NAPOLI-3: An open-label, randomized, phase III study of first-line liposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin versus nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4661-TPS4661
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab ◽  
Richard Hubner ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Andrew Scott Paulson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

TPS4661 Background: Liposomal irinotecan administered with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is approved in the USA for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) following progression with gemcitabine-based therapy. A phase 1/2 study in previously untreated locally advanced/metastatic PDAC showed promising anti-tumor activity with liposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m2 free base + 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 + LV 400 mg/m2 + oxaliplatin (OX) 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle (Wainberg et al. Ann Oncol 2019;30 Suppl 4: SO-005). Herein, we present the design of the phase 3 NAPOLI-3 study investigating the efficacy and safety of this regimen as first-line therapy in patients with mPDAC. Methods: NAPOLI-3 (NCT04083235) is a phase 3, open-label, randomized, global study in adults with histologically/cytologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma not previously treated in the metastatic setting. Patients are required to have one or more metastatic tumors measurable with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0–1. Site activation began in Dec 2019 and enrollment is ongoing. Random allocation (1:1) of 750 patients is planned to liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV + OX (regimen as per phase 1/2 study) or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall response rate assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 criteria) will be compared only if the primary endpoint shows superiority for liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/ LV + OX over nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine. Safety assessments include adverse-event monitoring. Patients will continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or study withdrawal, and will then be followed for survival every 2 months until death or study end (when all patients have died, withdrawn consent or are lost to follow-up). Clinical trial information: NCT04083235 .

CheckMate 649: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) or nivo + chemotherapy (CTX) versus CTX alone in patients with previously untreated advanced (Adv) gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS192-TPS192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus H. Moehler ◽  
Yelena Yuriy Janjigian ◽  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Jean-Sebastien Aucoin ◽  
Narikazu Boku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase Iii Study

TPS192 Background: Pts with adv G/GEJ cancer have an OS of ≈ 1 y, indicating an unmet medical need for new first-line treatments. Expression of PD-L1 is observed in up to 40% of pts with G/GEJ cancer and is associated with poor prognosis. In the randomized phase 3 ATTRACTION-2 study, NIVO demonstrated superior overall survival vs placebo with a 38% reduction of the risk of death (median OS, 5.3 vs 4.1 mo; HR, 0.62 P< 0.0001) and increased the OS rate at 12 mo (27% vs 12%; Boku N et al ESMO 2017) in pts with adv CTX-R (≥ 2 lines) G/GEJ cancer. In the phase 1/2 CheckMate-032 study in pts with CTX-R G/GEJ/esophageal cancer (79% ≥ 2 prior Tx lines), NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg had a manageable safety profile and resulted in 24% ORR (40% ORR in pts with PD-L1+ tumors), a median OS of 6.9 mo, and a 35% OS rate at 12 mo (Janjigian Y et al ASCO 2017). In the phase 1 CheckMate-012 trial, NIVO + CTX had clinical activity and manageable safety in pts with NSCLC (Rizvi NA et al J Clin Oncol 2016). These positive results support investigation of NIVO, NIVO + IPI, and NIVO + CTX in earlier lines of treatment for G/GEJ cancer. The open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 649 trial will evaluate NIVO + IPI and NIVO + CTX vs CTX alone as first-line treatment for pts with adv G/GEJ cancer (NCT02872116). Methods: 1266 pts aged ≥ 18 y with untreated, inoperable adv/metastatic G/GEJ cancer (histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma) regardless of PD-L1 status will be randomized to receive either NIVO + IPI, NIVO + CTX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin [XELOX] or fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin [FOLFOX]), or investigator choice of XELOX or FOLFOX. Tumor tissue for determination of PD-L1 status (Dako assay) must be provided from ≤ 6 mo before study treatment. No prior systemic treatment, including HER2 inhibitors, are allowed. Pts with known HER2+ status, suspected autoimmune disease, grade > 1 peripheral neuropathy, or active infection are excluded. Primary endpoint is OS in pts with PD-L1+ (≥ 1%) tumors. Other endpoints include OS in all pts; PFS and time to symptom deterioration in all pts and in pts with PD-L1+ tumors; and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116.

