Pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy with nabpaclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by anthracycline regimen in triple-negative breast cancer.

e12117 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a poor prognosis subtype of breast cancer (BC). We are lacking of definitive effective combinations in this tumor. So, it is warranted to explore new combinations. Neo-adjuvant setting is one of the most effective scenarios to explore a treatment efficacy. We aimed to evaluate efficacy of Nab-paclitaxel plus Carboplatin followed byanthracycline regimen by pathologic complete response (pCR: no disease in breast and axilla) in women with TNBC. Secondary endpoints were toxicity profile and breast conserving surgery. Methods: Women with stage II or III disease were included. Hormone receptors and HER2 negativity was confirmed by immunohistochemistry and/or FISH. Patients received Nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus Carboplatin AUC 2 intravenously on days 1, 8 every 21 for four cycles followed by Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 cycles and subsequent surgery. Breast Magnetic Resonance was done in all cases at diagnosis and before surgery. We obtained informed consent from all patients. Results: Thirty-two patients with confirmed clinical stage II (56.3%) or III (43.7%) TNBC were treatedbetween January 2015 and February 2019. The median age of the patients was 53.1 years (30.3-77.6 years). The average of received chemotherapy was 12 doses (7-14). The mean dose of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin was 8 doses. All patients received surgery with or without radiotherapy. There was only one case (3.1%) of progression during neoadjuvant treatment. The rate of pCR was 50% (16) in breast and axilla, partial response 43.8% (14) and stable disease 3.1% (1). Conservative surgery was performed in 50% of patients (16). The 3/4 grade toxicities were asthenia 3.1% (1), nausea/vomiting 6.3% (2), thrombocytopenia 6.3% (2), leukopenia 6.3% (2), neutropenia 40.6% (13), febrile neutropenia 6.3% (2), diarrhea 3.1% (1), allergy 3.1% (1), peripheral neurotoxicity 3.1% (1). After a median follow-up of 18.3 months (5.0–41.9) 93.8% (30) of patients are alive. Two patients (6.3%) had early local relapse and distant relapse, respectively, and are deceased due to progression disease. Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by anthracycline regimencombination as neoadjuvant treatment in TNBC achieved an encouraging rate of pCR, allowing conservative surgery in half of our patients. Toxicities were not severe in most patients and hematologic toxicity was manageable with G-CSF.

Download Full-text

BRCA1/2 Mutations and Bevacizumab in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: Response and Prognosis Results in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From the GeparQuinto Study

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.77.2285 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (22) ◽

pp. 2281-2287 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Peter A. Fasching ◽

Sibylle Loibl ◽

Chunling Hu ◽

Steven N. Hart ◽

Hermela Shimelis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Strong Predictor ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Brca1 And Brca2 ◽

Mutation Carriers

Purpose BRCA1/2 mutations are frequent in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). These patients are often treated with primary systemic chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of BRCA1/2 mutations on pathologic complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a cohort of patients with TNBC treated with anthracycline and taxane–containing chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Germline DNA was sequenced to identify mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 493 patients with TNBC from the GeparQuinto study. The pCR rates were compared in patients with and without mutation, as well as in patients treated with and without bevacizumab. In addition, the influence of BRCA1/2 mutation status and pCR status on DFS was evaluated relative to treatment. Results BRCA1/2 mutations were detected in 18.3% of patients with TNBC. Overall, patients with mutations had a pCR rate of 50%, compared with 31.5% in patients without a mutation (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.37 to 3.46; P = .001). The pCR rate among patients treated with bevacizumab was 61.5% for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and 35.6% for those without mutations (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.43 to 5.89; P = .004). pCR was a strong predictor of DFS for patients without BRCA1/2 mutations (hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.31) but not for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.69). Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab may increase the pCR after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with TNBC with BRCA1/2 mutations. In patients treated with anthracycline and taxane–based chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab), pCR was a weaker predictor of DFS for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers than for patients without mutations.

