Impact of age on efficacy and safety of daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) in patients (pts) with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): MAIA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8035-8035
Author(s):  
Saad Zafar Usmani ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Torben Plesner ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Median Dose ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

8035 Background: D-Rd significantly reduced the risk of progression/death by 44% in transplant-ineligible NDMM pts vs Rd in the phase 3 MAIA study. To examine the impact of age on efficacy/safety of D-Rd vs Rd in this population, a subgroup analysis was conducted in pts <75 and ≥75 y of age. Methods: Transplant-ineligible NDMM pts were randomized 1:1 to Rd ± DARA; stratification was based on age (<75 vs ≥75 y), ISS (I, II, III), and region (North America vs Other). Pts received 28-day cycles of either R 25 or 10 mg (based on renal function) PO QD on Days 1-21 and either d 40 or 20 mg (based on age or BMI) PO/IV weekly until progression. In the D-Rd arm, pts received daratumumab 16 mg/kg IV QW for Cycles 1-2, Q2W for Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter until progression. PFS is the primary endpoint. Results: Among 737 randomized pts (D-Rd, n=368; Rd, n=369), 321 (44%) were ≥75 y of age. For D-Rd vs Rd, relative median dose intensity for R was 79% vs 93% for <75 y subgroup and 66% vs 89% for ≥75 y subgroup, respectively. After median follow-up of 28 mo, significant PFS benefit of D-Rd vs Rd was maintained in both <75 and ≥75 y subgroups (Table). Deeper responses and MRD-negative rate (10-5 threshold) remained higher with D-Rd vs Rd in both subgroups (Table). Most common (≥10%; D-Rd/Rd) grade 3/4 TEAEs in ≥75 y pts were neutropenia (60%/41%), lymphopenia (19%/12%), anemia (16%/22%), pneumonia (15%/10%), leukopenia (12%/6%), and thrombocytopenia (8%/11%). Fewer pts receiving D-Rd vs Rd discontinued treatment due to TEAEs (<75 y: 5% vs 12%; ≥75 y: 10% vs 21%). Conclusions: D-Rd pts received less R vs Rd group regardless of age. Efficacy of D-Rd in <75 and ≥75 y pts was consistent with the ITT population, and D-Rd demonstrated acceptable tolerability regardless of age. Together with the phase 3 ALCYONE study, these studies confirm clinical benefit of daratumumab plus standard-of-care in transplant-ineligible NDMM pts ≥75 y of age. Clinical trial information: NCT02252172. [Table: see text]

Phase 3 randomized study of daratumumab (DARA) + bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (D-VTd) vs VTd in transplant-eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): CASSIOPEIA Part 1 results.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8003-8003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Michel Attal ◽  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Marie-Christine Béné ◽  
Annemiek Broijl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

8003 Background: VTd is a standard of care (SoC) for TE NDMM. CD38 mAb DARA significantly reduced the risk of progression/death and improved CR and MRD-negative rates in relapsed refractory MM or transplant-ineligible NDMM in phase 3 studies. We report the primary and final analysis of Part 1 of CASSIOPEIA. Methods: In Part 1, TE NDMM pts 18-65 y were randomized 1:1 to VTd (6 28-day cycles [C; 4 pre-ASCT induction, 2 post-ASCT consolidation] of V 1.3 mg/m2 SC BIW Week [W] 1-2; T 100 mg PO QD; d 40-80 mg/week PO or IV W 1-4 C 1-2, W 1-3 C 3-6) ± DARA (16 mg/kg IV QW C 1-2, Q2W C 3-6). Melphalan 200 mg/m2 was pre-ASCT HDT. The primary endpoint, post-consolidation sCR rate, was assessed at Day [D] 100 post-ASCT. Part 2 (maintenance) is ongoing. Results: A cohort of 1085 pts (D-VTd, 543; VTd, 542) was randomized. The D 100 post-ASCT sCR rate was significantly higher for D-VTd vs VTd (28.9% vs 20.3%; P = 0.0010; Table). At 18.8-mo median follow-up, PFS from first randomization favored D-VTd with HR 0.47 (95% CI, 0.33-0.67; P <0.0001). With median PFS NR in either arm, 18-mo PFS rates were 92.7% vs 84.6% for D-VTd vs VTd. Rates of ≥CR, ≥VGPR, and MRD negativity supported sCR results (Table). OS is immature with 46 deaths on study (D-VTd, 14; VTd, 32; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80). The most common (≥10%) grade 3/4 TEAEs (D-VTd/VTd) were neutropenia (27.6%/14.7%), lymphopenia (17.0%/9.7%), stomatitis (12.7%/16.4%), and thrombocytopenia (11.0%/7.4%). In the D-VTd arm, infusion-related reactions occurred in 35.4% of pts. Conclusions: D-VTd in induction prior to and consolidation after ASCT improved depth of response (sCR, ≥CR, and MRD negativity) and PFS with acceptable safety. The favorable benefit-risk profile supports the use of D-VTd in TE NDMM. CASSIOPEIA is the first study to demonstrate clinical benefit of DARA + SoC in TE NDMM. Clinical trial information: NCT02541383. [Table: see text]