Axitinib versus sorafenib as first‑line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA348-LBA348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Jorge Gallardo ◽  
Vladmir Lesovoy ◽  
Salman Al-Shukri ◽  
Viktor Stus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

LBA348 Background: In the phase III AXIS trial, second-line therapy with axitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib for mRCC. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial to compare PFS of axitinib vs sorafenib as first-line therapy. Methods: Patients with untreated, measurable (RECIST v1.0), clear‑cell mRCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0 or 1 were randomized 2:1 to axitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or sorafenib 400 mg BID. Randomization was stratified by PS. Primary endpoint was PFS per independent radiology committee. The study had 90% power to detect a 78% PFS improvement from 5.5 mo with sorafenib to 9.8 mo with axitinib, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.561 (overall 1-sided α=0.025). Results: Patients (N=288) were mainly from Eastern Europe (51%), Asia (25%), North America (14%), or South America (10%).Patient baseline characteristics for axitinib (n=192) vs sorafenib (n=96) included: median age, 58y vs 58y; male, 70% vs 77%; white, 71% vs 69%; favorable risk, 49% vs 55%; PS 0, 57% vs 57%; nephrectomy, 85% vs 90%. Median (m) PFS was 10.1 vs 6.5 mo with axitinib vs sorafenib (HR adjusted for PS, 0.767; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.559–1.053; 1‑sided P=0.0377). In patients with PS 0 and 1, respectively, mPFS with axitinib vs sorafenib was 13.7 vs 6.6 mo (HR, 0.644; 95% CI, 0.419–0.991; 1‑sided P=0.022) and 6.5 vs 6.4 mo (HR, 0.931; 95% CI, 0.585–1.482; 1‑sided P=0.38). Objective response rates (ORRs) with axitinib vs sorafenib were 32.3% vs 14.6% (1‑sided P=0.0006 adjusted for PS). Overall survival data were not mature. All-grade all‑causality adverse events (≥20%) with axitinib vs sorafenib were diarrhea (50% vs 40%), hypertension (49% vs 29%), weight decreased (37% vs 24%), fatigue (33% vs 26%), decreased appetite (29% vs 19%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (26% vs 39%), dysphonia (23% vs 10%), asthenia (21% vs 16%), and hypothyroidism (21% vs 7%). Conclusions: The study did not achieve its primary endpoint statistically, but axitinib demonstrated numerically longer mPFS and significantly higher ORR vs sorafenib, with an acceptable safety profile, as first-line therapy for mRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT00920816.

Efficacy and safety results from AvaALL: An open-label, randomized phase III trial of standard of care (SOC) with or without continuous bevacizumab (Bev) treatment beyond progression (PD) in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after first-line Bev and chemotherapy (chemo).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9004-9004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Javier De Castro ◽  
Anne-Marie C. Dingemans ◽  
Frank Griesinger ◽  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Safety Signals

