Nonconventional responses and survival benefit of immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14572-e14572
Author(s):  
Meera Yogarajah ◽  
Brian S Kuszyk ◽  
Chipman Robert Geoffrey Stroud ◽  
Cynthia R. Cherry ◽  
Paul R. Walker

e14572 Background: Objective response rates (ORR) utilizing RECIST or WHO criteria have been traditionally used as clinical endpoints to assess efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy. However in the era of immunotherapeutic agents, response rate assessment can be misleading due to nonconventional responses resulting in premature discontinuation of treatment. Wolchok et al proposed immune-related response criteria (irRC) to assess immune responses in melanoma. He also noted that stable disease which is not indicative of antitumor activity could be a potential surrogate marker of better clinical outcome. Brahmer et al reported nonconventional pattern of responses with Nivolumab in lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review was done to assess differences in responses utilizing both RECIST v1.1 and irRC criteria in lung cancer patients treated with Nivolumab. Patients who received minimum of 4 cycles of Nivolumab were included in the study. The CT scans were reviewed by a senior radiologist. We reviewed 64 patients treated with Nivolumab between 4/30/2015 to 6/21/2016 and 30 patients were found eligible. Results: Patient characteristics. Male 53%; median age 61 years; squamous 47%; adeno 40%; small cell 13%; Median cycles of Nivolumab 6. Response rates utilizing both criteria was essentially similar with only 2 patients showing dis-concordant responses (6.6%). We utilized RECIST responses criteria for further analysis. Partial response (PR) 2/30; stable disease (SD) 12/30; progressive disease (PD) 15/30 and not evaluable (NE) 1/30. ORR 6.6%. Kaplan–Meier curve was used to analyze difference in survival between patients with PR+SD and PD. The median survival for PD was 9 months and PR+SD was not reached at median follow up of 1 year. Overall survival at 1 year for PD 33% and PR+SD 60% (p = 0.048). Hazard ratio for PD was 3.060 (p = 0.60). Conclusions: Patients with stable disease had a better survival and should be considered as responders though traditionally not included in the ORR. However irRC did not help in differentiating nonconventional immune responses in lung cancer patients. [Table: see text]

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1538-1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaoliang Chen ◽  
Like Yu ◽  
Changying Jiang ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Da Sun ◽  
...  

Purpose Tumor necrosis treatment (TNT) uses degenerating tumor cells and necrotic regions of tumors as targets for radioimmunotherapy. Previous studies in animal tumor models and clinical trials have demonstrated that when linked to the therapeutic radionuclide iodine-131, recombinant chimeric TNT antibody (131I-chTNT) can deliver therapeutic doses to tumors regardless of the location or type of malignancy. Therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of 131I-chTNT in advanced lung cancer patients were studied in this pivotal registration trial. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced lung cancer were treated with systemic or intratumoral injection of 131I-chTNT in eight oncology centers in China. The objective response rate (ORR) was assessed as the primary end point. Results All 107 patients who were entered onto the study and completed therapy had experienced treatment failure after prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy a mean of three times. The results showed an ORR of 34.6% (complete response, 3.7%; partial response, 30.8%; no change, 55.1%; and progressive disease, 10.3%) in all patients and 33% in 97 non–small-cell lung cancer patients. A biodistribution study demonstrated excellent localization of the radioactivity in tumors in both systemically and intratumorally injected patients. The most obvious adverse side effect was mild and reversible bone marrow suppression. Conclusion Radioimmunotherapy with 131I-chTNT was well tolerated and can be used systemically or locally to treat refractory tumors of the lung.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutao Liu ◽  
Fang Xu ◽  
Yubo Wang ◽  
Qingchen Wu ◽  
Buhai Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanning Wang ◽  
Qianning Zhang ◽  
Chuansheng Chen ◽  
Yuxuan Hu ◽  
Liyun Miao ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn pivotal immunotherapy trials, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as treatments for lung cancer patients with brain metastases remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy of immunotherapy versus standard systemic therapy in advanced lung cancer patients with and without brain metastases.MethodsSystematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference proceedings up to Aug 6, 2020 without year and language restrictions. The main outcomes were the overall survival in patients with and without brain metastases measured by hazard ratios, and the difference in efficacy between patients with and without brain metastases was measured by ratio of hazard ratios.ResultsNine eligible randomized controlled trials involving 6241 patients (682 [11%] with brain metastases and 5559 [89%] without brain metastases) were included in the analysis. A survival benefit of immunotherapy was observed for both patients with brain metastases (HR, 0.75; 95%CI, 0.53-0.97; P = .026) and patients without brain metastases (HR, 0.75; 95%CI, 0.67-0.83; P <.001). However, patients without brain metastases benefit more from immunotherapy than patients with brain metastases (HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 1.15-1.63; P = .001). Additionally, subgroup analyses indicated that tumor type affect the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with brain metastases (HR, 1.04 vs 1.54; interaction, P = .041).ConclusionsImmunotherapy can significantly improve overall survival for advanced lung cancer patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, especially in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, but the magnitude of benefit is brain metastases dependent.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020206597.


Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoda Badr ◽  
Cardinale B. Smith ◽  
Nathan E. Goldstein ◽  
Jorge E. Gomez ◽  
William H. Redd

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 3570-3578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrsima Abdoli ◽  
Simon R. Van Kranen ◽  
Uros Stankovic ◽  
Maddalena M. G. Rossi ◽  
Jose S. A. Belderbos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document