Outcomes with rituximab plus bendamustine (R-Benda), dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide (DRC), and bortezomib, dexamethasone, rituximab (BDR) as primary therapy in patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7509-7509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jithma P. Abeykoon ◽  
Saurabh Zanwar ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Carrie A. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Frontline Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

7509 Background: Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoma for which scant comparative data exist to guide frontline therapy. Herein, we compare 3 commonly used regimens in WM: R-Benda, DRC, and BDR in frontline setting. Methods: Patients (Pts) with active WM seen at Mayo Clinic between 2000 & 2018 who received R-Benda, DRC or BDR as primary therapy were included in this retrospective study. Response rates were assessed by Consensus Criteria. All time to event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy, using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The study included 172 pts with active WM (R-Benda, n=67, DRC, n=75, BDR, n=30).The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.7 years (y) (95% CI 3.7-3.0). Baseline characteristics, including IPSS, and time to frontline therapy from WM diagnosis were similar across the 3 cohorts. Clinically relevant endpoints are shown in the Table. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were similar across the 3 groups. Grade 3 neuropathy requiring treatment discontinuation was encountered in 13% pts treated with BDR. 56 pts received subsequent salvage therapy [(10% in R-Benda arm, 44% in DRC arm, & 53% in BDR arm]; 29% pts in the R-Benda arm and 30% pts in DRC arm received a PI-based regimen while 69% pts in the BDR arm received alkylator-rituximab based therapy. Conclusions: Outcomes (MRR, TTNT and EFS) with frontline R-Benda are superior in comparison to frontline DRC or BDR in patients with WM. Clinically relevant endpoints are not significantly different with DRC vs. BDR. The toxicity profile across the 3 groups was comparable. [Table: see text]

Estimating treatment-free survival (TFS) over extended follow-up in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): Five-year follow-up of CheckMate 067.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10043-10043
Author(s):  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Charlene Mantia ◽  
Lillian Werner ◽  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
Sumati Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Therapy Initiation ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Mean Time

10043 Background: We previously defined a novel outcome, TFS, to characterize the time between ICI therapy cessation and subsequent therapy initiation/death. TFS is part of an integrated analysis to comprehensively describe how pts spend overall survival (OS) time, on and off treatment, with/without treatment-related toxicity. We reported survival states, including TFS, in ICI-treated pts with MEL in the phase 3 CheckMate 067 trial (NCT01844505) over the 36-mo period since randomization (Regan. J Clin Oncol. 2019); 60-mo results are presented here. Methods: Data were analyzed for 937 pts with MEL who started treatment with nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI), NIVO, or IPI in CheckMate 067. TFS was defined as the area between the Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves for 2 conventional time-to-event endpoints defined from randomization: time to protocol therapy cessation and time to subsequent therapy/death. TFS was also divided into TFS with/without grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and OS was estimated. The area under each KM curve was estimated by the 60-mo restricted mean (r-mean) time to event and expressed as a percentage of the 60-mo period. Bootstrapped 95% CIs were calculated for differences. Results: Over the 60-mo period, pts spent an average of 33%, 17%, and 20% of time free of treatment after receiving NIVO+IPI, NIVO, and IPI, respectively (r-mean TFS, 19.7, 9.9, and 11.9 mo; Table). NIVO+IPI-treated pts had r-mean TFS that was 9.8 mo longer than NIVO-treated pts (95% CI, 6.7–12.8) and 7.8 mo longer than IPI-treated pts (95% CI, 4.6–11.0). Mean TFS with grade ≥3 TRAEs remained a small proportion of the 60-mo period at 3%, 2%, and < 1% with NIVO+IPI, NIVO, and IPI, respectively. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, average TFS with/without toxicity represented greater percentages of the 60-mo vs 36-mo period for NIVO+IPI and NIVO, but not for IPI. Pts treated with NIVO+IPI continued to have TFS twice as long as those treated with NIVO alone, due to earlier therapy cessation for toxicity without disease progression and subsequent resolution of many of those toxicities. The majority of TFS time was spent without grade ≥3 TRAEs across all arms. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of combination of bortezomib and rituximab in relapsed and/or refractory Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8535-8535
Author(s):  
I. M. Ghobrial ◽  
J. Matous ◽  
S. Padmanabhan ◽  
A. Badros ◽  
S. Chuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Toxicity Assessment ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Relapsed Disease

