Looking to possible predictive factors of primary resistance to abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) in pretreated patients (pts) with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 248-248
Author(s):  
Orazio Caffo ◽  
Antonello Veccia ◽  
Francesca Maines ◽  
Alberto Bonetta ◽  
Gilbert Spizzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

248 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are new generation hormonal agents (NHA) which demonstrated a survival gain in patients (pts) with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) pre-treated with docetaxel. Although all patients eventually became resistant to these NHAs, some of them show primary resistance, defined as an early progression within the first 3 months, which leads to an early treatment interruption. In the present analysis we have tried to identify which factor, if any, may predict primary resistance to AA and ENZ. Methods: We evaluated a consecutive series of 57 pts, treated in our hospital in two successive named patient programs conducted in our hospital to allow pre-treated CRPC patients to receive NHAs before their approval in Italy: 26 received AA (1,000 mg po + prednisone 10 mg po daily) and 31 ENZ (160 mg po daily). For each pt we have recorded the pre- and post-NHA clinical history, the treatment details and outcomes. We have also assessed the ability of a series of 24 selected clinical factors to predict NHAs resistance, through a logistic regression analysis. Continuous variables were categorized by quartiles and chosen for the initial model after a univariate chi-square analysis. Results: Among the 24 factors, the presence of pain at baseline, high baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after one month of treatment were predictive of primary NHA resistance at the univariate analysis. However, only PSA levels were confirmed at the multivariate analysis [exp(beta) 0.115; p = 0.007], as patients failing to achieve a 50% or more reduction in baseline PSA levels, were more likely to show primary NHA resistance (48% vs. 15%). Conclusions: Our results suggest that PSA trend may represent a simple and rapid method of identifying patients with primary resistance to NHAs, so patients failing to achieve a 50% or more reduction within the first month of treatment should undergo intensive investigations, to verify whether they have primary resistance to NHAs. These data should be confirmed in a larger patient population.

The hematologic parameters in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
Onal Cem ◽  
Ali Murat Sedef ◽  
Fatih KOse ◽  
Ezgi Oymak ◽  
Ozan Cem Guler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response

308 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic implications of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 102 mCRPC treated with abiraterone either pre- or post-chemotherapy between November 2012 and October 2017 in three institutions. We calculated NLR and PLR at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after initiation of abiraterone, and we evaluated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response every 4 weeks. Fifty patients (49%) were treated with abiraterone post-docetaxel, and 52 patients (51%) received abiraterone pre-chemotherapy. Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, patients were stratified as low NLR ( < 3.1) or high NLR (≥ 3.1), and low PLR ( < 163) or high PLR (≥ 163). The cutoff for anemia was < 12g/dL. Results: Median follow-up times for patients overall and for those who survived were 24.0 months (range, 0.3 – 54.9 months) and 25.5 months (range, 2.8 – 54.9 months), respectively. The median time of abiraterone treatment was 8.1 months (range, 2.4 – 40.1 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 20.8 months (interquartile range: 17.3–24.4). In univariate analysis, NLR, PLR, PSA response, and low hemoglobin (Hgb) were found significantly predictive of OS and progression-free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, declines in NLR and PSA of ≥ 90% emerged as significant independent predictors of OS and PFS. High-NLR patients who remained high or who returned to low NLR after 4 and 12 weeks showed significantly worse OS than patients with low baseline NLR. Patients with baseline Hgb > 12 g/dL had significantly longer median OS compared with patients with Hgb ≤ 12 g/dL; however, the significance of Hgb was lost at 12 weeks. Conclusions: NLR and PSA response to abiraterone was a significant predictor of OS and PFS in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone delivered either pre- or post-chemotherapy. Furthermore, persistent increase in NLR during abiraterone has prognostic value for OS in patients with mCRPC.

Safety and clinical outcome of a cohort of patients (pts) with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) in a named patient program (NPP): Updated results of a retrospective study from an Italian cooperative group.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 253-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orazio Caffo ◽  
Lucia Fratino ◽  
Giovanni Lo Re ◽  
Umberto Basso ◽  
Alessandro D'Angelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Clinical Records

