scholarly journals Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28) ◽  
pp. 3137-3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Tice ◽  
Diana L. Miglioretti ◽  
Chin-Shang Li ◽  
Celine M. Vachon ◽  
Charlotte C. Gard ◽  
...  

Purpose Women with proliferative breast lesions are candidates for primary prevention, but few risk models incorporate benign findings to assess breast cancer risk. We incorporated benign breast disease (BBD) diagnoses into the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk model, the only breast cancer risk assessment tool that uses breast density. Methods We developed and validated a competing-risk model using 2000 to 2010 SEER data for breast cancer incidence and 2010 vital statistics to adjust for the competing risk of death. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the relative hazards for age, race/ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, history of breast biopsy, BBD diagnoses, and breast density in the BCSC. Results We included 1,135,977 women age 35 to 74 years undergoing mammography with no history of breast cancer; 17% of the women had a prior breast biopsy. During a mean follow-up of 6.9 years, 17,908 women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. The BCSC BBD model slightly overpredicted risk (expected-to-observed ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.06) and had modest discriminatory accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.665). Among women with proliferative findings, adding BBD to the model increased the proportion of women with an estimated 5-year risk of 3% or higher from 9.3% to 27.8% (P < .001). Conclusion The BCSC BBD model accurately estimates women's risk for breast cancer using breast density and BBD diagnoses. Greater numbers of high-risk women eligible for primary prevention after BBD diagnosis are identified using the BCSC BBD model.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1506-1506
Author(s):  
S. A. Israel ◽  
H. Nassar ◽  
A. L. Gross ◽  
L. K. Jacobs ◽  
D. K. Armstrong ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Tan-Chiu ◽  
J. Wang ◽  
J. P. Costantino ◽  
S. Paik ◽  
C. Butch ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (11) ◽  
pp. 2796-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine S. Berkey ◽  
Rulla M. Tamimi ◽  
Bernard Rosner ◽  
A. Lindsay Frazier ◽  
Graham A. Colditz

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hikmat Abdel-Razeq ◽  
Luna Zaru ◽  
Ahmed Badheeb ◽  
Shadi Hijjawi

Background and Objectives. Breast cancer has been the most common cancer affecting women in Jordan. In the process of implementing breast cancer prevention and early detection programs, individualized risk assessment can add to the cost-effectiveness of such interventions. Gail model is a widely used tool to stratify patients into different risk categories. However, concerns about its applicability across different ethnic groups do exist. In this study, we report our experience with the application of a modified version of this model among Jordanian women. Methods. The Gail risk assessment model (RAM) was modified and used to calculate the 5-year and lifetime risk for breast cancer. Patients with known breast cancer were used to test this model. Medical records and hospital database were utilized to collect information on known risk factors. The mean calculated risk score for women tested was 0.65. This number, which corresponds to the Gail original score of 1.66, was used as a cutoff point to categorize patients as high risk. Results. A total of 1786 breast cancer patients with a mean age of 50 (range: 19–93) years were included. The modified version of the Gail RAM was applied on 1213 patients aged 35–59.9 years. The mean estimated risk for developing invasive breast cancer over the following five years was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.56), and the lifetime risk was 3.42 (95% CI: 3.30, 3.53). Only 210 (17.3%) women had a risk score >0.65 and thus categorized as high risk. First-degree family history of breast cancer was identified among 120 (57.1%) patients in this high-risk group. Conclusions. Among a group of patients with an established diagnosis of breast cancer, a modified Gail risk assessment model would have been able to stratify only 17% into the high-risk category. The family history of breast cancer contributed the most to the risk score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document