Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 3-weekly versus weekly cisplatin in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial (ChiCTR-TRC-12001979).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6006-6006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Liang ◽  
Wei-Xiong Xia ◽  
Xing Lv ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
Qi Zeng ◽  
...  

6006 Background: In intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with either every three week (ETW) or once a week (OAW) cisplatin is accepted practice for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). However, ETW and OAW were never prospectively compared in phase 3 clinical trials. This study is to assess the efficacy and toxicity profiles of CCRT with ETW versus OAW schedule of cisplatin. Methods: We conducted an open-label phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial in an endemic area. Patients with stage II-IVB NPC were randomly assigned to receive either cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 2 cycles or cisplatin 40 mg/m² weekly up to 6 cycles concurrently with IMRT. IMRT in both groups was given as 2.19-2.34 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 68-70 Gy to the primary tumor and 62-68 Gy to the involved neck area. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival. Intention-to-treat population was adopted for efficacy analyses. Results: Of the 526 eligible patients, 267 were assigned to OAW arm, and 259 to ETW arm. Two arms were well-balanced in all prognostic factors. No difference was observed in overall tumor response between OAW and ETW (99.6% vs 98.9%, P = 0.624). After a median follow-up of 17.5 months (range 1.6-64.1), estimated 2 year failure-free survival rate was 92% (95% CI 87.7-96.3) in OAW and 88.3% (95% CI 83.2-93.4) in ETW (hazard ratio 1.056, 95% CI 0.58-1.92). The grade 3 or 4 toxicities were similar between two arms, but leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly higher in OAW compared with ETW (24.8% vs 15.9%, P = 0.015 and 5.2% vs 1.1%, P = 0.01, respectively). Stomatitis (35.2% vs 32.6%, P = 0.576), leucopenia and nausea/vomiting (11.2% vs 12.5%, P = 0.684) were the most commonly observed grade 3 or 4 toxicities during both OAW and ETW arms. Conclusions: Weekly regimen of cisplatin as CCRT shows similar treatment efficacy but increased toxic effect of leucopenia and thrombocytopenia compared with 3-weekly schedule in LANPC. Longer follow-up is needed to fully assess prognosis and late toxicities. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-TRC-12001979.






2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6004-6004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Yuan Chen ◽  
Qi Yang ◽  
Minghuang Hong ◽  
Ming-Huang Hong

6004 Background: Initial 3-year results from our clinical trial in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients showed that induction chemotherapy (IC) with cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) resulted in improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a marginally significant effect on distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), but the effect of IC on locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly. Here, we present 5-year follow-up results. Methods: Our trial was a randomized, open-label phase 3 trial comparing IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in patients with stage III-IVB (except T3N0-1) NPC. The IC followed by CCRT group received cisplatin (80 mg/m² d1) and fluorouracil (800 mg/m² d1-5) every three weeks for two cycles before CCRT. Both groups were treated with 80 mg/m² cisplatin every three weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoints were DFS and DMFS. We did efficacy analyses in the 476 randomized patients (intention-to-treat population). Results: After a median follow-up of 82.6 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 73.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.7-79.1) in the IC followed by CCRT group and 63.1% (95% CI 56.8-69.4) in the CCRT alone group (P = 0.005). The 5-year DMFS rate was also significantly higher in the IC followed by CCRT group (82.8%, 95% CI 77.9-87.7) than in the CCRT alone group (73.1%, 95% CI 67.2-79.0, P = 0.013). Our updated analysis revealed an OS benefit of IC: the 5-year OS rate was 80.8% in the IC followed by CCRT group versus 76.8% in the CCRT alone group (P = 0.045). There were no significant differences in the rate of grade 3–4 late adverse events during follow-up between the two groups. Conclusions: IC followed by CCRT provides long-term DFS, DMFS, and OS benefits compared with CCRT alone in locoregionally advanced NPC and, therefore, can be recommended for these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00705627.



2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Zou ◽  
Jing-Jing Yuan ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Jian-Wu Ding ◽  
Bing Liao ◽  
...  

PurposeTo analyze the outcomes and toxicities of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).MethodsRetrospective analysis of 163 patients with LA-NPC referred from August 2015 to December 2018 was carried out. All patients underwent platinum-based ICT followed by CCRT plus ACT.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 40 months, ranging from 5 to 69 months. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 80.8, 90.0, 91.6, and 87.4%, respectively. The most frequent acute grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (66.8%), neutropenia (55.8%), mucositis (41.1%), thrombocytopenia (27.0%), and anemia (14.7%).ConclusionICT followed by CCRT plus ACT did not seemingly enhance DFS and OS in LA-NPC patients compared to the addition of ICT to CCRT (historical controls). In contrast, ICT followed by CCRT plus ACT had more acute adverse events than ICT followed by CCRT. Longer-term clinical studies are required to examine the treatment outcomes and late toxicities.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document