Improving management of hypersensitivity reactions: A BC Cancer-Victoria quality improvement initiative.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 230-230
Author(s):  
Jennifer Marie Rauw ◽  
Sunil Parimi ◽  
Helen Anderson ◽  
Pamela Hinada ◽  
Bethina Abrahams ◽  
...  

230 Background: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) are a documented, predictable side effect of multiple chemotherapy agents. Reactions negatively affect the patient experience, increase the amount of chair time, nursing and physician resources, may result in the omission of a potentially effective cancer management tool from a patient’s treatment plan and could potentially result in death. BC Cancer is a Health Care Organization with 6 cancer centres across British Columbia, Canada. Guideline(GL)s have been developed at BC Cancer to support clinicians to manage reactions acutely and reduce the risk of reactions with subsequent cycles. A recent audit identified that the GLs were not always being followed at the Victoria Centre. Our goal was to encourage physician and nursing staff to follow GLs, which we hypothesized would result in decreased rates of HSR. Methods: Our aim was to decrease HSR to < 5% of doses delivered within 1 year at BC Cancer-Victoria. We engaged stakeholders (nursing, physicians, pharmacy, clerical staff and administration). Our change ideas improved adherence to GLs by focusing on: physician attendance and documentation, written orders for rescue medication, and rate of infusion of the chemotherapy drug rechallenge. Our interventions included: two physician-education sessions, one nursing education session, daily huddles, pre-printed order development for management of the reaction (PPOA) and prophylaxis for subsequent cycles (PPOB), and a modified clinic flow. All interventions were introduced and underwent modifications through PDSA cycles. Our family of measures were: Outcome: number of reactions, percent of reactions per dose given. Process: percent of PPO use per reaction, physician attendance and notes dictated per reaction. Balancing: physician and nursing satisfaction. We analyzed the data using quality improvement run charts and control charts. Results: After the start of our initiative, our total number of reactions displayed special cause variation, and a shift in the baseline from a mean of 11.27 HSR per month to 7.526. This change was reflected in the percentage of reactions per doses given which fell from 3.1% to 1.9%. Average percentage of dictated notes per reaction increased from 55% to 64%. Physician attendance per reaction also showed special cause variation with the average increasing from 57% to 90%. PPOA and PPOB use both increased over time. Nursing and Physician satisfaction data will also be presented. Conclusions: Our successful initiative has resulted in HSR management which more closely reflects GLs, including increased physician attendance and notes, and clear consistent written orders detailed on PPO A and B. This has led to decreased HSRs at our site, resulting in decreased resource use and increased patient safety and quality. This has provincial implications as there is the potential to spread this initiative to other BC Cancer sites.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1363-1369
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Shriner ◽  
Richelle M. Baker ◽  
Andrew Ellis ◽  
Rebecca Dixon ◽  
Michele Saysana

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Follow-up on results of inpatient tests pending at discharge (TPAD) must occur to ensure patient safety and high-quality care continue after discharge. We identified a need to improve follow-up of TPAD and began a quality improvement initiative with an aim of reducing the rate of missed follow-up of TPAD to ≤20% within 12 months. METHODS The team used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement and implemented a process using reminder messages in the electronic health record. We collected data via retrospective chart review for the 6 months before the intervention and monthly thereafter. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with missed follow-up of TPAD, defined as no documented follow-up within 72 hours of a result being available. The use of a reminder message was monitored as a process measure. RESULTS We reviewed charts of 764 discharged patients, and 216 (28%) were noted to have TPAD. At baseline, the average percentage of patients with missed follow-up was 80%. The use of reminder messages was quickly adopted. The average percentage of patients with missed follow-up of TPAD after beginning the quality improvement interventions was 35%. CONCLUSIONS We had significant improvement in follow-up after our interventions. Additional work is needed to ensure continued and sustained improvement, focused on reducing variability in performance between providers and investing in technology to allow for automation of the follow-up process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18085-e18085
Author(s):  
Zachary Otaibi ◽  
Amir Kamran ◽  
Gene Grant Finley ◽  
Richard White ◽  
Athanasios Colonias ◽  
...  

e18085 Background: EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements are key targets in nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (nsNSCLC). Treatment with targeted therapy has been shown to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in many lung cancer patients. Current guidelines recommend evaluating all advanced nsNSCLC patients for these targets; however, previous work within our institution revealed that we were not testing a large segment of eligible patients. In order to improve testing rates, we utilized multidisciplinary meetings aimed at direct physician education and process/work-flow enhancement in order to improve our testing rates. We found a significant improvement in testing rates following this intervention, however, whether or not this improved rates were durable/sustainable was unclear. To determine whether this improvements were sustained we analyzed an additional two years of data from our registry. Methods: Utilizing the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) molecular testing framework, we launched a lean six sigma initiative aimed at improving our molecular profiling rates in 2014. A series of multidisciplinary meetings were conducted addressing key action items as outlined by the ACCC. Since this intervention, a total of 419 advanced nsNSCLC patients were identified from our tumor registry (2014-2017). Testing rates for EGFR and ALK were determined by individual chart review and compared to our previously published testing rates (2011-2013). Results: We found 81.1% (340/419) and 69.0% (289/419) of patients were tested for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements, respectively. We utilized a chi-square test of homogeneity to determine whether there was an increased EGFR and ALK testing rate post-intervention. Our EGFR testing rate increased 87.7%, from 43.2% (2011-2013) to 81.1% (2014-2017), p < 0.00001, and our ALK testing rate increased 189.9%, from 23.8% (2011-2013) to 69.0% (2014-2017), p < 0.00001. Further, the rates testing were comparable or even improved year-over-year post intervention indicating a sustained improvement following the quality improvement initiative. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary educational and process enhancement meetings help to improve molecular testing rates in nsNSCLC. In addition, the updated analysis suggests these improvements were durable year-over-year.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-231
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R Pfoh ◽  
Kathryn Martinez ◽  
Nirav Vakharia ◽  
Michael Rothberg

