Dora: A randomized phase II multicenter maintenance study of olaparib alone or olaparib in combination with durvalumab in platinum responsive advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1113-TPS1113
Author(s):  
Sarah Sammons ◽  
Tira Jing Ying Tan ◽  
Tiffany A. Traina ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
Young-Hyuck Im ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS1113 Background: PARP inhibition (PARPi) with olaparib is approved in HER2-negative germline BRCA mutant (g BRCAm) metastatic breast cancer. Maintenance PARPi in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer improves median PFS regardless of gBRCA mutation status. Preclinical work has shown that platinum response strongly correlates with olaparib response in breast cancer models; hence, maintenance therapy trials are underway in aTNBC. PARPi modulates immune responses and enhances immunogenicity in many preclinical models. We hypothesize that olaparib either alone or in combination with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab will have clinical efficacy as maintenance therapy in aTNBC subjects who have responded to platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: DORA is a randomized, international, multicenter, phase II study designed to explore the efficacy of olaparib or olaparib in combination with durvalumab as maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive aTNBC. 60 subjects will be enrolled following a minimum of 3 cycles of treatment with platinum-based (cisplatin or carboplatin) chemotherapy as a single agent or combination therapy in the first or second-line setting. Subjects deriving clinical benefit (CR / PR / SD) from platinum-based therapy will be eligible and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in arm 1 will receive olaparib orally 300mg BID continuously and in arm 2 will receive olaparib orally 300mg BID continuously in combination with durvalumab 1500mg IV every 4 weeks. Assessment of tumor response will be done every 8 weeks. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints: overall survival, clinical benefit rate, safety. Correlative analyses: pre-treatment archival/fresh biopsy samples are mandated. Post-treatment tissue biopsy is requested. Serial ctDNA will be collected at baseline, staging, and progression to correlate with response and track emerging genomic alterations in a platinum sensitive cohort under the pressure of PARP inhibition. Whole exome DNA sequencing, IHC for PDL-1 and TILs will be performed on tissue samples. ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03167619. (Moore K, et al "SOLO-1: Phase III trial of maintenance olaparib following platinum-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation" ESMO 2018; Abstract LBA7-PR). Clinical trial information: NCT03167619.

Efficacy of niraparib maintenance therapy in Chinese women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with and without secondary cytoreductive surgery: Results from the NORA trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5534-5534
Author(s):  
Lingying Wu ◽  
Xiaohua Wu ◽  
Jianqing Zhu ◽  
Rutie Yin ◽  
Jiaxin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Chinese Women ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

5534 Background: NORA is the first, phase III, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that demonstrated individualized starting dose regimen of niraparib, which significantly improved PFS in Chinese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC). This sub-group analysis evaluated the efficacy of niraparib maintenance therapy with and without secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in PSROC. Methods: The NORA phase III RCT included adult (≥18 years) Chinese women with PSROC who were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral niraparib (n = 177) or matched placebo (n = 88). This retrospective subgroup analysis was based on the progression-free survival (PFS) of niraparib maintenance therapy in these two groups of patients with PSROC, patients with SCS, and patients without SCS. The PFS was assessed by blinded independent central review. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator and log-rank test were performed to calculate the median PFS time. Results: Of the 265 evaluable patients, 69 (26.0%) patients received the SCS (niraparib, n = 48; placebo, n = 21), and 196 (74.0%) patients were without SCS (niraparib, n = 129; placebo, n = 67). Among patients with and without SCS, baseline characteristics for BRCA mutation were 26.1% vs 41.8%, complete response to last platinum-based chemotherapy were 68.1% vs 43.9%, time (6-12 months) to progression after penultimate therapy were 23.2% vs 34.7%, respectively. Treatment with niraparib led to a significant reduction of risk to disease progression compared with placebo in patients with SCS (Hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.32 [0.13–0.78]; P = 0.0102) and without SCS (0.34 [0.23–0.50]; P< 0.001). Moreover, in the subgroups of patients who received SCS, niraparib maintenance therapy had a significantly longer PFS compared with placebo (Median [95% CI]: not reached [18.33 – not estimable] vs 5.75 months [3.68 – not estimable]; P = 0.0102). This trend was also similar in the subgroup of patients who did not receive SCS (Median [95% CI]: 10.28 months [7.49 – 18.37] vs 4.90 months [3.71 – 5.52]; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The results from this retrospective sub-group analysis revealed that niraparib maintenance therapy provided significant clinical efficacy in patients with PSROC, irrespective of SCS. Clinical trial information: NCT03705156.