Download Full-text

Impact of the Addition of Carboplatin and/or Bevacizumab to Neoadjuvant Once-per-Week Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide on Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Stage II to III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.57.0572 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 33 (1) ◽

pp. 13-21 ◽

Cited By ~ 394

Author(s):

William M. Sikov ◽

Donald A. Berry ◽

Charles M. Perou ◽

Baljit Singh ◽

Constance T. Cirrincione ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Complete Response ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Open Label ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Dense ◽

The Impact

Purpose One third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). CALGB 40603 (Alliance), a 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomized phase II trial, evaluated the impact of adding carboplatin and/or bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 443) with stage II to III TNBC received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week (wP) for 12 weeks, followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks (ddAC) for four cycles, and were randomly assigned to concurrent carboplatin (area under curve 6) once every 3 weeks for four cycles and/or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for nine cycles. Effects of adding these agents on pCR breast (ypT0/is), pCR breast/axilla (ypT0/isN0), treatment delivery, and toxicities were analyzed. Results Patients assigned to either carboplatin or bevacizumab were less likely to complete wP and ddAC without skipped doses, dose modification, or early discontinuation resulting from toxicity. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with carboplatin, as were hypertension, infection, thromboembolic events, bleeding, and postoperative complications with bevacizumab. Employing one-sided P values, addition of either carboplatin (60% v 44%; P = .0018) or bevacizumab (59% v 48%; P = .0089) significantly increased pCR breast, whereas only carboplatin (54% v 41%; P = .0029) significantly raised pCR breast/axilla. More-than-additive interactions between the two agents could not be demonstrated. Conclusion In stage II to III TNBC, addition of either carboplatin or bevacizumab to NACT increased pCR rates, but whether this will improve relapse-free or overall survival is unknown. Given results from recently reported adjuvant trials, further investigation of bevacizumab in this setting is unlikely, but the role of carboplatin could be evaluated in definitive studies, ideally limited to biologically defined patient subsets most likely to benefit from this agent.

Download Full-text

Triple Negative Breast Cancer Pathologic Diagnosis and Current Chemotherapy Treatment Options

Oncology & Hematology Review (US) ◽

10.17925/ohr.2014.10.1.25 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 10 (01) ◽

pp. 25

Author(s):

Bernardo L Rapoport ◽

Simon Nayler ◽

Georgia S Demetriou ◽

Shun D Moodley ◽

Carol A Benn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Hormone Receptors ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Single Agent ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Pathologic Diagnosis ◽

Metastatic Setting

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 12–20 % of all breast cancers and are a heterogeneous group of tumors, both clinically and pathologically. These cancers are characterized by the lack of expression of the hormone receptors estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), combined with the lack of either overexpression or amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2)gene. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and DNA damaging agents continue to be the mainstay of treatment of this disease in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. The lack of predictive markers in identifying potential targets for the treatment of TNBC has left a gap in directed therapy in these patients. Platinum agents have seen renewed interest in TNBC based on an increasing body of preclinical and clinical data suggesting encouraging activity. However, comparisons between chemotherapy regimens are mostly retrospective in nature and the best agents or drug combinations for TNBC have not been established in prospective randomized trials. Numerous studies have now shown that TNBC has significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates compared with hormone receptor positive breast cancer when treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and pCR correlates well with better outcomes for these patients. Patients with TNBC account for a larger number of deaths in the setting of metastatic breast cancer. There is no preferred treatment for the first-line metastatic setting. Although individual agents are recommended, given the often aggressive nature of TNBC and the presence of extensive visceral disease, the use of a combination of drugs, rather than a single agent, is often advocated. This review article will outline the pathologic diagnosis of TNBC and the treatment options available to these patients in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting, including an assessment of future directions of treatment.

Download Full-text

Differential pathologic complete response rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy among molecular subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1005 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 1005-1005 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Hiroko Masuda ◽

Keith A. Baggerly ◽

Ying Wang ◽

Ya Zhang ◽

Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Clinical Stage ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Gene Profiling ◽

