Randomized Phase III and Extension Studies of Naldemedine in Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation and Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (34) ◽  
pp. 3859-3866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Katakami ◽  
Toshiyuki Harada ◽  
Toru Murata ◽  
Katsunori Shinozaki ◽  
Masakazu Tsutsumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Spontaneous Bowel Movement ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
End Point ◽  
Μ Opioid Receptor ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and debilitating adverse effect (AE) of opioids—common analgesics for cancer pain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, naldemedine (S-297995), for OIC, specifically in patients with cancer. Patients and Methods This phase III trial consisted of a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (COMPOSE-4) and an open-label, 12-week extension study (COMPOSE-5). In COMPOSE-4, eligible adults with OIC and cancer were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders (≥ 3 SBMs/week and an increase of ≥ 1 SBM/week from baseline). The primary end point of COMPOSE-5 was safety. Results In COMPOSE-4, 193 eligible patients were randomly assigned to naldemedine (n = 97) or placebo (n = 96). The proportion of SBM responders in COMPOSE-4 was significantly greater with naldemedine than with placebo (71.1% [69 of 97 patients] v 34.4% [33 of 96 patients]; P < .0001). A greater change from baseline was observed with naldemedine than with placebo in the frequency of SBMs/week (5.16 v 1.54; P < .0001), SBMs with complete bowel evacuation/week (2.76 v 0.71; P < .0001), and SBMs without straining/week (3.85 v 1.17; P = .0005). In COMPOSE-4, more patients treated with naldemedine than with placebo reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) (44.3% [43 of 97 patients] v 26.0% [25 of 96 patients]; P = .01); in COMPOSE-5, 105 (80.2%) of 131 of patients reported TEAEs. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported TEAE in COMPOSE-4 (19.6% [19 of 97 patients] v 7.3% [seven of 96 patients] with naldemedine v placebo) and COMPOSE-5 (18.3% [24 of 131 patients] with naldemedine). Naldemedine was not associated with signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal and had no notable impact on opioid-mediated analgesia. Conclusion Once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg effectively treated OIC and was generally well tolerated in patients with OIC and cancer.

Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
pp. 1921-1928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Katakami ◽  
Koji Oda ◽  
Katsunori Tauchi ◽  
Ken Nakata ◽  
Katsunori Shinozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Frequency Change ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
End Point

Purpose This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study aimed to determine the dose of naldemedine, a peripherally-acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, for future trials by comparing the efficacy and safety of three doses of naldemedine versus placebo in patients with cancer and opioid-induced constipation. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years old with cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2, who had been receiving a stable regimen of opioid analgesics for ≥ 2 weeks, had at least one constipation symptom despite laxative use, and no more than five spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) during the past 14 days, were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to oral, once-daily naldemedine 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg, or placebo, for 14 days. The primary end point was change in SBM frequency per week from baseline during the treatment period. Secondary end points included SBM responder rates, change from baseline in the frequency of SBM without straining, and complete SBM. Safety was also assessed. Results Of 227 patients who were randomly assigned, 225 were assessed for efficacy (naldemedine 0.1 mg, n = 55; 0.2 mg, n = 58; 0.4 mg, n = 56; placebo, n = 56) and 226 for safety. Change in SBM frequency (primary end point) was higher with all naldemedine doses versus placebo ( P < .05 for all comparisons), as were SBM responder rates and change in complete SBM frequency. Change in SBM frequency without straining was significantly improved with naldemedine 0.2 and 0.4 (but not 0.1) mg versus placebo (at least P < .05). Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common with naldemedine (0.1 mg: 66.1%; 0.2 mg: 67.2%; 0.4 mg: 78.6%) than placebo (51.8%); the most common treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea. Conclusion Fourteen-day treatment with naldemedine significantly improved opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer and was generally well tolerated. Naldemedine 0.2 mg was selected for phase III studies.

