Early-onset small bowel and colorectal cancer patients with BRCA mutations: Actionable variants in atypical presentations.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 545-545
Author(s):  
Karen Vikstrom

545 Background: The paradigm of genetic panel testing for hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to emerge. An association between Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome and early onset CRC and has been reported, though only significantly associated with BRCA1 mutations. Guidelines do not include CRC in the HBOC spectrum. We describe nine early-onset ( < 55 years) gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 to highlight actionable findings that would have been missed by traditional CRC genetic testing. Methods: The nine affected patients underwent genetic testing using NGS-based multi-gene cancer panels. Genomic DNA variants were identified and classified according to ACMG criteria. Patient medical histories were obtained by referring clinician and documented on test requisition forms, and were de-identified for analysis. Results: Nine patients had a pathogenic (P) variant in BRCA1 (three cases) or BRCA2 (six cases). Four patients were under the age of 32 at the time of their CRC diagnosis. Of the nine cases, only one met NCCN testing criteria for HBOC syndrome. All patients were negative for P variants in the canonical CRC genes (APC, MUTYH, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM). Conclusions: In this series, nine unrelated patients with early-onset CRC were found to carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The presence of BRCA mutations in these CRC patients is alone not strong evidence of causation; however, it suggests that clinicians should consider expanded panel testing in the presence of complex family histories, as these patients would have been found negative by traditional genetic tests. As the phenotypic spectrum of classical cancer syndromes is expanded by broad panel-based testing, it is important to identify patients that fall outside traditional diagnostic criteria, as some patients will have actionable findings in unexpected genes.

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Yeomans Kinney ◽  
Yeon-Ah Choi ◽  
Brenda DeVellis ◽  
Erin Kobetz ◽  
Robert C Millikan ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Toss ◽  
Eleonora Molinaro ◽  
Marta Venturelli ◽  
Federica Domati ◽  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
...  

NCCN Guidelines recommend BRCA genetic testing in individuals with a probability >5% of being a carrier. Nonetheless, the cost-effectiveness of testing individuals with no tumor family history is still debated, especially when BRCA testing is offered by the national health service. Our analysis evaluated the rate of BRCA pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants in 159 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients diagnosed ≤60 years, and 109 luminal-like breast cancer (BC) patients diagnosed ≤35 without breast and/or ovarian family histories. In TNBC patients, BRCA mutation prevalence was 22.6% (21.4% BRCA1). Mutation prevalence was 64.2% ≤30 years, 31.8% in patients aged 31–40, 16.1% for those aged 41–50 and 7.9% in 51–60 s. A total of 40% of patients with estrogen receptors (ER) 1–9% were BRCA1 carriers. BRCA detection rate in early-onset BCs was 6.4% (4.6% BRCA2). Mutation prevalence was 0% between 0–25 years, 9% between 26–30 years and 6% between 31–35 years. In conclusion, BRCA testing is recommended in TNBC patients diagnosed ≤60 years, regardless of family cancer history or histotype, and by using immunohistochemical staining <10% for both ER and/PR. In luminal-like early-onset BC, a lower BRCA detection rate was observed, suggesting a role for other predisposing genes along with BRCA genetic testing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1523-1523
Author(s):  
Gregory Idos ◽  
Katherine G Roth ◽  
Leah Naghi ◽  
Charite Nicolette Ricker ◽  
Julie Culver ◽  
...  

