Early safety from a phase I, multicenter, open-label clinical trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) injected (inj) into liver tumors in combination with pembrolizumab (pem).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3015-3015 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Randolph Hecht ◽  
Miklos Pless ◽  
Antonio Cubillo ◽  
Aitana Calvo ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

3015 Background: T-VEC is a genetically modified, oncolytic HSV-1 designed to selectively replicate within tumors and produce GM-CSF to enhance systemic antitumor immunity. The safety and efficacy of T-VEC in treatment of advanced melanoma has been demonstrated as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors (Andtbacka JCO 2015, Chesney JCO 2017, Ribas Cell 2017). T-VEC has also demonstrated tolerable safety for intrahepatic inj (Hecht JCO 2018). This phase 1b, multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study (NCT02509507) evaluates the safety of intrahepatic inj of T-VEC in combination with intravenous (IV) pem in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases (mets). Methods: The primary objective is to assess the maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) of T-VEC inj into liver tumors based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). DLT rate was evaluated with the mTPI up-and-down design. Eligible pts were ≥ 18 years, had progressive HCC or breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or renal cell cancer liver mets, with measurable liver tumors suitable for inj. This dose escalation study comprised 2 groups: A (non-HCC) and B (HCC). T-VEC was given initially at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL followed by up to 4 mL of 107 PFU/mL (cohort 5) or 108 PFU/mL (cohort 6) every 21 (±3) days (Q21D). Inj volume was based on lesion size. Pem (200 mg) was given IV Q21D. Results: Here we report on three cohorts: A5 (107 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem), A6 (108 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem), and B5 (107 PFU/mL T-VEC + pem). Twenty-nine pts were treated: 7 in A5, 17 in A6, 5 in B5. Median age was 61 years (range: 30, 76). Median number of inj was 4 and median treatment duration was 88 days. One DLT of cholestatic hepatitis was observed out of 6 DLT evaluable pts in cohort A5. No DLTs were observed in cohort A6 and B5. MTC was 108 PFU/mL in non-HCC patients; exploration of MTC in the HCC population is ongoing. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent across cohorts. The most common treatment-emergent treatment-related adverse events (TETRAE) were pyrexia (79.3%), chills (37.9%), and nausea (37.9%). Eight pts (27.6%) had grade 3/4 TEAEs: 2pts (6.9%) related to the combination therapy and the rest not related to treatment. No fatal AEs were observed. Conclusions: T-VEC intrahepatic inj in combination with IV pem at standard doses has thus far been demonstrated as feasible and tolerable to continue further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02509507 .

Early safety from a phase 1, multicenter, open-label clinical trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) injected into liver tumors.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 438-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Randolph Hecht ◽  
Miklos Pless ◽  
Antonio Cubillo ◽  
Aitana Calvo ◽  
Steven Raman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

438 Background: T-VEC is a genetically modified HSV-1 oncolytic immunotherapy designed to preferentially replicate in tumors, produce GM-CSF, and stimulate anti-tumor immune responses. This study evaluates the safety of intrahepatic injection (inj) of T-VEC in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases (mets). Methods: The primary objective is to assess the maximum tolerated dose. Eligible pts were ≥ 18 years (y) old, had progressive HCC or breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), gastroesophageal cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or renal cell cancer with liver mets, with measurable liver tumors suitable for inj. This dose escalation study comprised 2 groups: A (non-HCC) and B (HCC). T-VEC was given initially at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL followed by up to 4 mL of 107 PFU/mL (cohort 1) or 108 PFU/mL (cohort 2) every 21 (±3) days (Q21D), or up to 8 mL of the maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) Q21D (cohort 3). Inj volume was based on lesion size. Results: Results from cohorts 1 and 2 of group A are reported. 14 pts were treated; 12 (3 BC, 9 CRC) were DLT-evaluable: Median age was 65.5 y (range: 33, 73); median number of inj was 3; 1 pt received all 12 inj. MTC was 108 PFU/mL. There was 1 DLT, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/grade 2 bilirubin increase (inc), after 1 dose. In all treated pts, 4 (28.6%) had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs): anemia and inc gamma-glutamyltransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and AST. There were 2 deaths attributable to disease. Incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) is shown (Table). Conclusions: The MTC was 108 PFU/mL Q21D after initial inj at 106 PFU/mL. Repeated intrahepatic inj of T-VEC at the FDA-approved concentration for intralesional inj of melanoma was deemed tolerable and feasible in pts with liver mets. Additional investigation in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02509507. [Table: see text]

A multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled phase II study of ONO-4538 for cutaneous angiosarcoma (Angio Check study).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11579-TPS11579
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Fujisawa ◽  
Koji Yoshino ◽  
Taiki Isei ◽  
Kenjiro Namikawa ◽  
Taku Fujimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

TPS11579 Background: Cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) is a rare sarcoma and advanced cases face a complex treatment regimen and dismal prognosis. Several cytotoxic agents (anthracycline, taxane, and gemcitabine) and targeted therapies (bevacizumab and sorafenib) have been tested for advanced disease in clinical trials with poor results. Since CAS commonly develops in elderly patients, high-grade adverse events from treatment may not be ideal and thus therapies featuring durable response and low comorbidity are in great demand. Recent studies suggest that CAS has a distinct genomic profile, including higher tumor mutational burden (TMB), compared to angiosarcomas developed in other sites. Moreover, we have shown that CAS with higher PD-1/L1 in the tumor microenvironment had statistically better overall survival compared with those without, indicating CAS susceptibility to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. However, to date, reports of immune checkpoint inhibitors for CAS are nonexistent. Methods: The present study is a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial of ONO-4538 (nivolumab, 480 mg IV every 4 weeks) for patients with unresectable or metastatic CAS refractory to first-line paclitaxel. Twenty-three patients with advanced CAS will be enrolled at 11 sites in Japan with a primary objective to assess the confirmed response rate (H0 p < 5%, H1: p > 20%) to nivolumab. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, time to response, and adverse events. A correlative aim includes assessing tissue biomarkers using whole-genome sequencing (1023 genes including interferon-gamma associated genes and other known factors associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors) for association with response to nivolumab. The study started in April 2020 and remains open with 7 patients enrolled at time of Clinical trial information: UMIN000043039.

scholarly journals DOP60 Vedolizumab treatment persistence and safety in an extended access program (XAP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S099-S100
Author(s):  
S Danese ◽  
K Subramanian ◽  
J Van Zyl ◽  
S Adsul ◽  
D Lindner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Extended Access ◽  
Dosing Frequency ◽  
Access Program

Abstract Background Vedolizumab, a gut-selective, α 4β 7 integrin antagonist, has been established as an effective and safe treatment for patients with UC or CD in the GEMINI phase 3 program and long-term safety (LTS) study. An extended access program (XAP) was initiated to provide continued access to patients who were benefiting from vedolizumab in GEMINI LTS and to monitor safety. We now report persistence and safety results from a 2-year data analysis. Methods Vedolizumab XAP (NCT02743806) is a phase 3b/4 prospective, open-label, multinational interventional study. A rollover from GEMINI LTS (NCT00790933) to the XAP, patients reduced dosing frequency from vedolizumab 300 mg IV every 4 weeks (Q4W) to every 8 weeks (Q8W) or remained on vedolizumab 300 mg IV Q4W if medically indicated. This 2-year data analysis assessed persistence on Q8W dosing after dosing frequency reduction, need for escalation to Q4W dosing, incidence of relapse (defined as dose escalation, study withdrawal due to adverse event, loss of adequate benefit from vedolizumab, or increased corticosteroid [CS] or immunomodulator dose), and safety 2 years after rollover from GEMINI LTS. Results A total of 311 patients (142 UC, 169 CD) from GEMINI LTS enrolled in the XAP. Median (range) duration of exposure to vedolizumab prior to the XAP was 8.0 years (5.2–10.0) for patients with UC and 7.5 years (5.4–9.9) for patients with CD. Of patients with UC and CD, 93.0% and 84.6%, respectively, reduced dosing frequency to Q8W at XAP start, and 87.3% and 77.5%, respectively, remained on Q8W after 2 years. At baseline, 93.0% of all patients with UC and 88.2% of all patients with CD were in CS-free remission; patients who maintained Q4W dosing at baseline had lower CS-free remission rates (62.5% in UC and 69.2% in CD). Of patients who initiated Q8W dosing at enrolment in the XAP, 95% had no relapse for ≥6 months (97.0% UC, 93.7% CD; Table 1). Only 7.3% of patients required dose escalation to Q4W, and 11.6% experienced relapse during the 2-year follow-up. Times to dose escalation and relapse were similar in patients with UC and CD (Figures 1 and 2). At 2 years, 4 of 8 patients with UC and 4 of 12 patients with CD who required dose escalation to Q4W discontinued vedolizumab early due to loss of benefit or adverse events. Adverse events related to vedolizumab were infrequent; no new or serious events attributed to vedolizumab were reported. Conclusion High patient persistence on Q8W vedolizumab was observed in the first 2 years after reduction of dosing frequency in the XAP. Overall, there were low rates of Q4W dose escalation and CD or UC disease relapse. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports with no new signals observed.

