Potentially avoidable hospitalizations in patients with advanced cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18275-e18275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connor Johnson ◽  
Yian Xiao ◽  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Risa Wong ◽  
Sara D'Arpino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Physical Symptom ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Data Repository ◽  
Avoidable Hospitalizations

e18275 Background: Cancer patients and their clinicians often wish to avoid preventable hospital admissions, but efforts to understand the predictors of avoidable hospitalizations are lacking. We sought to examine reasons for hospital admissions in patients with advanced cancer, identify potentially avoidable hospitalizations (PAH), and explore predictors of PAH. Methods: We prospectively enrolled hospitalized patients with advanced cancer from 9/2014 - 11/2014 as part of a longitudinal data repository to define symptom burden in this population. Upon admission, we assessed patients’ symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]; scored 0-10). We created a summated ESAS physical symptom variable. We used consensus-driven medical record review to identify the primary reason for each hospital admission and categorize it as PAH or not based on of an adaptation of Graham’s criteria for PAH. We used mixed multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify predictors of PAH. Results: We assessed 477 hospital admissions in 200 consecutively admitted patients (mean age = 64.6; 47% female; 67% married). Over half of admissions came through the emergency department (56%). The most common reasons for admissions were fever/infection (30%), symptoms (26%), and planned admission for chemotherapy or procedure (10%). We identified 149 (31%) as PAH. Among these PAH, 45 (30%) were readmissions due to failure of timely outpatient follow-up (within 7 days of discharge) and 44 (30%) were due to premature discharge from prior hospitalization. In a mixed logistic regression model, being married (odds ratio [OR] 0.48 [0.28-0.81]; p < 0.01) was associated with lower likelihood of PAH, while higher physical symptom burden (OR 1.02 [1.00-1.04]; p = 0.04) was associated with greater likelihood of PAH. Conclusions: We identified that a substantial proportion of hospitalizations in patients with advanced cancer are potentially avoidable, often related to failure of timely outpatient follow-up and premature hospital discharge. Our results demonstrate that patients’ symptom burden predicts PAH, thus underscoring the need to address patients’ symptoms in order to reduce preventable hospital admissions.

scholarly journals Potentially Avoidable Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Advanced Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e420-e427 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Connor Johnson ◽  
Yian Xiao ◽  
Risa L. Wong ◽  
Sara D'Arpino ◽  
Samantha M.C. Moran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Physical Symptom ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Primary Reason ◽  
Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer often prefer to avoid time in the hospital; however, data are lacking on the prevalence and predictors of potentially avoidable readmissions (PARs) among those with advanced cancer. METHODS: We enrolled patients with advanced cancer from September 2, 2014, to November 21, 2014, who had an unplanned hospitalization and assessed their patient-reported symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) at the time of admission. For 1 year after enrollment, we reviewed patients’ health records to determine the primary reason for every hospital readmission and we classified readmissions as PARs using adapted Graham’s criteria. We examined predictors of PARs using nonlinear mixed-effects models with binomial distribution. RESULTS: We enrolled 200 (86.2%) of 232 patients who were approached. For these 200 patients, we reviewed 277 total hospital readmissions and identified 108 (39.0%) of these as PARs. The most common reasons for PARs were premature discharge from a prior hospitalization (30.6%) and failure of timely follow-up (28.7%). PAR hospitalizations were more likely than non-PAR hospitalizations to experience symptoms as the primary reason for admission (28.7% v 13.0%; P = .001). We found that married patients were less likely to experience PARs (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.57; P < .001) and that those with a higher physical symptom burden were more likely to experience PARs (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.05; P = .012). CONCLUSION: We observed that a substantial proportion of hospital readmissions are potentially avoidable and found that patients’ symptom burdens predict PARs. These findings underscore the need to assess and address the symptom burden of hospitalized patients with advanced cancer in this highly symptomatic population.

scholarly journals Prescreening of Patient-reported Symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Outpatient Palliative Cancer Care

