Inclusion of spiritual pain in patient reported outcome assessments as part of an integrative medicine physician consultation.

190 Background: Complementary and integrative health services are increasingly available to patients at cancer centers to help address physical and psychological needs. We review inclusion of spiritual pain (SP) as part of patient reported outcome (PRO) assessments in patients presenting for an outpatient integrative medicine consultation at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: PRO data were collected as part of outpatient physician consultations at an integrative medicine clinic; we reviewed data between January 2013 and April 2017. Patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-FS, 12 symptoms, scale 0-10, 10 worst possible) immediately prior to the clinical encounter. ESAS distress subscales analyzed included psychological, physical, and global. Statistical analyses included summary statistics, two sample t-tests, correlations, and logistic regression. Results: We analyzed data from 4348 unique participants. Demographics included 65% women, average age 55.5, 78% Caucasian, 72% married or with significant other, majority Christian non-Catholic (49%) followed by non-specified (23%), and Catholic (20%). Overall, 41% of patients reported SP at baseline. Patients reporting a SP score of ≥ 1 (n = 1549) reported significantly higher levels of global, physical, and psychological distress than patients with SP scores of 0 (n = 2275) (all p’s < 0.001). Older patients and men were less likely to report SP. SP clustered with psychological symptoms of depression and anxiety (reliability coefficient 0.76). Conclusions: A significant number of cancer patients presenting for integrative medicine consultations reported having SP, with SP clustering with psychological versus physical symptoms. More research is needed to better understand how routine screening for SP contributes to assessments of overall psychological health.

Download Full-text

Successes with and barriers to patient-reported outcome deployment at a comprehensive cancer center.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.30_suppl.292 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽

pp. 292-292

Author(s):

Nadine Jackson McCleary ◽

Deborah Schrag ◽

Neil E. Martin ◽

Sadiqa Mahmood ◽

Elizabeth Beyer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Treatment Plan ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Lessons Learned ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Oncology Practice ◽

Plan Modification

292 Background: Routine collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) reduces hospitalizations and improves quality of life. In the absence of clear implementation guidelines and research guiding deployment, PROs may not have the desired impact on outcomes in routine oncology practice. We share lessons learned from PRO deployment at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Methods: We developed a symptom/toxicity assessment tool based on the PRO-CTCAE to capture 15 symptomatic adverse events with a 1-week recall: fatigue/ decreased appetite/insomnia/ shortness of breath/numbness and tingling/concentration, general pain/anxiety/sadness, rash, nausea/vomiting/fever, constipation, and diarrhea. Responses from eligible English-literate patients scheduled for a gastrointestinal cancer center or adult palliative care visit between January 18 to March 22, 2018 were transmitted directly from clinic tablet to the EMR. To evaluate the deployment, we sought qualitative feedback from clinic staff and three multidisciplinary working groups comprised of patients, nurses, pharmacists, operations leaders, quality/safety experts, and health services researchers to identify technical and workflow gaps in PRO Content, Implementation, and Analytics. Results: We noted a 38% response rate of the N = 4440 PROs assigned to N = 4440 scheduled visits for N = 2055 unique patients (36% were completed, 2% started but not completed); 62% were not started. Workflow enhancement requests include an updated summary view, a clinical documentation tool, a scoring algorithm to highlight severe responses, and a quality metric dashboard to evaluate the deployment. Ongoing analyses are studying the proportion of moderate-severe symptomatic adverse events reported and their association with provider action (i.e., supportive care referral, chemotherapy treatment plan modification, or unplanned ED/hospitalization in the subsequent 30 days). Conclusions: Refinement of the PRO deployment strategy is needed to guide implementation efforts and demonstrate meaningful impact in routine oncology practice.