First-line carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) with or without pembrolizumab (pembro) for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC: Updated results of KEYNOTE-021 cohort G.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9094-9094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou ◽  
Shirish M. Gadgeel ◽  
Hossein Borghaei ◽  
Leena Gandhi ◽  
Amita Patnaik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
First Line ◽  
End Point ◽  
Background Data ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
Nonsquamous Nsclc ◽  
Radiologic Progression

9094 Background: Data from the randomized, phase 2 cohort G of KEYNOTE-021 (NCT02039674) showed that adding pembro to first-line CP in patients (pts) with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC significantly improved the primary end point of ORR (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0016) and the key secondary end point of PFS (HR 0.53, P= 0.0102) compared with CP alone and had a manageable safety profile (grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs, 39% vs 26%; treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation, 10% vs 13%). We present updated efficacy for cohort G based on 5 mo additional follow-up. Methods: 123 pts with stage IIIB/IV, chemotherapy-naive, nonsquamous NSCLC and no EGFR mutation or ALK translocation were randomized to 4 cycles of carboplatin AUC 5 + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 Q3W ± 24 mo of pembro 200 mg Q3W; maintenance pemetrexed was permitted in both arms. Eligible pts in the CP arm who had radiologic progression could crossover to pembro monotherapy. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1 by blinded, independent central review. All Pvalues are nominal. Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, median follow-up was 14.5 mo (range, 0.8-24.0). 36 of 48 pts (75.0%) in the CP arm who discontinued CP received subsequent anti–PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy. There was 1 additional response in each arm, and ORR was 56.7% (95% CI 43.2%-69.4%) with pembro + CP vs 30.2% (95% CI 19.2%-43.0%) with CP ( P = 0.0016). Median DOR was not reached for pembro + CP (range, 1.4+ to 18.6+ mo) and was 16.2 mo (range, 2.8 to 20.7+) for CP alone. PFS remained longer with pembro + CP (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.83, P = 0.0035; median [95% CI] NR [9.7 mo-NR] vs 8.9 mo [6.2-10.3]; 12-mo estimate, 56% vs 34%). With 16 deaths in the pembro + CP arm and 23 deaths in the CP arm, HR for OS was 0.69 (95% CI 0.36-1.31, P= 0.13). Median OS was not reached in either arm; at 12 mo, estimated OS was 76% in the pembro + CP arm and 69% in the CP alone arm. Conclusions: With 5 mo additional follow-up, first-line pembro + CP continues to provide a substantial, clinically relevant improvement in efficacy over CP alone in pts with advanced nonquamous NSCLC, including an almost doubled ORR, halved risk of progression or death, and a trend toward improved OS despite a 75.0% crossover rate in the CP arm. Clinical trial information: NCT02039674.