Immunomodulatory switch maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: The phase III IMPALA study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS785-TPS785 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cunningham ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Alfredo Zurlo ◽  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Immune Monitoring ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Impact Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
To Receive

TPS785 Background: The Toll-like receptor 9 agonist MGN1703 was compared to placebo in 59 metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients with disease control after standard induction chemotherapy in the double-blind randomized phase 2 IMPACT study. MGN1703 showed a superior effect over placebo, with a hazard ratio (HR) for the primary endpoint “PFS on maintenance” of 0.55 (p = 0.041) by local assessment and 0.56 (p = 0.070) by independent radiological review. Exploratory PFS analyses identified patients with objective RECIST response, normalized CEA and presence of activated NKT cells at the end of induction treatment to benefit the most from MGN1703. The OS evaluation showed a HR of 0.40 (median 24.5 vs. 15.1 months) for patients with RECIST response after induction therapy. Furthermore, at time of IMPACT study closure, 4 MGN1703 patients were still without progressive disease and continued treatment in compassionate use. As of August 2015, 3 patients were still receiving MGN1703 treatment in excess of three years (47-55 months), with 2 objective responses ongoing over 46 months. Methods: The international, multicenter, open-label phase 3 IMPALA study is conducted in collaboration with the AIO, TTD and GERCOR cooperative groups. In IMPALA, mCRC patients having achieved an objective tumor response following any type of first line induction therapy are randomized to receive MGN1703 switch maintenance monotherapy in the experimental arm or local standard of care in the control arm. In case of relapse, patients will reintroduce induction treatment whenever feasible, with those in the experimental arm continuing to receive MGN1703 therapy in the weeks without infusional chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study will be OS. Secondary endpoints include PFS, response rates, safety, and QoL in selected centers. Induction treatment, CEA and activated NKT at baseline are stratification factors and will be prospectively assessed. All randomized patients take part in a comprehensive immune monitoring plan evaluating cytokines and chemokines in serum and the activation status of immune cell populations. Recruitment started in September 2014 and the study is expected to recruit 540 patients within 24 months in 8 European countries. Clinical trial information: NCT02077868.

scholarly journals Rapid acute treatment of agitation in individuals with schizophrenia: multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study of inhaled loxapine

2011 ◽  
Vol 198 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Lesem ◽  
Tram K. Tran-Johnson ◽  
Robert A. Riesenberg ◽  
David Feifel ◽  
Michael H. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Point ◽  
Syndrome Scale ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Negative Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Global Impression Improvement

BackgroundThere is a need for a rapid-acting, non-injection, acute treatment for agitation.AimsTo evaluate inhaled loxapine for acute treatment of agitation in schizophrenia.MethodThis phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00628589) enrolled 344 individuals who received one, two or three doses of inhaled loxapine (5 or 10 mg) or a placebo. Lorazepam rescue was permitted after dose two. The primary efficacy end-point was change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale–Excited Component (PANSS–EC) 2 h after dose one. The key secondary end-point was Clinical Global Impression–Improvement scale (CGI–I) score 2 h after dose one.ResultsInhaled loxapine (5 and 10 mg) significantly reduced agitation compared with placebo as assessed by primary and key secondary end-points. Reduced PANSS–EC score was evident 10 min after dose one with both 5 and 10mg doses. Inhaled loxapine was well tolerated, and the most common adverse events were known effects of loxapine or minor oral effects common with inhaled medications.ConclusionsInhaled loxapine provided a rapid, well-tolerated acute treatment for agitation in people with schizophrenia.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib in the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 1785-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Tsoukas ◽  
M. Elaine Eyster ◽  
Sumiko Shingo ◽  
Saurabh Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Karen M. Giallella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Pain Patient ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Points ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Upper Respiratory Infection ◽  
Hemophilic Arthropathy ◽  
To Receive

This 2-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of etoricoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy. In part 1 (6 weeks), 102 patients (≥ 12 years old) with hemophilic arthropathy were randomized to receive 90 mg etoricoxib once daily or placebo (1:1 ratio). In part 2 (6 months), 51 patients taking placebo in part 1 were randomized to receive 90 mg etoricoxib or 25 mg rofecoxib once daily; patients taking etoricoxib in part 1 continued the same treatment. Efficacy end points included Patient Assessment of Arthropathy Pain, Patient Global Assessment of Arthropathy Disease Status, and Investigator Global Assessment of Arthropathy Disease Status. Safety was evaluated at each study visit. Etoricoxib provided significant improvement in all end points versus placebo (P < .001). Fewer patients taking etoricoxib discontinued due to a lack of efficacy versus placebo (P = .048). During part 2, efficacy was maintained; etoricoxib and rofecoxib demonstrated similar results. The most common adverse experiences were upper respiratory infection and headache. The incidence of joint bleeding during part 1 was similar between etoricoxib (66.7%) and placebo (72.6%) and during part 2 between etoricoxib (77.0%) and rofecoxib (78.9%). We conclude that etoricoxib provided superior efficacy versus placebo for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy and was generally safe and well tolerated.