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garden Lee ◽  
Han Sang Kim ◽  
Si Won Lee ◽  
Eun Hwa Kim ◽  
Bori Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Severe Symptom ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background: Although early palliative care is associated with a better quality of life and improved outcomes in end-of-life cancer care, the criteria of palliative care referral are still elusive. Methods: We collected patient-reported symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at the baseline, first, and second follow-up visit. The ESAS evaluates ten symptoms: pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, dyspnea, sleep disorder, appetite, and wellbeing. A total of 71 patients were evaluable, with a median age of 65 years, male (62%), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status distribution of 1/2/3 (28%/39%/33%), respectively. Results: Twenty (28%) patients had moderate/severe symptom burden with the mean ESAS ≥5. Interestingly, most of the patients with moderate/severe symptom burdens (ESAS ≥5) had globally elevated symptom expression. While the mean ESAS score was maintained in patients with mild symptom burden (ESAS<5; 2.7 at the baseline; 3.4 at the first follow-up; 3.0 at the second follow-up; P =0.117), there was significant symptom improvement in patients with moderate/severe symptom burden (ESAS≥5; 6.5 at the baseline; 4.5 at the first follow-up; 3.6 at the second follow-up; P <0.001). Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients with ESAS ≥5 may benefit from outpatient palliative cancer care. Prescreening of patient-reported symptoms using ESAS can be useful for identifying unmet palliative care needs in advanced cancer patients.

Symptom burden in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha M.C. Moran ◽  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
William F. Pirl ◽  
Lara Traeger ◽  
Pallavi Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Massachusetts General Hospital ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Psychological Needs ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Assessment System

100 Background: Patients with advanced cancer experience high rates of both physical and psychological morbidity, but data describing patients’ symptoms during hospital admissions are lacking. We sought to describe symptom burden in hospitalized patients with incurable solid and hematologic malignancies. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with incurable cancers admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital from 9/1/2014 through 5/1/2015. Within the first week of their admission, we assessed physical and psychological symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r). Beginning 11/15/2015, we also administered the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), scored categorically. Results: We enrolled 457 of 547 (84%) eligible patients. Participants (mean age=63.8 years; n=231, 51% female) had the following malignancies: gastrointestinal (n=149, 33%), lung (n=77, 17%), genitourinary (n=52, 11%), breast (n=33, 7%), hematologic (n=24, 5%), and other solid tumors (n=122, 27%). Using the ESAS-r, tiredness, drowsiness, anorexia, and pain were the most common severe symptoms. Using the PHQ-4, approximately one-third of participants screened positive for depression (91/271, 34%) and anxiety (86/273, 32%). Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with incurable solid and hematologic malignancies experience substantial physical and psychological symptoms. Most patients reported at least moderate tiredness, drowsiness, anorexia and pain. Additionally, a concerning proportion reported depression and anxiety. Our data demonstrate the need for efforts to alleviate the physical symptoms experienced by this population, while also seeking to understand and address their psychological needs. [Table: see text]

The influence of a cachexia clinic on palliative care integration in oncology.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 124-124
Author(s):  
Diane Portman ◽  
Sarah Thirlwell ◽  
Kristine A. Donovan
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
The Impact

124 Background: Appetite and weight loss are common in patients with advanced cancer and specialized cachexia clinics have been established to address these symptoms. Given the association between anorexia/cachexia and other adverse symptoms, these patients may also benefit from specialty level palliative care (PC). However, referral to outpatient specialty level PC is often delayed or does not occur. We sought to examine the prevalence of other factors associated with appetite and weight loss in patients with advanced cancer and the impact of a specialized cachexia clinic on identification and treatment of other PC needs. Methods: The records of patients referred by their Oncologist to the cachexia clinic of a cancer center from August 2016 to June 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Subjects who had been referred to PC by their Oncologist were excluded. Patients had been assessed for symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r). Patients identified with PC needs had been referred to the PC clinic for follow-up within 30 days after cachexia clinic consultation. Results: Thirty subjects were evaluated in the cachexia clinic (average age 68 years; 63% female). The predominant diagnosis was lung cancer (70%). An average of 6 symptoms per patient were in the moderate to severe range on ESAS, excluding appetite. Depression, fatigue and pain were most common. The average cachexia clinic total ESAS score was 51.61. Only 17% of patients had completed advance directives. Ninety-three % of patients were referred to PC and 68% were seen. The average number of PC visits was 2.79. Within the PC clinic, advance directive completion increased to 37%, goals of care discussion occurred with 50% and 17% received hospice referrals. At the most recent follow-up in the PC clinic, the average total ESAS score had decreased by 11.44 (22%) and all ESAS item scores were improved on average. Conclusions: The cachexia clinic proved a useful means to identify other PC needs and achieve effective PC referrals. We suggest this is proof of concept that specialty clinics can be a meaningful way to achieve an earlier entry point to comprehensive PC in patients who were not previously referred by their Oncologists.

