Population-based assessment of disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate endpoint (SE) of 5-year overall survival (5Y OS) in stage I-III rectal (RC) and colon cancer (CC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3602-3602
Author(s):  
Richard M. Lee-Ying ◽  
Yaling Yin ◽  
Howard John Lim ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke
Author(s):  
Jun Yin ◽  
Mohamed E Salem ◽  
Jesse G Dixon ◽  
Zhaohui Jin ◽  
Romain Cohen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Disease-free survival with a 3-year median follow-up (3-year DFS) was validated as a surrogate for overall survival with a 5-year median follow-up (5-year OS) in adjuvant chemotherapy colon cancer (CC) trials. Recent data show further improvements in OS and survival after recurrence, in patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX. Hence, re-evaluation of the association between DFS and OS and determination of the optimal follow-up duration of OS to aid its utility in future adjuvant trials are needed. Methods Individual patient data from nine randomized studies conducted between 1998 and 2009 were included; three trials tested biologics. Trial-level surrogacy examining the correlation of treatment effect estimates of 3-year DFS with 5 to 6.5-year OS was evaluated using both linear regression (R2WLS) and Copula bivariate (R2Copula) models and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For R2, a value closer to 1 indicates a stronger correlation. Results Data from a total of 18,396 patients were analyzed (median age = 59 years; 54.0% male), with 54.1% having low-risk tumors (pT1-3 & pN1), 31.6% KRAS mutated, 12.3% BRAF mutated, and 12.4% microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair tumors. Trial level correlation between 3-year DFS and 5-year OS remained strong (R2 =0.82, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.98; R2 =0.92, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.00) and increased as the median follow-up of OS extended. Analyses limited to trials that tested biologics showed consistent results. Conclusion Three-year DFS remains a validated surrogate endpoint for 5-year OS in adjuvant CC trials. The correlation was likely strengthened with 6 years of follow-up for OS.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1375-1375
Author(s):  
Vishal Kukreti ◽  
Peter Petersen ◽  
Melania Pintilie ◽  
Richard Tsang ◽  
Michael Crump ◽  
...  

Abstract Follicular lymphoma arising in an extranodal site is uncommon and its natural history and treatment is poorly characterized in the literature. We retrospectively reviewed a large cohort of patients with stage I and II follicular lymphoma and analyzed the outcomes of patients with extranodal (EN-FL) presentations to identify sites of involvement and treatment outcome, and compared these to patients with nodal follicular lymphoma. From 1967 to 1999, 668 cases of limited stage follicular lymphoma (stage I and II) were treated at the Princess Margaret Hospital. Of these, 157 cases (23.5%) presented in extra-nodal sites. The most common site of presentation was in the head and neck area (42%) followed by gastro-intestinal tract (14.6%) then skin (10.8%). The majority of patients had stage I disease (61.8%). Pathological type was follicular grade I: 22.9%, grade II: 33.1%, and grade III: 43.9%. Treatment consisted of involved field radiation therapy in 72%, combined modality therapy in 22.3% and chemotherapy alone in 3.8%. The treatment changed over time with increased use of combined modality treatment (CMT) [1967–77: 10.5%, vs. 1989–99: 33%] mainly due to the adoption of CMT for follicular grade III lymphoma. Overall complete response rate (CR) to primary treatment was 93%; the CR rate for radiation alone was 97.3%. The cumulative incidence of relapse (RR) was 44% at 10 years. The RR at 10 years was higher for patients age >60 (62% vs. 49%; p =0.059) but did not vary according to stage, tumour bulk, gender or histologic grade. For extranodal lymphoma, the 10-year overall survival (OS) rate was 56% and the 10-year disease free survival (DFS) was 42% and was similar for major sites of presentation. Comparison of Stage I–II Nodal and Extra-nodal Follicular Lymphoma Nodal Follicular Lymphoma Extra-nodal Follicular Lymphoma 10 yr Overall Survival 61% 56% (p=0.97) 10 year Disease Free Survival 41% 42% (p=0.27) 10 yr Relapse Rate 50% 44% (p=0.11) In conclusion, a significant number of patients with localized FL present with extra-nodal disease, involving diverse sites. Patients with EN-FL were more likely to have follicular grade III histology. OS, DFS and RR were similar to nodal follicular lymphoma. These results suggest that the clinical management of stage I and II extra-nodal follicular lymphoma should be the same as for nodal, and that a significant proportion of patients have prolonged DFS with radiation-based therapy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4018-4018
Author(s):  
M. E. Buyse ◽  
K. J. Punt ◽  
C. H. Köhne ◽  
P. Hohenberger ◽  
R. Labianca ◽  
...  

