Standardization of oral chemotherapy delivery to improve patient safety: A pilot study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
Tejas Desai ◽  
Maritza Carvalho ◽  
Ron Fung ◽  
Devi Ahuja ◽  
Simerjit Gollee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Patient Adherence ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Oral Chemotherapy ◽  
Safety Standards ◽  
Patient Safety Indicators ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Pharmacy Interventions

90 Background: Oral chemotherapy (OC) presents unique challenges to patient safety. In contrast with parenteral chemotherapy, patient education and comprehension are crucial to the safe administration of OC, appropriate toxicity interventions and patient adherence. At Trillium Health Partners we identified a lack of standardization to OC education and monitoring, that resulted in gaps in patient care. Using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society 2013 chemotherapy safety standards as guidance, we developed and piloted a multi-disciplinary oral chemotherapy care pathway (OCCP) to improve the approach to education and monitoring of patients newly started on OC. Methods: Patients newly started on OC between 03/15–06/15 were enrolled by 2 participating physicians representing a predominantly lung/GI practice. Baseline data was abstracted retrospectively in the 3 months prior to the pilot to reflect all study participants. The OCCP included in-person and telephone assessments by an oncology pharmacist and nurse over 2 cycles of OC. Pilot outcomes included pharmacy interventions, dose modification for toxicity, medication errors, the percent of prescriptions on computerized physician order entry (CPOE), adherence documentation and comprehension of treatment plan. Results: The pilot enrolled 20 patients and compared them against 21 baseline patients. During the pilot there were improvements in the percentage of patients who had pharmacy interventions, documentation of adherence and assessment of comprehension of the treatment plan as well as a reduction in dose modifications due to toxicity (Table 1). Conclusions: Use of a newly developed oral chemotherapy care pathway demonstrated both feasibility as well as improvements in a variety of key patient safety indicators. These results suggest that implementation of a standardized oral chemotherapy care pathway can feasibly improve patient safety outcomes. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals ReCAP: Comparison of Independent Error Checks for Oral Versus Intravenous Chemotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa C. Griffin ◽  
Rachel E. Gilbert ◽  
Larry H. Broadfield ◽  
Anthony E. Easty ◽  
Patricia L. Trbovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Nova Scotia ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
The United States ◽  
Oral Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Community Pharmacies ◽  
Improve Patient

QUESTION ASKED: In the United States, research has found that oral chemotherapy is subject to fewer safeguards than are in routine use for intravenous (IV) chemotherapy; however, less is known about the Canadian context. The objective of this study was to determine whether similar safeguards, in the form of independent checks, existed to identify potential errors related to IV and oral chemotherapy formulations in a particular cancer system. SUMMARY ANSWER: In the cancer system studied, a total of 57 systematic checks were identified for IV chemotherapy, whereas only six systematic checks were identified for oral chemotherapy. Community pharmacists were the only qualified professionals involved in independent, systematic checking of oral chemotherapy, which occurred during ordering and dispensing. METHODS: Human factors specialists conducted observations and interviews in cancer center clinics, a cancer center pharmacy, and four community pharmacies across Nova Scotia. Processes were analyzed to determine whether an independent check was performed, which qualified provider completed the check, and at what point of the process the check occurred. BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTOR(S), DRAWBACKS: This study had some limitations. Although there are many forms of safeguards (eg, preprinted orders), only one type of safeguard (ie, independent checks) was examined in the cancer system studied. We chose to focus on independent checks because they were observable and were defined in the cancer center’s policies. Another limitation was that just a single jurisdiction (Nova Scotia), and four community pharmacies were examined. We examined each community pharmacy in detail, and sites were chosen to be representative (eg, rural versus urban). Further, the model used to deliver oral chemotherapy in Nova Scotia is not unique; a number of other provinces share similar models. REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS: There is an enormous opportunity for pharmacists and other qualified professionals to take on an expanded role in improving patient safety for oral chemotherapy. Oral chemotherapy, like IV chemotherapy, is known to be potentially hazardous, but in the cancer system studied, there were dramatically fewer independent checks associated with all aspects of oral chemotherapy–related processes. Greater involvement of pharmacists, both in the clinic environment and the community, would facilitate increased systematic checking, which could improve patient safety related to oral chemotherapy. [Figure: see text]

National Analysis of Adverse Patient Safety Events in Bariatric Surgery

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin K. Poulose ◽  
Marie R. Griffin ◽  
Yuwei Zhu ◽  
Walter Smalley ◽  
William O. Richards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Patient Safety Indicators ◽  
National Analysis ◽  
Improve Patient

