Outcome of patients with an initial presentation of brain metastases.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
Lawrence Berk ◽  
Bryan Stevens

133 Background: Many studies have looked at the survival of patients with brain metastases but few studies have determined if the survival of patients initally presenting with brain metastases is the same as patients who subsequently develop brain metastases. Methods: Patients with no known history or a malignancy who presented to the hospital with brain metastases were retrospectively revieweed for survival. The survival data were collected from the hospital's tumor registryand the Social Security Index. The years 2010-2011 were studied as of 5/31/2013. Results: Ninety-four patients met the inclusion criteria in 2010 and eight-two patients in 2011. Sixty five percent of the patients in 2010 were male and fifty-five percent were male in 2011. The median age was approximately 60. In 2010 53% of the patients had lung cancer and 12% had breast cancer and in 2011 45% had lung cancer and 13% had breast cancer. zThus the median survival is equivalent to the median survival of the lung cancer patients, which was 71 days in 2010 and 37 days in 2011. the median survival of the breast cancer patients were 153 days in 2010 and 35 days in 2011. Sixty three percent of the patients received radiation therapy as some part of their treatment and eighteen percent received no treatment. The median survival time of patients receiving radiation therapy only as treatment was 84 days and the patients with no treatment had a survival of 34 days. Conclusions: The survival of patients presenting with brain metastases falls within the range expected from previous studies of patients with brain metastases. The survival of patients presenting with lung cancer was much poorer than patients with breast cancer. Patients for no treatment appear to be appropriately selected, with a median surival of approximately one month.

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 2529-2536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minesh P. Mehta ◽  
Patrick Rodrigus ◽  
C.H.J. Terhaard ◽  
Aroor Rao ◽  
John Suh ◽  
...  

Purpose: This phase III randomized trial evaluated survival as well as neurologic and neurocognitive function in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors receiving whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without motexafin gadolinium (MGd). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 30 Gy of WBRT ± 5 mg/kg/d MGd. Survival and time to neurologic progression determined by a blinded events review committee (ERC) were coprimary end points. Standardized investigator neurologic assessment and neurocognitive testing were evaluated. Results: Four hundred one (251 non–small-cell lung cancer) patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference by treatment arm in survival (median, 5.2 months for MGd v 4.9 months for WBRT; P = .48) or time to neurologic progression (median, 9.5 months for MGd v 8.3 months for WBRT; P = .95). Treatment with MGd improved time to neurologic progression in patients with lung cancer (median, not reached for MGd v 7.4 months for WBRT; P = .048, unadjusted). By investigator, MGd improved time to neurologic progression in all patients (median, 4.3 months for MGd v 3.8 months for WBRT; P = .018) and in lung cancer patients (median, 5.5 months for MGd v 3.7 months for WBRT; P = .025). MGd improved neurocognitive function in lung cancer patients. Conclusion: The overall results did not demonstrate significant differences by treatment arm for survival and ERC time to neurologic progression. Investigator neurologic assessments demonstrated an MGd treatment benefit in all patients. In lung cancer patients, ERC- and investigator-determined time to neurologic progression demonstrated an MGd treatment benefit. MGd may improve time to neurologic and neurocognitive progression in lung cancer.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19683-19683
Author(s):  
M. Choi ◽  
W. Chan ◽  
J. Jaiwatana ◽  
T. Khansur

19683 Background: More than 2/3 of lung cancer patients are age = 65 and the proportion of elderly patients are expected to rise in the United States. However data on the use of optimal chemoradiotherapy in this group of patients are limited. Methods: All lung cancer patients = 65 years, who received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy at the G. V. Montgomery VAMC between Jan 2000 to Dec 2005, were analyzed from tumor registry and computerized medical records. Patients who only received palliative radiation therapy for bone and brain metastasis were excluded. Results: Among 652 lung cancer patients diagnose, 46 patients = 65 years received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy over the 6 year study period. The median age was 72 (range:65–84) and 70% of the patients were = 70 years. All patients were male with 65% white and 35% black population. The majority of patients were stage III (85%) while there was one stage I and six stage II patients. 41 patients (89%) were able to complete the planned radiation therapy and median dose delivered was 6140 cGy. The chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin and paclitaxel either weekly during radiation therapy and every three weeks in sequential treatment. There was only 1 treatment related mortality and only 15% of patients survived less than 6 months. The 1, 2, 3 year survival rates were 67%, 24%, and 15% respectively and median survival was 15.3 months. 15 patients were treated sequentially(S) with chemotherapy (median cycle-3) followed by radiation therapy and 31 patients concurrently (C) with chemoradiotherapy. (median- 5 weekly treatment) The survival among the two groups did not differ statistically. (median survival-19.1 month (S) vs. 14 month (C) p=0.78) Conclusions: Both sequential and concurrent chemoradiotherapy is feasible and beneficial in elderly patients with lung cancer. Sequential treatments might be as effective as concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly VA patient population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document