Effect of t(11;14) on outcomes of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the connect MM registry.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8032-8032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Robert M. Rifkin ◽  
Brian G. Durie ◽  
Mohit Narang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

8032 Background: The impact of t(11;14) (16%–24% of MM pts) on prognosis is not fully understood. Consensus is lacking on the effects of induction treatment (tx) on outcomes with t(11;14). The Connect MM Registry (NCT01081028) is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of pts with NDMM designed to examine real-world diagnostic patterns, treatment (tx) patterns, clinical outcomes, and HRQoL pt-reported outcomes in pts with NDMM. The impact of t(11;14) on tx outcomes are reported. Methods: Analysis included data from pts from 250 community, academic, and government sites in cohort (C) 1 (9/2009–12/2011) and C2 (12/2012–4/2016), who completed first-line (1L; induction) tx and were tested for t(11;14) by FISH or cytogenetics. Primary end points (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) were measured from start of 1L tx to earliest event (PFS, death or progression; OS, death), loss to follow-up, or data cutoff, adjusted for baseline (BL) risk factors. A sensitivity analysis excluding pts with concomitant cytogenetic abnormalities [del 17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), 1q+] was also performed. Results: By 1/2018, 3011 pts were enrolled; 2938 were treated. Of 1574 enrolled pts tested for t(11;14), 378 were t(11;14)+ and 1196 were t(11;14)−. More pts in C2 vs C1 were t(11;14)+ (60% vs 40%). BL characteristics were similar between groups. t(11;14) status did not affect PFS ( P= NS) or OS ( P= NS; Table). Pts in C1 and C2 received similar 1L txs (IMiD agent + proteasome inhibitor [PI], 30% vs 42%; PI only, 42% vs 43%; IMiD agent only, 17% vs 11%). Results were similar when pts with concomitant abnormalities were excluded. Conclusions: Results of this analysis suggest that t(11;14) does not affect PFS and OS outcomes in NDMM pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01081028. [Table: see text]

Enestnd 4-Year (y) Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Vs Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1676-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Surapol Issaragrisil ◽  
Richard E Clark ◽  
Josy Reiffers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1676 Background: Pts treated with nilotinib in the ENESTnd phase 3 trial achieved higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR, ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABLIS), deeper molecular responses (MR4, ≤ 0.01%IS and MR4.5, ≤ 0.0032%IS), significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and fewer CML-related deaths compared with imatinib by 1, 2, and 3 y. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up of 3 y; efficacy and safety data based on longer follow-up of 4 y will be presented to further assess the impact of nilotinib vs imatinib in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. Methods: Adult pts (N = 846) with newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP were randomized to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), nilotinib 400 mg BID (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). MMR, MR4, MR4.5, time to progression to AP/BC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: Significantly higher rates of MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 by 3 y were achieved in nilotinib- vs imatinib-treated pts (Table). Nilotinib led to the achievement of higher rates of molecular responses regardless of Sokal risk group or age. The difference in the rates of both MR4 and MR4.5 continued to be significantly higher for nilotinib, with the difference in favor of nilotinib increasing from 1 to 3 y (MR4: 9%-14% difference by 1 y, 18%-24% difference by 3 y; MR4.5: 6%-10% difference by 1 y, 13%-17% difference by 3 y). Among patients who achieved MMR, more pts achieved MR4 or MR4.5 on nilotinib 300 mg BID (68%) and nilotinib 400 mg BID (62%) compared with imatinib (49%). No pt in any arm progressed after achieving MR4.5. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). No new progressions occurred on core treatment between the 2-y and 3-y analyses. When events occurring after treatment discontinuation were included, the rates of progression to AP/BC were also significantly lower with nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). Nearly twice as many pts had emergent mutations on imatinib (n = 21) vs either nilotinib arm (n = 11 in each arm), with 5 pts overall developing mutations between 2 and 3 y. OS remained similar in all groups at 3 y, but fewer CML-related deaths occurred in both the nilotinib 300 mg BID (n = 5) and 400 mg BID (n = 4) arms vs imatinib (n = 14). Both drugs were well tolerated. Few new adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were observed between 2 and 3 y. Rates of discontinuation due to AEs were 10%, 14%, and 11% in the nilotinib 300 mg BID, nilotinib 400 mg BID, and imatinib arms, respectively. Conclusions: Nilotinib continues to demonstrate superiority vs imatinib, yielding faster and deeper molecular responses and a significantly decreased risk of progression. Results of ENESTnd support the use of nilotinib as a standard of care option in newly diagnosed adult pts with Ph+ CML-CP and should be considered to replace imatinib as the standard-of-care frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding; II-Yang: Research Funding. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reiffers:BMS: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other; Novartis: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses, Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other. Nicolini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Research Funding. Hochhaus:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kemp:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Fan:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Waltzman:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Safety and efficacy of daratumumab-based regimens in elderly (≥75 y) patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Subgroup analysis of POLLUX and CASTOR.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8033-8033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Ajay K. Nooka ◽  
Ludek Pour ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

