Effect of intra-observer variation in prostate volume measurement on prostate-specific antigen density calculations among prostate cancer active surveillance participants

2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1739-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan S. Ko ◽  
Patricia Landis ◽  
H. Ballentine Carter ◽  
Alan W. Partin
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Chandan Kumar Nath ◽  
Bhupen Barman ◽  
Pranjal Phukan ◽  
Stephen L. Sailo ◽  
Biswajit Dey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Determination of isolated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in asymptomatic individuals has not demonstrated sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be useful in the routine evaluation of prostate disease. To enhance the accuracy of serum PSA we have used a proportion of serum PSA and prostate volume, which we refer to as prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Prostate volume in this study was calculated using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Materials and Methods A total of 106 patients with prostatic disease clinically confined to the prostate glands were evaluated. Results and Observation The mean PSAD for prostate cancer was 0.15 ± 0.01 while that for benign hypertrophy of the prostate (BPH) was 0.11 ± 0.02 (p < 0.05). Significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted in the prostate volume in these two groups with the mean prostate volume measured by TRUS in the BPH to be 53.85 ± 9.71 mL compared with 58.14 ± 7.48 mL in the carcinoma. PSA density of 0.13 ng/mL can be used as a cutoff for the individual in our set-up who should go for prostate biopsy with sensitivity and specificity of over 90%. Conclusion These results suggest that PSAD may be useful in distinguishing BPH and prostate cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Yusim ◽  
Muhammad Krenawi ◽  
Elad Mazor ◽  
Victor Novack ◽  
Nicola J. Mabjeesh

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in men undergoing systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We retrospectively analyzed data of men who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy because of elevated PSA (≤ 20 ng/ml) or abnormal digital rectal examination. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to compare PSA and PSAD performance and chi-square automatic interaction detector methodologies were used to identify predictors of clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7 or international society of urological pathology grade group ≥ 2). Nine-hundred and ninety-two consecutive men with a median age of 66 years (IQR 61–71) were included in the study. Median PSAD was 0.10 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.10–0.22). Prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 338 men (34%). Clinically significant prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 167 patients (50% of all cancers and 17% of the whole cohort). The AUC to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.64 for PSA and 0.78 for PSAD (P < 0.001). The highest Youden's index for PSAD was at 0.20 ng/ml2 with 70% sensitivity and 79% specificity for the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Men with PSAD < 0.09 ng/ml2 had only 4% chance of having clinically significant disease. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSAD between 0.09 and 0.19 ng/ml2 was significantly higher when prostate volume was less than 33 ml. In conclusion, PSAD was a better predictor than PSA alone of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing TRUS-guided biopsy. Patients with PSAD below 0.09 ng/ml2 were unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer. Combining PSAD in the gray zone (0.09–0.19) with prostate volume below 33 ml adds diagnostic value of clinically significant prostate cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 107-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel L. Washington ◽  
Avi Lefridge Baskin ◽  
Niloufar Ameli ◽  
Hao Gia Nguyen ◽  
Antonio C. Westphalen ◽  
...  

107 Background: Elevated prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) measurements has been shown to be strongly associated with clinically significant disease and to predict progression on active surveillance for men with low stage/grade disease. We hypothesize that elevated MRI PSAD is similarly associated with increased risk of progression on subsequent biopsy. Methods: Patients with Gleason grade 3+3 on diagnostic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy who were managed with active surveillance and underwent at least one additional biopsy were included. Patients who underwent MRI greater than 6 months after diagnosis were excluded. Summary statistics were generated for demographic and clinical characteristics. MRI PSAD was calculated using prostate volume on MRI and PSA temporally closest to the MRI. Multivariable logistics regression models were used to evaluate the association between MRI PSAD and predictors of upgrade on serial biopsy. Results: 166 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 74 of them were upgraded to Gleason grade ≥7 on follow up biopsy. TRUS volume was noted be strongly correlated with MRI prostate volume (Pearson’s r=0.82, p<0.01). MRI PSAD 0.15-0.225 ng/ccl and ≥0.0225 ng/cc were significantly associated with upgrade to Gleason grade 7 compared to MRI PSAD <0.075 ng/ml/ml after controlling for age and time since diagnosis. MRI PSAD less than 0.15 was not associated with upgrade on follow up biopsy (in any patient, if so, state that no one with a PSAD < 0.15 upgraded). Conclusions: MRI PSAD is significantly associated with Gleason upgrading on follow up biopsy for men initially diagnosed with Gleason grade 3+3 disease. This finding is important because surveillance MRI is increasingly being used to monitor men on active surveillance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document