253 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) provided a survival advantage compared to placebo in patients (pts) with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who had received docetaxel (de Bono JS et al, NEJM 2011). The present retrospective study is aimed to assess safety and clinical outcome in an unselected CRPC population which received AA in a named patient program (NPP). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all pts treated with AA for CRPC by NPP in our institutions. All pts have been previously treated with a docetaxel-based first-line chemotherapy and received the standard AA dose of 1,000 mg daily plus prednisone 10 mg daily. For each pt we recorded the pre- and post-AA clinical history, the AA treatment details toxicities and clinical outcomes. Results: To date we have collected a consecutive series of 245 pts from 18 Italian hospitals. The median age was 73 (range 45 to 91). The median baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 100 ng/ml (range 0.33->100.000); 79% of the pts had bone metastases, while nodal, lung and liver metastases were observed in 52%, 9%, and 7% of the pts, respectively. The median duration of AA treatment was 5 months (range, 1 to 26). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were anemia (11 pts), fatigue (nine pts), bone pain (four pts), constipation (two pts), thrombocytopenia (two pts), nausea (one pt), diarrhea (one pt), dyspnea (one pt), edema (one pt), hypertension (one pt), hyperbilirubinemia (one pt), and hypokaliemia (one pt). A PSA reduction of more than 50% was observed in 50.9% of the pts. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6 months and 15 months, respectively; the 1 year PFS and OS rates were 24.3% and 56.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Our results have confirmed the safety and efficacy of AA in an unselected population of pts with pre-treated CRPC outside clinical trials and provided further support concerning the good safety profile of the drug.

scholarly journals A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. E47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Joseph Khalaf ◽  
Claudia M. Avilés ◽  
Arun A. Azad ◽  
Katherine Sunderland ◽  
Tilman Todenhöfer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression

Introduction: Recently, a prognostic index including six risk factors (RFs) (unfavourable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS], presence of liver metastases, short response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists/ antagonists, low albumin, increased alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) was developed from the COUAA- 301 trial in post-chemotherapy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Our primary objective was to evaluate this model in a cohort of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone.Methods: We identified 197 chemotherapy-naive patients who received abiraterone at six BC Cancer Agency centres and who had complete information on all six RFs. Study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), time to PSA progression, time on treatment, and overall survival (OS). PSA RR and survival outcomes were compared using Χ2 test and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify RFs independently associated with OS.Results: Patients were classified into good (0‒1 RFs), intermediate (2‒3 RFs), and poor (4‒6 RFs) prognostic groups (33%, 52%, and 15%, respectively). For good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, PSA RR (≥50% decline) was 60% vs. 42% vs. 40% (p=0.05); median time to PSA progression was 7.3 vs. 5.3 vs. 5.0 months (p=0.02); and median OS was 29.4 vs. 13.8 vs. 8.7 months (p<0.0001).Conclusions: The six-factor prognostic index model stratifies clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome is important for informing clinical practice and clinical trial design.

scholarly journals Consequences of Different Corticosteroids on Serum Potassium and Prostate-Specific Antigen in Patients Receiving Abiraterone for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117955491773773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaomi Tatsuzawa ◽  
Ryuichi Ogawa ◽  
Naoki Kinjo ◽  
Soan Kim ◽  
Fumitaka Shimizu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Serum Potassium ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Androgen Synthesis ◽  
Castration Resistant

Background: Abiraterone acetate is an androgen synthesis inhibitor approved for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Although co-administration of either prednisone or prednisolone at 10 mg/d has been recommended to reduce the risk of abiraterone-induced hyperaldosteronism (notably hypokalemia) and to give adjunctive pain relief effects, whether these glucocorticoids can be substituted by dexamethasone remains unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of medical records of patients who were given abiraterone for the treatment of CRPC with either prednisolone (ABI/PSL) 10 mg/d or dexamethasone (ABI/DEX) 0.5 or 1 mg/d between 2014 and 2017 in Juntendo University Nerima Hospital. Demographic and biochemical data including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Results: Fifty-three eligible patients (27 in ABI/PSL group and 26 in ABI/DEX group) were extracted from the records. Both groups showed no significant changes in serum potassium level before and after starting treatment. In the ABI/PSL group, 12 patients (46%) showed elevations of PSA and 7 patients (27%) discontinued treatment within 3 months. In contrast, in the ABI/DEX group, only 6 patients (25%) showed elevations of PSA and 3 patients (13%, all were given dexamethasone 1 mg/d) discontinued treatment. Conclusions: Dexamethasone and prednisolone may be equally effective in preventing abiraterone-induced hypokalemia.

