Accelerator-based BNCT in rescue treatment of patients with recurrent GBM: A multicenter phase II study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2536-2536
Author(s):  
Shin-Ichi Miyatake ◽  
Shinji Kawabata ◽  
Hiromi Goto ◽  
Yoshitaka Narita ◽  
Minoru Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Brain Edema ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Irradiation Time ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

2536 Background: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is tumor-selective particle radiation and theoretically efficacious especially for tumors with infiltrative nature, such as glioblastoma (GBM). The aim of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of accelerator-based BNCT (AB-BNCT) using cyclotron-based neutron generator, BNCT30, and 10B-boronophenylalanine (borofalan(10B)) agent, SPM-011, in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas, chiefly GBM. Methods: The multi-institutional open-label, phase II clinical trial for recurrent 27 cases of malignant gliomas (MG) (24 cases were GBM) was conducted with above mentioned AB-BNCT system, using 500mg/kg of SPM-011 (study code, JG002). The patients were enrolled from February 2016 to June 2018. The inclusion criteria are bevacizumab-naïve MG, recurrent after standard treatment composed of XRT and chemotherapy with TMZ. Neutron-irradiation time were determined not to exceed to 8.5 Gy-Eq for scalp dose which was decided by preceding phase I trial. Primary endpoint was 1-year survival rate and secondary ones were median overall survival (mOS), median progression free survival (mPFS) and so on. The results were compared to previous Japanese domestic bevacizumab trial for recurrent GBM (JO22506) which had the similar inclusion criteria with JG002. Results: 1-year survival rate and mOS of recurrent GBM cases in JG002 was 79.2% (95% CI:57.0-90.8) and 18.7 months (95% CI:12.9-23.4) (data cutoff = 20 Jun 2019) respectively, while those of JO22506 was 34.5% (90% CI:20.0-49.0) and 10.5 months (95% CI:8.2-12.4), respectively. Median PFS of JG002 and JO22506 were 0.9 and 3.3 months, respectively. Most important adverse event in JG002 was brain edema. 21 out of 27 cases were treated with bevacizumab after progress disease. Conclusions: AB-BNCT demonstrated acceptable safety and prolonged survival for recurrent MG chiefly GBM. AB-BNCT might produce brain edema somewhat after the treatment, which might be the unavoidable adverse event of re-irradiation for recurrent MG, however that seemed to be controlled with bevacizumab. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-194742 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals CTNI-26. ACCELERATOR-BASED BNCT IN RESCUE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GBM: A MULTICENTER PHASE II STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii48-ii48
Author(s):  
Shin-Ichi Miyatake ◽  
Shinji Kawabata ◽  
Hiromi Goto ◽  
Yoshitaka Narita ◽  
Minoru Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Brain Edema ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Irradiation Time ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Particle Radiation ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract BACKGROUND Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is tumor-selective particle　radiation and theoretically efficacious especially for tumors with infiltrative nature, such as glioblastoma (GBM). The aim of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of accelerator-based BNCT (AB-BNCT) using cyclotron-based neutron generator, BNCT30, and 10B-boronophenylalanine (borofalan(10B)) agent, SPM-011, in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas, chiefly GBM. METHODS The multi-institutional open-label, phase II clinical trial for recurrent 27 cases of malignant gliomas (MG) (24 cases were GBM) was conducted with above AB-BNCT system, using 500mg/kg of SPM-011 (study code, JG002). The patients were enrolled from February 2016 to June 2018. The inclusion criteria are bevacizumab-naïve MG, recurrent after standard treatment composed of XRT and chemotherapy with TMZ. Neutron-irradiation time were determined not to exceed to 8.5 Gy-Eq for scalp dose. Primary endpoint was 1-year survival rate and secondary ones were median overall survival (mOS), median progression free survival (mPFS). The results were compared to previous Japanese domestic bevacizumab trial for recurrent GBM (JO22506) which had the similar inclusion criteria with JG002. RESULTS 1-year survival rate and mOS of recurrent GBM cases in JG002 was 79.2% (95% CI:57.0–90.8) and 18.7 months (95% CI:12.9–23.4) respectively, while those of JO22506 was 34.5% (90% CI:20.0–49.0) and 10.5 months (95% CI:8.2–12.4), respectively. Median PFS of JG002 and JO22506 were 0.9 and 3.3 months, respectively. Most important adverse event in JG002 was brain edema. Brain edema in 21 out of 27 cases was treated with bevacizumab after progress disease. CONCLUSIONS AB-BNCT demonstrated acceptable safety and prolonged survival for recurrent MG chiefly GBM. AB-BNCT might produce brain edema somewhat after the treatment, which might be the unavoidable adverse event of re-irradiation for recurrent MG, however that seemed to be controlled well with bevacizumab.

