First-line dose-dense chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, folinic acid and 5- fluorouracil (DCF) plus panitumumab (P) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction: Updated results of a phase II multicenter trial.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15023-e15023
Author(s):  
Gianluca Tomasello ◽  
Wanda Liguigli ◽  
Laura Toppo ◽  
Federica Negri ◽  
Alessandra Curti ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 146-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Tomasello ◽  
Wanda Liguigli ◽  
Laura Toppo ◽  
Rodolfo Mattioli ◽  
Federica Negri ◽  
...  

146 Background: Gastric cancer is a highly aggressive disease. No established standard first-line regimens are currently available. Aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy with DCF combined with P in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic cancer of the stomach or GEJ. Methods: HER2 negative, ECOG PS 0-1, not previously treated pts, received up to 4 cycles of therapy with Panitumumab 6 mg/kg d 1, Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 d 1, Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 d 1, L-Folinic acid 100 mg/m2 d 1 and 2, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus d 1 and 2, and then 600 mg/m2 as a 22 h c.i. on d 1 and 2, every 2 weeks, plus Pegfilgrastim 6 mg on d 3. Pts aged ≥ 65 years were treated with the same chemotherapy schedule with a dose reduction by 30%. Pts with disease control after 4 cycles, received P until progression. Results: From 05/2010 to 01/2014, 52 consecutive pts were enrolled (75% M, 25% F; median age: 64.5 y, range: 42-75; metastatic 90%, locally advanced inoperable 10%; 96% adenocarcinoma; 13 pts with GEJ cancer). Primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). At 31 Aug 2014 cut-off date, 1 pt is still on treatment, 2 lost at f-up, 11 alive and 39 dead. 50 pts evaluable for response and all for toxicity. A median of 4 cycles (range 0-6) was administered. 3 CR, 29 PR, 10 SD and 8 PD were observed, for an ORR (by ITT) of 62% (95% CI, 48%-75) and a DCR of 81%. 26 pts entered the maintenance phase with only P and received a median 7.3 cycles (range 1-46). Median TTP was 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.9) and median OS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.4- 11.6). Most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were: leucopenia (29%), neutropenia (19%), febrile neutropenia (13%), anemia (10%), asthenia (27%), mucosytis (13%), anorexia (17%), nausea/vomiting (12%), diarrhea (15%), ipokalemia (12%), and skin rash (25%). Two toxic deaths were registered (pulmonary aspergyllosis due to febrile neutropenia and gastric hemorrhage). Conclusions: Dose-dense chemotherapy combined with P is a very active regimen in gastric cancer. Due to a not negligible toxicity profile, it may represent a treatment option in neoadjuvant setting. Clinical trial information: 2009-016962-10.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7541-7541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbin Chen ◽  
Manuel R. Modiano ◽  
Joel W. Neal ◽  
Julie R. Brahmer ◽  
James R. Rigas ◽  
...  

7541 Background: AFL is a recombinant human fusion protein that acts as a decoy receptor and prevents the interaction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-B, and placental growth factor with their receptors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AFL in combination with first-line chemotherapy of C and P in NSCLC. Methods: This phase II, single arm, open label, multicenter trial in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, or metastatic NSCLC excluded patients with squamous histology, cavitating lesions, ECOG > 1, uncontrolled hypertension, or brain/CNS metastases. All patients received IV AFL 6 mg/kg, P 500 mg/m2, and C 75mg/m2, every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. For those who completed the combined chemotherapy, Q3W administration of AFL was to continue until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or any other cause for withdrawal. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Planned sample size was 72 patients. Results: The study was closed prematurely due to 3 confirmed cases of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS). A total of 42 patients were enrolled. Median age was 61.5 years; 54.8% were male, 85.7% white and 50% ECOG 0. A median of 4 cycles of AFL was administered. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were nausea (69%) and fatigue (67%), with hypertension (36%) as the most common grade 3/4 TEAE. The 3 patients with RPLS were Caucasian women. Two had a history of hypertension and both experienced elevated BP and reduced CrCl. Of the 38 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 26.3% (95% CI, 12.3-40.3%) and median PFS was 5 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.1). Conclusions: The rate of RPLS observed in this study with AFL + C + P was higher than anticipated. A meta-analysis of safety from three large placebo-controlled studies reported no RPLS among 1333 patient treated with AFL + chemotherapy, and none was reported in prior combination studies of AFL + P or AFL + C + docetaxel. Though the study was stopped early, ORR and PFS were in accordance with most historical first-line NSCLC studies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Glenjen ◽  
Katrin Hammerling ◽  
Ingunn Hatlevoll ◽  
Rune Småland ◽  
Petra Weber Hauge ◽  
...  

71 Background: The Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG) conducted a phase II randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of FLOX and FLIRI as first line treatment in metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer. At progression or unacceptable drug related toxicity, a crossover to the other treatment arm should be done, if second line chemotherapy was indicated. Methods: 66 patients from 6 treatment centers in Norway were randomized to FLOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 and FA 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2, or FLIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1, bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 and FA 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2). Both treatments were repeated every second week. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety data. Results: At the present time data from 63 patients are available for analysis. First-line treatment: FLOX (n = 32) versus (v.) FLIRI (n = 31): Complete response (CR) n = 0 in both arms, partial response (PR) n = 16 v. 9, stable disease (SD) n = 12 v. 13, progressive disease (PD) n = 3 v. 6, not assessable for evaluation n = 1 v. 3 patients. RR was 50 % in the FLOX arm v. 29 % in the FLIRI arm, p = not significant (n.s), Pearson Chi-Square test. Median TTP was 5 months (95 % CI 2.2-7.8) v. 4 months (95 % CI 2.2-5.8), p = n.s, median OS was 11 months (95 % CI 9.2-12.8 ) v. 10 months (95 % CI 5.7-14.3), p = n.s, Log Rank test. Patient characteristics were well balanced. Febrile neutropenia was present among 10 % of the patients in the FLOX arm versus 7 % in the FLIRI arm. Second line treatment: 30 patients received second line treatment with FLOX or FLIRI. Data regarding RR, TTP, OS and safety will be updated in December 2011. Conclusions: The FLOX and FLIRI regimens are well tolerated among patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. As first line treatment the FLOX regime had a higher RR of 50% v. 29% for the FLIRI regime, longer TTP; 5 v. 4 months and longer OS 11 v. 10 months, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document