9004 Background: The role of treatment with Bev beyond PD is unclear in the multiline treatment strategy of advanced NSCLC.AvaALL(NCT01351415), a multinational, open-label, randomized phase III trial, assessed continuous Bev and SOC beyond first PD (PD1) in pts with NSCLC following first-line treatment with platinum-based chemo plus Bev. Here we present efficacy and safety data from AvaALL. Methods: Pts with NSCLC who received 4–6 cycles of chemo + Bev and ≥2 cycles of maintenance Bev were randomized after PD1 to second-line SOC therapy (docetaxel, pemetrexed or erlotinib) ± Bev. After second PD (PD2) and third PD (PD3), pts received third-line or fourth-line SOC ± Bev treatment, respectively. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were OS rates (6, 12, and 18-months [mos]), progression-free survival (PFS) from PD1 to PD2/from PD2 to PD3, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Data cut-off: 24 Jun 2016. Results: Overall, 485 pts were randomized (n = 475 treated). Pt characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Bev plus chemo resulted in a median OS of 11.9 mos versus 10.2 mos for SOC alone (HR 0.84, 90% CI 0.71–1.00; p = 0.1016; 387 OS events). The primary endpoint was not met (416 OS events were required, at 10% two-sided significance level). OS rates were 10% higher in the Bev arm vs SOC alone at 6-, 12- and 18-mos. Median PFS2 was 4.9 mos with Bev vs 3.8 mos with SOC (HR 0.85, 90% CI 0.72–1.00; p = 0.0907). PFS3 was significantly improved (3.5 mos for Bev, 2.4 mos for SOC; HR 0.65, 90% CI 0.51–0.84; p = 0.0047). ORR and DCR were slightly higher in the Bev arm versus the SOC arm (ORR 9.7% vs 6.7%; DCR 86.2% vs 79.3%, respectively). No new safety signals were identified. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 78.2% of Bev pts and 61.6% of SOC pts. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not met, efficacy data suggest a positive trend for continued Bev plus SOC after PD1 compared with SOC alone. No cumulative safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT01351415.

Reductions in JAK2V617F allele burden with ruxolitinib treatment in COMFORT-II, a phase III study comparing the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib to best available therapy (BAT).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6514-6514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Heinz Gisslinger ◽  
Francesco Passamonti ◽  
Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Total Daily Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Allele Burden ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Allele Specific ◽  
Jak2v617f Allele Burden

6514^ Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent and selective JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) based on results of the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life of patients (pts) with MF. Since one measure of efficacy is molecular response, this analysis correlates changes in mutant allele burden (%V617F) with spleen size reduction in COMFORT-II. Methods: COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib 15 or 20 mg twice daily (BID) with BAT. The primary endpoint was a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline (BL) at week 48. Change in %V617F was measured by allele specific qPCR. Pts were stratified by reduction in %V617F (< 10%, 10-20%, > 20%) and results were correlated with achievement of the primary endpoint. Results: More pts in the ruxolitinib arm had ≥ 10% V617F reductions compared with BAT (41% vs 5%; P = .01; Table). The majority of reductions > 20% were gradual and progressive over the course of the study; 2 pts had rapid reductions from 48% to 1% and 45% to 9% over 48 weeks. In the ruxolitinib arm, significantly more pts with a > 20% V617F reduction achieved the primary endpoint compared with pts with a < 10% reduction (79% vs 30%; P = .004); in each group, gender did not affect spleen response. For pts with < 10% reductions (15 mg BID, n = 16; 20 mg BID, n = 24), the average total daily dose (TDD) was ruxolitinib 29.6 mg; pts with > 20% reductions (15 mg BID, n = 3; 20 mg BID, n = 11) had a TDD of 35.3 mg. Conclusions: Pts who received ruxolitinib had larger reductions in JAK2V617F allele burden compared with BAT. %V617F reductions were gradual over the course of the 48-week study; longer follow-up is needed to determine the extent of allele burden reduction. [Table: see text]

Checkmate 649: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study of nivolumab (Nivo) plus ipilimumab (Ipi) versus oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine in patients (Pts) with previously untreated advanced or metastatic gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS213-TPS213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelena Yuriy Janjigian ◽  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Jean-Sebastien Aucoin ◽  
Carlo Barone ◽  
Narikazu Boku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Open Label Phase