Identifying risk factors for adverse events after bariatric surgery (BaS) can help define high-risk groups to improve patient safety. We calculated cumulative incidence of adverse events and identified risk factors for these events using validated surgical patient safety indicators (PSIs) developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. BaS patients ≥18 years old were identified using the 2002 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Cumulative incidence at discharge was calculated for accidental puncture or laceration (APL), pulmonary embolus or deep venous thrombosis (PE/DVT), and postoperative respiratory failure (RF). Factors predictive of these PSIs were identified. From 7,853,982 discharges, a national cohort of 69,490 BaS patients was identified. During BaS hospitalization, the cumulative incidences per 1000 discharges of APL, PE/DVT, and RF were 12.6, 3.4, and 7.3, respectively. Risk factors for APL included male gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1–2.3, P < 0.05) and age of 40–49 years (OR 1.6 [1.1–2.3], P < 0.05) compared to ages 18–39 years. Patients aged 50–59 years (OR 3.5 [1.6–7.7], P < 0.05) had a higher chance of PE/DVT compared to those 18–39 years. Male gender (OR 1.8 [1.1–2.9], P < 0.05), ages 40–49 (OR 2.1 [1.1–4.2], P < 0.05) and 50–59 (OR 3.8 [2.1–6.9], P < 0.05), a history of chronic lung disease (OR 1.7 [1.1–2.7], P < 0.05), and Medicare coverage compared to private insurance (OR 2.2 [1.2–3.8], P < 0.05) were predictive of RF. This study established national measures for BaS adverse events. Further, risk factors associated with adverse events varied by gender, age, insurance status, and comorbidity. Evaluation of these higher risk BaS groups is needed to improve patient safety.

scholarly journals Writing’s on the wall: improving the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e001086
Author(s):  
Claire Cushley ◽  
Tom Knight ◽  
Helen Murray ◽  
Lawrence Kidd
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Surgical Safety Checklist ◽  
Surgical Safety ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Mandatory Requirement ◽  
Who Checklist ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Theatre Team

Background and problemThe WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has been shown to improve patient safety as well as improving teamwork and communication in theatres. In 2009, it was made a mandatory requirement for all NHS hospitals in England and Wales. The WHO checklist is intended to be adapted to suit local settings and was modified for use in Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. In 2018, it was decided to review the use of the adapted WHO checklist and determine whether improvements in compliance and engagement could be achieved.AimThe aim was to achieve 90% compliance and engagement with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist by April 2019.MethodsIn April 2018, a prospective observational audit and online survey took place. The results showed compliance for the ‘Sign In’ section of the checklist was 55% and for the ‘Time Out’ section was 91%. Engagement by the entire theatre team was measured at 58%. It was proposed to move from a paper checklist to a wall-mounted checklist, to review and refine the items in the checklist and to change the timing of ‘Time Out’ to ensure it was done immediately prior to knife-to-skin.ResultsFollowing its introduction in September 2018, the new wall-mounted checklist was reaudited. Compliance improved to 91% for ‘Sign In’ and to 94% for ‘Time Out’. Engagement by the entire theatre team was achieved 100% of the time. Feedback was collected, adjustments made and the new checklist was rolled out in stages across all theatres. A reaudit in December 2018 showed compliance improved further, to 99% with ‘Sign In’ and to 100% with ‘Time Out’. Engagement was maintained at 100%.ConclusionsThe aim of the project was met and exceeded. Since April 2019, the new checklist is being used across all theatres in the Trust.

scholarly journals Understanding safety in healthcare: the system evolution, erosion and enhancement model

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Carthey
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Complex Systems ◽  
Human Error ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
New Model ◽  
System Evolution ◽  
Accident Causation ◽  
System Migration ◽  
Improve Patient

The paper summarises previous theories of accident causation, human error, foresight, resilience and system migration. Five lessons from these theories are used as the foundation for a new model which describes how patient safety emerges in complex systems like healthcare: the System Evolution Erosion and Enhancement model. It is concluded that to improve patient safety, healthcare organisations need to understand how system evolution both enhances and erodes patient safety.

Atmung – Standardisierte Checkliste macht Intubation von Neugeborenen sicherer

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 124-125
Author(s):  
Maria Weiß
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Improve Patient

Hatch LD. et al. Intervention To Improve Patient Safety During Intubation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Pediatrics 2016; 138: e20160069 Kinder auf der Neugeborenen-Intensivstation sind besonders durch Komplikationen während des Krankenhausaufenthaltes gefährdet. Dies gilt auch für die Intubation, die relativ häufig mit unerwünschten Ereignissen einhergeht. US-amerikanische Neonatologen haben jetzt untersucht, durch welche Maßnahmen sich die Komplikationsrate bei Intubationen in ihrem Perinatal- Zentrum senken lässt.

Allogeneic blood transfusion and AIS surgery: how the NSQIP database can improve patient safety

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hady Eltayeby ◽  
Catherine Brown ◽  
Brendan T. Campbell ◽  
Craig Bonanni ◽  
Mark Indelicato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Allogeneic Blood Transfusion ◽  
Allogeneic Blood ◽  
Improve Patient
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document