8033 Background: Daratumumab (D) plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd; POLLUX) or with bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd; CASTOR) demonstrated prolonged PFS and tolerability compared with Rd and Vd alone, respectively, in RRMM pts. We examined the safety and efficacy profiles of DRd and DVd in elderly (≥75 y) pts from these phase 3 studies. Methods: Pts with ≥1 prior line of therapy were enrolled. All pts in POLLUX were treated until progression; CASTOR pts received 8 cycles of Vd ± daratumumab. Different D (16 mg/kg) dosing schedules were used in POLLUX (qw for cycles 1-2, q2w for cycles 3-6, and q4w thereafter) and CASTOR (qw in Cycles 1-3, q3w for Cycles 4-8, and q4w thereafter). Elderly pts received a reduced dexamethasone dose (20 mg once weekly). Results: In POLLUX, 29/286 (DRd) and 35/283 (Rd) were ≥75 y, with 86% and 91% having ECOG status ≤1, respectively. With 17.3 months of median follow up, 10% in DRd and 11% in Rd discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Common (>10%) grade 3/4 TEAEs for DRd included neutropenia and hypokalemia (Table). Twelve (41%) DRd pts experienced infusion-related reactions (IRR) and 4 (14%) experienced grade 3/4 IRR; none discontinued due to IRR. Median PFS was not reached (NR) in DRd vs 11.4 months in Rd (HR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.55; P=0.0007), and ≥CR % was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (52% vs 9%; P=0.0002). In CASTOR, 23/251 (DVd) and 35/247 (Vd) were ≥75 y, with 100% and 94% having ECOG status ≤1, respectively. With 13.0 months of median follow up, rates of discontinuation due to TEAEs were similar (15% vs 20%). Thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and pneumonia were common grade 3/4 TEAEs for DVd (Table). Thirteen (65%) pts reported IRR (10% grade 3/4) and no pts discontinued due to IRR. Median PFS was NR in DVd vs 8.1 months in Vd (HR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.61; P=0.0007), and significantly higher ≥CR % was observed in DVd vs Vd (25% vs 3%; P=0.0154). Conclusions: The safety and efficacy profiles in elderly pts were generally comparable with the overall population in each study. Clinical trial information: NCT02136134 and NCT02076009. [Table: see text]

Daratumumab (DARA) in combination with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MMY1001): An open-label, phase 1b study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8000-8000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej J. Jakubowiak ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Brendan M. Weiss ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

8000 Background: DARA in combination with established standard of care regimens prolongs PFS, deepens responses, and demonstrates a favorable safety profile in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The tolerability and efficacy of DARA-KRd in newly diagnosed MM pts was examined. Methods: Newly diagnosed pts regardless of transplantation eligibility were enrolled. Pts received DARA 16 mg/kg QW for Cycles 1-2, Q2W for Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter. All pts received the 1st dose of DARA split over 2 days. Carfilzomib (K) was administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (20 mg/m2 on C1D1, 36 or 70 mg/m2 subsequently based on tolerability of first dose) for ≤13 cycles or elective discontinuation for ASCT. Lenalidomide 25 mg was given on Days 1-21 and dexamethasone 20-40 mg per week. The primary endpoint was tolerability. Results: Twenty-two pts (median [range] age, 60 [34-74] y) were enrolled and received a median of 8 (1-10) treatment cycles. Nineteen pts escalated K dose to 70 mg/m2 by C1D15. Median (range) duration of follow-up was 7.4 (4.0-9.3) months. Six (27%) pts discontinued treatment (1 AE [pulmonary embolism]; 1 PD; 4 other [ASCT]). Serious AEs occurred in 46% of pts, and 14% were possibly related to DARA; 18 (82%) experienced a grade 3/4 TEAE. The most common grade 3/4 TEAEs (>10%) were lymphopenia (50%) and neutropenia (23%); 1 (5%) cardiac grade 3 TEAE was observed (congestive heart failure) which resolved; pt quickly resumed study treatment with reduced K dose. No grade 5 TEAE was reported. All DARA-associated infusion reactions (27% of pts) were grade ≤2. Treatment with DARA-KRd yielded an ORR (≥partial response) of 100% (5% complete response, 86% ≥very good partial response) in 21 response-evaluable pts. The 6-month PFS rate was 100%. Conclusions: The addition of DARA to KRd was well tolerated; the overall safety profile was consistent with that previously reported for KRd, with no additional toxicity observed with the addition of DARA. Deep and durable responses were observed. These data support further investigation of DARA-KRd as a frontline treatment regimen. Updated data will be presented based on longer follow up. Clinical trial information: NCT01998971.