8535 Background: This phase II study aimed to determine safety and activity of weekly bortezomib in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM). Methods: Patients who had at least one previous therapy for WM and who had relapsed or refractory disease were eligible. NCI CTCAE v3.0 was used for toxicity assessment. All patients received bortezomib IV weekly at 1.6mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, q 28 days × 6 cycles, and rituximab 375 mg/m2 at days 1, 8, 15, 22, on cycles 1 and 4. Results: 37 pts (26 men and 11 women, median age 62 years, range 42 - 73) have been treated to date. The median number of lines of prior treatment was 3 (range 1 - 5). All patients had received prior rituximab and 5 pts received prior bortezomib. The median IgM at baseline was 3540 mg/dL (range 700-10,800). The median follow up is 12 months (range 5 - 26 months). Thirty-five pts are evaluable for response. Complete remission and near complete remission occurred in 2 (6%), partial remission in 17 (48%), and minimal response in 10 (29%). Progressive disease occurred in 1 (3%) and stable disease occurred in 5 (14%). Most patients achieved response rapidly within 3 months of therapy (2–7 months). Rituximab flare occurred only in 6 patients (20%). At 24 months of follow up, 8/35 pts have shown relapsed disease. The median time to progression and duration of response has not been reached. Patients tolerated therapy well without significant toxicities: grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in only 2 pts. Grade 1 and 2 neuropathy occurred in 10 pts (26%). Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 5 patients, and anemia and thrombocytopenia in 4 patients. Grade 5 pneumonia and viral infection occurred in 1 patient who was within the first cycle of therapy and did not receive herpes zoster prophylaxis. Attributable toxicities otherwise proved manageable with appropriate supportive care and the combination was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: The combination of weekly bortezomib and rituximab has been well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging activity, with CR+ PR + MR in 83% of evaluable patients with relapsed WM. No significant peripheral neuropathy has been observed to date with this regimen. [Table: see text]

Atezolizumab + obinutuzumab + venetoclax in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (R/R iNHL): Primary analysis of a phase 2 trial from LYSA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7544-7544
Author(s):  
Charles Herbaux ◽  
Herve Ghesquieres ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Stephanie Guidez ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3