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of a quality improvement programme on blood pressure (BP) control and determine whether medication intensification or repeated measurement improved control.DesignRetrospective cohort comparing visits in 2015 to visits in 2016 (when the programme started).SubjectsAdults with ≥1 primary care visit between January and June in 2015 and 2016 and a diagnosis of hypertension in a large integrated health system.MeasuresElevated BP was defined as a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg. Physician response was defined as: nothing; BP recheck within 30 days; or medication intensification within 30 days. Our outcome was BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last visit of the year. We used a multilevel logistic regression model (adjusted for demographic and clinical variables) to identify the effect of the programme on the odds of BP control.ResultsOur cohort included 111 867 adults. Control increased from 72% in 2015 to 79% in 2016 (p<0.01). The average percentage of visits with elevated blood pressure was 31% in 2015 and 25% in 2016 (p<0.01). During visits with an elevated BP, physicians were more likely to intensify medication in 2016 than in 2015 (43% vs 40%, p<0.01) and slightly more likely to obtain a BP recheck (15% vs 14%, p<0.01). Among patients with ≥1 elevated BP who attained control by the last visit in the year, there was 6% increase from 2015 to 2016 in the percentage of patients who received at least one medication intensification during the year and a 1% increase in BP rechecks. The adjusted odds of the last BP reading being categorised as controlled was 59% higher in 2016 than in 2015 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.64).ConclusionA system-wide initiative can improve BP control, primarily through medication intensification.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-833
Author(s):  
Bryan Imhoff ◽  
Samuel Wagner ◽  
Kelly Howe ◽  
Jonathan Dangers ◽  
Niaman Nazir

Introduction: Intubation and mechanical ventilation are common interventions performed in the emergency department (ED). These interventions cause pain and discomfort to patients and necessitate analgesia and sedation. Recent trends in the ED and intensive care unit focus on an analgesia-first model to improve patient outcomes. Initial data from our institution demonstrated an over-emphasis on sedation and an opportunity to improve analgesic administration. As a result of these findings, the ED undertook a quality improvement (QI) project aimed at improving analgesia administration and time to analgesia post-intubation. Methods: We performed a pre-post study between January 2017–February 2019 in the ED. Patients over the age of 18 who were intubated using rapid sequence intubation (RSI) were included in the study. The primary outcome was the rate of analgesia administration; a secondary outcome was time to analgesia administration. Quality improvement interventions occurred in two phases: an initial intervention focused on nursing education only, and a subsequent intervention that included nursing and physician education. Results: During the study period, 460 patients were intubated in the ED and met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Prior to the first intervention, the average rate of analgesia administration was 57.3%; after the second intervention, the rate was 94.9% (P <0.01). Prior to the first intervention, average time to analgesia administration was 36.0 minutes; after the second intervention, the time was 16.6 minutes (P value <0.01). Conclusion: This QI intervention demonstrates the ability of education interventions alone to increase the rate of analgesia administration and reduce the time to analgesia in post-intubation patients.


CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S53 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. McLane ◽  
K. Scott ◽  
Z. Suleman ◽  
J. Deol ◽  
J. Fanaeian ◽  
...  

Background: Buprenorphine/naloxone (bup/nal) is a partial opioid agonist/antagonist and recommended first line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency departments (EDs) are a key point of contact with the healthcare system for patients living with OUD. Aim Statement: We implemented a multi-disciplinary quality improvement project to screen patients for OUD, initiate bup/nal for eligible individuals, and provide rapid next business day walk-in referrals to addiction clinics in the community. Measures &amp; Design: From May to September 2018, our team worked with three ED sites and three addiction clinics to pilot the program. Implementation involved alignment with regulatory requirements, physician education, coordination with pharmacy to ensure in-ED medication access, and nurse education. The project is supported by a full-time project manager, data analyst, operations leaders, physician champions, provincial pharmacy, and the Emergency Strategic Clinical Network leadership team. For our pilot, our evaluation objective was to determine the degree to which our initiation and referral pathway was being utilized. We used administrative data to track the number of patients given bup/nal in ED, their demographics and whether they continued to fill bup/nal prescriptions 30 days after their ED visit. Addiction clinics reported both the number of patients referred to them and the number of patients attending their referral. Evaluation/Results: Administrative data shows 568 opioid-related visits to ED pilot sites during the pilot phase. Bup/nal was given to 60 unique patients in the ED during 66 unique visits. There were 32 (53%) male patients and 28 (47%) female patients. Median patient age was 34 (range: 21 to 79). ED visits where bup/nal was given had a median length of stay of 6 hours 57 minutes (IQR: 6 hours 20 minutes) and Canadian Triage Acuity Scores as follows: Level 1 – 1 (2%), Level 2 – 21 (32%), Level 3 – 32 (48%), Level 4 – 11 (17%), Level 5 – 1 (2%). 51 (77%) of these visits led to discharge. 24 (47%) discharged patients given bup/nal in ED continued to fill bup/nal prescriptions 30 days after their index ED visit. EDs also referred 37 patients with OUD to the 3 community clinics, and 16 of those individuals (43%) attended their first follow-up appointment. Discussion/Impact: Our pilot project demonstrates that with dedicated resources and broad institutional support, ED patients with OUD can be appropriately initiated on bup/nal and referred to community care.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlanne J. FitzGerald ◽  
Beverly Hart ◽  
Adrienne Laverdure ◽  
Brian Schafer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Druce ◽  
Mary-Anne Doyle ◽  
Amel Arnaout ◽  
Dora Liu ◽  
Fahad Alkherayf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document