Download Full-text

ENRICH: Validating a multidimensional patient-reported financial toxicity measure.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.27_suppl.153 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽

pp. 153-153

Author(s):

Grace L. Smith ◽

Robert Joseph Volk ◽

Lisa M Lowenstein ◽

Susan K. Peterson ◽

Alyssa G. Rieber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Financial Stability ◽

Safety Net ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Financial Toxicity ◽

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged ◽

Safety Net Hospital ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Future Utility

153 Background: Financial toxicity is a patient-reported outcome reflecting burdens of cancer treatment costs. There is a need to assess financial toxicity in cancer care, as its unique domains—upstream factors like direct medical costs or downstream economic impact like bankruptcy—predict worse QOL, adherence, and mortality. Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients bear disparate financial toxicity burdens. We thus developed and report performance of a new measure, the Economic StraiN and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh), to assess all financial toxicity domains in economically diverse patients. Methods: We studied 238 patients with Stage I-IV cancer from a tertiary academic comprehensive cancer center (MDA) and county safety-net hospital serving socioeconomically disadvantaged patients (LBJ). Financial toxicity domains and corresponding subscales were developed from qualitative/cognitive (n = 104) interviews. ENRICh and Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) questions were administered (n = 127; MDA = 71, LBJ = 56). To demonstrate known-group validity, we compared ENRICh scores between centers; for concurrent validity, we correlated ENRICh and COST; for reliability, we calculated Cronbach's coefficient α for ENRICh subscales (range 0, none, to 10, high burden). Results: There were 4 distinct, valid financial toxicity domains/subscales: 1) Burden of cost; 2) Disruption of financial stability; 3) Depletion of financial coping; 4) Depletion of instrumental coping. Patients from the 2 centers significantly differed in subscale and overall ENRICh scores. Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients had worse mean scores (4.9 vs 2.1, 95%CI -3.6,-2.1, effect size 1.4, P < .001). ENRICh significantly correlated with COST (r = -0.82, 95%CI -0.87,-0.77, P < .001). Subscales were reliable with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.78 to 0.94). The 4 ENRICh domains collectively had synergistic impact on overall financial toxicity burden. Conclusions: ENRICh is valid, reliable, and identifies and 4 novel domains of financial toxicity. Future utility of this tool is to guide assessment/interventions targeting financial toxicity domains affecting diverse cancer patients, to mitigate disparities.

Download Full-text

Implementation of an enhanced recovery program framework in medical oncology.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.27_suppl.66 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽

pp. 66-66

Author(s):

Brittany C Campbell ◽

Yvette Ong ◽

Jarrod Eska ◽

Sharon Mathai ◽

Noel Mendez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Medical Oncology ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Functional Mobility ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Control Group ◽

Surgical Patient ◽

Quality Improvement Initiative ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

66 Background: Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) apply multi-modal approaches to manage symptoms, decrease complications, and reduce length of stay (LOS). Widely adopted in surgical settings, there is limited evidence of their implementation in non-surgical patient cohorts. An ERP was implemented in a medical oncology population at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. The aim of this quality improvement initiative was to evaluate the implementation of an enhanced recovery framework and determine feasibility in medical oncology. Methods: Enhanced recovery in medical oncology (ERMO) was implemented using Plan, Do, Study, Act methodology. Implementation included introduction of integrative medicine, opioid sparing alternatives, fluid and nutrition management, and functional mobility. Outcome measures included symptom distress as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT), LOS, and opioid use, evaluated from January 2017 through April 2018. Results: A total of 50 patients were evaluated during the program implementation, and compared with 49 control patients retrospectively reviewed prior to ERMO implementation. Average LOS for ERMO patients was 7.3 days compared to 5.5 days for the control group. Time to RIOT averaged 18.9 days for control patients (n = 30) versus 20.8 days for ERMO patients (n = 17). Nineteen patients (38%) had a reduction in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) from admission to discharge, with an average MEDD of 328.47 milligrams per patient. Conclusions: ERMO as a framework is feasible. The patient reported outcomes such as ESAS and RIOT, and barriers to implementation, including participant engagement and patient pain management perceptions, should be evaluated in the context of larger clinical trials.