4018 Background: Disease-free survival (DFS) is the primary endpoint of most trials testing adjuvant treatments. However many other endpoints are used. There is much confusion about these endpoints since different definitions were used among trials, or no definitions were provided at all. Moreover there is no consensus on either the definition of each endpoint or on the most relevant among these endpoints. This creates difficulties when comparing the results of various trials. Methods: Adjuvant trials in colon cancer were used as a model. A systematic review was performed on published adjuvant studies in colon cancer from 1997–2006, and the definitions of endpoints other than overall survival (OS) were recorded. A panel of medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, and a statistician, all with expertise in randomised trials in colorectal cancer, aimed to reach consensus on the definition of the various endpoints as well as to select the most relevant among these. Results: A total of 52 studies were identified. In addition to overall survival 8 other endpoints were used, and both the definition of these endpoints as well as the starting point differed considerably among these studies. No definition was provided for the endpoint in 19 (37%) studies and for the starting point in 30 (58%) studies. The panel reached consensus on the definition of each endpoint ( table ), and agreed that DFS, defined as the time from randomisation to any event irrespective of cause was considered to be the most relevant endpoint for adjuvant studies. The date of randomisation was considered to be the most appropriate starting point. Conclusions: The proposed guideline will help in the design of future adjuvant studies in colon cancer, and will achieve the uniformity required to facilitate cross-study comparisons. It may serve as a model for adjuvant studies in other solid tumors. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3508-3508 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Allegra ◽  
G. A. Yothers ◽  
M. J. O'Connell ◽  
S. Sharif ◽  
N. J. Petrelli ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548
Author(s):  
Brandon Matthew Meyers ◽  
Humaid Obaid Al-Shamsi ◽  
Alvaro Tell Figueredo

3548 Background: Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery in the early stages of the disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage III disease, but the magnitude of benefit in stage II colon cancer is less clear. A previous Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) found improved disease-free, but not overall survival (Figueredo et al., 2008). An updated SR/MA was performed to determine the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. Methods: Relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were independently searched by all authors, using the same search strategy employed in the original study (1/1988 to 9/2012). Randomized trials containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy versus observation were included. Pooled results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) whenever possible, or risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using a random effects model. Results: Seven studies were identified, and included in the final SR/MA. Six of the 7 studies were included in the disease-free survival analysis (n=4587). Adjuvant 5FU was associated with better disease-free survival (RR 0.84 (95%CI 0.75-0.94)). All 7 studies (n=5353) were included in the overall survival analysis showing an improvement with adjuvant 5FU (HR 0.87 (95%CI 0.78-0.97)). There was no evidence of heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 0% for all analyses). Conclusions: In stage II colon cancer, adjuvant 5FU chemotherapy statistically improves both disease-free and overall survival. Our SR/MA demonstrates, for the first time, an overall survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3395-3407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Figueredo ◽  
Manya L. Charette ◽  
Jean Maroun ◽  
Melissa C. Brouwers ◽  
Lisa Zuraw

Purpose To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy? Methods A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation. Results Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P = .07). Conclusion There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.