Phase I dose escalation study of TG02 in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6577-6577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail J. Roboz ◽  
Hanna Jean Khoury ◽  
Jamile M. Shammo ◽  
Mary Syto ◽  
Francis Burrows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Levels

6577 Background: TG02 is a novel multikinase inhibitor with a unique spectrum of activity, targeting both the cell cycle regulatory cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 1 and 2 and the transcriptional regulators CDKs 7 and 9. TG02 also inhibits the emerging oncogenic MAPK ERK5 and the DNA damage response mediator CDK5. TG02 kills primary blasts from a variety of hematologic cancers and is curative in the MV4-11 model of FLT3-mutant AML. Methods: This is a first-in-man,single arm, open label, phase I dose escalation trial. The primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximally tolerated dose (MTD ) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients (pts) ≥ 18 years with advanced hematological malignancies or newly diagnosed AML pts ≥ 65 years unfit for intensive therapy were enrolled onto daily (A) and intermittent (B, 5 days on 2 days off X 2 weeks) schedules. Pts had acceptable organ function and ECOG PS 1-2. Definition of DLT was G3-4 AST or ALT ≥7 days, G4 AST or ALT, G4 hyperbilirubinemia, any other NCI CTC G3-4 events not due to underlying disease. Dose levels on arm A were 10mg to 70mg and 15mg-150 mg on arm B. Results: Forty-five pts have received at least one dose of study drug. Median age was 66 years (range, 37-87) and 80% were ECOG 0-1. Disease types enrolled included: AML (80%), high-risk MDS (22%), and CML-BC (3%). The median number of previous regimens was 3 (range, 1-12). The MTD on arm A was defined at 50 mg daily based on 2 DLTs at the 70mg dose level (G4 hyperbilirubinemia, G4 fatigue). Enrollment to arm B has competed dose levels 15 (N=3), 30 (N=3), 50 (N=3), 70 (N=3), 100mg (N=3), and enrollment at 150mg is ongoing without DLT to date. Common drug related adverse events were nausea (42%), vomiting (23%), fatigue (18%), decreased appetite (15%), constipation and diarrhea (13% each). Preliminary PK demonstrated dose proportional increases in exposure and a T1/2 , supporting once daily dosing. Conclusions: The MTD for TG02 has been determined for the daily schedule at 50mg. Enrollment continues on the intermittent schedule. Schedules of every other day and week on/week off dosing will also be evaluated.

Determination of the recommended phase II dose of birinapant in combination with pembrolizumab: Results from the dose-escalation phase of BPT-201.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2506-2506
Author(s):  
Russell J. Schilder ◽  
Mark Albertella ◽  
James Fredric Strauss ◽  
Malin Sydvander ◽  
Dung T. Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Suitable Standard ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

2506 Background: Birinapant is a bivalent SMAC mimetic targeting cIAP1. Synergistic effects of combining birinapant with immune checkpoint inhibitors have been demonstrated in preclinical models. Based on these observations, a clinical trial with birinapant and pembrolizumab was initiated (NCT02587962). Methods: Patients ≥18 years with advanced solid tumors without further suitable standard therapeutic options were eligible for inclusion. Birinapant (5.6-22 mg/m2) was administered IV on day 1 and 8 in addition to pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression using standard 3+3 dose-escalation. The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of birinapant in combination with pembrolizumab. Secondary and exploratory objectives included antitumor activity assessed by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST, pharmacokinetics and assessment of biomarkers including serum cytokines, cIAP1, PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled at 4 dose levels of 5.6 (n = 3), 11 (n = 3), 17 (n = 6) and 22 (n = 7) mg/m2. Most common tumors were pancreatic (n = 5), colorectal (n = 4), ovarian (n = 3) and sarcoma (n = 3). Median prior therapies were 4 (0-12). The most common AE related to any of the study drugs was rash occurring in 3 patients. Ten patients had 17 SAE's of which only one (stomatitis) was judged related to birinapant. Increased ALT/AST (G3/G2) leading to missed day 8 dose constituted a DLT at 22 mg/m2. Grade 2 lipase increases were seen in 2 patients. No cases of Bell’s palsy were detected. ORR by RECIST 1.1 was 5.6% (n = 1) in 18 evaluable patients. The responding patient had microsatellite stable colorectal carcinoma (MSS-CRC)) and remains on therapy 13+ months after first dose. By iRECIST, ORR was 11.1%. CBR (PR+SD) by RECIST was 22.2%. The exposure to birinapant generally increased with dose. The RP2D was determined to be 22 mg/m2. Conclusions: Birinapant and pembrolizumab is a safe and tolerable combination that has shown encouraging signals of efficacy. A phase 2 study evaluating efficacy of this combination in MSS-CRC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02587962.