The impact of infection on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with Philadelphia negative relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- R/R BCP ALL) in a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study (TOWER).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18511-e18511
Author(s):  
Andre C. Schuh ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Max S. Topp ◽  
Xinke Zhang ◽  
Paul Cannell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Point Change ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

e18511 Background: In the phase 3 TOWER study (NCT02013167), blinatumomab (BLIN) significantly improved overall survival in adults with Ph- R/R BCP ALL, and these patients (pts) also reported better HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 measures) compared with standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy. This analysis assessed the impact of grade 3+ infection, which was reported in 34.1% of BLIN pts vs 52.3% of SOC pts, on HRQoL in TOWER. Methods: Pts were stratified into two groups: those with infection vs those without infection, between baseline and Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29. A difference-in-difference (DID) model investigated the impact of infection on HRQoL. A 5-point change is considered the minimum clinically important difference in the EORTC QLQ-C30 for between group comparisons (King et al. 1996). Results: In total, 342 pts (n = 247 BLIN; n = 95 SOC) had a non-missing baseline and ≥1 post-baseline HRQoL score for any scale. Grade 3+ infection was reported in 15 (4.5%) pts before Day 8, 49 (14.5%) pts before Day 15, and 76 (22.6%) pts before Day 29. Pts with grade 3+ infection reported clinical meaningful deterioration in global health status (GHS) score and in almost all functional subscales across timepoints assessed (Table). At Day 29, grade 3+ infection was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful deterioration in GHS and most functional scales (Table). Similar but smaller effects were also observed for symptom scales/items (data not shown). Conclusions: Grade 3+ infection in pts with Ph- R/R BCP ALL was associated with clinically meaningful deterioration in HRQoL. The lower incidence of infection in pts treated with BLIN vs SOC may have contributed to the improved HRQoL for pts treated with BLIN. Clinical trial information: NCT02013167. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib Compared with Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: 12 Months Result of Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 476-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Jeong A Kim ◽  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Hyeoung Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Radotinib is a second generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed by IL-YANG Pharm. Co., Ltd (Seoul, South Korea) and approved by the Korea FDA for the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who have failed prior TKIs. We conducted the randomized, open-label, phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of radotinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. Methods Based on baseline demographics and Sokal risk score, 241 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months and molecular response was assessed by RQ-PCR at baseline and every 3 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MR4.5 by 12 months, and the rate of progression to accelerate phase or blast crisis. Results All