scholarly journals Accelerator-based BNCT for patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a multicenter phase II study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Kawabata ◽  
Minoru Suzuki ◽  
Katsumi Hirose ◽  
Hiroki Tanaka ◽  
Takahiro Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Brain Edema ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Particle Radiation ◽  
Boron Neutron Capture ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Background Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) utilizes tumor-selective particle radiation. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of accelerator-based BNCT (AB-BNCT) using a cyclotron-based neutron generator (BNCT 30) and 10B-boronophenylalanine (SPM-011) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma (MG) (primarily glioblastoma [GB]). Methods This multi-institutional, open-label, phase II clinical trial involved 27 recurrent MG cases, including 24 GB cases, who were enrolled from February 2016 to June 2018. The study was conducted using the abovementioned AB-BNCT system, with 500 mg/kg SPM-011 (study code: JG002). The patients were bevacizumab-naïve and had recurrent MG after standard treatment. The primary endpoint was the 1-year survival rate, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results were compared to those of a previous Japanese domestic bevacizumab trial for recurrent GB (JO22506). Results The 1-year survival rate and median OS of the recurrent GB cases in this trial were 79.2% (95% CI: 57.0–90.8) and 18.9 months (95% CI: 12.9–not estimable), respectively, whereas those of JO22506 were 34.5% (90% CI: 20.0–49.0) and 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.2–12.4), respectively. The median PFS was 0.9 months (95% CI: 0.8–1.0) by the RANO criteria. The most prominent adverse event was brain edema. Twenty-one of 27 cases were treated with bevacizumab following progressive disease. Conclusions AB-BNCT demonstrated acceptable safety and prolonged survival for recurrent MG. AB-BNCT may increase the risk of brain edema due to re-irradiation for recurrent MG; however, this appears to be controlled well with bevacizumab.

REGOMA: A Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Open-Label Phase II Clinical Trial of Regorafenib Compared to Lomustine in Relapsed Glioblastoma Patients

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lombardi ◽  
Gian Luca De Salvo ◽  
Alba Ariela Brandes ◽  
Marica Eoli ◽  
Roberta Rudà ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

Cyto-KIK: A phase II trial of cytoreductive surgery in kidney cancer plus immunotherapy (nivolumab) and targeted kinase inhibition (cabozantinib).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4598-TPS4598
Author(s):  
Karie Runcie ◽  
Eric A. Singer ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
Christopher B. Anderson ◽  
Matthew Dallos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Orthotopic Mouse Model

TPS4598 Background: Despite recent therapeutic advancements in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), only 5-10% of patients will achieve a complete response (CR) to therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy removes a large portion of the tumor which may be a source of immunosuppression driven by tumor cell-intrinsic factors in the tumor microenvironment. A pre-clinical orthotopic mouse model of aggressive metastatic triple negative breast cancer showed that neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition generated enhanced and sustained antitumor immune responses with improved survival compared to adjuvant therapy (Liu J et al. Cancer Discov. 2016:1382). Clinical validation of improved outcomes with neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors has been demonstrated in trials for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, advanced melanoma, and recurrent glioblastoma (Forde, P.M., et al. N Engl J Med. 2018:1976; Amaria, R.N., et al Nat Med. 2018:1649; Cloughesy T.F., et al. Nat Med 2019:477). Recent data from a phase III trial in subjects with untreated mRCC, demonstrated the superiority of combination cabozantinib and nivolumab over sunitinib and established a new standard of care for mRCC (Choueiri T.K., et al. Annals of Onc, 2020;31 (suppl; abstr 6960). We hypothesize that if tumor specific immune responses to immunotherapy are greatest prior to nephrectomy, then treatment with nivolumab (nivo) and cabozantinib (cabo) prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy will lead to maximal peripheral and intra-tumoral specific immune responses and higher rates of CR during the course of treatment. Methods: This is an open label phase II, multicenter clinical trial of combination nivo and cabo prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with mRCC (NCT04322955). 48 treatment- naïve subjects with radiological or histological diagnosis of mRCC will be enrolled with the primary endpoint of CR rate according to RECIST version 1.1. Subjects will receive cabo (40mg) daily and nivo (480mg) every 4 weeks for 12 weeks prior to nephrectomy and a 3+3 design will be used to evaluate the safety of the interval (21 or 14 days) between the discontinuation of cabo and nephrectomy. Post-operatively, subjects will resume treatment with cabo and nivo until evidence of disease progression. Secondary endpoints include median size reduction of the primary tumor, response rate, PFS, OS, and surgical outcomes using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Tissue based assays will quantify treatment related changes in the renal tumor microenvironment through polychromatic immunofluorescence, single cell RNA sequencing of the biopsy and nephrectomy specimen, and multiplex assessment of circulating serum cytokines. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI will be performed in a subset of subjects to assess radiologic correlates of response. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04322955.

