Comparison of simultaneous high dose stereotactic radiotherapy with normofractionated radiotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma under systemic therapy.
467 Background: Conventional radiation therapy (RT) is considered ineffective in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). There are data suggesting that this might be related to low doses per fraction and that higher doses could be more effective. We introduced hypofracationated high-dose radiation therapy in patients with an indication for radiotherapy an retrospectively compared the results to patients with a conventional radiation therapy. Methods: We identified 97 pts with mRCC and an indication for radiotherapy of metastatic lesions between 2007 and 2013. All pts underwent simultaneous systemic therapy based on targeted agents and systemic therapy. 83 pts had a hypofractionated high dose stereotactic radiation (HDRT) (5 Gy per fraction, 3 fractions per week, total 45 Gy) while 14 pts underwent conventional normo-fractionated radiotherapy (NDR) (1.8 Gy per fraction) as described elsewhere. Results: Median age was 64.1 years (27-86). 189 metastatic lesions were irradiated. 64% of the pts had clear cell histology, with 14% harboring papillary RCC type II and 11% other subentities. Median overall survival was significantly longer for pts after HDRT was 9.4 months (+/-9.4 months) and 4.5 months (+/- 3.4 months) after NDR (p=0.01). The multivariate cox regression analysis revealed the MSKCC risk score, HDR therapy and the disease free survival as positive predictors for survival. No grade III toxicities were found, with 24% of the patients experiencing grade 1 or 2 side effects, mainly diarrhea and fatigue. Conclusions: In mRCC HDRT with simultaneous systemic therapy is related to a better overall survival than NRT. HDRT in combination with targeted therapy should be regarded the standard of care if RT is indicated.