Download Full-text

Oncology massage impact on patient with cancer and caregiver self-reported symptoms as part of an integrative oncology program at a comprehensive cancer center.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.26_suppl.79 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽

pp. 79-79

Author(s):

Gabriel Lopez ◽

Kathrin Milbury ◽

Amy Spelman ◽

Qi Wei ◽

Pamela A Sumler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Outpatient Clinic ◽

Symptomatic Relief ◽

Psychological Symptom ◽

Well Being ◽

Physical Symptoms ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽

Oncology Massage ◽

The Impact

79 Background: Massage as a manual therapy has shown benefit for symptomatic relief in patients with cancer and their caregivers. We explored the impact of a single massage session on self-reported symptoms in an outpatient clinic at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Patients and caregivers received oncology massage treatments (30 or 60-min duration) at our Integrative Medicine Center outpatient clinic from Sep 2012-Jan 2015. Participants completed a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS; 0-10 scale, 10 most severe) pre- and post-massage. ESAS individual items and subscales scores of Physical Distress (PHS), Psychological Distress (PSS), and Global Distress (GSD) were analyzed. We used paired t-tests with a Bonferroni correction (i.e., p < .001) to examine pre/post massage self-reported symptoms. Results: Initial massage visits for 164 patients and 39 caregivers were analyzed. Highest symptoms burden (means) at baseline for patients were Sleep 3.93, Fatigue 3.70, and poor sense of Well-Being 3.62; for caregivers Distress 4.14, Sadness 3.43, and Sleep 3.21. Although patients reported significantly more physical symptoms (F = 27.56, P < .0001) compared to caregivers at baseline, groups did not differ in regard to psychological symptom burden (P = .75). Massage therapy was associated with significant improvements in PHS, PSS, and GSD for both patients and caregivers at P < .0001. Including participants with symptom report ≥ 1, massage resulted in a clinically significant improvement (reduction ≥ 1) in pain, fatigue, sleep, distress, dry mouth, sadness, numbness, anxiety, wellbeing for patients; pain, fatigue, distress, sadness, numbness, anxiety, wellbeing for caregivers. Regarding massage duration, there were no significant effects for 30 vs 60-min duration on pre/post ESAS difference scores. Conclusions: A single 30- or 60-minute massage session resulted in acute relief of self-reported symptoms in patients and caregivers. Further study is warranted regarding optimal massage dose and frequency.

Download Full-text

Enhancing Patient-Provider Communication With the Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer: A Randomized Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2010.30.3909 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (8) ◽

pp. 1029-1035 ◽

Cited By ~ 204

Author(s):

Donna L. Berry ◽

Brent A. Blumenstein ◽

Barbara Halpenny ◽

Seth Wolpin ◽

Jesse R. Fann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Controlled Trial ◽

Clinic Visit ◽

Self Report ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Control Group ◽

Cancer Symptoms ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Life Issues ◽

Clinic Visits

Purpose Although patient-reported cancer symptoms and quality-of-life issues (SQLIs) have been promoted as essential to a comprehensive assessment, efficient and efficacious methods have not been widely tested in clinical settings. The purpose of this trial was to determine the effect of the Electronic Self-Report Assessment–Cancer (ESRA-C) on the likelihood of SQLIs discussed between clinicians and patients with cancer in ambulatory clinic visits. Secondary objectives included comparison of visit duration between groups and usefulness of the ESRA-C as reported by clinicians. Patients and Methods This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 660 patients with various cancer diagnoses and stages at two institutions of a comprehensive cancer center. Patient-reported SQLIs were automatically displayed on a graphical summary and provided to the clinical team before an on-treatment visit (n = 327); in the control group, no summary was provided (n = 333). SQLIs were scored for level of severity or distress. One on-treatment clinic visit was audio recorded for each participant and then scored for discussion of each SQLI. We hypothesized that problematic SQLIs would be discussed more often when the intervention was delivered to the clinicians. Results The likelihood of SQLIs being discussed differed by randomized group and depended on whether an SQLI was first reported as problematic (P = .032). Clinic visits were similar with regard to duration between groups, and clinicians reported the summary as useful. Conclusion The ESRA-C is the first electronic self-report application to increase discussion of SQLIs in a US randomized clinical trial.