Symptom burden and characteristics of patients who die in the acute palliative care unit of a tertiary cancer center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
YuJung Kim ◽  
Grace S. Ahn ◽  
Hak Ro Kim ◽  
Beodeul Kang ◽  
Sung Soun Hur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Tertiary Cancer Center

53 Background: Acute Palliative Care Units (ACPUs) are novel inpatient programs in tertiary care centers that provide aggressive symptom management and assist transition to hospice. However, patients often die in the APCU before successfully transferring to hospice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the symptom burden and characteristics of advanced cancer patients who die in the APCU. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all advanced cancer patients admitted to the APCU between April, 2015 and March, 2016 at a tertiary cancer center in Korea. Basic characteristics and symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were obtained from consultation upon APCU admission. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare patients who died in the APCU with those who were discharged alive. Results: Of the 267 patients analyzed, 87 patients (33%) died in the APCU. The median age of patients was 66 (range, 23-97). Patients who died in the APCU had higher ESAS scores of drowsiness (6 vs 5, P = 0.002), dyspnea (4 vs 2, P = 0.001), anorexia (8 vs 6, P = 0.014) and insomnia (6 vs 4, P = 0.001) compared to patients who discharged alive. Total symptom distress scores (SDS) were also significantly higher (47 vs 40, P = 0.001). Patients who died in the APCU were more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] for female patients 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.67, P < 0.001) and have higher ESAS scores of drowsiness (OR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.08-3.99, P = 0.029) and dyspnea (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.26-3.80, P = 0.005). These patients showed significantly shorter survival after APCU admission (7 days vs 31 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients who die in the APCU are more likely to be male and have significantly higher symptom burden that include drowsiness and dyspnea. These patients show rapid clinical deterioration after APCU admission. More proactive and timely end-of-life care is needed for these patients.

scholarly journals Impact of Palliative Care in Evaluating and Relieving Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer. The DEMETRA Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Corli ◽  
Giacomo Pellegrini ◽  
Cristina Bosetti ◽  
Luca Riva ◽  
Matteo Crippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Symptom Intensity ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Patients Experience

Abstract Background: Cancer patients experience a number of symptoms throughout the course of the disease. We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer at admission to specialist palliative care (PC) services and seven days later, to estimate the immediate impact of PC intervention.Patient and methods: The analysis was based on an observational, prospective, multicenter study (named DEMETRA) conducted in Italy to outline the profile of patients, families and PC services in different care settings (hospital, hospice and home care). The prevalence and intensity of symptoms were assessed using three tools, including the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS).Results: Five PC centers recruited 865 cancer patients. Thirty-three different symptoms were observed at baseline, the most frequent being asthenia (85%) and lack of appetite (71%). Two-thirds of patients experienced six to twelve simultaneous symptoms. The intensity of the most frequent symptoms according to ESAS varied from 5.5 for asthenia to 3.9 for nausea. The presence and intensity of physical symptoms increased with increasing levels of anxiety and depression. After seven days, prevalence decreased significantly only for nausea and breathlessness, while intensity diminished significantly for almost all symptoms. At admission we noted a correlation between patients' symptoms and the care setting. After one week, the symptom intensity was uniformly reduced in all settings.Conclusions: The study confirmed the considerable symptom burden of patients with advanced cancer. PC intervention significantly lessened the severity of symptoms, despite the patients’ advanced disease and short survival.

scholarly journals Impact of Palliative Care in Evaluating and Relieving Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Results from the DEMETRA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (22) ◽  
pp. 8429
Author(s):  
Oscar Corli ◽  
Giacomo Pellegrini ◽  
Cristina Bosetti ◽  
Luca Riva ◽  
Matteo Crippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Intervention Patient ◽  
Almost All