scholarly journals Olaparib Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation (SOLO3): A Randomized Phase III Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1164-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Penson ◽  
Ricardo Villalobos Valencia ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Charles A. Leath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
End Point ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Measurable Disease

PURPOSE A phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00628251 ) showed activity of olaparib capsules versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase III trial (SOLO3) of olaparib tablets versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received at least 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, open-label trial, patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib 300 mg twice a day or physician’s choice single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in the measurable disease analysis set assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). The key secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by BICR in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS Of 266 randomly assigned patients, 178 were assigned to olaparib and 88 to chemotherapy. In patients with measurable disease (olaparib, n = 151; chemotherapy, n = 72), the BICR-assessed ORR was significantly higher with olaparib than with chemotherapy (72.2% v 51.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.53 [95% CI, 1.40 to 4.58]; P = .002). In the subgroup who had received 2 prior lines of treatment, the ORR was 84.6% with olaparib and 61.5% with chemotherapy (OR, 3.44 [95% CI, 1.42 to 8.54]). BICR-assessed PFS also significantly favored olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.91]; P = .013; median, 13.4 v 9.2 months). Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of olaparib and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Olaparib resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in ORR and PFS compared with nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received at least 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy.

scholarly journals ICON 9—an international phase III randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of maintenance therapy with olaparib and cediranib or olaparib alone in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer following a response to platinum-based chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-138
Author(s):  
Osnat Elyashiv ◽  
Jonathan Ledermann ◽  
Gita Parmar ◽  
Laura Farrelly ◽  
Nicholas Counsell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundTwo novel biological agents—cediranib targeting angiogenesis, and olaparib targeting DNA repair processes—have individually led to an improvement in ovarian cancer control. The aim of ICON9 is to investigate the combination of cediranib and olaparib maintenance in recurrent ovarian cancer following platinum-based therapy.Primary objectiveTo assess the efficacy of maintenance treatment with olaparib in combination with cediranib compared with olaparib alone following a response to platinum-based chemotherapy in women with platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer during first relapse.Study hypothesisMaintenance therapy with cediranib and olaparib in combination is associated with improved patient outcomes compared with olaparib alone.Trial designInternational phase III randomized controlled trial. Following a response to platinum-based chemotherapy patients are randomized 1:1 to either oral olaparib and cediranib (intervention arm) or oral olaparib alone (control arm).Major inclusion criteriaPatients with a known diagnosis of high grade serous or endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum, progressing more than 6 months after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who have responded to second-line platinum-based chemotherapy.Primary endpointsProgression-free and overall survival. Co-primary endpoints to be assessed using a fixed-sequence gatekeeping approach: (1) progression-free survival, all patients; (2) progression-free survival, BRCA wild type; (3) overall survival, all patients; (4) overall survival, BRCA wild type.Sample size618 patients will be recruited.Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting resultsAccrual is expected to be completed in 2024 with presentation of results in 2025.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03278717.

Phase II consolidation trial with anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody (hu3S193) in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after a second remission

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002239
Author(s):  
Oren Smaletz ◽  
Gustavo Ismael ◽  
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz ◽  
Ivana L O Nascimento ◽  
Ana Luiza Gomes de Morais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Lewis Y

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of hu3S193, a humanized anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody, as a consolidation strategy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after salvage platinum-doublet chemotherapy.MethodsThis single-arm phase II study accrued patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with Lewis-Y expression by immunohistochemistry who had achieved a second complete response after five to eight cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received intravenous infusions of hu3S193, 30 mg/m2 every 2 weeks starting no more than 8 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy and continuing for 12 doses, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the second remission. Secondary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics.ResultsTwenty-nine patients were enrolled. Most had a papillary/serous histology tumor (94%), stage III disease at diagnosis (75%), and five (17%) underwent secondary cytoreduction before salvage chemotherapy. Two patients were not eligible for efficacy but were considered for toxicity analysis. Eighteen patients (62%) completed the full consolidation treatment while nine patients progressed on treatment. At the time of analysis, 23 patients (85%) of the eligible population had progressed and seven of these patients (26%) had died. Median progression-free survival of the second remission was 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.6–13.9), with a 1-year progression-free survival of the second remission rate of 50.1%. The trial was terminated early since it was unlikely that the primary objective would be achieved. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (55%) and vomiting (51%).ConclusionsHu3S193 did not show sufficient clinical activity as consolidation therapy in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy.Trial registrationNCT01137071.