Intrinsic Subtypes ◽

Subtype Classification ◽

Tnbc Subtype

1005 Background: By gene profiling, Lehmann et al. (J Clin Invest 121:2750-2767, 2011) reported that triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) can be classified into 6 clusters—basal-like 1 (BL1), basal-like 2 (BL2), immunomodulatory (IM), mesenchymal (M), mesenchymal stem-like (MSL), and luminal androgen receptor (LAR)—plus an unstable (UNS) cluster. While it is clear that patients with TNBC differently respond to chemotherapy, the clinical relevance of these molecular TNBC subtypes is unknown. Methods: We qualitatively reproduced the Lehmann et al. experiments using Affymetrix CEL files from the public datasets. We identified 130 TNBC gene expression microarrays obtained from 03/00 to 03/10. All patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing sequential taxane and anthracycline-based regimens and had evaluable pathological tumor response data. Median follow-up was 68.1 months. (5.1-147.5). We classified TNBC samples using Lehmann’s gene signatures, then performed Fisher's exact test to correlate TNBC subtype and pCR status. To assess the independent utility of TNBC subtype for predicting pCR status, we fit a logistic regression model to our data and used age, clinical stage, treatment regimens, and nuclear grade as potential explanatory factors. We also performed comparison of the subtypes with the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and RCB index. Results: The BL1 subtype had the highest pCR rate (52%); BL2 and LAR the lowest (0% and 10%, respectively). TNBC subtype and pCR status were significantly associated (p = 0.044). TNBC subtype was an independent predictor of pCR status (p = 0.022) by a likelihood ratio test.The Lehmann’s subtype classification better predicted pCR status than did the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes (basal-like vs. non basal-like). Conclusions: Dividing TNBC into 7 subtypes predicts high vs. low pCR rate. The 7-subtype classification may lead to innovative personalized medicine strategies for patients with TNBC. There is a need for prospective validation of the hypothesis that pCR rates associated with the seven TNBC subtypes will predict long-term patient outcome.

Download Full-text

Low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide/methotrexate (LDCM) and aspirin for patients who fail to achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment for stage II-III breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e12000 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12000-e12000

Author(s):

Susan Burdette-Radoux ◽

Chris E. Holmes ◽

Farrah B. Khan ◽

Kim Dittus ◽

Karen M. Wilson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Poor Response ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Angiogenic Activity

e12000 Background: Patients (pts) who fail to achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a 20% risk of recurrence at two years. Data for effective postsurgical chemotherapy in this population is lacking. LDCM is an all-oral chemotherapy regimen with anti-angiogenic activity and acceptable toxicity in metastatic breast cancer. Aspirin is associated with a lower risk of breast cancer recurrence in retrospective studies and has anti-angiogenic activity. Here we combine LDCM and aspirin for high risk pts with poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Pts with stage II-III HER-2 negative breast cancer who had residual invasive cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. Pts completed surgery and radiotherapy prior to enrolment and began study treatment within 180 days of surgery. Pts received four 28-day cycles of LDCM (cyclophosphamide 50 mg po daily, and methotrexate 2.5 mg po twice daily on days 1 and 2 each week ). Aspirin 325 mg daily was added on cycles 3 and 4. Pts were evaluated for the primary endpoint of toxicity and safety every 28 days. Secondary endpoint was 2 year relapse free survival. Results: 10 of 13 planned pts were evaluable for toxicity as of Jan 24, 2013. Pathologic stage ranged from T2N0 to T3N3. 70% of tumors were chemoresistant (stable or upstaged at time of surgery). 60% of pts had hormone receptor positive tumors and received concurrent hormonal therapy. Median age was 59 years (range 38-76). All pts completed 4 cycles of study treatment without dose reduction. There were no grade 3 or 4 related toxicities. Worst hematologic toxicity was grade 2 leukopenia. Worst nonhematologic toxicity was grade 2 fatigue; all other related toxicities were grade 1. 9 pts were evaluable for recurrence and none had recurred at a median followup of 13 months (range 7-23). Conclusions: This antiangiogenic regimen is well tolerated in patients at high risk for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in no recurrences at 13 months followup, and suggesting it may be a candidate for future trials in this setting. Subsequent analyses will include longer term followup and biomarkers for angiogenesis. Clinical trial information: NCT01612247.

