/m2, to determine the MTD of the regimen. The dose and schedule of ITP were constant: ifosfamide 1,500 mg/m2 (days 1 to 3); paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (day 1); and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 (day 1). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given between all cycles of therapy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients enrolled onto this phase I trial. AG was well tolerated at all dose levels, with no grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression. Toxicity experienced with ITP included grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia in four patients and grade 3 nausea/vomiting in three patients. No grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity was observed. Eight of 14 assessable patients experienced a major response to AG, including five of six patients treated at the two highest AG dose levels. After completion of AG-ITP, nine of 14 assessable patients had a major response (three complete responses and six partial responses). CONCLUSION: AG is a well-tolerated and active regimen. Sequential chemotherapy with AG-ITP is also well tolerated, and phase II investigation at the highest dose level is ongoing.

Phase I trial of vorinostat in combination with erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations after erlotinib progression

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19057-e19057 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Reguart ◽  
A. F. Cardona ◽  
D. Isla ◽  
F. Cardenal ◽  
R. Palmero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Global Analysis ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

e19057 Background: Vorinostat (SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that induces differentiation, growth arrest and apoptosis of malignant cells. In vitro, there is a synergistic interaction of vorinostat in combination with gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines. Moreover, vorinostat increases levels of E-cadherin, p21, and downregulates expression of phospho-AKT and phospho-ERK1/2. These molecular findings could reverse resistance to erlotinib in mutant patients. Methods: We conducted a standard 3+3 Phase I trial of oral erlotinib 150 mg QD in combination with oral vorinostat (dose level 1 [DL1], 300 mg QD on days 1–7 every 21 days; DL2, 400 mg QD on days 1–7 every every 21 days, and; DL3, 400 mg QD on days 1–7 and 15–21 in a 28-day cycle). Cycles were repeated for a maximum of 6 cycles until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity. Pts with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations (Exon 19 and 21) after erlotinib progression and ECOG ≤2 were eligible. The main objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), drug activity and safety of the combination regimen. Results: Thirteen patients have been enrolled up to date, with 9 patients available for this interim analysis (median age, 59 years; range 41–77). One patient (DL3 cohort) experienced a dose limiting toxicity (Grade 3 diarrhoea). The MTD has not been reached. The most common drug-related toxicities of any grade in the first cycle of treatment were anemia (77.8%), skin alterations (66.7%), diarrhoea (66.7%), xerostomy (55.6%), asymptomatic changes in liver function tests (55.6%), and asthenia (55.6%). There were no Grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events during first cycle of treatment and the global analysis of cycles showed asthenia (11.1%), somnolence (11.1%) and hyporexia (11.1%). Four pts discontinued treatment, all due to PD. Of 9 evaluable pts for efficacy, 6 had stable disease as best response (median duration of treatment 6.0 months, range 4–12). Final data will be presented at ASCO meeting. Conclusions: Although accrual continues to determine the MTD, the combination of vorinostat and erlotinib appears to be well tolerated and effective in this group of advanced NSCLC pts with EGFR mutations after erlotinib progression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I Trial of Intravesical Docetaxel in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer Refractory to Standard Intravesical Therapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 3075-3080 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. McKiernan ◽  
Puneet Masson ◽  
Alana M. Murphy ◽  
Manlio Goetzl ◽  
Carl A. Olsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Superficial Bladder Cancer ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Intravesical Therapy ◽  
Systemic Absorption ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Up to 50% of patients treated with intravesical agents for superficial bladder cancer will experience recurrence. Response rates to second-line intravesical therapies range from 20% to 40%. For these high-risk patients, novel agents are necessary to prevent recurrence. Docetaxel is a microtubule depolymerization inhibitor with unique physiochemical properties, making it an excellent candidate for investigation as an intravesical agent. Patients and Methods This phase I trial included patients with recurrent Ta, T1, and Tis transitional cell carcinoma who experienced treatment failure with at least one prior intravesical treatment. Docetaxel was administered as six weekly instillations at a starting dose of 5 mg, with a dose-escalation model used until a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD. Efficacy was evaluated by cystoscopy with biopsy, cytology, and computed tomography imaging. Results Eighteen patients (100%) completed the trial, and the distribution of stages included six patients with Tis, seven with Ta, and five with T1 disease. No grade 3 or 4 DLTs occurred in 108 infusions, and no patient had systemic absorption of docetaxel. Eight (44%) of 18 patients experienced grade 1 or 2 toxicities, with dysuria being the most common. Ten (56%) of 18 patients had no evidence of disease at their post-treatment cystoscopy and biopsy. None of the patients who experienced relapse had disease progression. Conclusion Intravesical docetaxel exhibited minimal toxicity and no systemic absorption in the first human intravesical clinical trial. This suggests that docetaxel is a safe agent for further evaluation of efficacy in a phase II trial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document