three study groups were well balanced with baseline age, gender, race and Sokal risk score. With minimum follow-up of 12 months, the proportions of patients receiving a study drug were 86.3% (69/79) in radotinib 300 mg bid group, 71.6% (58/81) in radotinib 400 mg bid group, and 81.5% (66/81) in imatinib 400 mg qd group. By 12 months, rates of MMR were significantly higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid (51.9%, P = .0044) and radotinib 400 mg bid (45.7%, P = .0342) compared with imatinib (29.6%). The median time to MMR among responders were shorter on radotinib 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and radotinib 400 mg bid (5.6 months) than imatinib group (8.2 months). The MR4.5 rates by 12 months were also higher for both radotinib 300 mg bid (15.2%) and 400 mg bid (13.6%) compared to imatinib (8.6%). The CCyR rates by 12 months were also higher for radotinib 300 mg bid (91.1%, P = .0120) compared with imatinib (76.5%). There was no progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis in all groups by 12 months. Discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) or laboratory abnormalities occurred in 7 (8.8%), 16 (19.8%), and 5 (6.2%) patients for radotinib 300 mg bid, radotinib 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.5% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid, in 13.6% for radotinib 400 mg bid, and in 19.8% receiving imatinib. And grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19.0%, 23.5%, and 29.6% for radotinib 300 mg bid, 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. The most common any grade non-laboratory AEs were skin rash (35.4% and 33.3%), nausea/vomiting (22.8% and 23.5%), headache (19.0% and 30.9%), and pruritus (19.0% and 30.0%) in radotinib 300 mg bid and radotinib 400 mg bid, respectively; AEs in the imatinib group were edema (34.6%), myalgia (28.4%), nausea/vomiting (27.2%), and skin rash (22.2%). Overall, grade 3/4 non-laboratory AEs were uncommon in all groups. Conclusions With minimum 12 months follow-up, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of CCyR and MMR than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. The safety profiles of the radotinib and imatinib were different, and most AEs were manageable with optimal dose reduction. The results of this trial support that radotinib can be one of the standard of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Table. Baseline Characteristics, Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Rates Radotinib 300mg BID Radotinib 400mg BID Imatinib 400mg QD (N=79) (N=81) (N=81) Age, median (range), years 45 (20-75) 43 (18-84) 45 (18-83) Gender, n (%) Male 52 (65.8) 47 (58.0) 52 (64.2) Female 27 (34.2) 34 (42.0) 29 (35.8) Sokal risk, n (%) Low 21 (26.6) 22 (27.2) 22 (27.2) Intermediate 38 (48.1) 38 (46.9) 39 (48.2) High 20 (25.3) 21 (25.9) 20 (24.7) MMR by 12 months, % 51.9 45.7 29.6 P = .0044 P = .0342 Cumulative Incidence of MMR by 12 months¢Ó, % 57.0 58.0 35.0 P = .0040 P = .0037 MR4.5 by 12 months, % 15.2 13.6 8.6 CCyR by 12 months, % 91.1 81.5 76.5 ¢Ó Kaplan-Meier estimates of MMR Disclosures Kim: IL-YANG Pharm. Co. Ltd: Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Chung:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Choi:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study of 400 Mg Versus 800 Mg of Imatinib Mesylate (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Using Molecular Endpoints: 1-Year Results of TOPS (Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity) Study