7544 Background: R/R iNHL treatment remains challenging. Atezolizumab (ATE) and obinutuzumab (OBI) are monoclonal antibodies acting respectively to inhibit T-lymphocyte exhaustion or by inducing lymphoma cells cytotoxicity, whereas venetoclax (VEN) is a small molecule inhibiting BCL-2. Combining tumor-targeted therapies with agents that enhance anti-tumor immunity represents an attractive treatment paradigm. This LYSA sponsored multicenter phase 2 trial (NCT03276468) evaluated ATE, OBI and VEN combination in R/R B-cell lymphomas. Herein, we present primary efficacy and safety data from the iNHL cohort including Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and Marginal Zone Lymphomas (MZL). Methods: Patients ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed R/R FL and MZL who failed at least one line of therapy were eligible. OBI was given IV at 1 g on day (D) 1, 8 and 15 of cycle (C) 1 and on D1 from C2 to C8 every 3 weeks. ATE was given IV, 1.2 g every 3 weeks, started at D2 of C1, then administered at D2 of each cycle for 24 cycles. VEN was given orally at 800 mg/D at full dose, starting on D8C1 for 24 cycles. The primary endpoint was the Overall Response Rate (ORR) evaluated by Lugano criteria at the end of induction (EOI) after 8 cycles of ATE, OBI and VEN (M6) or at premature treatment discontinuation. Results: At the time of the primary analysis (08 Jan 2021), 78 patients were enrolled. FL cohort (n = 58): the median follow-up was 14.5 months. Main baseline characteristics were: Ann Arbor Stage III/IV, 85.7%; FLIPI HR, 47.3%; > 2 prior lines of therapy, 32.1%; and exposed to ASCT, 30.4%. The ORR on PET scan at EOI was measured at 53.6% [41.8%-65.1%], including 30.4% of CMR. 37 patients (63%) received the full induction treatment. MZL cohort (n = 20; 13 nMZL, 5 eMZL, 2 sMZL): the median follow-up was 11.9 months. Main baseline characteristics were: Ann Arbor Stage IV, 100%; bone marrow infiltration, 38.9%; ≥ 2 extra-nodal sites, 50%; and > 2 prior lines of therapy, 22.2%. The ORR on CT scan at EOI was measured at 66.76% [44.6%-84.4%], including 16.7% of CR and 50.0% PR. 11 patients (55%) received the full induction treatment. At time of the present analysis, responses in the 2 cohorts seem durable with only 21,4% of responders who have reported relapse/progression. Out of the 78 pts, a total of 55 (70.5%) pts experienced grade 3–4 adverse event (AE) and 1 patient experienced an AE that led to discontinuation of any drug. Main AE of grade 3 or more were hematologic cytopenias, with only one febrile neutropenia (1.3%). Three pts experienced immune-related AE (1 grade 2 myositis and 2 grade 3 colitis), no tumor lysis syndrome was observed. Conclusions: ATE, OBI and VEN triplet appears to be well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicity brought by the combination. The ORR at EOI seems to be comparable to other innovative regiments in this setting, with durable responses to date. Clinical trial information: NCT03276468.

Pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide for enzalutamide-resistant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Updated analyses after one additional year of follow-up from cohorts 4 and 5 of the KEYNOTE-199 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5042-5042
Author(s):  
Julie N Graff ◽  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Christopher J. Hoimes ◽  
Winald R. Gerritsen ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Fisher Syndrome ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

5042 Background: KEYNOTE-199 (NCT02787005) is a multicohort phase 2 study to evaluate pembrolizumab (pembro) in mCRPC. A previous analysis of patients with RECIST-measurable (cohort 4 [C4]) or bone-predominant nonmeasurable (cohort 5 [C5]) disease who were chemotherapy-naive and had progression while on enzalutamide (enza) found that pembro + enza showed antitumor activity and manageable safety. Long-term outcomes are of interest with immunotherapy; hence, updated efficacy and safety data after an additional 1 year of follow-up are presented. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had resistance to enza after prior response. Prior treatment with abiraterone was allowed. Pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles + enza QD until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) in C4. Secondary end points were DOR (C4), and DCR, rPFS, OS and safety (both cohorts). Results: 126 pts (C4, 81; C5, 45) were treated. Median age was 72 years (range 43-92), 32.5% had visceral disease and 87.3% previously received ≥6 mo of enzalutamide; 121 pts (96.0%) discontinued, most because of progressive disease. Median (range) time from enrollment to data cutoff was 31.7 mo (23.1-37.1) in C4 and 35.5 mo (22.9-37.3) in C5. In C4, confirmed ORR was 12.3% (95% CI 6.1-21.5) (2 CRs, 8 PRs); median (range) DOR was 8.1 mo (2.5+ to 15.2), and 62.5% had a response ≥6 mo (Kaplan-Meier estimate). Additional efficacy analyses are outlined in the table. A total of 27.2% and 28.9% of pts in C4 and C5, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. Two pts in C4 died of immune-related AEs (Miller Fisher syndrome and myasthenia gravis). Incidence of any-grade (34.1%) and grade 3 or 4 (5.6%) rash, regardless of relatedness to treatment, was higher than previously reported for individual agents but manageable with standard-of-care treatments; 2 pts discontinued because of rash. Conclusions: After an additional 1 year of follow-up, pembro + enza continued to show antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with mCRPC who became resistant to enza. The treatment combination is being further evaluated in the ongoing phase 3 KEYNOTE-641 trial (NCT03834493). Clinical trial information: NCT02787005. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Everolimus as Primary Therapy in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WMCTG 09-214)