Download Full-text

Anlotinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e12585 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12585-e12585

Author(s):

Xi Chen ◽

Shuqun Zhang ◽

Xuexin Li ◽

Yinbin Zhang ◽

Youhuai Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Early Stage ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Pathological Stage

e12585 Background: Anlotinib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that strongly inhibits VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and c-kit. Combining anti-angiogenesis with chemotherapy yielded increased response rates in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary TNBC. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated stage ⅡB-IIIA histologically documented TNBC were assigned to receive chemotherapy plus oral Anlotinib (12 mg qd, d1-14; 21 days per cycle; total 8 cycles). Chemotherapy comprised of epirubicin at 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2 followed by docetaxel at 100 mg/m2, (21 days per cycle; both total 4 cycles), which was then followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) (no invasive carcinoma in breast or axilla). Stratification was based on the clinical breast cancer stage. This study is registered on Chinese Clinical Trials.gov (ChiCTR2000038174), and still ongoing. Results: Between July 2019 to June 2020, 18 patients (female) with pathological stage ⅡB (83.3%), and IIIA (16.7%) were enrolled with a median age of 46 years (range: 32-72). Overall pCR rate was 44.4% (8/18, CI 95%: 24.6%-66.3%). The pCR rate of pathological stage IIB patients was 46.7%(CI 95%: 26.7%-69.9%), which is tend to be better than the pCR rate of 33.3%(CI 95%: 6.2%-79.2%) for patients with pathological stage IIIA. There are 21 kind of AEs were observed, all including 56 times grade 1 AEs and 34 times grade 2 AEs, no grade 3 or higher AE was observed. The most common AEs included hand-foot syndrome(55.6% in total with 33.3% grade 2 and 22.2% grade 1), oral mucositis(50.00% in total with 33.3% grade 2 and 16.67% grade 1), fatigue(61.1%, all grade 1), hoarse voice(33.3%, all grade 1), nasal bleeding(27.8%, all grade 1), hypertension(22.2% with 5.6% grade 2) and diarrhea(22.2% with 5.6% grade 2). Neither unexpected safety signals nor treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: The addition of anlotinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000038174.

Download Full-text

Low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide/methotrexate (LDCM) and aspirin for patients without pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment for stage II-III breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.26_suppl.163 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽

pp. 163-163 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Susan Burdette-Radoux ◽

Chris E. Holmes ◽

Farrah B. Khan ◽

Kim Dittus ◽

Karen M. Wilson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Poor Response ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Angiogenic Activity

163 Background: Patients (pts) who fail to achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a 20% risk of recurrence at two years. Data for effective postsurgical chemotherapy in this population is lacking. LDCM is an all-oral chemotherapy regimen with anti-angiogenic activity and acceptable toxicity in metastatic breast cancer. Aspirin is associated with a lower risk of breast cancer recurrence in retrospective studies and has anti-angiogenic activity. Here we combine LDCM and aspirin for high risk pts with poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Pts with stage II-III HER-2 negative breast cancer who had residual invasive cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. Pts completed surgery and radiotherapy prior to enrolment and began study treatment within 180 days of surgery. Pts received four 28-day cycles of LDCM (cyclophosphamide 50 mg po daily, and methotrexate 2.5 mg po twice daily on days 1 and 2 each week ). Aspirin 325 mg daily was added on cycles 3 and 4. Pts were evaluated for the primary endpoint of toxicity and safety every 28 days. Secondary endpoint was 2 year relapse free survival. Results: 10 of 13 planned pts were evaluable for toxicity as of May 4, 2013. Pathologic stage ranged from T2N0 to T3N3. 70% of tumors were chemoresistant (stable or upstaged at time of surgery). 60% of pts had hormone receptor positive tumors and received concurrent hormonal therapy. Median age was 59 years (range 38-76). All pts completed 4 cycles of study treatment without dose reduction. There were no grade 3 or 4 related toxicities. Worst hematologic toxicity was grade 2 leukopenia. Worst nonhematologic toxicity was grade 2 fatigue; all other related toxicities were grade 1. 9 pts were evaluable for recurrence and one had recurred at a median followup of 16 months (range 10-26). Conclusions: This antiangiogenic regimen is well tolerated in patients at high risk for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in one recurrence at 16 months median followup, and it may be a candidate for future trials in this setting. Subsequent analyses will include longer term followup and biomarkers for angiogenesis. Clinical trial information: NCT01612247.