Background: Cancer patients experience multiple symptoms throughout the course of the disease. We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer at admission to specialist palliative care (PC) services and seven days later to estimate the immediate impact of PC intervention. Patient and methods: The analysis was based on an observational, prospective, multicenter study (named DEMETRA) conducted in Italy on new patients accessing network specialist PC centers during the period May 2017–November 2017. The prevalence and intensity of symptoms were assessed at baseline and after seven days using three tools including the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Results: Five PC centers recruited 865 cancer patients. Thirty-three different symptoms were observed at the baseline, the most frequent being asthenia (84.9%) and poor well-being (71%). The intensity of the most frequent symptoms according to ESAS ranged from 5.5 for asthenia to 3.9 for nausea. The presence and intensity of physical symptoms increased with increasing levels of anxiety and depression. After seven days, prevalence of nausea and breathlessness as well as intensity of almost all symptoms significantly decreased. Conclusions: The study confirmed the considerable symptom burden of patients with advanced cancer. PC intervention has significantly reduced the severity of symptoms, despite the patients’ advanced disease and short survival.

Integrating palliative care services in oncology clinics: An application of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 168-168
Author(s):  
Sherri L. Rauenzahn ◽  
Susanne Schmidt ◽  
Jessica Jones ◽  
Ifeoma Aduba ◽  
Laura LaNiel Tenner
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services

168 Background: Research inpalliative care has shown improvements in overall survival, quality of life, symptom management, care satisfaction and reductions in the cost of care. Therefore, the American Society of Clinical Oncology has recommended early concurrent palliative care in patients with advanced cancer and with high symptom burden. Despite this recommendation, integrating palliative services at our NCI-designated cancer center has been challenging. The aims of this project were to quantitatively describe the symptom burden of patients in ambulatory oncology clinics; facilitate the establishment of an effective referral system by detecting discrepancies between symptom burden and referral practices; and improve the integration of palliative care services by implementing the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) tool into 5 of our oncology clinics. Methods: ESAS forms consist of 10 questions assessing patient symptom burden and quality of life. Total scores range from 0 to 100. This tool was distributed to patients at two breast, two gastrointestinal and the thoracic clinics at each visit. The provider reviewed the forms and decided if a palliative care referral was appropriate based on patient responses. The forms as well as referral decisions were entered into REDCap. Over a 5 month period, 607 patients completed the initial assessment and 430 follow up forms were collected, resulting in a total of 1,037 scores collected. Results: The mean ESAS score for all patient visits was 20.7 (SD = 18.7). Only 3.5% (n = 21) of all patients were initially referred to palliative care and 2.6% (n = 11) of patients were referred on follow up visits. Those with an initial referral had an initial mean score of 39.0 (SD = 19.0) and a mean follow up score of 31.9 (SD = 19.5). Conclusions: This project highlights the low palliative care consultation rate and the under-utilization of services by most oncologists at the cancer center despite using the ESAS tool. However, those who received a referral had lower ESAS scores at follow-up. We propose utilizing a trigger that would capture a preset percentage of patients who indicated scores reflective of high symptom burden and distress.

Changes in symptom burden associated with exposure to outpatient palliative care in an integrated health system.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 204-204
Author(s):  
Eric C. Haupt ◽  
Ishita Sharma ◽  
Huong Q Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Oncology Patient ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Integrated Health ◽  
Advance Care

204 Background: Patients with serious illnesses are often referred to palliative care (PC) for symptom management, advance care planning, and goals-of-care discussions. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the symptom burden (SB) and short-term changes in patients receiving outpatient PC from nine clinics within an integrated health system in Southern California. Methods: We included 3,007 adults with cancer who completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at the start of PC from 1/1/14 - 6/30/18. Patients were identified at baseline as having either a high SB if they scored ≥ 4 on at least two out of nine symptoms or low SB if they did not meet this threshold. We compared baseline socio-demographic and clinical characteristics between high SB and low SB patients. We also examined changes in the ESAS for patients with a follow-up survey at 30 ± 14 days after baseline. Results: Patients with high SB at presentation to PC tended to be younger and had comparable co-morbidities to patients with low SB. Availability of a follow-up ESAS was low but similar between groups (18%). Changes in the ESAS met published minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for the high SB patients whereas low SB patients showed worsening symptoms. Conclusions: We observed similar symptom burden in this community-based oncology patient population as other studies from specialized cancer centers. Greater effort is needed to standardize timing of follow-up assessments and integrating personalized symptom goals.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document