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 335-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
François Guilhot ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Score ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
P Value ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: IM 400 mg/d is the standard of care for pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Previous reports suggest the rate of major molecular response (MMR), defined as BCR-ABL/control gene (BAC) ratio of ≤ 0.1% on the International Scale, predicts for a benefit in long-term outcomes. Phase 2 trials demonstrated that IM 800 mg/d as initial treatment of CML-CP decreases the time to MMR and increases the depth of molecular response (MR), and may therefore improve long-term outcomes. Methods: TOPS is a prospective, open-label, randomized (2:1) Phase 3 trial that compared IM 800 mg/d to 400 mg/d in CML-CP. Pts were stratified by Sokal risk score. The primary endpoint is MMR rate at 12 months (mo) and secondary endpoints include: rates of complete hematological response, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), time to CCyR and MMR, progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC), eventfree survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), IM dose-intensity, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Rates were compared by Fisher’s exact test and time to event outcomes by logrank test. Results: 476 pts were enrolled (800 mg/d, n=319; 400 mg/d, n=157) at 103 sites in 19 countries between 6/05 and 12/06. Median age at diagnosis was 47 yrs, and 24% of pts had high Sokal risk score. Significantly more pts receiving IM 800 mg/d achieved MMR at 3 mo and 6 mo, but not at 12 mo when compared with 400 mg/d (Table 1). Time to MMR was faster in the 800 mg/d arm compared to 400 mg/d; P = .0038. Table 1: MMR rate (%) over time according to randomized dose of IM MMR rate (%) Intent-to-treat (ITT) population Evaluable pts (with polymerase chain reaction assessment) 400 mg (N = 157) 800 mg (N = 319) P-value 400 mg %, (n) 800 mg %, (n) P-value Month 3 3 12 .0011 4 (137) 14 (283) .0011 Month 6 17 34 .0002 20 (135) 39 (276) .0001 Month 9 36 45 .0604 41 (136) 54 (267) .0203 Month 12 40 46 .2035 46 (133) 54 (269) .1386 Achievement of MMR according to average dose over the first 12 mo of treatment was greatest when the intended dose intensity (DI) was achieved (Table 2). Table 2. MMR at 12 mo according to DI (evaluable patients) Randomized Dose MMR DI (first 12 mo) (n) MMR rate, % [95% CI] 400 mg (n =133) 46% ≥ 400 mg (74) 50 [38−62] &lt; 400 mg (59) 41 [28−54] 800 mg (n =269) 54% 800 mg (52) 63 [49−76] 600 – 799 mg (134) 62 [53−70] 400 – 599 mg (69) 38 [26−50] &lt; 400 mg (14) 21 [5−51] CCyR occurred faster in the 800 mg/d arm, indicated by a higher response rate at 6 mo (57% vs. 45%, P = .0146). At 12 mo rates of MMR and CCyR (ITT population) were higher for the 800 mg/d arm but were no longer significantly different (MMR 46% vs. 40%, P= .2035; CCyR 70% vs. 66%, P= .3470). In pts with high Sokal risk scores, rates of MMR at 12 mo were 41% and 26% (P = .1565) for the 800 mg/d and 400 mg/d arms, respectively. Exploratory analysis of MR at 3 mo and its correlation with achievement of MMR at 12 mo follow. Of the pts in the 400 mg arm with BAC ratios &gt;0.1–≤ 1%, &gt;1–≤ 10% or &gt; 10% at 3 mo, 83%, 46%, and 11% later achieved an MMR at 12 mo. In the 800 mg arm 73%, 45% and 21% of the pts with respective BAC ratios achieved an MMR at 12 mo. Based on the BAC ratio at 6 mo, the observed MMR rate at 12 months was 52%, 11%, and 0% in the 400 mg/d arm compared to 46%, 14%, and 18% in the 800 mg/d arm. In the first year of follow-up, 6 pts had documented progression to AP/BC during treatment: 3 (1.9%) in the 400 mg/d arm and 3 (0.9%) in the 800 mg/d arm. At 12 mo, 85% of pts in the 400 mg/d arm were receiving the randomized dose compared to 62% of pts in the 800 mg/d arm. Median DI was 400 mg/d in the 400 mg arm and 750 mg/d in the 800 mg arm. Dose interruptions &gt; 5 days occurred more frequently in the 800 mg/d arm (67% vs 38%). Earlier achievement of MMR correlated with IM plasma trough level at 1 mo for the overall TOPS cohort; pts with IM concentrations &lt; 1165 ng/mL (lowest quartile of the aggregate group) achieved MMR slower than those with concentrations ≥ 1165 ng/mL (p=.0149). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were rash, diarrhea and myalgia occurring slightly more frequently in the 800 mg/d arm. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred more frequently in pts receiving 800 mg/d. Conclusions: TOPS confirms the efficacy and safety of IM in newly-diagnosed CML-CP. MMR occurred earlier in pts treated with 800 mg/d and in patients with plasma IM level above the lowest quartile, reinforcing the utility of IM blood level testing to optimize treatment. DI of IM 800 mg/d was maintained and tolerability was good. Additional follow-up is required to evaluate the effect of dose and MR on long-term clinical outcomes.