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 2400-2404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. Treon ◽  
Kirsten Meid ◽  
Christina Tripsas ◽  
Leonard T. Heffner ◽  
Herbert Eradat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Multicenter Clinical Trial ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Melphalan 200mg/m2 (MEL 200) and MEL 140/DT-PACE Are Equally Effective in Multiple Myeloma (MM), While the Latter Is Less Toxic.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 839-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Tricot ◽  
Maureen Reiner ◽  
Maurizio Zangari ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
Bart Barlogie
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Study Enrollment ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Rapid Responses ◽  
Preparative Regimen ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Induction Cycle

Abstract MEL 200 is now generally accepted to represent the best preparative regimen for autotransplantation in MM patients. We have previously reported that DT-PACE is very effective in inducing rapid responses even in high risk myeloma (JCO 2003, 31: 73–80). The present study aimed at comparing outcome and toxicity of previously treated (≥ 2 cycles of prior therapy) MM patients, who were randomized to tandem transplants with either MEL 200 or MEL 140 plus full dose DT-PACE administered over two days (MEL/DT-PACE). The treatment in both arms consisted of one induction cycle with DT-PACE, followed by tandem transplants (randomized), one consolidation cycle with DT-PACE and 2 years of maintenance therapy with dexamethasone (20mg/d, days 1–4, every 3 weeks) plus thalidomide 100mg/day. 97 patients were enrolled; 93 collected sufficient stem cells for transplantation and were randomized to MEL 200 (N=48) or MEL140/DT-PACE (N=45). Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Graphs were compared with logrank statistics. Median age was 57 years. Prior to study enrollment β2M was ≥ 4mg/L in 28%; CRP ≥ 4 mg/L in 59%; LDH ≥ 250 U/L in 16%. 16% had &gt; 12 months preceding therapy and 27% showed abnormal metaphase cytogenetics. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, except for a trend of more patients with β2M ≥ 4mg/: in the MEL 200 arm (p=0.09). 100% of randomized patients proceeded to the first transplant and 82% to a second; 87% in the MEL/DT-PACE and 77% in the MEL 200 arm (p=0.23). The CR rates were identical (44% and 42%, respectively). EF/OS at 3 years were 51%/71% in the MEL/DT-PACE arm and 55%/79% in the MEL 200 arm (p=.89/.73) (Figure 1). Recovery of ANC &gt; 500μl plus platelets &gt; 20,000/μl untransfused, was comparable after the first (p=0.21) and second transplant (p=0.17). Grade 3–5 toxicity was lower in the MEL/DT-PACE arm in terms of mucositis (p=.006) and febrile neutropenia (p=.001). We conclude that both preparative regimens, MEL 200 and 140 with the addition of DT-PACE, appear equally effective in previously treated MM patients. However, the Mel 140 resulted in a significantly lower incidence of mucositis and febrile neutropenia and may thus be preferred in patients not in excellent clinical condition prio to transplantation. Figure Figure

