Evolving Systemic Treatment Landscape for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (36) ◽  
pp. 3615-3623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rana R. McKay ◽  
Dominick Bossé ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri

Purpose To outline current practices and challenges in the systemic management of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Design We conducted a focused review of hallmark randomized controlled trials informing the systemic treatment of patients with RCC. We concentrated on trials informing the use of combination therapies, therapy in both treatment-naïve and previously treated patients, sequential treatment strategies, and schedules. Results The systemic treatment of advanced RCC has experienced tremendous progress over the past 15 years. An improved understanding of the canonical pathways implicated in RCC pathogenesis has resulted in the development of molecularly targeted and immunotherapy options for patients. These therapies have replaced cytokine-based treatments as the standard of care for patients with advanced RCC. Until recently, sequential vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–targeted therapy or VEGF-targeted therapy followed by mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition has been the prevailing treatment paradigm for patients. However, newer agents such as cabozantinib and nivolumab have challenged this traditional approach. In addition, combination treatments including nivolumab plus ipilimumab and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab have transformed the RCC treatment landscape, and other doublet combinations in clinical testing will likely continue to alter the treatment paradigm in RCC. Currently, factors that inform treatment selection between different therapy options include performance status, comorbidities, prognostic risk stratification, treatment adverse event profile, and mode of administration, with no Level I evidence for predictive biomarker use in clinic. Conclusions The treatment options for advanced RCC are rapidly evolving since the introduction of VEGF-targeted therapy, immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade and, more recently, combination regimens. Despite the success of these regimens, advanced RCC remains a largely incurable disease, and additional strategies are warranted.

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengxiang Li ◽  
Yu‐Ning Wong ◽  
Katrina Armstrong ◽  
Naomi Haas ◽  
Prasun Subedi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Karam ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Leticia Varella ◽  
Jorge A. Garcia ◽  
Robert Dreicer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C Coppin ◽  
F Porzolt ◽  
L Le ◽  
M Autenrieth ◽  
T Wilt

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1368-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
L M Minasian ◽  
R J Motzer ◽  
L Gluck ◽  
M Mazumdar ◽  
V Vlamis ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Three trials were conducted to define the efficacy and toxicity of interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospectively, 159 patients were treated with interferon alfa-2a. In the first trial, 42 patients received 50 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly three times per week. In the second trial, 64 patients received gradually escalating doses of interferon alfa-2a from 3 to 36 x 10(6) U subcutaneously administered daily. The third trial was randomized; 25 patients received daily interferon alfa-2a alone and 28 were treated with daily interferon alfa-2a and 0.15 mg/kg vinblastine every 3 weeks. RESULTS The overall response proportion was 10% (two complete and 14 partial responses). The median response duration was 12.2 months. The median survival duration was 11.4 months, with 3% of patients alive at 5 or more years. A univariate statistical analysis showed that a Karnofsky performance status > or = 80, prior nephrectomy, and interval from diagnosis to treatment of longer than 365 days were significant prognostic factors for survival. In a multivariate analysis, only prior nephrectomy and Karnofsky performance status > or = 80 were shown to be independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION Interferon alfa-2a had minimal antitumor activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and long-term survival was achieved in a small proportion of patients. The need for continued investigation and the identification of more effective therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma is evident from the poor overall survival rate observed in these 159 patients. The investigation of new agents and of interferon alfa-2a in combination with other agents remains a priority.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMT.S9280
Author(s):  
Taylor Y. Lu ◽  
Edward N. Rampersaud

Kidney cancer is the most lethal of the genitourinary malignancies. Prior to the advent of cytokine-based immunotherapy 25 years ago, surgery was the only viable treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Adjuvant therapy with interferon and interleukin-2 revolutionized the treatment paradigm, although responders were too often uncommon. The mid-portion of the last decade saw born a new class of drugs aimed at the angiogenesis/VEGF pathway, common to most clear-cell RCC. The latest FDA-approved compound in this class has promised to yield equal or better first-line efficacy as its predecessors while, perhaps, providing better tolerability. Here we review the available data at present regarding pazopanib.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hsun Yang ◽  
Cheng-Keng Chuang ◽  
Jia-Juan Hsieh ◽  
John Wen-Cheng Chang

Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (19) ◽  
pp. 2988-2995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy L. Rose ◽  
Allison M. Deal ◽  
Bhavani Krishnan ◽  
Matthew E. Nielsen ◽  
Angela B. Smith ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document