Download Full-text

Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for neck pain in military aircrew: qualitative interviews to inform design and content

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039488 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. e039488

Author(s):

Anna Dowling ◽

Ellen Slungaard ◽

Nicola R Heneghan

Keyword(s):

Neck Pain ◽

Outcome Measure ◽

Physical Symptoms ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Direct Access ◽

Specific Patient ◽

Concept Elicitation ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measure ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact

IntroductionThe prevalence of flight-related neck pain is 70% in UK fast jet pilots; much higher than the general population. The Aircrew Conditioning Programme and direct access physiotherapy exist to minimise the impact on military capability, but a population specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is required to investigate the effectiveness of these. We aimed to explore the experiences of flight-related neck pain to inform the content validity and development of a population specific PROM.MethodsQualitative semistructured interviews combining phenomenological and grounded theory methods, reported using Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. A purposive sample of 10 fast jet pilots with neck pain was recruited. Concept elicitation interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim along with field notes. Data analysis involved subject and methodological expertise used a concept elicitation approach.ResultsParticipants included 10 male fast jet pilots, age 34.7 years. Identified themes included: (1) physical symptoms associated with flying activities; (2) occupational effects revealed modifications of flying, or ‘suboptimal’ performance owing to neck pain; (3) psychological effects revealed feelings or worry and (4) social and activity effects showed impact on out of work time.ConclusionPopulation-specific occupational, psychological and social factors should be considered alongside physical symptoms when managing neck pain in military aircrew. Findings support the development of a PROM specifically designed for military aircrew with neck pain.

Download Full-text

Changes in fatigue, barriers, and predictors towards physical activity in advanced cancer patients over a period of 12 months—a comparative study

Supportive Care in Cancer ◽

10.1007/s00520-021-06020-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

J. Frikkel ◽

M. Beckmann ◽

N. De Lazzari ◽

M. Götte ◽

S. Kasper ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Physical Functioning ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients ◽

Psychological Conditions ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve advanced cancer patients’ (ACP) physical functioning, fatigue, and quality of life. Yet, little is known about ACPs’ attitude towards PA and its influence on fatigue and depressiveness over a longer period. This prospective, non-interventional cohort study examined ACPs’ fatigue, depression, motivation, and barriers towards PA before and after 12 months of treatment among ACP Methods Outpatients with incurable cancer receiving treatment at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center reporting moderate/severe weakness/tiredness during self-assessment via MIDOS II were enrolled. Fatigue (FACT-F), depression (PHQ-8), cancer-related parameters, self-assessed PA behavior, motivation for and barriers against PA were evaluated (T0). Follow-up data was acquired after 12 months (T1) using the same questionnaire. Results At follow-up, fatigue (p=0.017) and depressiveness (p=0.015) had increased in clinical relevant extent. Physically active ACP did not show significant progress of FACT-F (p=0.836) or PHQ-8 (p=0.799). Patient-reported barriers towards PA remained stable. Logistic regression analyses identified motivation as a positive predictor for PA at both time points (T0, β=2.152, p=0.017; T1, β =2.264, p=0.009). Clinically relevant depression was a negative predictor for PA at T0 and T1 (T0, β=−3.187, p=0.044; T1, β=−3.521, p=0.041). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological conditions in physical activity behavior of ACP. Since psychological conditions seem to worsen over time, early integration of treatment is necessary. By combining therapy approaches of cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise in interdisciplinary care programs, the two treatment options might reinforce each other and sustainably improve ACPs’ fatigue, physical functioning, and QoL. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials, DRKS00012514, registration date: 30.05.2017

Download Full-text