Durable Responses with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Updated Time-to-Event Analyses of the Multicenter PINNACLE Study.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 125-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Goy ◽  
Steven Bernstein ◽  
Brad Kahl ◽  
Benjamin Djulbegovic ◽  
Michael Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Median Time ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: We previously reported substantial activity with single-agent bortezomib (VELCADE®; Vc) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory MCL in the PINNACLE study (JCO2006;24:4867–74), which resulted in approval of Vc for MCL pts following ≥1 prior therapy. All pts have now completed treatment. Here we report updated time-to-event data in all pts, and by response category, with extended follow-up. Methods: 155 pts (median age 65 yrs; 55%/41%/4% with 1/2/≥3 prior therapies; 77% Stage IV MCL; 55% positive bone marrow) received Vc 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles; of these, 141 were response-evaluable. Response and progression were determined by modified International Workshop Response Criteria using independent radiology review. Results: After a median follow-up of 26.4 mo, 55 pts (35%) remained in follow-up; 93 (60%) had died, 2 (1%) had withdrawn consent, and 5 (3%) were lost to follow-up. Pts received a median of 4 treatment cycles (range 1–21; 8 in responding pts). Median time to first response was 1.3 months. Median duration of response (DOR) was 9.2 mo in all responders and has not been reached in pts achieving CR/CRu. Median time to progression (TTP), time to next therapy (TTNT; first Vc dose to start of next therapy), and overall survival (OS) are shown in the table for all pts and by response. Survival rate at 12-mo was 69% overall and 91% in responding pts. In pts refractory to their last therapy (no response or response with TTP <6 mo; n=58), median DOR was 5.9 mo, median TTP was 3.9 mo, median TTNT was 4.6 mo, and median survival was 17.3 mo. Safety profile was similar to previously reported; most common grade ≥3 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (13%), fatigue (12%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). The most common AE resulting in Vc discontinuation was peripheral neuropathy (10%). Twelve (8%) pts died on-study, including 5 (3%) considered related to Vc. Conclusions: Vc provides durable responses plus prolonged time off-therapy and survival in responding pts, suggesting substantial clinical benefit in relapsed/refractory MCL. Median TTP, TTNT, and OS (months) in all pts and by response All pts (N=155) Responders (N=45) CR/CRu (N=11) PR (N=34) SD (N=52) PD (N=34) NE, not estimable TTP 6.7 12.4 NE 9.1 6.9 1.2 TTNT 7.4 14.3 23.9 13.3 7.0 2.3 OS 23.5 35.4 36.0 35.1 27.8 13.7

Phase II Trial of the mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 in Relapsed and/or Refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia: The Dana Farber Cancer Institute Experience.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1011-1011
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Stacey Chuma ◽  
Amy Sam ◽  
Renee Leduc ◽  
Marybeth Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Dana Farber Cancer Institute ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have demonstrated the clinical activity of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 in low- grade lymphomas. Our preclinical studies demonstrated activity of mTOR inhibitors in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) cell lines and patient samples. This phase II study aimed to determine safety and activity of the oral mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (Novartis Pharmaceutical, MA) in patients with relapsed or refractory WM. METHODS: Patients who had at least one previous therapy for WM, and who had symptomatic relapsed or refractory disease were eligible. NCI CTCAE v3.0 was used for toxicity assessment. All patients received daily RAD001 at 10 mg. A cycle was considered 28 days. Patients were allowed to stay on therapy until progression of disease or excessive toxicity. This study was conducted in a collaborative effort between Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine. Here, we report the data on the patients accrued at DFCI. RESULTS: 19 pts (15 men and 4 women) have been treated to date. All patients had symptomatic disease and required therapy. The median number of lines of prior treatment was 3 (range 1 – 5) including included rituximab, nucleoside analogues (fludarabine or 2-CDA), combination chemotherapy (e.g. CHOP, CVP), chloramucil, and bortezomib. The median IgM at baseline was 3330 mg/dL (range 1010– 7410). The median follow on RAD001 was 8 months (range 3 – 22 months). Eighteen pts are currently evaluable for response. Best responses to RAD001 after 2 cycles using IgM monoclonal protein were as follows: partial remission in 8 (44%), minimal response in 5 (28%). Progressive disease occurred in 4 (22%) and stable disease occurred in 1 (6%). The overall response rate (PR+MR) was 72%. The median duration of response has not been reached (3–22+ months). Patients tolerated therapy well without significant toxicities. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient, grade 3 pneumonia in 1 patient, grade 3 hyperglycemia in 1 patient and grade 3 mucositis in 1 patient. Other adverse events of grade 2 or lower included nail cracking, mucositis, diarrhea, and fatigue. Attributable toxicities otherwise proved manageable with appropriate supportive care, and RAD001 was generally well tolerated. One patient enrolled on the study withdrew consent and changed to hospice care within 3 weeks of therapy, and passed away due to disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the oral RAD001 single agent RAD001 in patients with relapsed or refractory WM was welltolerated and demonstrated significant activity achieving an overall response rate in 72% of patients. Future studies of combination of this agent with rituximab and bortezomib are currently being planned.