Phase I/II dose escalation and expansion study of FLX475 alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in advanced cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS24-TPS24
Author(s):  
William Ho ◽  
Nicole Nasrah ◽  
Dan Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ligand Expression

TPS24 Background: Regulatory T cells (Treg) can dampen anti-tumor immune responses in the tumor microenvironment (TME). The predominant chemokine receptor on human Treg is CCR4, the receptor for the chemokines CCL17 and CCL22, which are produced by tumor cells, tumor-associated macrophages and dendritic cells, as well as by effector T cells (Teff) in the setting of an inflammatory anti-tumor response. Preclinical studies with orally-available CCR4 antagonists have demonstrated potent inhibition of Treg migration into tumors, an increase in the intratumoral Teff/Treg ratio, and anti-tumor efficacy as a single agent and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. In a first-in-human trial conducted in healthy volunteers, the oral CCR4 antagonist FLX475 was demonstrated to be well tolerated with outstanding PK properties. A robust PD assay measuring receptor occupancy on circulating Treg demonstrated the ability to safely achieve exposure levels predicted to maximally inhibit Treg recruitment into tumors via CCR4 signaling. These human PK, PD, and safety data have enabled a streamlined design of a Phase 1/2 study of FLX475 in cancer patients both as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint inhibitor. Methods: This clinical trial is a Phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation and cohort expansion study to determine the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FLX475 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. The study is being conducted in 2 parts, a dose-escalation phase (Part 1) and a cohort expansion phase (Part 2). In Part 1 (Phase 1) of the study, at least 3 to 6 eligible subjects will be enrolled in sequential cohorts treated with successively higher doses of FLX475 as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 1b). In Part 2 (Phase 2) of the study, expansion cohorts of both checkpoint-naïve and checkpoint-experienced patients with tumor types predicted to be enriched for Treg and/or CCR4 ligand expression (i.e. “charged tumors”) -- including both EBV+ and HPV+ tumors and NSCLC, HNSCC, and TNBC -- will be enrolled using a Simon 2-stage design. As of November 6, 2018, Cohort 1 has been completed without DLT. Clinical trial information: NCT03674567.

A phase I clinical trial to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of glumetinib (SCC244) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21702-e21702
Author(s):  
Hua-Jun Chen ◽  
Jin-Ji Yang ◽  
Xuening Yang ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Minghui Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Once Daily

e21702 Background: Aberrant activation of the MET pathway is associated poor prognosis and poor response to standard therapies in cancer patients. Glumetinib (SCC224) is an oral potent and highly selective MET inhibitor. This is an open label, dose-escalation, phase I clinical study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC regardless of MET status. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC failed standard treatments received glumetinib orally according to one of four dose escalation regimens on a 28-day cycle: 100 mg, 200 mg, 300mg and 400 mg once daily, in a Pharmacologically Guided Dose Escalation (PGDE) design (a variation of the standard 3+3 design). The primary endpoints are the incidence of dose limit toxicity (DLT), maximally tolerated dose (MTD), biologically effective dose (BED). The secondary endpoints are treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), safety and tolerability, anti-tumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and its metabolites. Results: As of Feb 7, 2020, a total of eighteen eligible (18) patients were enrolled into this study: 3 at 100 mg, 3 at 200 mg, 6 at 300 mg and 6 at 400 mg. Only one patient among 6 evaluable patients at 400mg cohort reported one DLT of grade 3 vomiting. Treatment-related adverse events mostly were grade 1 or 2 nausea, vomiting, elevated alkaline phosphatase, elevated conjugated bilirubin, edema, headache, asthenia and decreased appetite. Non-DLT treatment related G3/4 adverse events were peripheral edema (n = 1, 5.5%), hypothyroidism (n = 1, 5.5%). Absorption was rapid after dosing and the median time to reach maximum plasma drug concentration ( Tmax) was 2.0‐6.0 hours. The mean value of half-life(t1/2) in each dose group ranged from 20.43h to 35.36 h. In response to glumetinib, one patient with MET overexpression at 200mg dose level had a best of response of partial response and completed 44 weeks glumetinib treatment, 4 patients (3 with MET amplification) had a best of response of stable disease. Conclusions: Glumetinib was well tolerated at doses up to 400 mg once daily and demonstrated clinical activity in advanced NSCLC with MET alterations. Glumetinib is used in ongoing clinical trials to further explore safety and efficacy in NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03466268.

