Advanced biliary tract cancer: Experience with ABC-02 regimen in a tertiary care center in the United States.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15624-e15624
Author(s):  
Rishi Agarwal ◽  
Nabeela Iffat Siddiqi ◽  
Shuchi Gulati ◽  
Arun Sendilnathan ◽  
Changchun Xie ◽  
...  
HPB ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Carroll Jr ◽  
Zachary M. Hurwitz ◽  
Jessica P. Simons ◽  
James T. McPhee ◽  
Sing Chau Ng ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 1023-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Khosravi ◽  
Sophia Zhang ◽  
Alyce M. Anderson ◽  
Laura K. Ferris ◽  
Sonal Choudhary ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jill Koshiol ◽  
Catterina Ferreccio ◽  
Susan S. Devesa ◽  
Juan Carlos Roa ◽  
Joseph F. Fraumeni

Biliary tract cancers encompass tumors of the gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts, and ampulla of Vater. In the United States, biliary tract cancer is the fifth most common malignant neoplasm of the digestive tract, accounting for about 3,700 deaths per year. The gallbladder is the primary subsite for 40% of biliary tract cancers, followed by the extrahepatic bile ducts (33%), ampulla of Vater (20%), and unspecified subsite (8%). Gallbladder cancer occurs twice as often in women than men, while other biliary tumors are more common in men. Risk of gallbladder cancer is elevated in Amerindians, including the Pima Indians in the United States and the Mapuches in Chile, and in certain Hispanic populations. While a significant fraction of these tumors are related to underlying gallstones (cholelithiasis), information on other risk factors is limited, due to the rarity of the tumors, the often rapidly fatal course, and small number of epidemiologic studies.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16018-16018
Author(s):  
K. K. Curtis ◽  
D. W. Northfelt

16018 Background: Second opinions (SO) are common in medical practice. Aside from case series, little evidence exists to demonstrate a clinical benefit associated with SO. Lack of relevant data limits knowledge of numbers of patients, diseases, and motivations of SO seekers. Within the field of medical hematology/oncology (H/O), no specific demographic data are available to characterize patients seeking SO in the United States. Methods: To typify such patients at Mayo Clinic in Arizona (MCA), we recorded demographic and disease-related information for patients seeking these evaluations over a six month period from 1/1 through 6/30/05. Results: A total of 683 patients contacted MCA for medical H/O SO over the 6 month study period. A complete set of demographic and disease-related information was obtained from 655 patients; the remainder were excluded from the data set. Demographically, the majority of patients were female (53%), married (66%), and lived nearby (i.e., from Arizona-58%, or bordering state-22%). Average age was 62.3 years. Among oncologic diagnoses, the majority of patients (60% of 374 reported oncologic diagnoses) stated a diagnosis of breast, lung, colorectal, pancreatic or prostate cancer. Approximately 1/3 of patients had metastatic disease at the time they sought evaluation at MCA. There were 278 patients seeking evaluation for hematologic abnormalities, with the majority (160 patients, 58%) seeking evaluation for non-malignant conditions. Of those with malignancies, lymphoma (including Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin) was the most common (45%), followed by multiple myeloma (21%) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (15%). Conclusions: This study provides insight into demographics and disease processes of patients seeking medical H/O SO at a tertiary care center in the United States. Although no definite conclusions can be drawn about motivations for seeking H/O SO, future research should examine patient motivation to better understand factors leading to this behavior. Given a lack of evidence for clinical benefit associated with SO seeking, and its potential costliness, better knowledge of demographic and motivational factors may allow for a more constructive approach to be taken toward the needs of SO seekers. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 661-662
Author(s):  
F.A. Castro ◽  
J. Koshiol ◽  
A.W. Hsing ◽  
S.S. Devesa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document