Once daily controlled-release pregabalin in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia: a phase III, double-blind, randomized withdrawal, placebo-controlled study

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2069-2083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley M. Arnold ◽  
Pierre Arsenault ◽  
Cynthia Huffman ◽  
Jeffrey L. Patrick ◽  
Michael Messig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily

Optimal combination therapy with tropisetron in 445 patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 2439-2446 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Hulstaert ◽  
S Van Belle ◽  
H Bleiberg ◽  
J L Canon ◽  
M Dewitte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Antiemetic Agent ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE This study evaluated tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma, Basle, Switzerland)-based combination therapy in patients who had incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting when using tropisetron as a single antiemetic agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand seventy-two patients, who were scheduled to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy, were treated with 5 mg tropisetron once daily in their first chemotherapy course. A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used to evaluate three additional treatments to the recommended 5 mg once daily (intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; orally on days 2 through 6) tropisetron regimen during course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of course 1. Four hundred forty-five patients were centrally randomized to receive, in addition, open-label dexamethasone (day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; days 2 through 6, 8 mg orally) and/or open-label alizapride (day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg orally; days 2 through 6, 4 x 50 mg orally) and/or double-blind tropisetron (ie, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily) or corresponding placebo. RESULTS Complete response rates (no nausea and no vomiting) were 72% for day 1 and 48% for days 1 through 6 of course 1. During course 2, more complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added, both for day 1 (76% v 66%, P = .020) and for days 1 through 6 (50% v 34%, P = .0004). A moderate increase in the complete response rate was seen with the addition of conventional-dose alizapride (day 1, 75% v 68%, P = .14; days 1 through 6: 47% v 37%, P = .041). Doubling the dose of tropisetron did not change the complete response rate. CONCLUSION The addition of dexamethasone significantly increases the complete response rate of both acute and delayed emesis in patients who have incomplete disease control with tropisetron alone.

scholarly journals 4564 Nilotinib alters microRNAs that regulate specific autophagy and ubiquitination genes in the cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson’s patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Alan Fowler ◽  
Yasar Torres-Yhagi ◽  
Fernando Pagan ◽  
Michaeline Hebron ◽  
Barbara Willmarth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Empirical Bayes ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Open Label Phase

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our preclinical data demonstrate that the principal effects of nilotinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in models of neurodegeneration is clearance of misfolded proteins via autophagy. Here we aimed to evaluate the effects of nilotinib on microRNAs in the cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson’s disease patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected as part of an open label phase I (NCT02281474) (n = 12, 300 mg nilotinib taken orally once daily for 6 months), and a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT02954978) (n = 75, randomized 1:1:1 into placebo, 150 mg or 300 mg nilotinib taken orally once daily for 12 months). RNA was isolated from CSF and Indexed sequencing libraries were prepared from total RNA plus miRNA. Next generation whole-genome sequencing (single-end 1x75 bp, 25 million raw reads per sample) was performed to identify miRNAs significantly differentially expressed (fold-change ≥ 2, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR p-value ≤ 0.05 or Empirical Bayes FDR ≤ 0.05) with treatment compared to baseline. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Next generation whole-genome sequencing of microRNAs in the CSF demonstrated that nilotinib significantly increases microRNAs that specifically regulate expression of autophagy and ubiquitination genes in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. In the open label phase I, samples, 28 microRNAs found to regulate autophagy and ubiquitination genes, were significantly altered with treatment (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR p-value ≤ 0.05). In the phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study samples, we verified several of those 28 candidate microRNAs had been significantly deferentially expressed with treatment (Empirical Bayes FDR p-value ≤ 0.05). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our data provide robust evidence that nilotinib’s effects on misfolded protein clearance is via autophagy and CSF miRNA sequencing is a valid biomarker of nilotinib’s effects in a definitive phase III study to investigate nilotinib in Parkinson’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESCRIPTION: Charbel Moussa is listed as an inventor on several Georgetown University patents for the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a treatment for neurodegenerative diseases

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document