Comment on “Efficacy of Prophylactic Low-Molecular Weight Heparin for Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Outcomes From the CONKO-004 Trial”

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thein Hlaing Oo
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (18) ◽  
pp. 2028-2034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Pelzer ◽  
Bernhard Opitz ◽  
Gerd Deutschinoff ◽  
Martina Stauch ◽  
Peter C. Reitzig ◽  
...  

Purpose Advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), in addition to its high mortality, accounts for the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Enoxaparin, a low–molecular weight heparin, is effective in prevention and treatment of VTEs. Some small studies have indicated that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with histologically proven APC were randomly assigned to ambulant first-line chemotherapy and prophylactic use of enoxaparin or chemotherapy alone to investigate the probable reduction in symptomatic VTEs and the impact on survival. Results A total of 312 patients were recruited as one of the protocol end points was reached. Within the first 3 months, the numbers of symptomatic VTEs were as follows: 15 of 152 patients in the observation group and two of 160 patients in the enoxaparin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52; χ2 P = .001). The numbers of major bleeding events were as follows: five of 152 patients in the observation arm and seven of 160 patients in the enoxaparin arm (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.35 to 3.72; χ2 P = 1.0). Overall cumulative incidence rates of symptomatic VTEs were 15.1% (observation) and 6.4% (enoxaparin; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83; P = .01). Progression-free (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.32; P = .64) and overall survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.38; P = .44) did not differ between groups. Conclusion This study demonstrates the high efficacy and feasibility of primary pharmacologic prevention of symptomatic VTEs in outpatients with APC. Treatment efficacy was not affected by simultaneous treatment with enoxaparin in this trial setting.


2007 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fikri Icli ◽  
Hakan Akbulut ◽  
Gungor Utkan ◽  
Bülent Yalcin ◽  
Dilek Dincol ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4506-LBA4506 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Riess ◽  
U. Pelzer ◽  
G. Deutschinoff ◽  
B. Opitz ◽  
M. Stauch ◽  
...  

LBA4506 The full, final text of this abstract will be available in Part II of the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, distributed onsite at the Meeting on May 30, 2009, and as a supplement to the June 20, 2009, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2014 ◽  
Vol 350 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thangirala Sudha ◽  
Murat Yalcin ◽  
Hung-Yun Lin ◽  
Ahmed M. Elmetwally ◽  
Tipu Nazeer ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 2071-2076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederiek F. van Doormaal ◽  
Marcello Di Nisio ◽  
Hans-Martin Otten ◽  
Dick J. Richel ◽  
Martin Prins ◽  
...  

Purpose Earlier studies showed that low molecular weight heparin significantly prolongs the survival of a wide variety of patients with cancer without venous thromboembolism. This study was designed to confirm these findings in a more homogeneous group of patients with cancer. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, randomized, open-label study, patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (stage IIIB), hormone-refractory prostate cancer, or locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to nadroparin or to no nadroparin in addition to their standard anticancer treatment. In the nadroparin arm, subcutaneous nadroparin was administered for 6 weeks (2 weeks at therapeutic dose, and 4 weeks at half therapeutic dose). The patients were eligible to receive additional cycles of nadroparin (2 weeks at therapeutic dose, and 4 weeks of washout period). Outcomes were overall survival, time to progression, and major bleeding. All study outcomes were adjudicated by an independent, blinded committee. Results A total of 244 patients were allocated to nadroparin, and 259 were allocated to the control group. A median survival of 13.1 months was observed in the nadroparin recipients compared with 11.9 months in the no-treatment arm (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.18, adjusted for cancer type). No difference in time to progression was observed. The number of major bleedings was comparable at 4.1% in the nadroparin set and 3.5% in the control set. Conclusion This study did not show a survival benefit of nadroparin in patients with advanced prostate, lung, or pancreatic cancer. Given the ongoing studies in this area and the previous data, the role of low molecular weight heparins in cancer survival remains undefined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document