Frontline Combined Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Alemtuzumab and Rituximab (CFAR) in High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 208-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer A Parikh ◽  
Michael Keating ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Frontline Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

Abstract Abstract 208 Background: Combined chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) has excellent clinical activity as frontline therapy for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a subset of pts who exhibited high-risk features, such as serum beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) ≥4 mg/L; the complete remission (CR) was lower and time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were shorter; therefore characterizing these pts as high-risk. Alemtuzumab (A) has activity as a single-agent and in combination with F in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. To improve the CR and OS for pts with high-risk CLL, we added A to the FCR regimen (CFAR) as frontline therapy in a Phase II clinical trial. Methods: All pts who met NCI-WG criteria to initiate therapy, were < 70 years and had a B2M ≥4 mg/L were eligible for the study. Frontline CFAR consisted of C-200 mg/m2 D3-5, F-20mg/m2 D3-5, A-30mg IV D1,3,5, and R-375–500 mg/m2 D2. Courses were repeated every 28 days for a total of 6 courses. All pts received pegylated filgrastim 6mg SC with each course of therapy. All pts received allopurinol for tumor lysis prophylaxis. Antibiotic prophylaxis with TMP/SMX DS and valacyclovir or valganciclovir was also given to all pts. CMV antigenemia was monitored before each course. Results: A total of 60 pts were enrolled from July 2005 through August 2008 (Table). One pt was lost to follow-up. The median age was 59 yrs (range 42–69) and 44 (75%) were male. Median B2M was 5.1 mg/L (4–11.6); HGB was 11.5gm/dL (5.5–15.1); PLT was 139 k/μL(41–446); WBC was 100k/μL (5–665); ALC was 92k/μL (4–619); and 30 pts (51%) were Rai stage III-IV. The median number of courses administered was 4 (2–6); reasons for not completing 6 courses included delayed recovery of counts (18), infection (8), AIHA (4), treatment failure (3) and pt. choice (2). CR was achieved in 70%, nPR in 3%, PR in 18%, and 7% pts did not respond, leading to an ORR of 92% (Table). There was no significant correlation between CR or OR with Rai Stage, IgVH mutation status, FISH status, ZAP70 and CD38 expression. After a median follow-up of 24 months (3–49), 19(32%) pts have progressive disease. Patients with 17p deletion and unmutated IgVH had significantly shorter TTP as shown in the >Table. Eleven (19%) pts have died: 4 with disease progression after achieving CR; 2 who did not respond; 2 with Richter's transformation; 1 transformed into AML; 1 due to metastatic lung cancer; and 1 due to severe pneumonia 8 months after achieving CR. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 31% and 13% courses. Major infections, including pneumonia and sepsis, were reported for 10(17%) pts. Minor infectious such as bronchitis, urinary tract infections and herpes zoster were reported for 15(25%) pts. In a historic cohort of high-risk pts treated with FCR, grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 31% and 10% courses; and major and minor infections were seen in 15% and 23% pts respectively, all comparable to that seen with frontline CFAR. A-associated infusion reactions occurred in 42 (71%) pts. CMV reactivation occurred in 7 (12%) pts, all of whom were on valacyclovir prophylaxis. There was 1 death due to CMV pneumonia; all other episodes of CMV reactivation were promptly treated with valaganciclovir leading to resolution of fever and/or antigenemia. The median OS for all pts has not been reached (49+mo) and the median TTP is 38 months. Conclusion: CFAR is an active frontline regimen in high-risk pts with CLL. Although CR rates in pts with other high-risk features such as 17p deletion and unmutated IgVH were >50%, TTP was significantly shorter for these pts than for pts without these features. With current follow-up, OS, TTP, infectious complications and grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity are comparable to historic high-risk pts treated with FCR. Disclosures: Keating: Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wierda:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Research Funding.

