A prospective study evaluating oral-only hormonal therapy with radiation for intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer in men age ≥ 70 years or with moderate comorbidity.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
Benjamin Ernst Onderdonk ◽  
Paige L. Dorn ◽  
Fauzia Arif ◽  
Daniel William Golden ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
...  

303 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves disease control in intermediate (IR) and high risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiation therapy (RT), but also causes toxicity which may be worse in men of older age or with comorbidity. We hypothesized that dual agent ADT, replacing GnRH agonist for an oral 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor (5AR), would improve hormonal health-related quality of life (HRQOL) without compromising PCa outcomes. Methods: Patients with localized IR or HR PCa, age > 70 years and/or with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score > 2 were treated with bicalutamide and finasteride or dutasteride (oADT). A synchronous standard of care (SOC) cohort received bicalutamide and GnRH agonist. Median RT dose was 78 Gy. Dual agent ADT was given for 4 months (mo), while 5AR or GnRH agonist continued for an additional 2 years. The primary endpoint was the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) hormonal HRQOL global score at 6 mo, with success defined as < 30% decline, requiring 40 men in the oADT group. Secondary endpoints included a log-rank comparison of freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between 1/2011 and 8/2018, 40 and 30 men were prospectively enrolled in the oADT and SOC cohorts, respectively, with similar CCI scores > 2 (73% vs 66%, p=0.58), and age (mean 71, p=0.99). Median follow-up was 36 mo. Global scores for hormonal HRQOL at baseline, 6 mo, and 2 yr were 89, 88, 84 for the oADT group, and 92, 81, 83 for the SOC group; the declines from baseline to 6 mo (p=0.04) and 2 yr (p=0.05) were smaller in the oADT group. Sexual HRQOL was better preserved at 6 mo (p<0.01) in the oADT group, which maintained higher testosterone at 2 years (452 vs 44, p<0.01). There were no differences in urinary or bowel HRQOL. The 3-year FFBF was 90% vs 96% (p=0.83) and OS was 83 vs 86% (p=0.77) between the oADT and SOC groups, respectively. Conclusions: oADT improves hormonal and sexual HRQOL compared to SOC ADT in men age ≥ 70 or moderate comorbidity treated with RT. These groups could be further evaluated in a randomized comparison; post-ADT RNA expression to evaluate the relative biologic effects will be performed. Clinical trial information: NCT01342367.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 97-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Crehange ◽  
Alexandre Cochet ◽  
Adele Cueff ◽  
Etienne Martin ◽  
Philippe Maingon ◽  
...  

97 Background: Degarelix, a GnRH antagonist, provides a very rapid and sustained testosterone suppression alongside with the VEGF pathway inhibition through the FSH receptors. This raises the question as to whether high risk localized prostate cancer (HRPCa) could respond differently to radiotherapy (RT) + Degarelix when compared with RT + GnRH agonist. Methods: 30 HRPCa patients were treated with exclusive RT combined with a GnRH agonist (n= 19) or Degarelix (n= 11). MRSI was performed before the start of hormones and 3 months after the end of RT. Choline (tumor metabolism) and citrate (healthy prostate metabolism) were quantified with MR spectroscopy and the slopes of gadolinium wash-in (SWI) and wash-out (SWO) were assessed in the peripheral zone (PZ), the central gland (CG) and the tumor with DCE-MRI. Results: At baseline, 14 patients had a T3 (46.7%) and 9 patients (30%) had a GS≥8. The median PSA values were 12.7 ng/mL [3.0-153.7] for agonists and 14.0 ng/mL [6.8-23.6] for Degarelix (p=ns). The mean prostate volumes (Pvol) were 32.0±15.5 mL for agonist and 33.0±10.0 mL for Degarelix (p=ns). The median dose of RT was 78Gy in each group, [72.0-80.0] with agonist and [70.2-80.0] with Degarelix. There were no significant differences in choline, citrate, SWI and SWO in the PZ, the CG and the tumor. At 3 months, Pvol were 20.8±8.0 mL for agonist and 21.4±6.2 mL for Degarelix (p=0.71) and the mean and median PSA values for agonist vs Degarelix were 0.5±0.8 ng/mL vs 0.1±0.1 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL [0.02-2.8] vs 0.1 ng/mL [0.005-0.3], respectively. Citrate was significantly decreased with Degarelix in the PZ (4.3±4.4 vs 1.1±0.8, p=0.0142), in the CG (4.0±4.0 vs 1.1±1.0, p=0.009) but not in the tumor (2.5±2.6 vs 1.7±1.9, p=0.23). Choline concentrations were similar between both groups in the PZ, the CG and the tumor. There was a trend towards a lower contrast uptake in the tumor with Degarelix (mean SWI and SWO: 134.6±56.2 s-1 vs 104.1±36.3 s-1, p=0.13 and 259.6±103.1 s-1 vs 306.1±70.4 s-1, p=0.15). Conclusions: Degarelix combined with RT offers a significant early, more profound metabolic atrophy in the prostate, but not in the tumor. There is a trend towards a lower tumor vascularization with Degarelix compared with GnRH agonists.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 374-374
Author(s):  
Ray Manneh Kopp ◽  
Mauricio Lema ◽  
Linda Ibatá

374 Background: In order to improve long term results for high-risk prostate cancer, several clinical trials have tested the addition of docetaxel chemotherapy. The outcomes of this trials have not led to clear conclusions. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized phase 3 trials testing the efficacy of docetaxel after radiotherapy in high risk prostate cancer patients. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed (Medline), Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted. We followed the PRISMA guidelines, three investigators independently selected the articles and verified inclusion criteria. We compared the overall survival and disease-free survival between the intervention group (adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel) and the control group (without adjuvant chemotherapy) by calculating the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pooled effects were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: 382 publications were identified, four phase III trials (STAMPEDE, RTOG0521, SPCG-13, GETUG 12) comparing docetaxel vs standard of care after radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer fulfilled the inclusion criteria with data from 2034 patients (1135 in placebo group and 899 in adjuvant docetaxel group). Heterogeneity was not found between the included studies for OS (I 2 0%), but it was found between studies for disease-free survival (I2 60%). Adjuvant docetaxel chemotherapy showed overall survival benefit when compared to ADT alone (HR 0,72 95% CI 0,54-0,96). Adjuvant docetaxel also improved the disease-free survival when compared to ADT alone (HR 0,74 95% CI 0,64-0,86). No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that docetaxel after definitive radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer is likely to be more effective than standard of care in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. Further prospective studies are needed in order to increase the sample that would lead to show a more robust data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document