Author(s):  
Jean F. Delaloye ◽  
Sandro Pampallona ◽  
Philippe A. Coucke ◽  
Alexandre Megalo ◽  
Pierre De Grandi

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyi Wu ◽  
Jy-Ming Chiang ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
Reiping Tang ◽  
Jinn-Shiun Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a significant prognostic marker in resectable colorectal cancer; however, there are no equivalent findings for perforated colon cancer. Using our colorectal cancer database, we retrospectively analyzed the data from 1995 to 2015 to determine whether the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with survival outcomes in patients with perforated colon cancer.Methods: One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to minimize the difference between the high (>5) and low (≤5) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio groups. Clinicopathological factors, long-term overall survival, and disease-free survival were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival.Results: Before propensity score matching, the high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio group had a significantly higher prevalence of leukocytosis (low vs. high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio groups: 12 [12.9%] vs. 46 [59.7%], p<0.001), lower serum albumin levels (low vs. high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio groups: 30 [32.3%] vs. 42 [54.5%], p=0.003), and a higher emergent operation rate (low vs. high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio groups: 5 [5.4%] vs. 20 [26.0%], p<0.001). After one-to-one propensity score matching, the groups comprised 41 patients each; none of the parameters were significantly different between the two groups. The mean follow-up period was 76.3 months. The 5-year overall survival (p=0.637) and disease-free survival (p=0.827) rates were not significantly different between the high and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio groups.Conclusions: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has limited predictive value for determining outcomes in patients with perforated colon cancer.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4193-4193
Author(s):  
Dok Hyun Yoon ◽  
Byeong Seok Sohn ◽  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Sung Yong Oh ◽  
Won-Sik Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Full cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy or abbreviated chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy are recommended as standard of care for limited stage (LS) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There are occasions when lesions are completely excised during the diagnostic surgical resection. In addition, initial surgical resection of the involved area is often performed in the treatment of intestinal lymphomas with LS disease due to obstructive lesions or perforation risk. As to these patients without residual gross lesions, however, the number of cycles of chemotherapy has not so far been questioned and full cycles of chemotherapy are usually performed. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an abbreviated three courses of R-CHOP chemotherapy in patients with completely excised stage I or II CD20+ DLBCL. Methods: This is a multicenter, single arm, phase 2 study designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of 3 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy in low risk LS DLBCL. Key inclusion criteria were as follows: pathologically confirmed CD20 positive DLBCL, age >18 years, stage I or II, and complete resection with no residual lesion after surgical resection. Patients with B symptoms, bulky disease, primary breast, testicular or CNS lymphomas were excluded. R-CHOP chemotherapy started within 6 weeks from surgical resection and was repeated every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Prophylactic G-CSF was not administered. Radiologic tumor assessment was performed at baseline, every 3 months until 2 years, then every 6 months until 5 years after completion of study treatment. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01279902.) Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled between Dec 2010 and May 2013. Of these, one was excluded because of ineligibility and the remaining 22 patients were included in the analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range, 29-77 years). Fourteen patients had stage 1 disease and the other eight had stage 2. Preoperative LDH level was available in 11 patients and it was elevated in two of them. Thus, preoperative IPI scores could be calculated in those 11 patients; 0 in 8, 1 in one, and 2 in one patients, respectively. Postoperative IPI scores were 0 in 11, 1 in 10 and 2 in one patients. Primary sites included intestine (n=15), cervical lymph nodes (n=4), stomach (n=1), tonsil (n=1) and spleen (n=1). All the 22 patients completed 3 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy as planned. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months (95% CI, 29.9-47.1 months), only one patient showed disease progression and died with the estimated 2-year DFS and OS rates of 95.0%. It was the only one patient with IPI of 2 with elevated LDH and age>60 that showed disease progression at 12.7 months. He had a splenic mass and underwent splenectomy followed by 3 cycles of R-CHOP. He underwent one cycle of salvage R-ESHAP chemotherapy but died of rapid disease progression. No grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities were observed. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity which was noted in 8 (36.4%) patients. Three patients experienced G3 febrile neutropenia. Conclusions: Three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy is an effective and safe therapeutic approach for patients with localized and completely excised DLBCL especially in those with low-risk IPI. Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) disease-free survival and (B) overall survival. (A) (B) Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) disease-free survival and (B) overall survival. / (A). / (B) Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document