scholarly journals Racial Variation in the Uptake of Oncotype DX Testing for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan C. Roberts ◽  
Morris Weinberger ◽  
Stacie B. Dusetzina ◽  
Michaela A. Dinan ◽  
Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes ◽  
...  

Purpose Oncotype DX (ODX) is a tumor gene-profiling test that aids in adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making. ODX has the potential to improve quality of care; however, if not equally accessible across racial groups, disparities in cancer care quality may persist or worsen. We examined racial disparities in ODX testing uptake. Methods We used data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, phase III, a longitudinal, population-based study of 2,998 North Carolina women who received a diagnosis of breast cancer between 2008 and 2014. Our primary analysis used modified Poisson regression to determine the association between race and whether ODX testing was ordered among two strata: node-negative and node-positive breast cancer. Results A total of 1,468 women with estrogen receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–negative, stage I or II breast cancer met inclusion criteria. Black patients had higher-grade and larger tumors, more comorbidities, younger age at diagnosis, and lower socioeconomic status than non-black women. Overall, 42% of women had ODX test results in their pathology reports. Compared with those who did not receive ODX testing, women who received ODX testing tended to be younger and have medium tumor size and grade. Our regression analyses indicated no racial disparities in ODX uptake among node-negative patients. However, racial differences were detected among node-positive patients, with black patients being 46% less likely to receive ODX testing than non-black women (adjusted relative risk, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; P = .006). Conclusion We did not find racial disparities in ODX testing for node-negative patients for whom ODX testing is guideline recommended and widely covered by insurers. However, our findings suggest that a newer, non–guideline-concordant application of ODX testing for node-positive breast cancer was accessed less by black women than by non-black women, reflecting more guideline concordant care among black women.

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
pp. 212-222
Author(s):  

This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest – Mammella Intergruppo (GONO MIG). Clinical trials include: Standard CEF versus accelerated CEF as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive or high-risk node-negative (T > 2 cm, age <35 years, G3, negative hormone receptors or high TL1 or S-phase) breast cancer. A phase III randomized trial. MIG-1Epirubicin plus paclitaxel versus cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. A phase III randomized study. MIG-5A phase III randomized study of sequential epidoxorubicin plus cyclophosp-amide followed by docetaxel (EC D) versus a combination of 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosp-amide (FEC) as adjuvant treatment of node-negative early breast cancer patients.A phase III randomized study of EC followed by paclitaxel versus FEC followed by paclitaxel, all given either every 3 or 2 weeks supported by pegfilgrastim, for node-positive breast cancer patients.Prevention of chemotherapy-induced menopause by temporary ovarian suppression with triptorelin versus control in young breast cancer patients. A randomized phase III multicenter study.Letrozole adjuvant therapy duration (lead) study: standard versus long treatment. A phase III trial in post-menopausal women with early breast cancer.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 3303-3307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Connor ◽  
Marilee McGinness ◽  
Joshua Mammen ◽  
Lori Ranallo ◽  
Stephanie LaFaver ◽  
...  

Breast Cancer ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakuni Noguchi ◽  
Koichiro Tsugawa ◽  
Futoshi Kawahara ◽  
Etsuro Bando ◽  
Koichi Miwa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document