Phase II trial of cytoreductive surgery in kidney cancer plus immunotherapy (nivolumab) and targeted kinase inhibition (cabozantinib) (Cyto-KIK).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS371-TPS371
Author(s):  
Karie Runcie ◽  
Eric A. Singer ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
Christopher B. Anderson ◽  
Matthew Dallos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Orthotopic Mouse Model

TPS371 Background: Despite recent therapeutic advancements in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), only 5-10% of patients will achieve a complete response (CR) to therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy removes a large portion of the tumor which may be a source of immunosuppression driven by tumor cell-intrinsic factors in the tumor microenvironment. A pre-clinical orthotopic mouse model of aggressive metastatic triple negative breast cancer showed that neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition generated enhanced and sustained antitumor immune responses with improved survival compared to adjuvant therapy (Liu J et al. Cancer Discov. 2016:1382). Clinical validation of improved outcomes with neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors has been demonstrated in trials for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, advanced melanoma, and recurrent glioblastoma (Forde, P.M., et al. N Engl J Med. 2018:1976; Amaria, R.N., et al Nat Med. 2018:1649; Cloughesy T.F., et al. Nat Med 2019:477). Recent data from a phase III trial in subjects with untreated mRCC, demonstrated the superiority of combination cabozantinib and nivolumab over sunitinib and established a new standard of care for mRCC (Choueiri T.K., et al. Annals of Onc, 2020;31 (suppl; abstr 6960). We hypothesize that if tumor specific immune responses to immunotherapy are greatest prior to nephrectomy, then treatment with nivolumab (nivo) and cabozantinib (cabo) prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy will lead to maximal peripheral and intra-tumoral specific immune responses and higher rates of CR during the course of treatment. Methods: This is an open label phase II, multicenter clinical trial of combination nivo and cabo prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with mRCC (NCT04322955). 48 treatment- naïve subjects with radiological or histological diagnosis of mRCC will be enrolled with the primary endpoint of CR rate according to RECIST version 1.1. Subjects will receive cabo (40mg) daily and nivo (480mg) every 4 weeks for 12 weeks prior to nephrectomy and a 3+3 design will be used to evaluate the safety of the interval (21 or 14 days) between the discontinuation of cabo and nephrectomy. Post-operatively, subjects will resume treatment with cabo and nivo until evidence of disease progression. Secondary endpoints include median size reduction of the primary tumor, response rate, PFS, OS, and surgical outcomes using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Tissue based assays will quantify treatment related changes in the renal tumor microenvironment through polychromatic immunofluorescence, single cell RNA sequencing of the biopsy and nephrectomy specimen, and multiplex assessment of circulating serum cytokines. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI will be performed in a subset of subjects to assess radiologic correlates of response. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: AAAS6927 .

scholarly journals OS2.3 Updated results of REGOMA: A randomized, multicenter, controlled open-label phase II clinical trial evaluating regorafenib in relapsed glioblastoma patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii219-iii219
Author(s):  
G Lombardi ◽  
G de Salvo ◽  
R Rudà ◽  
E Franceschi ◽  
M Eoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

Dual immune checkpoint blockade in advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, a phase II clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16201-e16201
Author(s):  
Susan Combs Scott ◽  
Ana De Jesus-Acosta ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Benjamin Philip Levy ◽  
Valsamo Anagnostou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Well Differentiated

e16201 Background: Limited systemic treatment options are available for progressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET), also called carcinoid tumors. Given emerging evidence for immunotherapy response in high grade NET including small cell lung cancer, we sought to determine the efficacy of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated NET in an open label phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible patients had well-differentiated, nonfunctional NET of lung, pancreas, or GI origin that had progressed within the past 12 months after at least one line of prior therapy. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 2 years. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Using a Simon’s 2-stage design, the study planned to accrue up to 56 patients. Based on published response rates to everolimus of 5%, we hypothesized that this regimen would be considered promising if the true ORR is > 15%. Results: Nine patients were enrolled prior to study closure due to funding, including 6 patients with NET of lung origin, 2 pancreatic, and 1 small bowel (Table). Median age was 71 years. All patients had distant metastatic disease at enrollment, with an average of 2 prior lines of therapy. Four of 9 patients achieved the primary endpoint of confirmed objective response, all of whom have ongoing response with a median duration of 15.4 months. Five of 9 patients, including all 4 responders, experienced immune-related toxicity requiring treatment modification or discontinuation. The trial did not accrue the target of 56 patients, however, objective response in 4 of 9 patients (ORR 44.4%, 90% CI: 16.9-74.9%) excluded the response rate target (15%). Conclusions: The impressive ORR of 44% with a median duration of response exceeding 15 months in this small clinical trial warrants further study of combination CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition in previously treated well-differentiated NET. Our ongoing immunologic and genomic correlative analysis in responders and non-responders will help inform future study of immunotherapy in this patient population in need of new systemic therapy approaches. Clinical trial information: NCT03420521. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document