MRI-based prostate specific antigen density predicts Gleason score upgrade in an active surveillance cohort.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 107-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel L. Washington ◽  
Avi Lefridge Baskin ◽  
Niloufar Ameli ◽  
Hao Gia Nguyen ◽  
Antonio C. Westphalen ◽  
...  

107 Background: Elevated prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) measurements has been shown to be strongly associated with clinically significant disease and to predict progression on active surveillance for men with low stage/grade disease. We hypothesize that elevated MRI PSAD is similarly associated with increased risk of progression on subsequent biopsy. Methods: Patients with Gleason grade 3+3 on diagnostic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy who were managed with active surveillance and underwent at least one additional biopsy were included. Patients who underwent MRI greater than 6 months after diagnosis were excluded. Summary statistics were generated for demographic and clinical characteristics. MRI PSAD was calculated using prostate volume on MRI and PSA temporally closest to the MRI. Multivariable logistics regression models were used to evaluate the association between MRI PSAD and predictors of upgrade on serial biopsy. Results: 166 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 74 of them were upgraded to Gleason grade ≥7 on follow up biopsy. TRUS volume was noted be strongly correlated with MRI prostate volume (Pearson’s r=0.82, p<0.01). MRI PSAD 0.15-0.225 ng/ccl and ≥0.0225 ng/cc were significantly associated with upgrade to Gleason grade 7 compared to MRI PSAD <0.075 ng/ml/ml after controlling for age and time since diagnosis. MRI PSAD less than 0.15 was not associated with upgrade on follow up biopsy (in any patient, if so, state that no one with a PSAD < 0.15 upgraded). Conclusions: MRI PSAD is significantly associated with Gleason upgrading on follow up biopsy for men initially diagnosed with Gleason grade 3+3 disease. This finding is important because surveillance MRI is increasingly being used to monitor men on active surveillance.

1993 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-308
Author(s):  
E. Gastaldi ◽  
S. Benvenuti ◽  
B. Mennini ◽  
M. Iacoviello ◽  
M. Caviglione ◽  
...  

PSA (prostate specific antigen) has not demonstrated sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be useful in the evaluation of prostate carcinoma. To enhance the accuracy of serum PSA the Authors have used a quotient of serum PSA (ng/ml) and prostate volume (calculated by transrectal ultrasound) which is named PSAD (prostate specific antigen density).


1994 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
C. Terrone ◽  
E. Vestita ◽  
A. Formigoni ◽  
S. Rocca Rossetti ◽  
G. Aimo

The possibility of distinguishing prostate cancer from BPH with the prostate specific antigen (PSA) determination is particularly poor when PSA levels are between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml. In these cases the quotient of serum PSA and prostate volume, defined as prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), seems to enhance the accuracy of PSA alone. In this study we evaluated retrospectively the preoperative PSA levels in 139 patients with BPH and in 26 patients with prostate cancer who underwent surgical treatment at our Department. We calculated the prostate volume with the following formula: length x width x depth x 0.52. The three dimensions were obtained from the surgical specimen in the patients with prostate cancer and using transrectal ultrasound in the cases of BPH. In patients with a serum PSA level of 4.1 to 10 ng/ml, PSA alone was not able to distinguish benign from malignant prostate disease; the PSAD values, on the contrary, provided a statistically significant (p < 0.003) stratification between BPH and prostate cancer (mean PSAD of 0.0088 and 0.191 respectively). Only 6% of patients with BPH had a PSAD greater than 0.15 compared to 76% of patients with prostate cancer. These results suggest the usefulness of PSAD in predicting the presence of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate levels of serum PSA.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasmet Sarici ◽  
Onur Telli ◽  
Orhan Yigitbasi ◽  
Musa Ekici ◽  
Berat Cem Ozgur ◽  
...  

Introduction: The discrepancy between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason scores is common. We investigate the predictive value of prostate biopsy features for predicting Gleason score (GS) upgrading in patients with biopsy Gleason scores ≤6 who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Our aim was to determine predictors of GS upgrading and to offer guidance to clinicians in determining the therapeutic option.Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer at 2 major centres between January 2007 and March 2013. All patients with either abnormal digital examination or elevated prostate-specific antigen at screening underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Variables were evaluated among the patients with and without GS upgrading. Our study limitations include its retrospective design, the fact that all subjects were Turkish and the fact that we had a small sample size.Results: In total, 321 men had GS ≤6 on prostate biopsy. Of these, 190 (59.2%) had GS ≤6 concordance and 131 (40.8%) had GS upgrading from ≤6 on biopsy to 7 or higher at the time of the prostatectomy. Independent predictors of pathological upgrading were prostate volume <40 cc (p < 0.001), maximum percent of cancer in any core (p = 0.011), and >1 core positive for cancer (p < 0.001).Conclusions: When obtaining an extended-core biopsy scheme, patients with small prostates (≤40 cc), greater than 1 core positive for cancer, and an increased burden of cancer are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading. Patients with GS ≤6 on biopsy with these pathological parameters should be carefully counselled on treatment decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document