Preliminary results of the organ preservation of rectal adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4008-4008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Garcia-Aguilar ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
Jin K. Kim ◽  
Jonathan B. Yuval ◽  
Hannah Thompson ◽  
...  

4008 Background: Organ preservation (OP) with a watch and wait strategy (WW) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) are new treatment paradigms for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The safety and efficacy of WW and of TNT have not been studied prospectively. Methods: Patients with MRI stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma were randomized to 4 months of FOLFOX or CAPEOX before (Induction) or after (Consolidation) fluorouracil or capecitabine based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients were re-staged 8-12 weeks after finishing TNT with digital rectal exam, flexible sigmoidoscopy and MRI. Patients with complete or near-complete clinical response were offered WW. Those with incomplete response had total mesorectal excision. The trial was designed so that each arm served as its own single-stage study that discriminates between 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 75% (historical null) and 85%, with 86% power, and a two-sided type I error of 5%. Secondary objectives included comparing DFS, OP, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates between the two arms using the log-rank test. Results: Of 324 patients enrolled, 307 (152 I, 155 C) are currently evaluable for the time-to-event analysis as of 2/1/2020. Median follow-up is 2.1 years; 52 DFS events were observed. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were generally balanced across the two arms. Full compliance with systemic chemotherapy was 82% and 81% for the I- and C-arms, respectively. The median radiation dose was 5400 cGy for both arms. Table shows 3-y DFS, DMFS, and OP rates. Conclusions: A WW strategy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer that achieve a clinical complete response to TNT results in organ preservation for a high proportion of patients without compromising survival. Up-front CRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy resulted in a numerically higher WW rate compared to induction chemotherapy followed by CRT. Clinical trial information: NCT02008656 . [Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Z. Z. Mamedli ◽  
A. V. Polynovskiy ◽  
D. V. Kuzmichev ◽  
S. I. Tkachev ◽  
A. A. Aniskin

The aim of the study: to increase the frequency of achieving pathologic complete response and increase disease-free survival in the investigational group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer T3(MRF+)–4N0–2M0 by developing a new strategy for neoadjuvant therapy.Materials and methods. In total, 414 patients were assigned to treatment. Control group I included 89 patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week. Control group II included 160 patients who underwent RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week and oxaliplatin once a week, during the course of RT. Study group III consisted of 165 patients. This group combined RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week and additional consecutive CapOx cycles. This group was divided into 2 subgroups: subgroup IIIa included 106 patients with consolidating chemotherapy (after CRT); subgroup IIIb included 59 patients who underwent “sandwich” treatment. Therapy consisted of conducting from 1 to 2 cycles of induction CapOx (up to CRT) and from 1 to 2 cycles of consolidating CapOx with an interval of 7 days. In the interval between the courses of drug therapy, RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions was performed. According to the results of the control examination, further treatment tactics were determined. The primary end points were 5-year disease-free survival and the achievement of a pathologic complete response.Results. Pathologic complete response was significantly more often recorded in patients in the investigational group III (17.48 %; p = 0.021) compared with control groups (7.95 % in the I group and 8.28 % in the II group). 5-year disease-free survival in patients in the study groups was: 71.5 % in the III group, 65.6 % in the II group and 56.9 % in the I group.Conclusion. The shift in emphasis on strengthening the neoadjuvant effect on the tumor and improving approaches to drug therapy regimens have significantly improved disease-free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 750-750
Author(s):  
Priyanka Vinod Chablani ◽  
Phuong Nguyen ◽  
Charles Andrew Robinson ◽  
Xueliang Jeff Pan ◽  
Steve Andrew Walston ◽  
...  

750 Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) as a prognostic indicator has not been well studied in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). In this study, we investigated the incidence and prognostic significance of PNI in patients with stages II-III locally advanced rectal cancer treated with nCRT. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 110 consecutive patients treated with nCRT for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 2004 to 2011. 88 of these patients had residual tumor in the resected specimen after nCRT. We evaluated the association of PNI with clinical outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), using log-rank and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results: Of the 88 patients with residual tumor at surgery, 14 patients (16%) had PNI and 74 patients (84%) did not. Baseline distribution of selected variables in the PNI+ and PNI- groups are shown in Table 1. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 0.9 to 84 months). The median DFS was 13.5 months for PNI+ patients and 39.8 months for PNI- patients (p<0.0001). The median DMFS was 13.5 months for PNI+ patients and median not reached (> 40 months) for PNI- patients (p<0.0001). We did not detect a significant association between the presence of PNI and worse OS, perhaps due to a high rate of censored patients in the OS analysis. In a multivariate model including pT stage, pN stage, tumor location, tumor size, type of surgery, and radial margin status, PNI remained a significant predictor of DFS (HR 16.8, 95% CI, 3.7–75.5, p<0.0002) and DMFS (HR 18.9, 95% CI, 4.4–81.9, p<0.0001). Conclusions: For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with nCRT prior to surgical resection, PNI found at the time of surgery is significantly associated with worse DFS and DMFS. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Shahab Hajibandeh ◽  
Shahin Hajibandeh

Background. Recent meta-analysis of 21 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) supports the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for nonmetastatic rectal carcinoma. In order to define a subgroup of patients who can potentially benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, this study aims to review trials investigating adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to stage of disease in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had undergone surgery for cure (stage II and stage III). Methods. We searched electronic information sources to identify randomised trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stages II and III rectal cancer with overall survival or disease-free survival as outcomes. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network notes on methodology were used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. Eight studies reporting total of 5527 patients were selected for analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival and overall survival compared to surgery alone in both stage II and stage III cancer. Conclusions. This study indicates that both stage II and stage III rectal cancer patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who already had neoadjuvant chemoradiation still remain unknown.


Oncotarget ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 8123-8135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Gaedcke ◽  
Andreas Leha ◽  
Rainer Claus ◽  
Dieter Weichenhan ◽  
Klaus Jung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document