A phase Ia/b study of TIM-3/PD-L1 bispecific antibody in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2654-TPS2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew David Hellmann ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
F. Stephen Hodi ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Bispecific Antibody ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS2654 Background: Programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1) have demonstrated clinical benefit in a subset of patients with manageable safety across a variety of tumor types. T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (TIM-3) can be co-expressed with PD-1 on exhausted T-cells and may be upregulated in tumors refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy (Koyama et al. 2016). Pre-clinical studies demonstrated that blockade of both PD-1 and TIM-3 improved survival of tumor-bearing mice compared to blocking anti-PD-1 only (Koyama et al. 2016). LY3415244 is a TIM-3/PD-L1 bispecific antibody that has the ability to target and inhibit both TIM-3 and PD-L1 and the potential to overcome primary and acquired anti-PD-(L)1 resistance by a novel mechanism to bridge TIM-3- and PD-L1-expressing cells. Methods: Study JZDA is a multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, Phase 1a/1b study of LY3415244 in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Phase 1a, subjects with any tumor type who are either PD-(L)1 inhibitor-naïve or exposed are eligible. In Phase 1b, expansion cohorts are planned in subjects with PD-(L)1-experienced NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, and melanoma. Patients with malignant mesothelioma are not required to have received prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. The primary objective is to assess safety and tolerability of LY3415244 and identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in Phase 1a (dose escalation). Safety and tolerability of the RP2D will be assessed in Phase 1b (dose expansion). The secondary objectives are to assess the pharmacokinetics of LY3415244 in Phase 1a/1b and assess early antitumor activity of LY3415244 in Phase 1b cohorts. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies will be obtained to explore potential biomarkers of response. During Phase 1a, dose escalation cohorts will proceed via a modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design with a 1-cycle (28-day) dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period. LY3415244 will be dosed intravenously every 2 weeks. Data from Phase 1a will determine the RP2D, which will be used for all cohorts in Phase 1b. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03752177.

Phase I/II dose-escalation and expansion study of FLX475 alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in advanced cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3163-TPS3163
Author(s):  
John D. Powderly ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Julie R. Brahmer ◽  
Sarina Anne Piha-Paul ◽  
Samantha Elizabeth Bowyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label

TPS3163 Background: Regulatory T cells (Treg) can dampen anti-tumor immune responses in the tumor microenvironment (TME). The predominant chemokine receptor on human Treg is CCR4, the receptor for the chemokines CCL17 and CCL22, which are produced by tumor cells, tumor-associated macrophages and dendritic cells, as well as by effector T cells (Teff) in the setting of an inflammatory anti-tumor response. Preclinical studies with orally-available CCR4 antagonists have demonstrated potent inhibition of Treg migration into tumors, an increase in the intratumoral Teff/Treg ratio, and anti-tumor efficacy as a single agent and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. In a first-in-human trial conducted in healthy volunteers, the oral CCR4 antagonist FLX475 was demonstrated to be well tolerated with outstanding PK properties. A robust PD assay measuring receptor occupancy on circulating Treg demonstrated the ability to safely achieve exposure levels predicted to maximally inhibit Treg recruitment into tumors via CCR4 signaling. These human PK, PD, and safety data have enabled a streamlined design of a Phase 1/2 study of FLX475 in cancer patients both as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint inhibitor. Methods: This clinical trial is a Phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation and cohort expansion study to determine the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FLX475 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. The study is being conducted in 2 parts, a dose-escalation phase (Part 1) and a cohort expansion phase (Part 2). In Part 1 (Phase 1) of the study, at least 3 to 6 eligible subjects are being enrolled in sequential cohorts treated with successively higher doses of FLX475 as monotherapy (Part 1a) or in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 1b). In Part 2 (Phase 2) of the study, expansion cohorts of both checkpoint-naïve and checkpoint-experienced patients with tumor types predicted to be enriched for Treg and/or CCR4 ligand expression (i.e. “charged tumors”) -- including both EBV+ and HPV+ tumors and NSCLC, HNSCC, and TNBC -- will be enrolled using a Simon 2-stage design. As of February 4, 2020, Phase 1 dose escalation has been completed and a recommended Phase 2 dose chosen for both FLX475 monotherapy and combination therapy with pembrolizumab. Enrollment into Phase 2 expansion cohorts has been initiated. Clinical trial information: NCT03674567 .