scholarly journals Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer After a Partial Response to the Last Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (32) ◽  
pp. 2968-2973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep M. del Campo ◽  
Ursula A. Matulonis ◽  
Susanne Malander ◽  
Diane Provencher ◽  
Sven Mahner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE In the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274 ), maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, prolonged progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer who had a response to their last platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective of the study was to assess the clinical benefit and patient-reported outcomes in patients who had a partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) to their last platinum-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 553 patients were enrolled in the trial. Of 203 patients with a germline BRCA mutation (g BRCAmut), 99 had a PR and 104 had a CR to their last platinum-based therapy; of 350 patients without a confirmed g BRCAmut (non–g BRCAmut), 173 had a PR and 177 had a CR. Post hoc analyses were carried out to evaluate safety and the risk of progression in these patients according to g BRCAmut status and response to their last platinum-based therapy. Ovarian cancer–specific symptoms and quality of life were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Ovarian Symptom Index. RESULTS Progression-free survival was improved in patients treated with niraparib compared with placebo in both the g BRCAmut cohort (PR: hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.131 to 0.441; P < .0001; CR: HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.160 to 0.546; P < .0001) and the non–g BRCAmut cohort (PR: HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.230 to 0.532; P < .0001; CR: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.383 to 0.868; P = .0082). The incidence of any-grade and grade 3 or greater adverse events was manageable. No meaningful differences were observed between niraparib and placebo in PR and CR subgroups with respect to patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION Patients achieved clinical benefit from maintenance treatment with niraparib regardless of response to the last platinum-based therapy.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: an Australian and New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group study

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Harnett ◽  
M. Buck ◽  
P. Beale ◽  
A. Goldrick ◽  
S. Allan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Group B

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin have shown single-agent activity in relapsed ovarian cancer. This combination was used to determine response rates, time-to-event efficacy measures, and toxicity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy who had measurable lesions and/or elevated CA-125 levels were identified as group A (platinum-refractory/platinum-resistant patients) and group B (platinum-sensitive patients). All patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days for up to eight cycles. Seventy-five patients (21 in group A and 54 in group B), with a median age of 58 years (range, 37–78), were enrolled. A median of six cycles (range, 1–8) was administered. By intent-to-treat analysis, 15 patients with measurable disease achieved partial response for an overall best response rate of 20.0% (9.5% in group A and 24.1% in group B). CA-125 response was observed in 48.4% patients (30.0% in group A and 57.1% in group B). Median time to progressive disease was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.6–9.0 months) with 5.0 months in group A and 8.3 months in group B. Median overall survival was 17.8 months (95% CI, 12.9–21.3 months) with 9.2 months for group A and 20.0 months for group B. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (61.3%), leukopenia (24.0%), nausea (16.0%), and vomiting (22.7%). We conclude that the combination of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine is active in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, but the regimen is unsatisfactory for further study due to modest response and relatively high toxicity.

Phase II study of DMXAA combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5032-5032 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Gabra
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Vascular Disrupting Agent ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

5032 Background: DMXAA (AS1404) is a small-molecule vascular disrupting agent, which in animal models shows additive or supra-additive effects with cytotoxics, including taxanes and platinum agents. This phase II study evaluated DMXAA in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients with a progression-free interval of more than 6 months after response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: Patients had first diagnosed disease FIGO stage Ic-IV, with presence of recurrent disease confirmed by imaging. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive up to 6 cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/ml × min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) with or without DMXAA (1200 mg/m2). Safety assessments included EKG, adverse events, laboratory screens and ophthalmic exam. Efficacy endpoints are objective response rates, time to progression, duration of response and stable disease, and median and 1-year survival. Results: 55 patients have been enrolled to date from a planned total of ∼70. Initial safety findings in the two arms are comparable. Preliminary investigator-assessed RECIST response data show the following unconfirmed outcomes: of 17 patients in the DMXAA arm, there are 10 with partial responses (PRs), 7 with stable disease (SD) and 0 with progressive disease (PD); of 14 patients in the control arm, there are 8 PRs, 6 SDs and 0 PDs. Conclusions: Initial safety findings suggest that addition of DMXAA to standard doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel did not add significantly to toxicity. Efficacy assessments are ongoing to determine the value of the triple combination in recurrent ovarian cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document