Activity of cabazitaxel following docetaxel and abiraterone acetate in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 186-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avishay Sella ◽  
Tal Sella ◽  
Avivit Peer ◽  
Raanan Berger ◽  
Stephen Jay Frank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Sensitive Period ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients

186 Background: Cabazitaxel (CAB) and abiraterone-acetate (AA) have been approved after docetaxel in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Both exhibit hormonal effects. AA depletes androgen in microenvironment; taxanes affect the microtubule-dependent trafficking of the androgen receptor. Recently, clinical cross-resistance has been suggested between AA and taxanes. This prompted evaluation of CAB following docetaxel and AA in CRPC. Methods: Over 13 months until December 2011, 130 CRPC patients received AA after docetaxel in compassionate programs. Of them, 24 (18.4%) subsequently received CAB. We retrospectively reviewed their data (PCWG2/RECIST and NCI toxicity criteria). Results: Fourteen (58.3%) received CAB/prednisone at 20 mg/m2 and 10 patients 25 mg/m2, overall a median of 4 (1-13) cycles. Nineteen (79.1%) received primary G-CSF support. Patient characteristics (median, range in parenthesis): Age 65 (57-85) years, Gleason- 8 (6-10), K.S- 80 (50-90) %. Metastatic sites: liver- 5 (20.8%), visceral- 8 (33.3%), osseous- 22 (91.6%), No. sites involved- 2 (1-4). Lab-work: PSA- 128.1 (0.01-1700) ng/ml, PSA Doubling time- 2.16 (0.64-7.41) months, alkaline phosphatase 129 (35-1200) u/L. Castration sensitive period - 16.2 (2.0-92.1) months. Using Cox univariate analysis, only K.S was near-significant for prediction of survival after initiating CAB, p=0.075, OR=0.315, 95% C.I (0.88-1.125). A PSA response of 30%, 95% C.I (11,8-54,2)% was observed after CAB with non progression occurring in 6 (26%) out of 23 evaluable patients, 95% CI (10.2-48.4)%. At analysis 11 patients are alive. Median survival from initiation of CAB was 8.2 (95% C.I 3.34-13.05) months, from AA 16.1 (95 C.I 11.56-20.64) and from docetaxel 32.0 (95% C.I 11.56-39.69). Non-progression with docetaxel (but not AA) was associated with longer survival with CAB, p=0.049, 43.1 v.s 17.4 months. Four (16.6%) patients developed infectious complications, including one death due to septic shock. Conclusions: Limited number of patients with CRPC received CAB following docetaxel and AA. In this selected population CAB was active. Response to prior docetaxel was associated with prolonged survival to CAB therapy.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZhenHeng Wei ◽  
ChuXin Chen ◽  
BoWen Li ◽  
YongYue Li ◽  
Hong Gu
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Castration Resistant

ObjectiveThe androgen receptor-targeting drugs abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide have shown positive results as treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC.MethodsWe retrieved relevant articles from PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE published before December 31, 2020. Eleven articles were initially selected, and four phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trials of abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide that involved 5199 patients with mCRPC were included. The end points were time to prostate-specific antigen progression (TTPP), according to the prostate-specific antigen working group criteria; overall survival (OS); and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS).ResultsFour randomized, controlled clinical trials involving 5199 patients were included in this study. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo alone, abiraterone significantly improved OS (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.8, P&lt;0.00001), rPFS (HR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.57-0.71, P &lt; 0.00001), and TTPP (HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.45-0.59, P &lt; 0.00001) in patients with mCRPC. Compared with placebo, enzalutamide significantly improved OS (HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.59-0.75, P&lt;0.00001), rPFS (HR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.29-0.37, P&lt; 0.00001), and TTPP (HR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.17-0.22, P &lt; 0.00001). An indirect comparison was performed to compare the efficacy of abiraterone and enzalutamide. The results showed that there was no significant difference between abiraterone and enzalutamide with regard to improving the OS of patients with mCRPC (HR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.854-1.242). Enzalutamide was superior to abiraterone with regard to improving rPFS in patients with mCRPC (HR=0.516, 95% CI: 0.438-0.608). With regard to improving TTPP, the efficacy of enzalutamide was better than that of abiraterone (HR=0.365, 95% CI: 0.303-0.441). In sAE, there was no difference between abiraterone and enzalutamide (P=0.21, I2 = 38%).ConclusionsCompared with placebo, both abiraterone and enzalutamide significantly prolonged OS, rPFS, and TTPP in patients with mCRPC. There was no difference in safety between abiraterone and enzalutamide. In addition, enzalutamide had better efficacy than abiraterone with regard to improving rPFS and TTPP but not OS, but the level of evidence was low. Therefore, a large direct comparison trial is needed to compare the efficacy of the two drugs.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier (CRD42021226808)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document