MYD88 Negative Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia Has Distinct Clinical & Biological Features As Compared To Its MYD88 Mutant Counterpart

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4299-4299
Author(s):  
Nikhil V Patkar ◽  
Prashant Deshpande ◽  
Russel Mascarenhas ◽  
PG Subramanian ◽  
Prashant Tembhare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Myd88 L265p Mutation ◽  
Myd88 L265p

Abstract Introduction Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) harbors a mutation in MYD88 gene (MYD88L265P) with frequencies varying from 67% to 91%. Although of diagnostic use its clinical significance in terms of prognosis and treatment response is unclear. We retrospectively analyzed WM for MYD88 L265P mutation, immunogenetic profile (presence of somatic hypermutations and biased gene usage) & correlated these with standard clinical variables including prognosis and patient outcome. Patients & Methods 32 cases WM (diagnosed as per WHO 2008/2001 criteria) were retrospectively accrued from 2007-2013. Genomic DNA extracted from bone marrow aspirate smears was subjected to an allele specific oligonucleotide PCR to detect the MYD88L265P mutation using fluorescently labeled primers followed by capillary electrophoresis. Immunogenetics was assessed in 29 patients. Clonal FR1/FR2 regions of the VH gene were amplified & sequenced. Sequence data was compared to the closest germline sequences on NCBI & IMGT databases. Laboratory variables (Hb, WBC, platelet, M Protein concentration, S. IgM, b2M level, S. Globulin, LDH, %of lymphoplasmacytic lymphocytes) were evaluated at baseline along with the International Prognostic Index (ISSWM). Response evaluation was done as per VIth International Consensus guidelines after treatment as well as at last follow up. 2-tailed Student's t-Test & Chi squared test were applied for statistical analysis. Results Median age was 60 years (range: 46-77), male predominant (87.5%).Majority of patients had cytopenia (90.6%) of one or more blood lineages. Median IWSSM was 3 (n=26). The median follow up was 21.5 months (range: 1 week to 82 months). Majority of patients were treated with cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone ± rituximab (55.1%), followed in others by bendamustine/rituximab(13.8%) or fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab,(13.8%) or cyclophosphamide/thalidomide/dexamethasone (10.3%). MYD88 L265P mutation was found in 84.3% (27/32) of patients. The immunogenetic results here pertain only to samples with productive IGHV gene rearrangement [22/29 (∼76%) cases]. 96% of cases revealed somatic hypermutations. 59% of cases showed a biased use for the VH3 gene followed by VH4 (22.7%) and VH1 (18.18%). The commonest gene used was IGHV3-7 (27.3%) followed by IGHV1-18 (18.2%). Clinical features separating MYD88 negative from MYD88 mutated WM are seen in Table 1. MYD88 negative WM presented with lower number of infiltrating tumor cells in the bone marrow (p=0.05), older age (p=0.02) and had a lower IWSSM score at presentation (p=0.03) as compared to mutated WM. Majority of the MYD88 negative group were in VGPR,(very good partial response) or CR (complete response) (75%:VGPR/CR) post treatment as compared to MYD88 mutated patients [21%: VGPR/CR, 31.6%: PR (partial response): 26.3%, SD (stable disease):15.8%, PD (progressive disease):6.3%]. At the last follow up 44.4% of MYD88 mutated WM had PD where as no patient in MYD88 WT had changed their initial post treatment status. Two patients with MYD88 mutation died due to disease related complications. Conclusion Our data indicates that WM is a biologically heterogeneous subset dichotomized by MYD88 mutations. WM patients with MYD88 mutations present at younger age with high tumor burden in the bone marrow, high risk of progression and poor therapeutic response. Although limited in number, MYD88 negative WM patients were not associated with PD as compared to the mutated group. Overall MYD88mutation may be considered as an adverse prognostic factor in WM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document