A Sequential Two-Stage Dose Escalation Study Evaluating The Safety and Efficacy Of Eltrombopag In Thrombocytopenic Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Resistant To Hypomethylating Agents (HMA)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2760-2760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami S Komrokji ◽  
Vu H. Duong ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Eric Padron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Thrombocytopenia remains a critical management challenge for MDS pts. The outcome of MDS Pts after HMA failure is poor. Eltrombopag is an oral, small non-peptide thormbopoeitin (TPO) receptor agonist. It has biologically distinct effects in part to its binding site on the TPO receptor that is distinct from that for native TPO and other synthetic agonists. We conducted an investigator initiated study with eltrombopag in MDS pts with thrombocytopenia after HMA failure. Methods The study is a phase 1, dose escalation design. Pts are allocated to dose cohorts of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300mg/day. Each dose cohort includes 6 pts. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20-30% myeloblasts. Pts must have at least one prior HMA treatment. The mean platelet count within a month of enrollment must be ≤ 50 X 109 /L. Key exclusions include splenic enlargement > 8 cm, bone marrow fibrosis ≥ grade 3, and prior TPO agonist use. The primary objective of the study is to determine the MTD. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as treatment related non-hematological grade 3-4 toxicity. If no DLTs were observed during the first 2 cycles of therapy, the next cohort of patients receives a higher dose of eltrombopag. Pts who did not receive treatment for 8 weeks were replaced for DLT assessment. The secondary endpoints include response, overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). Results Thirty-one pts were enrolled. Table-1 summarizes baseline characteristics. Most pts had higher risk MDS who were heavily pretreated. The median interval from MDS diagnosis was 28 months. Six pts were enrolled in cohort 1 (50 mg), 10 pts in cohort 2 (100 mg) (4 pts replaced (2 deaths unrelated to treatment, 1 infection, 1 progressive disease (PD)), 12 pts were enrolled in cohort 3 (150 mg) where 6 pts were replaced (5 PD and 1 infection), and to date, 3 pts are enrolled in cohort 4 (200 mg). No protocol defined DLT have been encountered to date. No grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events have been reported. The most common adverse events that were deemed possibly, or probably related to study drug included fatigue (n=9), diarrhea (n=6), night sweats (n=3), headache (n=3), numbness (n=3). There were 2 pts with grade 2 pneumonia and grade 3 fatigue, and 2 grade 2 diarrhea events. Seven pts (23%) developed leukocytosis on treatment and 13 pts (42%) experienced an increase in circulating myeloblasts at some point during study treatment. Three of 27 pts developed higher grade bone marrow myelofibrosis (change from grade 0-1 to grade 2-3), one of whom received the 50 mg dose and 2 pts on the150 mg dose. Eleven pts (35%) progressed to AML, 9 out of 11 patients who progressed had RAEB-2 or RAEB-t and 5 had poor risk cytogenetics. The median follow up duration is 23 months. The best response on study per IWG 2006 criteria include marrow CR (mCR) + Hematological improvement (HI) (6%, n=2), mCR (3%, n=1), HI (13%, n=4), stable disease (SD) (29%, n=9), PD (36%, n=11) and not evaluable for response (13%, n=4). The overall response rate (HI+) was 22% (7 out 31 pts) and 26% among pts evaluable for response (7 out of 27 pts). HI included 6 platelet responses and 1 erythroid response. Among 20 pts who were platelet transfusion dependent, 6 became transfusion independent (30%). The median duration of response was 3.3 months. The median duration of treatment is 2 months. The most common reasons for eltrombopag discontinuation were PD (48%) and infection (10%). Median OS was 5 months whereas median OS was 8 months among HI+ responders. The median LFS was 3.5 months. Conclusions Eltrombopag yielded modest responses in heavily treated higher risk MDS pts after HMA failure. Leukocytosis, increased circulating myeloblasts and myelofibrosis were observed in subsets of pts. Future development of eltrombopag as a single agent in MDS should be in lower risk MDS or in combination with HMA in higher risk MDS. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of eltrombopag in MDS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document