TPS213 Background: The combination ofoxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine is a standard-of-care (SOC) first-line treatment of pts with metastatic G/GEJ cancer, resulting in a median overall survival (OS) of 8–11 months and objective response rate (ORR) of 30%–50%. This is accompanied by up to 77% grade 3/4 toxicities. Therefore, new treatment options are needed to improve survival and decrease toxicity in G/GEJ cancer. Nivo, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that targets programmed death 1 (PD-1) and ipi, a fully human IgG1 mAb that targets cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4, have demonstrated manageable safety profiles and efficacy in multiple tumor types and may have a synergistic effect. In a phase 1/2 study in chemotherapy-refractory pts with G/GEJ/esophageal cancer with or without PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, second-line nivo 1 mg/kg + ipi 3 mg/kg demonstrated a manageable safety profile and resulted in 26% ORR (44% ORR in pts with PD-L1+ tumors), median OS of 6.9 months, and a 34% OS rate at 12 months (Janjigian Y, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34[suppl][abstract 4010]). This open-label, phase 3 trial will evaluate nivo + ipi as first-line therapy for pts with G/GEJ cancer (CheckMate 649; NCT02872116). Methods: In this study, 870 pts aged ≥ 18 years with untreated advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer with or without PD-L1 expression will be randomized to receive nivo + ipi (4 doses; followed by nivo monotherapy) or investigator’s choice of capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) or fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). Tumor tissue for determination of PD-L1 status must be provided from ≤ 6 months before study treatment. Pts receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy for G/GEJ cancer within the last 6 months or pts with suspected autoimmune disease, uncontrolled medical disorder, or active infection are excluded. Primary endpoint is OS in pts with PD-L1+ tumors. Secondary endpoints include OS in all pts and progression-free survival and time to symptom deterioration in all pts and pts with PD-L1+ tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116.

Efficacy and tolerability of tremelimumab in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 470-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padmanee Sharma ◽  
Luc Dirix ◽  
Filip Yves Francine Leon De Vos ◽  
James Patrick Allison ◽  
Lore Decoster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Full Analysis ◽  
Grade 3

470 Background: Clinical activity and tolerability of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody, tremelimumab, has yet to be established in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). In a Phase 2, multicenter, open label study (NCT02527434), tremelimumab was evaluated in pts with advanced solid tumors. We report a planned analysis of the safety and efficacy of tremelimumab monotherapy in a cohort of pts with mPDAC. Methods: Eligible pts were adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed mPDAC with tumor progression following prior standard first-line 5-FU- or gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy. Pts received tremelimumab 750 mg IV Q4W for 7 doses, followed by 750 mg Q12W for 2 doses, for up to a total of 12 mo (total 9 doses in 12 mo) or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were radiographically assessed Q6 wks relative to first dose. The primary endpoints were safety (evaluated by CTCAE v4.0) and objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessments (evaluated by RECIST v1.1). Results: As of April 5, 2017, 20 mPDAC pts had received treatment and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Median treatment duration was 1.8 mo. There were no observed objective responses (ORR 0%; 95% CI, 0.0, 16.8%). Of 20 pts, 2 were not evaluable and 18 had progressive disease (PD). Based on the full analysis set (N = 20), progression occurred in target lesions in 14 (70%), non-target lesions in 7 (35%), and new lesions in 13 (65%) pts (not mutually exclusive categories). At the time of progression, 11 (61%) pts were on treatment and 7 (39%) had discontinued treatment. Median overall survival was 4 mo (95% CI 2.83 - 5.42). Two (10%) pts were still in follow up at 12 mo after treatment initiation. Treatment-related AEs (trAEs) occurred in 14 pts (70%); grade ≥3 trAEs occurred in 6 pts (30%). Three pts (15%) discontinued therapy due to trAEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Tremelimumab monotherapy did not appear to be active in mPDAC pts who had tumor progression following prior standard first-line 5-FU- or gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02527434.

