Disparities in HER2 testing in breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13084-e13084
Author(s):  
Vijay Paryani ◽  
Mary Chen Schroeder ◽  
Heidi D. Klepin ◽  
Susan Anitra Melin ◽  
Greg B. Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Breast Cancer Outcomes ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Seer Data ◽  
Appropriate Therapy

e13084 Background: Although targeted therapies directed at human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) impact breast cancer outcomes, studies have found geographic variation in testing rates. We report population-based patterns of HER2 testing by patient, tumor and geographic characteristics. Methods: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data included women diagnosed 2010-2015 with de novo breast cancer. Women were categorized by age, race, stage, year of diagnosis, and receipt of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 testing. SEER classified lack of testing with “test ordered, results not in chart” and “test not done.” We report on cases with HER2 “test not done”. Records missing any variables were excluded. County-level measures of socioeconomic status were included for each woman. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions identified factors associated with testing. Results: Of 281,214 new breast cancer diagnoses, 1.75% had HER2 “test not done”. ER and PR testing were “not done” in 0.57% and 0.74% of cases, respectively. HER2-testing rates improved over time: 2.54% not tested in 2010 and 1.30% in 2015 (p < 0.01). The following characteristics were associated with higher rates of “test not done”: age >70 vs < 50 (OR = 1.33, p < 0.01), blacks vs whites (OR = 1.23, p < 0.01), Stage IV vs I (OR = 2.27, p < 0.01). Regional variation was also seen, with registries reporting HER2 “test not done” ranging from 0.18%-2.89%. On multivariate analysis (Table), HER2 testing was less likely for women age ≥ 70, blacks, Stage IV disease, and those living in counties with high rates of less than high school education. Conclusions: Rates of HER2 testing have increased. However, disparities exist and are associated with age, race, stage, geography, and education. Understanding the cause of these disparities could ultimately enhance access to appropriate therapy and improve disease outcomes. Odds of not having HER2 testing (select results from multivariate analysis). [Table: see text]

Evolving risk of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia (tMDS/AML) following modern cancer therapies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7516-7516
Author(s):  
Abhay Singh ◽  
Chebli Mrad ◽  
Mark G Faber ◽  
Theresa Hahn ◽  
Eunice S. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Seer Data ◽  
Similar Decrease

7516 Background: Data describing risks of tMDS/AML after targeted and immunotherapy (IO) agents are lacking. Melanoma (Mel) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are considered chemotherapy insensitive and have been treated with IO (interferon and interleukin) since the 1990s. In 2004, use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) began in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and expanded to RCC in 2005 and Mel trials in 2011. Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) use began in 2011 for Mel, 2012 for NSCLC in trials and later for RCC. For multiple myeloma (MM), use of lenalidomide has been increasing since 2007. All these modern therapies have well described immunomodulatory functions. Methods: Using 17 population-based SEER cancer registries, we studied 565,149 patients diagnosed from 2000-2015 with Mel, RCC, NSCLC, or MM who survived ≥1 year and assessed risk of tMDS/AML across periods P1 (2000-2005), P2 (2006-2010) and P3 (2011-2015). Censoring occurred at 5 years of follow up to limit bias and assess risk alteration across approval and utilization periods of these modern therapies. Results: tMDS/AML risk was significantly elevated after RCC in P1 [standardized incidence ratio (SIR): 1.61, possibly from chemo exposure that was still prevalent to some extent in P1 period] and a downtrend noted in P2 (SIR: 1.11) and P3 (SIR: 0.60). tMDS/AML risk after Mel showed similar downtrend, not statistically significant. In contrast, risk for tMDS/AML after MM increased across all periods ( SIRs 4.51 > 5.05 > 5.23), and risk after NSCLC increased from P1 to P2 but decreased thereafter, pattern most pronounced in stage I-III NSCLC ( 1.64 > 3.15 > 1.92). Conclusions: Periods when TKI and CPI use became standard in Mel and RCC, we observed a decrease in tMDS/AML risk. Similar decrease in the most recent period for stage I-III NSCLC was observed, possibly due to progression of these earlier staged cancers resulting in receipt of TKIs and CPI for stage IV disease. tMDS/AML risk after MM increased contradicting the decline in risk previously reported in the literature. Discordance may be due to survival bias as MM patients are now living longer (SEER 5-yr survival in ‘00 was 35% and 53% in ‘15) with more time to develop tMDS/AML. Overall, aside from better efficacy and/or tolerability of modern therapies, another observed benefit was lower tMDS/AML risk. This risk was lower than general population in Mel/RCC, suggesting a possible protective effect of these therapies. SIR tables/graphs with updated SEER data (available 04/2020) with follow up through 2018 will be presented.

scholarly journals Incorporation of biologic factors for the staging of de novo stage IV breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Yu He ◽  
Chen-Lu Lian ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Jian Lei ◽  
Li Hua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Prognostic Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv Breast Cancer

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of biological factors, including histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status in de novo stage IV breast cancer. Based on eligibility, patient data deposited between 2010 and 2014 were collected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. The receiver operating characteristics curve, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used for analysis. We included 8725 patients with a median 3-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of 52.6%. Higher histologic grade, HER2-negative, ER-negative, and PR-negative disease were significantly associated with lower BCSS in the multivariate prognostic analysis. A risk score staging system separated patients into four risk groups. The risk score was assigned according to a point system: 1 point for grade 3, 1 point if hormone receptor-negative, and 1 point if HER2-negative. The 3-year BCSS was 76.3%, 64.5%, 48.5%, and 23.7% in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 points, respectively, with a median BCSS of 72, 52, 35, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The multivariate prognostic analysis showed that the risk score staging system was an independent prognostic factor associated with BCSS. Patients with a higher risk score had a lower BCSS. Sensitivity analyses replicated similar findings after stratification according to tumor stage, nodal stage, the sites of distant metastasis, and the number of distant metastasis. In conclusion, our risk score staging system shows promise for the prognostic stratification of de novo stage IV breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document