Download Full-text

Effect of neoadjuvant pertuzumab-containing regimens on pathologic complete response rates in stage II-III HER2-neu positive breast cancer: A retrospective, single institutional experience.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.580 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 580-580

Author(s):

Rashmi Krishna Murthy ◽

Takeo Fujii ◽

Kenneth R. Hess ◽

Akshara Singareeka Raghavendra ◽

Bora Lim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Clinical Stage ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Complete Response ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Her2 Positive ◽

Her2 Breast Cancer ◽

Positive Breast Cancer

580 Background: Pertuzumab (P) in combination with trastuzumab (H) based chemotherapy is currently FDA- approved as a standard neoadjuvant treatment for patients with clinical stage II-III HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). The chemotherapy backbone of HER2-targeted therapy varies and may include taxane (T) and/or anthracycline (A), or carboplatin (C). The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate for HP-containing regimens compared to H containing regimens for stage II-III HER2+ BC. Methods: We identified all patients (n = 1150) with stage II-III HER2+ BC who received neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy from 2005 to 2016 through an institutional database. All patients underwent primary breast and lymph node surgery. pCR was defined as ypT0/is, ypN0. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression and chi-squared test for comparing proportions was used for the statistical analysis. Results: pCR was significantly higher for the HP group (n = 200) compared to the H group (n = 950): 44% vs. 41%, odds ratio = 1.8 (95% CI = 1.3, 2.5; P = 0.0002). Even with adjustment for all clinically significant factors (age, stage, tumor grade, hormone receptor (HR) status, A or C exposure), the improvement was statistically significant (adjusted OR = 2.1 (95% CI = 1.5, 2.9; P < 0.0001). The pCR rate by stage and HR status for the HP group is 62% vs. 55% (stage II vs. III) and 71% vs. 51% (HR- vs. HR+). The effect of P was not modified by HR status (HR-, OR = 2.3; HR+, OR = 1.7, P = 0.39) or by A (A-yes, OR = 1.8; A-no, OR = 2.6) (P = 0.28 for interaction) or C (C-yes, OR 2.6; C-no, OR = 1.8) (P = 0.30 for interaction). P was significantly more likely to be given to patients without A (36% vs. 10%, P < 0.0001) and more likely to be given to patients with C (30% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). In both groups, significant predictors of pCR were found to be stage, HR status, and C exposure. Conclusions: Pertuzumab containing regimens yield higher pCR rates compared to non-Pertuzumab containing regimens in stage II- III HER-2 positive breast cancer. The effect of Pertuzumab is not modified by anthracycline or carboplatin use.

Download Full-text

Triple negative breast cancer and platinum-based systemic treatment: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-019-6253-5 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Jessa Gilda P. Pandy ◽

Joanmarie C. Balolong-Garcia ◽

Mel Valerie B. Cruz-Ordinario ◽

Frances Victoria F. Que

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Breast Cancers ◽

Hand Search ◽

Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽

Platinum Chemotherapy

Abstract Background Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15–20% of breast cancers. Due to its heterogeneity and high rates of relapse, there is a need to optimize treatment efficacy. Platinum chemotherapy is still controversial and currently not recommended as first-line treatment for TNBC. Recent studies have shown promising activity of this regimen. This study was done to evaluate the effect of platinum chemotherapy on pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment for early TNBC and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic TNBC. Methods A systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Clinical trials databases and hand search were done to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of platinum-based chemotherapy in adults with TNBC. Studies were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Using the random effects model, pooled Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for pCR, and Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95%CI for PFS were analyzed. Results Eleven RCTs were included (N = 2946). Platinum-based chemotherapy showed pCR benefit of 40%vs27% (OR1.75,95% CI 1.46–2.62,p < 0.0001) in the neo-adjuvant setting. Subgroup analysis showed increased pCR rates (44.6%vs27.8%) with platinum plus taxane regimen (p < 0.0001). In metastatic TNBC, three RCTs were analyzed (N = 531), platinum treatment did not show PFS advantage (HR1.16,95%CI 0.90–1.49,p = 0.24). Conclusion Platinum chemotherapy is associated with increased pCR rates in TNBC, hence it is a viable option for patients in the neoadjuvant setting. Subgroup analysis showed that the combination of platinum and taxanes (Carboplatin/Paclitaxel) improved pCR. However, no PFS advantage was seen in metastatic TNBC. Given the current conflicting data in metastatic TNBC, further exploration with additional powered studies is needed.

Download Full-text