A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone In Patients ≥ 65 Years with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Continuous Use of Lenalidomide Vs Fixed-Duration Regimens

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 622-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Michel Delforge ◽  
John Catalano ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Martin Kropff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fixed Duration ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 622 Background: Lenalidomide is an oral IMiD® compound with a dual mechanism of action, namely tumoricidal and immunomodulatory activity, and has proven efficacy in patients with MM. The current study (MM-015) is a prospective, randomized phase 3 trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous lenalidomide treatment (MPR-R: melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance) vs fixed-duration regimens of melphalan and prednisone (MP) or melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. Methods: 459 patients aged ≥ 65 years with NDMM, stratified by age and International Staging System (ISS) stage were randomized to receive MPR-R, MPR, or MP. During double-blind treatment, patients received melphalan 0.18 mg/kg (D1-4), prednisone 2 mg/kg (D1-4), with or without lenalidomide 10 mg/day (D1-21) for nine 28-day cycles. Following 9 cycles of MPR, patients received maintenance lenalidomide (10 mg/day; D1-21) or placebo until progression; MP patients received placebo until progression. Patients with progressive disease (PD) could enroll in the open-label extension phase (OLEP) and receive lenalidomide at 25 mg/day (D1-21) with or without dexamethasone at 40 mg/day (D1-4, 9–12, and 17–20). The primary comparison for this trial was MPR-R vs MP. Updated data from a pre-planned interim analysis at 70% of events (median follow-up of 21 months) are presented. Results: MPR-R compared with MP resulted in a higher overall response rate (ORR; 77% vs 50%, P <.001) as well as higher rates of complete response (16% vs 4%, P < .001) and very good partial response (VGPR) or better (32% vs 12%, P < .001). Responses were more rapid in patients receiving MPR-R compared with MP (median 2 vs 3 months, P < .001), and improved over time. Overall, MPR-R reduced the risk of disease progression by 58% compared with MP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.423, P < .001) with a higher 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate (55% vs 16%). PFS was extended in patients receiving continuous lenalidomide therapy vs fixed-duration MP regardless of gender, ISS stage (stage I/II vs III), kidney function (creatinine clearance ≥ 60 vs < 60 mL/min), or baseline β2-microglobulin (≤ 5.5 vs > 5.5 mg/L). A landmark analysis comparing MPR-R and MPR initiated at the beginning of cycle 10 demonstrated that maintenance lenalidomide resulted in a 69% reduced risk of progression compared with placebo (HR = 0.314, P < .001). In addition, regardless of induction response (≥ VGPR or PR), patients who received maintenance lenalidomide had longer PFS compared with placebo. Importantly, patients relapsing during MPR-R had similar second-line treatment duration (median 55 weeks) compared with those relapsing while on placebo following MPR or MP (median 68 and 54 weeks, respectively). Additionally, PD rates during the OLEP were similar across all treatments (13% for each). Thus, outcomes of patients who relapse following continuous lenalidomide are similar to those who relapse following fixed-duration regimens, suggesting maintenance lenalidomide is not associated with more aggressive relapse. Follow-up remains too short to identify significant overall survival differences between the 3 groups. MPR-R had a manageable safety profile with minimal cumulative toxicities. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs) for patients treated with MPR-R and MP were 20% and 8%, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 71%, 38%, and 24% of patients receiving MPR-R and 30%, 14%, and 17% of those receiving MP; no grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy was observed. Importantly, maintenance lenalidomide was as well tolerated as placebo, with few grade 3/4 AEs. During maintenance, low rates of thrombocytopenia (3% vs 2%, respectively), neutropenia (2% vs 0%), deep vein thrombosis (1% vs 0%), and fatigue (1% vs 0%) were observed. Conclusions: MPR-R achieved a higher ORR, as well as better quality and more rapid responses vs MP. Furthermore, MPR-R compared with fixed-duration regimens of MP and MPR resulted in an unprecedented reduction in the risk of progression with a manageable safety profile, and similar rates of PD in subsequent OLEP treatment. These data suggest that continuous lenalidomide therapy with MPR-R is superior to regimens of limited duration by providing sustained disease control in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. Disclosures: Palumbo: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for first line use in multiple myeloma. Delforge:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Catalano:Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Grants. Hajek:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Kropff:OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Petrucci:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Yu:Celgene: Employment. Herbein:Celgene: Employment. Mei:Celgene: Employment. Jacques:Celgene: Employment. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document