CA045-001: A phase III, randomized, open label study of bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab (NIVO) versus NIVO monotherapy in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MEL).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9601-TPS9601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Adi Diab ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
James M.G. Larkin ◽  
Shahneen Kaur Sandhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study

TPS9601 Background: Standard of care for pts with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic MEL includes checkpoint inhibitors. Bempegaldesleukin is a CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist designed to provide sustained signaling through the IL-2 βγ receptor to activate and proliferate effector CD8+ T and NK cells over T-regulatory cells in the tumor (Hurwitz ME et al. ASCO GU 2017). In the dose-expansion phase of the phase 1/2 PIVOT-02 trial, bempegaldesleukin + NIVO was well tolerated at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; bempegaldesleukin 0.006 mg/kg IV Q3W + NIVO 360 mg IV Q3W), and previously untreated pts with MEL receiving the RP2D achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 20/38 (53%) and a complete response of 9/38 (24%) by independent radiology review (Diab A et al. SITC 2018). Presented is the design of the first phase 3 trial in the bempegaldesleukin + NIVO development program in pts with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic MEL. Methods: This phase 3, randomized, open-label study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of bempegaldesleukin + NIVO (NCT03635983). Eligible pts are ≥12 y with histologically confirmed stage III (unresectable) or stage IV MEL and ECOG PS ≤1 or Lansky PS ≥80% (minors 12-17 y). Pts are ineligible if they have active brain or leptomeningeal metastases, uveal MEL, or a recurrence within 6 mo of completing adjuvant treatment with any approved agent. Pts will be stratified by PD-L1 status (measured using PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx), BRAF mutation status, and lactate dehydrogenase level, and will be randomized to receive bempegaldesleukin 0.006 mg/kg IV Q3W + NIVO 360 mg IV Q3W or NIVO 360 mg IV Q3W up to 24 mo, or until progression or unacceptable toxicity (N ~ 764). Primary endpoints are ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include ORR and PFS by investigator, ORR and PFS by BICR in biomarker population, OS in biomarker population, and safety. Additional endpoints include pharmacokinetics and quality-of-life assessment. Clinical trial information: NCT03635983.

AcceleRET Lung: A phase III study of first-line pralsetinib in patients (pts) with RET-fusion+ advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9633-TPS9633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
Corinne Clifford ◽  
Melinda Louie-Gao ◽  
Jennifer Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS9633 Background: RET gene fusions have been identified as oncogenic drivers in multiple tumor types, including 1-2% of NSCLC, but no selective RET inhibitors are approved for use. The investigational RET inhibitor, pralsetinib, potently and selectively targets oncogenic RET alterations, including those that confer resistance to multikinase inhibitors. In the registration-enabling phase 1/2 study (ARROW; NCT03037385), pts with RET-fusion+ NSCLC treated with 400 mg once daily (QD) of pralsetinib (N = 80) after platinum-based chemotherapy achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 61% (95% CI 50, 72; 2 responses pending confirmation) per independent central review. In addition, a promising ORR of 73% (all centrally confirmed responses) was attained in the treatment naïve cohort (N = 26). Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2 across the entire safety population treated at 400 mg QD (N = 354). AcceleRET Lung, an international, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study, will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib versus standard of care (SOC) for first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic RET fusion+ NSCLC (NCT04222972). Methods: Approximately 250 pts with metastatic RET-fusion+ NSCLC will be randomized 1:1 to oral pralsetinib (400 mg QD) or SOC (non-squamous histology: platinum/pemetrexed ± pembrolizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed ± pembrolizumab; squamous histology: platinum/gemcitabine). Stratification factors include intended use of pembrolizumab, history of brain metastases, and ECOG PS. Key eligibility criteria include no prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease; RET-fusion+ tumor by local or central assessment; no additional actionable oncogenic drivers; no prior selective RET inhibitor; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Pts randomized to SOC will be permitted to cross-over to receive pralsetinib upon disease progression. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints include ORR, overall survival, duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, time to intracranial progression, intracranial ORR, safety/tolerability and quality of life evaluations. Recruitment has begun with sites (active or planned) in North America, Europe and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT04222972 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document