1523 Background: Mutation carrier prediction models are clinically useful tools for identifying candidates for genetic counseling and testing. Consensus guidelines recommend germline genetic testing for those with a carrier probability (CP) of approximately 5% or higher. However, prediction models may perform less well among racial/ethnic minorities. Our hypothesis is that pathogenic mutations (PM) are identifiable in a clinically meaningful fraction of racially/ethnically diverse patients with a CP of < 5%. Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective clinical trial of patients undergoing cancer-risk assessment using a 25 gene panel, which include APC, ATM, BARD1, BMPR1A, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CDK4, CDKN2A, CHEK2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, SMAD4, STK11, TP53. Patients were recruited from August 2014 to November 2016 at three centers. Patients were enrolled if they met standard clinical criteria for genetic testing or were predicted to have a ≥2.5% probability of inherited cancer susceptibility using validated prediction models. We evaluated the CP of patients with a PM in BRCA1, BRCA2, and/or a mismatch repair (MMR) gene using the following models: (1) BRCApro, (2) MMRpro and (3) PREMM1,2,6. Results: Of 2000 patients enrolled in this cohort, 80.6% are female (n = 1612). Regarding race/ethnicity, the cohort is 40.1% Non-Hispanic White (n = 802), 37.4% Hispanic (n = 748), 11.5% Asian (n = 230), 3.9% Black (n = 78), and 7.1% Other (n = 142). Among 241 (12.1%) patients who tested positive for a pathogenic mutation, 76 (31.5%) patients had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Of those, 52 (68.4%) patients had a BRCApro CP of < 5%. Thirty-eight (15.8%) patients had a pathogenic mutation in an MMR gene: 19 (50.0%) had an MMRpro CP of < 5%, while 13 (34.2%) had a PREMM1,2,6 CP of < 5%. The racial/ethnic distribution of BRCA1/2 or MMR mutation carriers is similar to that of the whole cohort. Conclusions: In a diverse cohort of patients undergoing 25-gene multiple-gene panel testing, half or more carriers of BRCA1/2 or MMR mutations had a CP of < 5%, the consensus guideline-recommended cutoff for genetic testing. These results support a lower threshold for genetic testing guidelines. Clinical trial information: NCT02324062.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1520-1520
Author(s):  
Molly S Daniels ◽  
Sheri Babb ◽  
Robin King ◽  
Diana Urbauer ◽  
Christopher I. Amos ◽  
...  

1520 Background: 10-15% of ovarian cancer patients have a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, with significant management implications for both patients and relatives. Genetic testing decisions are guided in part by the estimated likelihood of identifying a mutation. The BRCAPRO model uses personal and family history of breast and ovarian cancer to calculate the likelihood of a BRCA1/2 mutation. This study’s purpose was to assess the ability of BRCAPRO to accurately determine this likelihood. Methods: BRCAPRO scores were calculated using CancerGene v5.1 for 589 ovarian cancer patients referred for genetic counseling at three institutions. The study population was divided into quintiles by BRCAPRO score, with cutpoints chosen such that each quintile represented 20% of the sample. Chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to compare observed BRCA1/2 mutations to the number predicted. ANOVA models were used to assess factors impacting BRCAPRO accuracy. Results: 180/589 (31%) ovarian cancer patients tested positive for a BRCA1/2 mutation. At BRCAPRO scores under 40%, more mutations were observed than expected (93 observed vs. 34.1 expected, p<0.001). If patients with BRCAPRO scores <10% had not been offered genetic testing, almost one-third of mutations (51/180, 28%) would have been missed. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that BRCAPRO underestimated risk for high grade serous ovarian cancers but overestimated risk for other histologies (p<0.0001), underestimation increased as age at diagnosis decreased (p=0.02), and model performance varied by institution (p=0.02). Conclusions: Ovarian cancer patients classified as low risk by BRCAPRO are more likely to test positive than predicted, therefore the BRCAPRO prediction could falsely reassure patients considering genetic testing. BRCAPRO performance could be improved by incorporating factors such as ovarian cancer histology. Alternatively, given the high prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in high grade serous ovarian cancer and the apparent limitations of using family history to predict mutation probability, BRCA1/2 genetic testing could be offered to high grade serous ovarian cancer patients regardless of family history.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 747-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman ◽  
J. David Powers ◽  
Jessica Chubak ◽  
Douglas A. Corley ◽  
Nirupa R. Ghai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document